Some Words on the Standard Model
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-17 01:14:59
The Standard Model by Wikipedia:
Now mt recommendation is that you take the whole thing in, by the 16/24 (plus?) particles. These are:
This picture has 16 of them in it, but you need to add the mirror side of the anti-particles, adding up to 24(?), I believe. This number is now adjusted to 27/35 (see below).
Adding the two particles/quants of W and Z bosons and the two particles/quants of gluons and photons makes the total, at this time, 28 particles, all in all. For some reason, Wikipedia has decided to make one table for particles with particle and anti-particle nature and another one that gives a more simple picture for all these particles, not being 16 for real, but rather 28. However, the text speaks about 8 types of gluons and this number is therefore 35. It also says that these are supposed to be massless. I find this unbelievable because photons have mass and so should these gluons. I have yet to completely determine the nature of gluons and it may well be that we remain with only 27 particles all in all, being the photon and W and Z bosons and these 24 other particles.
Thus the list from Wikipedia:
Electron 511 keV
Positron 511 keV
Electron neutrino < 0.28 eV ****
Electron antineutrino < 0.28 eV ****
Up quark ~ 3 MeV ***
Up antiquark ~ 3 MeV ***
Down quark ~ 6 MeV ***
Down antiquark ~ 6 MeV ***
Muon 106 MeV
Muon neutrino < 0.28 eV ****
< 0.28 eV ****
~ 1.337 GeV
~ 1.3 GeV
~ 100 MeV
Strange antiquark ~ 100 MeV
Tau 1.78 GeV
+1/3 0 +2/3 ~ 4.2 GeV
If, conditionally, new particles are claimed then the new particles are required to be placed or attempted to be placed in the Standard Model, given a eV-value if possible and be backed by sound experiment and data, thus a good model/description should appear! This little text carries strict interpretation! I.e, it can't be dodged!
I've added a comment for clarification of the Standard Model, making it now 26 particles. This writing still lacks the newest combinatory particles that have been made. This comment has been added now, 05:04 CEST, 27.05.2011.
I've added a comment for clarification of the Standard Model, making it now 27/35 particles. This comment has been added now, 15:52 CEST, 27.05.2011.
Cascading Effects of Weak and Strong Interaction Forces
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-16 07:22:00
My angle to solving or providing a better explanation of gravity can be considered Cascading Effects of Weak and Strong [Interaction Forces] or either of them as purely magnetic force (thus constituting gravity) and holding off Electromagnetic force to itself (by the property of electrons and possibly others).
Note: you know, when evaluating the combination of Strong/Weak Nuclear Interaction Forces as gravity, please, bear in mind that this is a possible inclusive "or" (by the logical vee) relationship!
Note2: this provides explanatory force to my definition of gravity as the Graviton has been removed from the picture for good! This has first been published to the Philosophy Now forum 7th May, 2011.
The Ecological Rule of Thumb Regarding Overpopulation
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-15 23:30:43
A fine rule of thumb regarding ecological life in relation to Overpopulation (by Deep Ecology)
is to give birth to no more than 2 kids per woman, absolutely. That is, the women who choose to have only one or zero kids are providing "green-lungs" to the rest of the population. It doesn't mean that other people should compensate for the women who get fewer kids. No, that's why I write absolutely. If women choose to have fewer kids, it means that the society gives birth to fewer babies as well, if one is to live an ecological life according to this Rule of Thumb. You don't have to. It's just an option. I provide this writing simply to give people an easy guideline. People may think of only having a single child and then become depressed (by the thought of loneliness for this child) and forget about the whole thing. With this rule of thumb, you can either contemplate with others a possible friendship of growing your kids up together, 2 or 3, to avoid the usual syndrome of only having a single kid. Or, if all things go as planned, you get two happy kids with plenty of parental attention/quality time, which is often seen as good for making emotionally stable adults as they grow up.
The Standard Model of Elementary Particles May Now Be Complete!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-15 19:28:16 [CEST]
By my writings (these 2 below) and given that no new elementary particles are known, but generated like they generate new substances to the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements, I now declare the Standard Model of Elementary Particles complete in the same manner as The Periodic Table!
