Facebook X4

...perhaps the best thing in some people's minds: The Standard Model of Elementary Particles May Now Be Complete! also by 1/2 blogs: http://blog.t-lea.net/#post189 . Good? I do enjoy your (silent) attention and I hope that you are enjoying reading and knowledge and ongoing science too! Cheers! :-D
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for 3 minutter siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea
I've also written about Cascading Effects of Weak and Strong Interaction Forces , 1/2 - http://blog.t-lea.net/#post191 and ...
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for 5 minutter siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea
And http://blog.t-lea.net/#post192 . It should be noted that the wording and some information is different, but this is to be sorted out in near future.
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for 6 minutter siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
I've written about the Standard Model lately and you may want to take a look. http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/blogT/index.blog/1426763/some-words-on-the-standard-model/ .
What is written...
www.angelfire.com
This is my personal blog of views and whatever else information that I come up with. Enjoy!
for 7 minutter siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Regarding the legacy of my philosophy, I've written earlier that it belongs to my family. If you need some countries to "worship", you can _begin_ with Denmark, Germany and Austria. If this should change, I should do so in own person and by a video of live person on YouTube or somewhere. Alright?
forrige fredag · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
The Considerations of U.S. American Military Presence ->
This is now the activists' page for the surveillance of US American influence in the world, mainly outside Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq (10 000?) and South Korea! I hope people are with me in gathering and pointing out discrepancies to the information presented on the Wikipedia pages and that we, together, can force the Wikipedia pages to become more accurate and possibly set this kind of information up elsewhere!

Under the new world order, I can imagine a shift from the #coldwar/cold war against Soviet Union/#Russia and toward making super-power truly global by ramping up military power all over the world in order to become #symmetric to USA under "LoveToUSA-war" / #LoveToUSAwar and that this war is not really any war at all (and it also sounds a lot better than "The Cold War"! World, engage your people for a better future, please!!! #coldwar #Russia #China #superpower #global.

This time it's about #military #presence by #USA around the world. I mean, the bases USA has, have thousands of people in them, not just a couple of hundred. You can check with their presence yourself in terms of #bases around the world. I can mention #Germany, Saudi Arabia / #SaudiArabia, #Japan and various other engagements around the world that I see as nothing LESS than #downright #regionally #subversive #economic #suppression! On the other hand, I do have sympathy to the military presence in (in descending respects) #Iraq and in South Korea / #SouthKorea and in #Afghanistan, obviously. I also support presence in Somalia and (with caution) the ongoing operations against Libya! But this is it! These other countries, like Germany, have presence on grounding that can only be described as "misty"!

I therefore call for the removal/withdrawal, as soon as possible/ASAP, of these bases that don't take part in a CLEAR/#clear #threat #scenario (of war). Thus, in my opinion, the bases in Germany, Saudi Arabia ( #SaudiArabia ) and Japan should go, at least!!!

Some links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... tary_bases (Funnily enough, Wikipedia IS incredibly accessible! Thank Heaven for Se...!!!) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... eployments.

I almost forgot: when #911 happened, USA suddenly got another excuse for its miliary "play!!!

The above relates to #NineEleven.

When I write military presence, do not stick only to military terms of thinking!!! No, please, think in terms of all the crazy range of actions, like: "#psychiatric #techniques", #torture, #rape, #suppression, #gang #tricks, #biological #foul #play, #sabotage, "#doctors' #games" (whatever the interpretation you "like" to add!) and the whole range of sh*t!!! So, military presence CAN/DOES mean A LOT!!!

Just some thoughts on the military stuff: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... in_Germany - NO number on personnel stationed there! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novo_Selo_Range - NO number on the personnel stationed there! So how many are they? I mean, the list on Germany is #Satanic! Even the Novo Selo Range is "surface area of 144 km2" ("note on 12X12"). "The US Army started in late 2008 a 61.15 m USD investment"! "...stationed troops in Vicenza to 5,000", just as an example!

This looks to be a lasting project just for the surveillance, but they say "with more than 369,000 of its 1,580,255[2] active-duty personnel serving outside the United States and its territories." Alright.

Some more on these numbers:
Total: 369,000+ (2009(?))
Minus: 28,500 (South Korea, uncontroversial, 2011)
Minus: 90,000 (Afghanistan, uncontroversial, 2011)
Total2: 250,500 (hundred thousands and five hundred, possible nutcases doing all sorts of crazy stuff in the world, see list above, i.e., #gang tricks and so on...)
Then,
Germany: [numbers]
Spain: [numbers]
Japan: [numbers]
Italy: [numbers]
Greece: [numbers]
Brazil: [numbers]
Cuba: [numbers]

Note on Iraq: "By December 31, 2011, all U.S. military forces will withdraw from the country." by http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/6804.htm!

