You probably also need to read through my arguments here and consider Sociology of Suicide Candidates before the case can proceed under Court of Law!
(Is this the biggest Class Action Lawsuit yet waged in the World?)
The Class-Action Case More Elaborate by Description
So the procedure for these people who are affected by these suicide problems, relatives/close ones to deceased people or the people who are affected directly, being alive, but in frequent troubles with thoughts to commit suicide and their relatives primarily:
Pre-requisites:
The deceased/the person affected must have reported consistent problems to various people of trust, psychiatric services, the family physicians, the teachers relevant, the school health care service, family members, etc. "for a number of months or years", depending on how strict the relevant authorities are supposed to set this, what behaviour that has been displayed, i.e., the character toward duties at hand.
The deceased/the person affected must have reported consistent problems to various people of trust, psychiatric services, the family physicians, the teachers relevant, the school health care service, family members, etc. "for a number of months or years", depending on how strict the relevant authorities are supposed to set this, what behaviour that has been displayed, i.e., the character toward duties at hand.
Given the case, the material, the data-set of law from above, then this:
Open the case against the Justice Department in the relevant country, starting lowest of the usual 3 levels, serving the summons there.
Open the case against the Justice Department in the relevant country, starting lowest of the usual 3 levels, serving the summons there.
Of course, the legal foundation relates, at the most fundamental level, to the Human Rights, whether the ECHR or UDHR under UN internet domain. Start with checking UDHR art. 3 and 8, fx.
Then the case unfolds, that our daughter/son bla, bla, bla, that somebody should have intervened... Duties have been violated... Police has been corrupt, failed the duties, the police instructions... Failure to supply psychiatric support for this person to get out of these troubles that we happen to think are of the physical kinds, i.e., consistent physical abuse, even torture, leads to suicide ideation, to thoughts of killing oneself...
Fx., then the Justice Department's lawyer gives in, in being the defendant, that they have a valid lawsuit against us, we see that we have committed mistakes, we add nothing further, politely. Then the judge's ruling: AGAIN, Justice Department, you have failed to supply reliable services to the public and in this case to the plaintiff [name] (in question here for us in theory) and that the plaintiff is awarded legal victory over the Justice Department.
Hurray! Then a certain legal procedure, unknown how it connects with the very ruling against the Justice Department, but let's say that negotiations are entered, that the troubles have been this and that, status of being deceased vs. alive, the pains, the time of suffering, bla, bla, bla, material arguments toward reaching a decent compensation for the ones involved.
Not only this, but a class-action lawsuit has many legal significances and given the individual cases, numbering severe/high enough, then ALL are granted a kind of (increased) freedom toward improved legal system in terms of fighting corruption and heightening the physical security for ALL so that as few people as possible are to suffer from thoughts of killing themselves in the future!
Not only this, but a class-action lawsuit has many legal significances and given the individual cases, numbering severe/high enough, then ALL are granted a kind of (increased) freedom toward improved legal system in terms of fighting corruption and heightening the physical security for ALL so that as few people as possible are to suffer from thoughts of killing themselves in the future!
THEN THE BIGGEST HURRAY FOR ALL OF HUMAN KIND, LOCALLY OR REGIONALLY OR GLOBALLY!
Good?
(Go, go, go!)
(Go, go, go!)
Amnesty International on Facebook has been notified today, 21.10.2011! By "Worlds End Creek, South Australia, Australia"! Where in the World is the London "home" page?
ReplyDeleteThe London page has been found _only_ by entering via the Amnesty.org home page of them! Weird or what?
ReplyDeleteIt can be pointed out further that the (logical) premises that this has built on earlier, that among other things, suicidal candidates are under random circumstances fallen into relations or mind-set that has caused their suicide. This has NOW COMPLETELY changed: it may now be said that suicidal candidates (and victims) are in a sense (directly) political victims (without exception or "only" mostly) and that this thereby makes their (and my own) case legally valid given that a well substantiated pattern of behaviour shows that wide-ranging corruption (with Police and else, put away the scrouples and the ordinary perceptions, please) has been a direct cause to their death or wanton for death! This is a relationship that one can and should go to the courts FOR (even as DUTY in the hard sense, also philosophical). I don't want to write more at this point. *Good luck* to those who are positively/legally implied by / touched by this text!
ReplyDeleteFanfare (not of the usual kind) to follow the efforts: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It9UOnEMpKU !
ReplyDeleteBy " http://activistsblog777.blogspot.no/2012/01/class-action-lawsuit-now-against.html , Class Action Lawsuit NOW against the Departments of Justice around the World!" I add this now for the hope that the legal systems are improved onto a ascending trend of progress in terms of humanism, that is, the legal systems are in fact providing better and better legal protection to all, as it should already today that
ReplyDelete_"People who are having particular security problems or "involvement with sensitive matters" may apply for limited police authority for own person (and others, possibly) for a limited time-span for the ongoing legal process in achieving their (very justified ethical) ends for legal justice."_
Please, see also my "Philosophy of Law"... Good Luck! PS: It's also honour to die with the police badge on you than if you are to be removed from this world "naked".