Nr. 1 (To be known as the Photon Theory)
On Standard Model and the Future of It
Assertion: Photons are the smallest constituents of all matter. I assume the other particles of the Standard Model are made up of photons. Why is this? The sun burns mass and to my knowledge it only/mostly by far emits electromagnetic radiation, consequently in the form of photons. When a nuclear bomb explodes, it converts matter into electromagnetic radiation, energy of various forms. Compared to this, I think one can throw the string theory out the window along with dimensions beyond the usual 4 (I'm not certain about this concerning Einstein's theories that I'd like to keep as it is). Also, let's assume higher intensity radiation emits more dense amounts of photons and that it declines further down the electromagnetic spectrum.
New on photons: I think I can also hold that photons are "semi-fluid" on a hyper-level (of course). I don't know what this adds to our view of reality, but it's a possible way of reconciling the wave-particle duality.
On Impossibility of the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson
Concerning the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson:
I think it's clear at this stage that the Graviton and the Higgs' boson are blown out the window and are not to return to the world of physics ever again.
Why? Because they need to show that the photon is relevant to both of these concepts when it's hard in the first place to show the definite particle nature of the photon. Thus, photon necessarily must have both of these properties by which are hardly ever conceivable to prove, as separable particles apart from the photon itself!
It's clear however that the photon has "graviton" and "Higgs' boson" properties before we start out simply because "graviton" is to explain why particles are drawn to other objects, especially planets, and "Higgs' boson" is to explain why particles have mass whatsoever which all(?) have. It's therefore a kind of cheating to add "false particles" or "false names of properties" when they do not add explanatory force. The "mystery" of the (basic) particle of photon remains and also the mysteries with how mass and gravitation arise in the first place. Simply adding two names isn't very constructive in the general work of physics, I think (as mass and gravity are already in place).
I acknowledge that the Fermilab has set a confidence level for the finding of the Higgs' boson to 95%, but I'm sceptical of how they get there and if their work is more than mere "string theory work".
It's definite though, that the photon has both properties of mass and particle nature since it is affected by gravity (fx. from Mercury passing by the Sun). Yet the problem arises when you are to identify the graviton and the Higgs' boson, separately from the photon itself!
Have a nice day!
PS: Even in the light of Dark Matter and Dark Energy, there are only holes in the Standard Model to be filled and this is more than conceivable now.
Note: There has been made a correction of "the Periodic System of Substances" to the rightful, "The Periodic Table of Chemical Elements"! By today also, 15th May, 2011.
Addition to Kripkean Modality - The Future
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-15 00:12:12
The original writing is this:
One remark on the side. In order to use necessity of God, you'll have to write something like this:
◊[(∃x)(K) ⊃ (∃x)(G)] ⊃ □(∃x)(G)
That is, if God is affirmed, knowledge contains an existing God, then an existing God is necessarily an existing God.
The general is this:
The necessity of the future is determined by the possibility in the present and the affirmation in the future so that at the point of affirmation, a necessity is formed:
◊[(∃x)(P) ⊃ (∃x)(Q)] ⊃ □(∃x)(Q)
That is, if knowledge of something, P, gets affirmed and this knowledge contains an existing proposition Q, then an existing proposition Q is necessarily an existing proposition Q.
Thus this addition has come to life! Cheers!
Note: I'll get the more exact date of it later, but for now, I'll refer you to the RSSs.
Note2: I've added ◊, possibility, that has been formally missing, but either way has been an (necessary) implied part of the sentence. This has been added today, 15th May, 2011.
Life is a Vampire
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-14 21:07:13 [CEST]
Life is a Vampire
World is a Vampire
Earth is a Vampire
The Universe, possibly, is a Vampire
PEOPLE, even, may be Vampires
You're being drained everywhere. It's better to die
sooner than later!
Analogously: when you’re born, you start falling from the sky, and you
die in a crash when you hit the ground. This is the only description of life
Or, rather, more seriously: there's only one thing to do with it and that is to be easy about it!
The Legacy of My Philosophy
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-14 16:23:05
Regarding the legacy of my philosophy, I've written earlier that it belongs to my family. If you need some countries or place to "worship", you can begin with Denmark, Germany and Austria, despite the fact that my family (the extended one and the one that I denote) lives in Norway and origins from Norway. If this should change, I should do so in own person and by a video of live person on YouTube or somewhere. Alright?
The Importance of Registries/Registry of Citizens in Your Country
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-12 13:15:41
I like to write a little bit on "The Importance of Registries/Registry of Citizens in Your Country".
First of all, the system of your country, legally/ethically, becomes responsible! Anomalies, i.e., all strangeness outside normal family/friend/contact relations, have a chance to be investigated/accounted for. This includes of course disappearances.
Various other uses - generating valid identities, best exemplified by your passport!