USA! You get the Tommy Gun from Emily Thompson (known for the etiquette), that's for sure!

Note: this has first been published on Twitter and later added to the Philosophy Now, just today, 12.05.2011.
Note2: This has been edited today, 12.05.2011.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un
en.wikipedia.org
for ca. en uke siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
I've written a few little things lately and I'll present two of them: In Support of the Chinese Currency Policy/Policies - I hereby declare my full support to the Chinese currency policy or policies in the sense that the currency is set to encourage domestic demand (and inflict poverty in relation to all business abroad) and for limiting imports (because they are then expensive).

I can't say I find anything wrong with this, ethically or economically. This is indeed the most sensible thing to do when you're the developing country for the reasons above.

As a matter of fact, the OECD, the developed world has for a long and unjustified time relied on dubious matters like cheap coffee and cocoa and other (like minerals and what have you). This logic now needs to be removed from the (self-)deluded "western" minds!
These goods have been cheap way beyond what can generate an ascent for these countries of these products and this unreasonable pricing has lead to a constant poverty in exactly these countries. China seems to be aware of this and does consequently what is good for them, having in mind the decadence of the leading developed world. (You can check out my suggestion for Syndication...)

The matters should change when China breaks through as a developed country because I think it's plausible then that we will see a currency that levels out and become stable along with all other developed nations.

The obvious conclusion is then that China is now, rightfully (insofar as it is on this low level), using the economic mechanisms correctly for ensuring a continued (maximal/optimal) growth for their country.

Note: if USA (and possibly more or fewer of the OECD countries) are pushing this issue down on the Chinese and it becomes evident that they "suffer (to some degree) detriment/adversity more than reasonable (by the hard work of becoming a developed nation or, excl., by the recipe of the world(?) in the sense of the recipe for society in "pricing in" corruption)", this change will become a mark of the time when USA (by world power) has been negative as matter of being humanistic toward the world and in this matter, most prominently, the Chinese! This should be very shameful in case it's allowed to happen.

Note2: this has first been published on blog.t-lea.net 2011-05-11 20:19:40.
for ca. en uke siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Hei dere. Selv om dette defineres som en "distortion"/"warping" av tid-rom så er det ikke noen spesielle problemer med å kalle disse samme effekter ...av tid-gravitasjon og videre ...av tid-Cascading Effects of Strong/Weak Nuclear Interaction Forces! Bare så dere er klar over det! :-) Ha en fortsatt fin helg!
Endelig bevis for Einsteins teorier
www.aftenposten.no
Et av de mest langvarige forskningsprosjekter i NASAs historie er avsluttet.
for ca. en uke siden · Liker · · Del · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea You know, when evaluating the combination of Strong/Weak Nuclear Interaction Forces, please, bear in mind that this is a possible inclusive "or" relationship! I've not made the calculations yet on how this may look like! Cheers!
7. mai kl. 21:44 · Liker
Terje Lea You should know this, however, that it only relates to the explanation of gravity. By themselves, they are good as they are!
7. mai kl. 23:39 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
Further suspicion of U.S. American ambiguity: I think there are two significant sets of Windows flaws, one almost flawless Windows set for USA and a much bigger one for the rest of the World. Thus I call for a world wide-comparison into Windows systems flaws on a world scale and that investigators should have access to Microsoft data on this (unrestrained).
for omtrent 2 uker siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea What do you think?
2. mai kl. 18:25 · Liker
Terje Lea I put on the table the science of programming! I mean the languages are clear and most of those programming routines should be fairly given in terms of consequences. Also, as a leader, Microsoft may set the social code of tone on how programming should be done, that is, in a calculated faulty way, bringing further demise to European business life while, by social routes, avoiding them themselves!
2. mai kl. 18:28 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
Another suspicion of U.S. American ambiguity: I also happen to think that there are 2 kinds of processors (esp. Intel):
One "channelled" type of processors to USA (for special customers).
And one for the rest of the world, un-"channelled" type of processors.
"Channelling" in this instance means the division of the processor-"tubes"/"pipes"
where the signals are carried through in processing by logical ports, minutely
speaking, the magnesium atoms/silicone atoms are placed in a processing set-up.

Thus, "channelling" in this sense means there are processors where these "tubes"/"pipes" are separated by plastic(?) or some to prevent computing anomalies in case electricity could "jump" into the other "tubes"/"pipes"!