Notes: The above relates to Articles 3 and 8 of the UN Decl. of Human Rights with the ECHR equivalents (guaranteed)!
Of all my authority as matter of intelligence, this url may provide one of the best lists in the world of legal philosophy today as it goes into the supporting foundation "for all of us": http://philosophyblog777.blogspot.no/2012/12/the-modern-corpus-of-philosophy-of-law.html .
Fanfare (not of the usual kind) to follow the efforts: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xSWpRelyoo !
ReplyDeleteThe Fanfare is relaunched and on 58 sec. or so.
The Lawsuit Progresses
ReplyDeleteLet me remind the readers of this class-action lawsuit that the lawyers to the High Courts of Justice everywhere in the World, also the US. Supreme Court, have certain duties in this regard that involves advocating principal questions up the High Courts in order to improve the legal systems. This is an inherent part of their offices as "Lawyers to the High Courts", even being paid by public money!
In other words "the Amnesty letters" are freely for you to write "here and there", to this lawyer and that lawyer. Godspeed!
Your material for now, in specifying the duties of these Advocates/Solicitor advocates later:
Solicitor higher court advocacy has developed significantly since its first authorisation by the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solicitor_Advocate .
Url: http://www.solicitoradvocates.org/ .
From url: http://www.advocates.org.uk/ :
"What is the difference between a solicitor advocate and an advocate?"
"Solicitor advocates and advocates are both types of court lawyers."
"Solicitor advocates are solicitors first and foremost, which means they have a general initial training in all areas of law and in dealing with clients, before deciding to specialise in court work. After gaining experience in court, solicitors can then take extra advocacy training and sit more exams. If successful the solicitors' rights of audience are extended, allowing them to represent clients in the highest courts in Scotland and the UK."
"Solicitor advocates are regulated and trained by the Law Society of Scotland.
Advocates are lawyers who have focused purely on court work and are trained and regulated by a body called the Faculty of Advocates. They are self-employed specialists who are not usually approached by clients directly, but are contacted by solicitors whose clients need to be represented in court by a higher court advocate.
Historically only advocates could appear in the higher courts in Scotland and the UK but, since 1993, solicitor advocates have been entitled to appear there too."
Url: http://www.advokatforeningen.no/Drift-av-advokatvirksomhet/Advokatbevilling/Tittelbruk-pa-brevpapir-nettsider-mv/Moterett-for-Hoyesterett---tittelbruk-/ .
Møterett for Høyesterett - Advokatforeningen
Tidligere var ”høyesterettsadvokat” den aksepterte tittelen for advokater som hadde bestått høyesterettsprøven (advokaturen).
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis is the (mathematical) proof, yes, Applied Mathematics over Society, Political Science numbers or Law
ReplyDelete3 numbers for system considerations over health:
* The traffic deaths (success for reducing traffic deaths)
* The suicide numbers (the failure to provide progress to reduce suicide deaths/increased decency to overall population)
* The number of HIV/AIDS cases (probably to vanish due to scientific progress and be merged with leukemia/other cases) - Fighting cancer is underway, but in a special way, not entirely the plain, as with medication, more like a "side-effect" reaction to Neuro-numbers and increased self-awareness of own feelings.
(The F*CK-stupid people are to lay off! To present traffic deaths DOES NOT imply that I encourage people to cause traffic deaths!)
The hope: This information isn't so designed to say that people should be sad or depressed. No, I want people to understand that these f%¤%&"%"%!¤ing freaks are doing cruelties to people more or less in the open, if we just bother to give it thought of the "system"-kinds, correlating (my) ethics argument with their own statements and how much wrongdoing that has taken place in the course of history by fx. physicians, in Dr. Mengele, Eichmann of Nazi-Germany, in the physicians-concentration-camp-of-torture, the Dachau inhuman acts against people.
Motto: We give them no respect! They know what they have done, their most cruel wrongdoing is theirs to H*ll !!!
Again: BE HARD! STAY HARD! BITE IN!
----
This affects 1. The Human Being of Law, 2. The Class-action Lawsuits for those who are affected with suicide-problems, whether somebody has died or that they have these thoughts UNreasonably, 3. The Progress of society, 100 % Society + more!
The Class-Action Case More Elaborate by Description
ReplyDeleteSo the procedure for these people who are affected by these suicide problems, relatives/close ones to deceased people or the people who are affected directly, being alive, but in frequent troubles with thoughts to commit suicide and their relatives primarily:
Pre-requisites:
The deceased/the person affected must have reported consistent problems to various people of trust, psychiatric services, the family physicians, the teachers relevant, the school health care service, family members, etc. "for a number of months or years", depending on how strict the relevant authorities are supposed to set this, what behaviour that has been displayed, i.e., the character toward duties at hand.
Given the case, the material, the data-set of law from above, then this:
Open the case against the Justice Department in the relevant country, starting lowest of the usual 3 levels, serving the summons there.