Please, remember that these registries can be stored on various levels (and thus protected on these levels) fx. on the level of the local counties/local Police districts and in this way, these registries are protected from "the worst" anti-privacy/Big Brother scenarios! You can also make all sorts of access logging routines to them and the surveillance of these log-ins to these same registries. It's for your country to decide.
(More is coming up! So and so...)
In Support of the Chinese Currency Policy/Policies
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-11 20:19:40
I hereby declare my full support to the Chinese currency policy or policies in the sense that the currency is set to encourage domestic demand (and inflict poverty in relation to all business abroad) and for limiting imports (because they are then expensive).
I can't say I find anything wrong with this, ethically or economically. This is indeed the most sensible thing to do when you're the developing country for the reasons above.
As a matter of fact, the OECD, the developed world has for a long and unjustified time relied on dubious matters like cheap coffee and cocoa and other (like minerals and what have you). This logic now needs to be removed from the (self-)deluded "western" minds!
These goods have been cheap way beyond what can generate an ascent for these countries of these products and this unreasonable pricing has lead to a constant poverty in exactly these countries. China seems to be aware of this and does consequently what is good for them, having in mind the decadence of the leading developed world. (You can check out my suggestion for Syndication...)
The matters should change when China breaks through as a developed country because I think it's plausible then that we will see a currency that levels out and become stable along with all other developed nations.
The obvious conclusion is then that China is now, rightfully (insofar as it is on this low level), using the economic mechanisms correctly for ensuring a continued (maximal/optimal) growth for their country.
Note: if USA (and possibly more or fewer of the OECD countries) are pushing this issue down on the Chinese and it becomes evident that they "suffer detriment/adversity" more than reasonable (by the hard work of becoming a developed nation or, excl., by the recipe of the world(?) in the sense of the recipe for society in "pricing in" corruption), this change will become a mark of the time when USA (by world power) has been negative as matter of being humanistic toward the world and in this matter, most prominently, the Chinese! This should be very shameful.
Considering "Under the Gun..."
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-10 23:37:14 [CEST]
In relation to living "under the gun" (by Sisters of Mercy), I advise you to buy a gun because then you live by the gun which is a step up, I must say!
The "Sandwich" Bin Laden
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-10 21:51:09 [CEST]
Considerations for 1960 - 2011 in light of post-Cold War and the Mujahedeen movement that dissolved, succeded by the Taliban.
To the extent it can be uttered: was Osama Bin Laden a U.S. American "sandwich"? That is, first they created him. I think they've partly admitted this. And during the last 24 hours, they also nailed him. Thus, there may be something in the smoke of "USA brought 911 onto itself"! This should be something for the World (exc. USA) to consider!!!
I get these vivid images of Osama Bin Laden being "sandwiched" by two BIG U.S. American men and he has to take them both at the same time! And such a traumatic experience can be hurtful to a man for whom proctology is a shame!
Well, love labours on...
Note: this has first been published on the Philosophy Now forum, 9th May, 2011.
The Considerations of U.S. American Military Presence ->
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-10 21:39:00
This is now the activists' page for the surveillance of U. S. American influence in the world, mainly outside Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq (10 000?) and South Korea! I hope people are with me in gathering and pointing out discrepancies to the information presented on the Wikipedia pages and that we, together, can force the Wikipedia pages to become more accurate and possibly set this kind of information up elsewhere!
Under the new world order, I can imagine a shift from the #coldwar/cold war against Soviet Union/#Russia and toward making super-power truly global by ramping up military power all over the world in order to become #symmetric to USA under "LoveToUSA-war" / #LoveToUSAwar and that this war is not really any war at all (and it also sounds a lot better than "The Cold War"! World, engage your people for a better future, please!!! #coldwar #Russia #China #superpower #global.
This time it's about #military #presence by #USA around the world. I mean, the bases USA has, have thousands of people in them, not just a couple of hundred. You can check with their presence yourself in terms of #bases around the world. I can mention #Germany, Saudi Arabia / #SaudiArabia, #Japan and various other engagements around the world that I see as nothing LESS than #downright #regionally #subversive #economic #suppression! On the other hand, I do have sympathy to the military presence in (in descending respects) #Iraq and in South Korea / #SouthKorea and in #Afghanistan, obviously. I also support presence in Somalia and (with caution) the ongoing operations against Libya! But this is it! These other countries, like Germany, have presence on grounding that can only be described as "misty"!