Thus, lastly, un-"channelled" processors are hazardous and can bring frustration to programmers who may get funny or weird computing results.
for omtrent 2 uker siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
To the extent it can be uttered: was Osama Bin Laden a U.S. American "sandwich"? That is, first they created him. I think they've partly admitted this. And during the last 24 hours, they also nailed him. Thus, there may be something in the smoke of "USA brought 911 onto itself"! This should be something for the World (exc. USA) to consider!!!
for omtrent 2 uker siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
I've updated the blog on One.com for the 5th time and it concerns U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms: http://blog.t-lea.net/ ../#post134
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for omtrent 3 uker siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea Sorry, http://blog.t-lea.net/#post134 , for 2nd time.
26. april kl. 21:00 · Liker
Terje Lea It can be hard to accept that not everything is Facebook at times (by Facebook hypothesis).
26. april kl. 21:00 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
On Ted Bundy!

If you want my opinion on Ted Bundy, it's this: first, change the name, thus, Ted Bundy - Ted - the many people - Bundle Bundy! Consequently, this suggests that all these murders must have had more than one killer, taking into account the not-always-angelic Police force (you know, of the account of suicides and "general social control"!!!

Underlying facts for my view: "...who assaulted and murdered at least 30 young women", "...but the true total remains unknown; published estimates have run as high as 100 or more" and "...final apprehension in Florida in February, 1978"!

It should be noted that ALL of his criminal activity has run in the span of 18(?) - 31 years of age which I find highly dubious. The three above quotes are from this link on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_bundy!

It may be corollary that all these murders have been put on his name for the sake of public (emotional) safety!

Also note that this is purely speculation from my myself, my own point of view!
Ted Bundy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
Theodore Robert "Ted" Bundy, born Theodore Robert Cowell (November 24, 1946 – January 24, 1989), was an American serial killer, rapist, kidnapper, and necrophile who assaulted and murdered at least 30 young women, and possibly many more, in the states of Washington, Oregon, California, Utah, Idaho,
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Del · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
A Little Update Concerning Telepathy

Just because you support the short-sight (of Telepathy) doesn't mean that this forum has successfully discussed the case of telepathy.
Just as me, you haven't made much academic references yourself.
I don't blame you (the repliers to this topic) for this, but it doesn't make your case stronger either.
Conclusion: I recognise that I've been airing some views on the physics foundation of telepathy in terms of serious reductionism that I really believe in. I also see that more literature-research is to necessary to determine the most plausible argument of this telepathy phenomenon. As such, I deem this CASE still OPEN!!! I probably won't add more to this topic, but you are, of course, welcome to add the whole world to this topic if you want to!

To your help:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepathy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_investigation_of_telepathy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganzfeld_experiment
http://dbem.ws/FeelingFuture.pdf
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/06/science/06esp.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=esp&st=cse
By NYTimes, quote:
"One of psychology’s most respected journals has agreed to publish a paper presenting what its author describes as strong evidence for extrasensory perception, the ability to sense future events."

"The paper describes nine unusual lab experiments performed over the past decade by its author, Daryl J. Bem, an emeritus professor at Cornell, testing the ability of college students to accurately sense random events, like whether a computer program will flash a photograph on the left or right side of its screen. The studies include more than 1,000
subjects."

My underlining.

Thus, Daryl J. Bem, Cornell University is the man to look up for. I stick with him as I find it definite too or "statistically significant" as it's otherwise expressed! Enjoy your reading! Cheers!

(I've just recently published this to the Philosophy Now forum.)
Telepathy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
Telepathy (from the Greek τηλε, tele meaning "distant" and πάθη, pathe meaning "affliction, experience"),[2] is the induction of mental states from one mind to another. The term was coined in 1882 by the classical scholar Fredric W. H. Myers, a founder of the Society for Psychical Research,[1] and h
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Del · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
I've now updated both blogs and they are similar except for a comment that's missing from the blog.t-lea.net ! It's The importance of this discussion hinges on what the nature of Black Holes is and thus how this nature has implication on a tacky or defined edge! So the nature of the edge of a Black Hole is really a discussion of the nature of the Black Hole.
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
I've also added the Kursk issue to "U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms"! Link: http://blog.t-lea.net/#post134 !
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea I've added a comment to this argument with CNN and it's Political Science approach to presentation of Wall Street!
13. april kl. 03:07 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
I've written more on The Threat of USA - Beyond North Korea and Iran : The issue of Kursk has been added! Link:
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post156 - Addition to My Argument of Dualism - Philosophical Notes
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea It has gone down as rubbish AND it's not an addition to my argument for Dualism. That's the way it goes sometimes! Cheers!
6. april kl. 14:30 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
Please also note my presence on Angelfire with blog and website: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/index.html
The White Room
www.angelfire.com
RSS feed for this site. Alternatively, 10 latest additions of RSS. Here are the RSS archive files collected in items/writings of 100 each, link.
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea The blog: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/blogT/
5. april kl. 20:06 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
The Argument of Dualism - my angle to it, http://t-lea.net/philosophical_notes.html#AD
Philosophical Notes of Intellectual Music
t-lea.net
These are the Philosophical Notes of Intellectual Music. I make the points here that matter most to me in my (hobby-)philosophical life.
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post155 - Over Mixing Science with Religion - A little advise to the Religious people ∧ (wedge) relaxation to the Atheists.
Over mixing Religion and Science: always do like in chemistry, acid into the water and NOT the other way around. This goes for religion too! Always science into religion and NOT the other way around! Alright? Now the teaching should be sorted out forever! (By Twitter, 6:28 PM Mar 24th via web.)
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post154 - The Death of Religion and CNN/Journalism
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post152 - On the Status of Social Science, Political Science and Psychology
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post151 - Suggestion to Photon Experiment (1/2)
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post150 - On Psychiatric Diagnoses
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
I've now written several additions to the blogs you may want to read: http://blog.t-lea.net/#post149 - Philosophy of Psychiatry - The Definite Illnesses!
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Advise from a Friend to Believers in God - Christianity