Of course, the legal foundation relates, at the most fundamental level, to the Human Rights, whether the ECHR or UDHR under UN internet domain. Start with checking UDHR art. 3 and 8, fx.
Then the case unfolds, that our daughter/son bla, bla, bla, that somebody should have intervened... Duties have been violated... Police has been corrupt, failed the duties, the police instructions... Failure to supply psychiatric support for this person to get out of these troubles that we happen to think are of the physical kinds, i.e., consistent physical abuse, even torture, leads to suicide ideation, to thoughts of killing oneself...
Fx., then the Justice Department's lawyer gives in, in being the defendant, that they have a valid lawsuit against us, we see that we have committed mistakes, we add nothing further, politely. Then the judge's ruling: AGAIN, Justice Department, you have failed to supply reliable services to the public and in this case to the plaintiff [name] (in question here for us in theory) and that the plaintiff is awarded legal victory over the Justice Department.
Hurray! Then a certain legal procedure, unknown how it connects with the very ruling against the Justice Department, but let's say that negotiations are entered, that the troubles have been this and that, status of being deceased vs. alive, the pains, the time of suffering, bla, bla, bla, material arguments toward reaching a decent compensation for the ones involved.
Not only this, but a class-action lawsuit has many legal significances and given the individual cases, numbering severe/high enough, then ALL are granted a kind of (increased) freedom toward improved legal system in terms of fighting corruption and heightening the physical security for ALL so that as few people as possible are to suffer from thoughts of killing themselves in the future! THEN THE BIGGEST HURRAY FOR ALL OF HUMAN KIND, LOCALLY OR REGIONALLY OR GLOBALLY!
Good?
(Go, go, go!)
Note: "bla, bla, bla" does not entail disrespect.
For "3 numbers for system considerations over health":
ReplyDeleteThe Traffic Deaths - The Suicide Deaths
- Paving the way for the Class-Action Lawsuits for people afflicted with problems connected to suicides and ideation of suicide
Traffic deaths, Norway:
1990 2010 2013
335 194 120 (incl. September)
Suicide deaths, Norway:
1990 2010 2011
659 548 598 (last available)
The numbers of suicide deaths can be considered to be reactions or a functional expression over a (deficient) legal system.
HIV/AIDS is only included to show how mistaken even a large group of people can be despite the fact that they hold /the/ highest available education on EARTH!
(We expect HIV/AIDS to enter as 0 (zero) soon and replaced by Leukemia as matter of serious science.)
More... Increasing confidence toward Class-Action victories everywhere in the World.
ReplyDeleteContinuing the line, there are more important matters for the Class-Action Lawsuit to happen, and for the readers to help make it happen too: there are implicit duties with [UK-EN:] Advocates/Solicitor Advocates in moving this kind of Class-Action Lawsuit ahead, also complying to duties in progressing the British/US. American legal system overall, "as it now has become articulated" (hence legal text) or fall liable to charges of corrupt execution of office/profession.
See, please, http://www.advocates.org.uk/ , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_Justice , http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/prosecution/nsa.html and http://www.advocates.org.uk/downloads/guidetoconduct_5thedition.pdf .
Notice may be required: This text isn't produced to offend any nation's legal system by mentioning only the UK advokcates/lawyers. Quite the opposite, I intend to bring progress by this message to you and I hope that you can check and translate these "entities" into your national equivalents after a bit of text checking. Please understand that some of this may only occur inside expert texts and that some journalist-network checking / lawyer consulting (fee or not) may be required so that frustration in a difficult World do not happen to you.
ECHR - Article 5 Equal to UDHR Article 3, Partially
ReplyDeleteECHR - Article 5 - liberty and security
Article 5 provides that everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. Liberty and security of the person are taken as a "compound" concept - security of the person has not been subject to separate interpretation by the Court.
Article 5 provides the right to liberty, subject only to lawful arrest or detention under certain other circumstances, such as arrest on reasonable suspicion of a crime or imprisonment in fulfilment of a sentence. The article also provides those arrested with the right to be informed, in a language they understand, of the reasons for the arrest and any charge they face, the right of prompt access to judicial proceedings to determine the legality of the arrest or detention, to trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial, and the right to compensation in the case of arrest or detention in violation of this article.
Suggestions:
After the victories by the Class Action Lawsuits everywhere, now what?
Network, Amnesty International Membership, 2 together.
Closer connection to police and other people of confidence and duty.
After-Wake police inquiries to root out any criminal or criminals.
Getting armed and receiving security advice. Inlcuding precaution on future behaviour that provides more security.
Starting up the investigations for proper compensations from the State, preferably set individually, especially for those who have actually lost their beloved to death, depending... but no less than for death, certainly.
The above "after the Class Action Lawsuit" is the reason why the Class Action has to go through and why Legal Texts are so deeply respected (in Britain). Please read up if you are short, something like "The Class Action Lawsuit - What does it do?"