I therefore call for the removal/withdrawal, as soon as possible/ASAP, of these bases that don't take part in a CLEAR/#clear #threat #scenario (of war). Thus, in my opinion, the bases in Germany, Saudi Arabia ( #SaudiArabia ) and Japan should go, at least!!!
Some links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... tary_bases (Funnily enough, Wikipedia IS incredibly accessible! Thank Heaven for Se...!!!) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... eployments.
I almost forgot: when #911 happened, USA suddenly got another excuse for its miliary "play!!!
The above relates to #NineEleven.
When I write military presence, do not stick only to military terms of thinking!!! No, please, think in terms of all the crazy range of actions, like: "#psychiatric #techniques", #torture, #rape, #suppression, #gang #tricks, #biological #foul #play, #sabotage, "#doctors' #games" (whatever the interpretation you "like" to add!) and the whole range of sh*t!!! So, military presence CAN/DOES mean A LOT!!!
Just some thoughts on the military stuff: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... in_Germany - NO number on personnel stationed there! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novo_Selo_Range - NO number on the personnel stationed there! So how many are they? I mean, the list on Germany is #Satanic! Even the Novo Selo Range is "surface area of 144 km2" ("note on 12X12"). "The US Army started in late 2008 a 61.15 m USD investment"! "...stationed troops in Vicenza to 5,000", just as an example!
This looks to be a lasting project just for the surveillance, but they say "with more than 369,000 of its 1,580,255 active-duty personnel serving outside the United States and its territories." Alright.
Some more on these numbers:
Total: 369,000+ (2009(?))
Minus: 28,500 (South Korea, uncontroversial, 2011)
Minus: 90,000 (Afghanistan, uncontroversial, 2011)
Total2: 250,500 (hundred thousands and five hundred, possible nutcases doing all sorts of crazy stuff in the world, see list above, i.e., #gang tricks and so on...)
Note on Iraq: "By December 31, 2011, all U.S. military forces will withdraw from the country." by http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/6804.htm!
USA! You get the Tommy Gun from Emily Thompson (known for the etiquette), that's for sure!
Note: this has first been published on Twitter and later added to the Philosophy Now, just today, 12.05.2011.
Note2: This has been edited today, 12.05.2011.
Why Geronimo? - Comment to a Story by BBC
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-09 23:59:28
I have the theory that the U.S. Americans are incredibly focused on "making themselves whole" by living out their whole history by, in a sense, "taking on/internalising their rightful ancestors, the Indians". Thus, by carrying the Indian spirit, they hunt Osama Bin Laden by calling the operation Geronimo. Good?
Some people seem to think that Geronimo is supposed to be an a pseudonym, bu I believe this is to turn things on the head! That kind of ethnical (formerly racism) centrism is a bygone chapter in U.S. American history! No, I think it's a kind of honour to the heritage as much as giving the contemporary (native) U.S. Americans the rights (or monopoly) to gambling in some states. I'm not in doubt that USA seeks to make amends to wrongdoing in it's past like in the case of excuses to Rosa Parks (an U.S. African-American) or the apologies for the Tuskegee prison experiments in the 50s.
Our equivalent would be to consider ourselves "The Modern Roman Empire" just so that you get the idea for ourselves. Consequently, there is no problem for us to do the same thing and I do think it puts a better perspective on (living) history (by Gadamer or other) to do it this way. I hope you can produce some angles on this type of broadcast and air/voice the ideas to some people.
Note: I have written to BBC on the following story, "Osama Bin Laden: Why Geronimo?", which has the following link, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13265069, on 4th May, 2011, with the message above except the middle paragraph.
Note: on the Tuskegee issue, Wikipedia says: "...conducted between 1932 and 1972..."
My Definite Value, by My Services, My Work!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-09 16:42:04 [CEST]
In the vein of Bruce Lee when he says, "I don't care how good you are...", I have this to say to the idiot-sh*t words that come my way (so that I don't have to repeat myself):
I don't care who you are! I'm a devil of an expert, a very intelligent man!
Alright? Let's move on...
"Irritation"/Contempt Over U.S. American Behaviour - A Message!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-07 08:55:09
To people irritated with/in contempt of U.S. American behaviour, I can recommend to begin to work with "targets"/targets/objectives outside USA because here they don't have the HARD backing and they also have far less accessible (at least in friendly terms) surveillance systems/possibilities abroad! Thus, if one wants to "adjust"/"correct" U.S. American "deviant" behaviour, I would go straight for these "objectives" abroad! But then again, if this is to pervade, it may render the whole terrorist activity USELESS because the U.S. Americans quickly get the message of what is unacceptable (economic) behaviour to foreign interests! You can increase the effectiveness of this ten-fold if you are incredible keen on the "information-play"/information-play! So there you go!