Over the status of Jesus and how to remove the apparent contradiciton and the moral trouble with Jesus being tortured and killed on the cross, it can be worthwhile to consider this thought:
if you consider Jesus to be a kind of symbolism that goes like the following, I think you'll be better off. Alright, Jesus is (now) to be considered "purely symbolic" and it should spark these lines.
1. It might be that God loves humanity so much that he would incarnate on earth as "his Son, Jesus".
2. But this thought is so abruptly wrong because humanity loves God back and can't bear such an experience. Thus God is asked to refrain from this and the humanity to God and vice versa of love is by this affirmed!

Hallelujah! Enjoy your religion!
(First published on Twitter and blog.t-lea.net .)
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea Just in case it's worth something, it may be that my interpretation as suggestion to Christianity may unite it to Islam and Judaism because it hypothetically can be accepted in all three, yet only has a definite status in one -> Concl: Theology stays the same, but the 3, JCI now with the possibility to share a greater deal of understanding and coming across as honest, cross-religiously with this.
23. mars kl. 20:31 · Liker
Terje Lea Oops "contradiciton" -> "contradiction" :-D
3. april kl. 22:29 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post151 - Suggestion to Photon Experiment (1/2)
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post150 - On Psychiatric Diagnoses
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
I've now written several additions to the blogs you may want to read: http://blog.t-lea.net/#post149 - Philosophy of Psychiatry - The Definite Illnesses!
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. en måned siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Advise from a Friend to Believers in God - Christianity

Over the status of Jesus and how to remove the apparent contradiciton and the moral trouble with Jesus being tortured and killed on the cross, it can be worthwhile to consider this thought:
if you consider Jesus to be a kind of symbolism that goes like the following, I think you'll be better off. Alright, Jesus is (now) to be considered "purely symbolic" and it should spark these lines.
1. It might be that God loves humanity so much that he would incarnate on earth as "his Son, Jesus".
2. But this thought is so abruptly wrong because humanity loves God back and can't bear such an experience. Thus God is asked to refrain from this and the humanity to God and vice versa of love is by this affirmed!

Hallelujah! Enjoy your religion!
(First published on Twitter and blog.t-lea.net .)
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea Just in case it's worth something, it may be that my interpretation as suggestion to Christianity may unite it to Islam and Judaism because it hypothetically can be accepted in all three, yet only has a definite status in one -> Concl: Theology stays the same, but the 3, JCI now with the possibility to share a greater deal of understanding and coming across as honest, cross-religiously with this.
23. mars kl. 20:31 · Liker
Terje Lea Oops "contradiciton" -> "contradiction" :-D
3. april kl. 22:29 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
Apart from the view on Psychiatric diagnostication elsewhere, I start this topic just to see where it goes (or just for the f*ck of it)... nicely alongside the other...

Diagnoses: It's my view that Psychiatric diagnoses _are in fact_ best categorised by the two sides (of two) of Schizophrenia and Depression. It's also inherent that these two categories also contain these two concepts as actual psychiatric illnesses. Thus:
Category: Schizophrenia - Illnesses: Schizophrenia, Bulimia, Psychopathy, Compulsive Obsession (particularly of people), (more?)

Category: Depression - Illnesses: Depression, Anorexia, Stress Syndromes, PTSD, (more?)

This view is a mere suggestion.

(This has first been published on the Philosophy Now forum, today, 30.03.2011, about 30 minutes ago.)
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea This writing has also been put on my blog as "On Psychiatric Diagnoses" by the link, http://blog.t-lea.net/#post150 .
30. mars kl. 06:27 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
Some more bragging: I've recently or not so recently made these feats as well,
* A good possible solution/description to the corona of the Sun that used to be a mystery
* A 100% or so, possibly, solution to diagnostication of psychiatric illnesses beside the solutions of metabolism test by blood sample and the (f)MRI
* The obliteration of the possibility of Graviton and the Higgs' boson
* The obliteration of string theory as multi-dimensional by power of description and critique of Schrodinger's theory as implication, i.e., string theory is obliterated by implication and not explicitly in my papers/notes/outlines of ideas

(possibly other ideas on science like cancer preventive measures you can count to this) Cheers! :-)
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
I've also written these to both blogs:
http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/blogT/index.blog/1425241/philosophy-of-psychiatry-the-definite-illnesses/
and
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post149 ! :-)
What is written...
www.angelfire.com
This is my personal blog of views and whatever else information that I come up with. Enjoy!
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Some thoughts on Psychiatry: Philosophy of Psychiatry - The Definite Illnesses!
...and _no_ blowing of white smoke or mystic diagnostication. Here comes:
Mental illnesses are generally scientifically determined by and pathologically defined by the functioning level of the case in question, being the functioning that is defined by ALL parts of a normal life, i.e., social, work, personal, mental and physical.
Thus, any absurd notion that mental illnesses are in a haze is firmly _removed_.

The next problem is really the diagnostication. Not only are the the categories unclear/definitely undecided by consensus, but the approach to the patients is not entirely set by procedure either. I have this fourfold suggestion:
1. Cognition of patient's language. You can make good manuals for clues to look for in the patients.
2. Patient's behaviour. This is really the brain-child of B. F. Skinner and is still in good use, although a little more intelligently, like mimicry, possibly by computer pattern recognition.
3. The classic questionnaires incl. (the rather unserious) Rorschach test.
4. Patient's self-reports and general reports about the patient by close friends, family, etc.

Not only are these good, but you can still add the metabolism test from blood sample and new approaches by (f)MRI.

By this, diagnostication should be seen as 100% and there should be little margin of error unless the mental illness is in its very early stages!
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Also remember, please, there are two other websites: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/Evolution.html and the one over at home.online.no
Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other
www.angelfire.com
Opinions on Astrophysics, Possible Explanation of the Paradox of the Corona of the Sun and its Temperature Differences. Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other. Cancer-Preventive Measures. Form of evolution or forming a frame for evolution. Opinions on Physics.
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Some more words on my "Opinions on Physics": My angle to solving or providing a better explanation of gravity can be considered Cascading Effects of Weak and Strong or either of them as _purely_ magnetic force (thus constituting gravity) and holding off Electromagnetic force to itself (by the property of electrons and possibly others). Link: http://t-lea.net/Evolution.html
Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other
t-lea.net
Opinions on Astrophysics, Possible Explanation of the Paradox of the Corona of the Sun and its Temperature Differences. Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other. Cancer-Preventive Measures. Form of evolution or forming a frame for evolution. Opinions on Physics.
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Idea for electronic voting: Concerning electronic voting, it may be that a parallel login window for the political vote can be used! Thus, privacy and security is guaranteed to that degree, that is the bank-account by web can be used to this end! Clarity: one log-in window for bank-service and one log-in window for the vote!
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea This idea has first been published/tweeted on Twitter, time 22:06, 21.03.2011.
23. mars kl. 06:29 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
I'm also to write it to the Evolution webpage as I usually do with such writings. Cheers! :-)
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
The actual economic idea is written to the blog: http://blog.t-lea.net/#post144
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Question, shouldn't there be a quantified number for what the universities' turnover is, at least crudely and that this in turn yields an Efficiency number? What do you think? Cheers! :-) PS: Having written earlier for the support of education (yes, a plain standing, really), link: http://blog.t-lea.net/#post117 . Fx. you can choose the sectors that require highly skilled workforce to determine an inital start for inquiry and see how these change each year with the number of graduates. Good?
BlogT@One
blog.t-lea.net
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea
I think, if it hasn't already been quantified, that higher education can now, most certainly, BE quantified along the lines that I have described above. This relates, first and foremost, to the generation of wealth and industry OUTSIDE the ...Vis mer
23. mars kl. 04:21 · Liker
Terje Lea The title of this writing is now: "On the Definite Value of Higher Education to Society"!
23. mars kl. 04:31 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
Erklæring: Om kompetanse og utvikling av denne - De akademiske institusjoner

I den grad de akademiske institusjoner i Norge feiler i å være den intellektuelle rettesnor for hva som skal være det beste i Norge hva enn det angår etikk, profesjonalitet, talent og prestasjoner så er det IKKE tvil om at dette i høy grad faller på nettopp de akademiske institusjoner. Det nytter ikke å vise til feighet i de tilfeller man kan komme til å måtte "krype til korset"! Så i den grad de kan anklages dvs. utover gjeldende politiske "klima" i den grad de unnskylder seg med det av typen "Sovjetisk System", så gjør jeg nettopp det! DERE KOMMER IKKE UNNA SKYLD I TILFELLE DET KAN VISES AT DERE ER INTELLEKTUELT MANGELFULLE ELLER INTELLEKTUELT UÆRLIGE!

DENNE LILLE TEKST RELATERER SEG TIL DET SÅKALTE "INTELLEKTUELLE ANSVAR" VED AKADEMIA I NORGE.

Det er det jeg har å si! Jeg har prøvd alt!
(Dette er først skrevet på bloggen blog.t-lea.net .)
The White Room
www.t-lea.net
RSS feed for this site. Alternatively, 10 latest additions of RSS. Here are the RSS archive files collected in items/writings of 100 each, link.
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

Terje Lea Jeg beklager at dette presenteres 2 ganger, men jeg har gjort noen forandringer. Se den bedre tekst over.
22. mars kl. 06:07 · Liker
Skriv en kommentar ...

Terje Lea
Just in case you want to contact me on Facebook by message, the email for my Facebook account is terje_lea1975@hotmail.com . All good?
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
In case you find the "Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other" by http://t-lea.net/Evolution.html ! I'll see if I'll add some H2 headers on it, esp. the writing of "Opinions on Physics"!
Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other
home.online.no
Opinions on Astrophysics, Possible Explanation of the Paradox of the Corona of the Sun and its Temperature Differences. Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other. Cancer-Preventive Measures. Form of evolution or forming a frame for evolution. Opinions on Physics.
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Link for the view on Graviton and the Higg's boson: http://t-lea.net/Evolution.html
Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other
t-lea.net
Opinions on Astrophysics, Possible Explanation of the Paradox of the Corona of the Sun and its Temperature Differences. Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other. Cancer-Preventive Measures. Form of evolution or forming a frame for evolution. Opinions on Physics.
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
I'd like to present a short abstract for why I think Graviton and the Higg's boson don't exist! Here: Concerning the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson,

I think it's clear at this stage that the Graviton and the Higgs' boson are blown out the window and are not to return to the world of physics ever again.

Why? Because they need to show that the photon is relevant to both of these concepts when it's hard in the first place to show the definite particle nature of the photon. Thus, photon necessarily must have both of these properties by which are hardly ever conceivable to prove, as separable particles apart from the photon itself!
It's clear however that the photon has "graviton" and "Higgs' boson" properties before we start out simply because "graviton" is to explain why particles are drawn to other objects, especially planets, and "Higgs' boson" is to explain why particles have mass whatsoever which all(?) have. It's therefore a kind of cheating to add "false particles" or "false names of properties" when they do not add explanatory force. The "mystery" of the (basic) particle of photon remains and also the mysteries with how mass and gravitation arise in the first place. Simply adding two names isn't very constructive in the general work of physics, I think (as mass and gravity are already in place).
I acknowledge that the Fermilab has set a confidence level for the finding of the Higgs' boson to 95%, but I'm sceptical of how they get there and if their work is more than mere "string theory work".

It's definite though, that the photon has both properties of mass and particle nature since it is affected by gravity (fx. from Mercury passing by the Sun). Yet the problem arises when you are to identify the graviton and the Higgs' boson, separately from the photon itself!
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement
Terje Lea
Om kompetanse og utvikling av denne - De akademiske institusjoner

Erklæring! I den grad de akademiske institusjoner i Norge feiler i å være den intellektuelle rettesnor for hva som skal være det beste i Norge hva enn det angår etikk, profesjonalitet, talent og prestasjoner så er det IKKE tvil om at dette i høy grad faller på nettopp de akademiske institusjoner. Det nytter ikke å vise til feighet i de tilfeller man kan komme til å måtte "krype til korset"! Så i den grad de kan anklages dvs. utover gjeldende politiske "klima" i den grad de gjør det av typen "Sovjetisk System", så gjør jeg nettopp det! DERE KOMMER IKKE UNNA SKYLD I TILFELLE DET KAN VISES AT DERE ER INTELLEKTUELT MANGELFULLE ELLER INTELLEKTUELT UÆRLIGE!

"Det er det jeg har å si! Jeg har prøvd alt!"
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

I guess I can make a comment on the Libya military operation: I think it may be wise to do it, but it's yet to be seen what kind of support the new rule, if any, gets from being backed by this operation. It's also uncertain what kind of support the rebellion has since it has not achieved 50% of the Libyan military, my inference, before the actual rebellion started or before this UN supported military operation started. Alright?
for ca. 2 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

I have an idea over tele-medicine! Why just not have _the office_/"booth" with the nurse in it and have the doctor to administrate 5 of them or so as much of the actual medicine can be carried out by the nurse/secretary. This can be much more efficient and lower the threshold for seeking the services, i.e., a kind of "medical McDonald's". Hush, don't tell the grumpy doctors! Cheers! :-)
for ca. 3 måneder siden · Liker · · Stopp abonnement

"Jeg har oppdatert mine nettsteder flere ganger i det siste. Siste gang de er oppdatert er 24.02.2011 og det er med Evolution og kommentar over Aether theory og Modified Gravity theory by combining or not the strong and weak interaction forces of the atoms. Link: http://t-lea.net/Evolution.html"
"Hjertelig velkommen som leser!"
Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other
t-lea.net
Opinions on Astrophysics, Possible Explanation of the Paradox of the Corona of the Sun and its Temperature Differences. Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other. Cancer-Preventive Measures. Form of evolution or forming a frame for evolution. Opinions on Physics.
"about 3 months ago"

[To be sorted under main post of 100% Society right below.]
As my brother points out in a deleted post there are limitations on handguns to former criminals and people suffering from insanity as there should be.
"19. December 2010, time, 04:13 CET"

I have formerly written about "lenient" gun acquisition. I see now that this possibility is plentiful and sufficient and this is all that is required. Tasers can be a good alternative or combination for a less bloody, potentially, society.
"10. February 2011, time, 01:55 CET"

100% Society: I've already written about the Data Storage Directory on my blog that I think should be implemented as part of this idea. There should also be sufficient possibilities to defend oneself by guns, tazers and pepperspray canisters. I would also let the Police do the necessary surveillance by video cameras either by possible harddisk review from scenery or by actual monitoring and control. The 2 options are both good. This surveillance should cover the most used places, the places by most people-traffic. One should also allow private people do their own video-surveillance of private space and property including estate-entrance. The rest of the laws can basically remain as they are. Social justice: I think it's fair to allow people who "fall through" a kind of safety net, an arrangement of benefits for the newborn/kids, unemployed, the disabled and the retired. This should secure decency and stable society (without desperation). I've yet to consider the definite divide between a kind of private arrangement and public arrangement, but there should be no doubt that the 2 can go well together, with the private option being more rewarding than the public one, especially in the scope of retirement. This should be mostly it. The other laws can remain basically the same.
"about 2 months ago"

Also by handguns, I'm thinking of the 9mms or some thereof as it provides sufficient "stopping power".
"18. December 2010, time, 15:39 CET"

As my brother points out in a deleted post there are limitations on handguns to former criminals and people suffering from insanity as there should be.
"19. December 2010, time, 04:13 CET"

I have formerly written about "lenient" gun acquisition. I see now that this possibility is plentiful and sufficient and this is all that is required. Tasers can be a good alternative or combination for a less bloody, potentially, society.
"3 minutes ago"

I'll also write some on the "100% Society" in some time to come, both in response to Popper's political comment and to the much hated and paranoid Welles' "1984", according to myself. Much of "1984" is deeply unfounded, I think. And to be educated is also to seek rationality in others, thus this Police State regime is probably put away for ever. More later...
"about 2 months ago"

"Welles'" should perhaps be "Orwell's". I'm sorry I've written the author's name wrongly, although, "1984" is famous enough...
"19 minutes ago"

The Refutation of the Problem of Induction
[time stamp]

An Attack on Indexicality - Now complete.

Posted 05/02/09 - 11:12 AM; forums.philosophyforums.com
[More...]
"44 minutes ago"

I think I've made updates to it on the 23rd and 25th of January. I'll see to it that the updates are reported by RSS. It must be noted though that these updates have been available on the Philosophy Now forum a while already!
"42 minutes ago"

http://t-lea.net/philosophical_notes.html#PSST
"33 minutes ago"

Next addition to be made and one that I've forgotten to add previously: Further to the argument, by myself. What are these examples of nature supposed to mean then when we walk around in nature and discover them, classically speaking by ind...uction? By this induction-free thinking, it's simply the "lawfulness"/"law of nature" that this nature is ABLE to produce this impression, this fact of animal or facet of nature! This is an interpretation of "law of nature" that is very wide and loose, but I think it should be allowed (and valid) to formulate "laws of nature" this way! [More...]
"27 minutes ago"

"Jeg har lagt til et nytt prosjekt jeg kommer til å forfølge:"
Philosophy of Language/Logics, The Relation Between Syntax and Semantics in Terms of Reduction

This is the start of the project of writing about the relationship between syntax and semantics for reducing semantics to only syntax (to a certain point). This may only be a summary of existing literature or my addition to that line of thinking. I think Searle is inconclusive about syntax at best, but there are good chances that there are others who are more prominent in this sense of this project that I like to investigate.

Here we go!

(Interesting books and possibly people:)
"34 minutes ago"

http://t-lea.net/philosophical_notes.html#RSSTR
"34 minutes ago"

There is a simple line for religious people in response to Atheists/Humanists and it is this: to be a religious person is just a BIGGER meal with religious issues gently encircling the science portion in the middle! Cheers! :-)
"about an hour ago"

With NO detriment, necessarily, to the science issues as such... Just so you get it!
"about an hour ago"

On the Question: Is Religion a Force for Good?
Yes! And undoubtedly so! Ethics and thereby good[ness] lies at its very heart! What else is religion supposed to be? Who else? The Atheists? No, you dumba**!!! I agree, though, that religion is also abused to obtain other ends, but ultimately, it's a definite force for GOOD!!!
Cheers!
PS: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00xbgr3, The Munk Debate on Religion!
BBC - BBC Parliament Programmes - Intelligence Squared Debate, The Munk Debate on Religion
www.bbc.co.uk
Tony Blair and Christopher Hitchens debate whether religion is a force for good.
"about 3 weeks ago"

This is written formerly on the Philosophy Now forum by myself: "Even though the religious people commonly speak about Good and Evil, you can easily convert the terms into right and wrong and be able to communicate independently of all beli...ef systems.

Good and Evil are extra concerns for the people who are religious and can/should be neglected by people who are not part of such a belief system! [More...]
13. January, time: 02:58 CET.

First written on Twitter (Aetixintro, I don't bother to write something different): News concerning NDNID: it's now final (and irrefutable for the next 200 years or so, if not forever)!! Links (3 places): First - http://t-lea.net/god.html !
God.Materialism.Idealism.
t-lea.net
This is my writing over God and the making of the new modal argument of God, being NDNID. There are also views of God's nature here, first and foremost in the natural sense.
"about a month ago"

Lastly, my wishes to the readers: HAPPY NEW YEAR, everyone! Take care and make the most of it! I thank you for your support and I will probably need for the few immediate years to come! Cheers! :-)
"about a month ago"

It has finally been worked first at the Philosophy Now forum here: http://forum.philosophynow.org/viewtopic.php?p=66721#p66721 !
Philosophy Now Forum • View topic - Advancing Non-Dogmatic New Intelligent Design (NDNID)
forum.philosophynow.org
"about a month ago"

Third - http://home.online.no/~terlea/ !
The White Room
home.online.no
In the face of blatant human rights violations, exemplified most prominently by the Police and Health services, I write this. I am indeed suffering in this condition of excessive mental torments from fears of being murdered, possibly by (medically) assisted torture. You can read more about this on[...]
"about a month ago"

Second - http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/god.html !
God.Materialism.Idealism.
www.angelfire.com
This is my writing over God and the making of the new modal argument of God, being NDNID. There are also views of God's nature here, first and foremost in the natural sense.
"about a month ago"

I'd like to remind of 2 information doctrines that I've made: 'Information should be free in the sense that it enables people to do [ethical/moral] good and only to this extent!' TL and 'Information is [ethically/morally] good if and only if "information is free in the sense that it enables people to do [ethical/moral] good and only to this extent!"' TL and these have originally been a response to what used to perceive as William Gibson's sentence, 'All information should be free.' This Cyberpunk doctrine of Chaos has now been put away for good! (The sentence has originally been MADE by Steven Levy. I've written it like this: (This is a precision of Steven Levy's '3rd Commandment of the Personal Computer Revolution': 'All information should be free.')

The Information Doctrines have been made, respectively, 28.07.2010 and 30.09.2010! I hope you like them! Cheers! :-)
"on Saturday"

You can possibly consider me as serious because of these feats of mine:
Finalising Ethical Objectivity
The New Modal Conception of God
Reestablishing the De-Dicto position in relation to Indexicality
Solving the Demarcation problem in Philosophy of Science
Making an Irrefutable and Certified Solution for Epistemology
The sinking of the Paradigm theory by Thomas Kuhn by ICT
The definite Time theory and putting away McTaggart for good
"on Friday"

"41 -- 55? of 55? (combining 4 files)!" There are several issues here. I'm looking for presenting a more unified time-stamp image and also a better count of the actual combined files needed for each page while counting the posts at "34" now. (This accusation of Facebook X4 for being dishonest because I post the content from old files from Facebook has no force! This is because the time-stamp for this particular posting has no relevance to the content presented other than saying that I'm on it, giving the readers a "live" image of the blog of following it as I write and this has been the only intention by this!! Comprende, you ********?!