I believe in a level playing field and EVERYBODY is expected to behave according to rules and regulations and play a fair game! In case these are broken, systematically or otherwise, I call for the highest price to be paid: DEATH and DESTRUCTION!!! Cheers!
Note: this has first been published on Twitter and has the following markers: #justice #ethics #terrorism #interests #USA #Islam! Good?
Bruce Lee - A Character Study
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-06 21:15:58
I've found a very cool interview with Bruce Lee who's being interviewed by Pierre Burton, I assume. At least, the interview from YouTube:
Note: the videos are about 8 - 9 minutes each so make sure you get the whole thing, please. You can also buy a lot of stuff on the internet so it's just to dive in (if you need the reminder)!
Notes to the videos:
1. About 4:27 into the 1st part, he exclaims "violence, man!" by what I think, are his own real, vivid experiences with violence and the whole ramble/trouble/devastation with it.
2. About 1:26 into the 3rd part, there's his classic remark on making trouble and consequently getting shot by a gun for it and then these words follow, "I don't care how good you are" in clear respect of the dangers of guns and to people in general.
I just want you to pay attention to Bruce Lee's attitude during the interview and how he stays controlled and composed during it. You may also sense his incredible toughness here.
Some other notes:
His star of fame in Hong Kong:
He has a special excellence in combining mind and body and his mind is reported upon below by this Wikipedia article:
Lee is best known as a martial artist, but he also studied drama and philosophy while a student at the University of Washington. He was well-read and had an extensive library. His own books on martial arts and fighting philosophy are known for their philosophical assertions, both inside and outside of martial arts circles. His eclectic philosophy often mirrored his fighting beliefs, though he was quick to claim that his martial arts were solely a metaphor for such teachings. He believed that any knowledge ultimately led to self-knowledge, and said that his chosen method of self-expression was martial arts. His influences include Taoism, Jiddu Krishnamurti, and Buddhism. On the other hand, Lee's philosophy was very much in opposition to the conservative world view advocated by Confucianism. John Little states that Lee was an atheist. He was asked in 1972 what his religious affiliation was, and he replied, "none whatsoever". Also in 1972, he was asked if he believed in God, and he responded, "To be perfectly frank, I really do not".
The following quotations reflect his fighting philosophy.
"Be formless... shapeless, like water. Now you put water into a cup, it becomes the cup. You pour water into a bottle; it becomes the bottle. You put water into a teapot; it becomes the teapot. Now water can flow, or creep or drip or crash! Be water, my friend...""All types of knowledge, ultimately leads to self knowledge""Use only that which works, and take it from any place you can find it"."Do not deny the classical approach, simply as a reaction, or you will have created another pattern and trapped yourself there"."Quick temper will make a fool of you soon enough"."I always learn something, and that is: to always be yourself. And to express yourself, to have faith in yourself. Do not go out and look for a successful personality and duplicate him"."It's not the daily increase but daily decrease. Hack away at the unessential". End!!!
Some speculation: Regarding "social control", like it or not, by the "gang" in the neighbourhood, I suspicious of why this fine masculine character of Bruce Lee has only given a living daughter, almost like he has trumped the idiot American stereo-type "superior white" masculinity. Thus, as I leave nothing to fantasy, I demand that you give his genetic legacy a FINE CHANCE everywhere in the world! It's almost embarrassing to see that even his only living daughter only has one child, pardon me for not knowing Chinese names, that I think is a boy! Either way, you in USA are to give this family a fine genetic strand into the future, or I'll hope you are so f*cking undressed for all your stupidity that you are to suffer labels of all sh*t in the World! Please, care for his genetic legacy because he has been a brilliant MAN!!!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-06 11:24:00
Hmm... ehh... I can't hold myself, I must say the name is dubious! Alright! In Deutsch:
Ich bin aus USA und ich habe ein Name hier, es sagt Te*** L. F. Ols***-L**! So ich frage, wer ist er? Sie wissen...
Ich kann Sie antworten dass er ist unseren Kommissar der Spooks der Europa! Verstanden Sie??? Also, er ist unseren Kommissar der Spooks der Europa! Ist es klar?
Guten Tag, Herr Amerikaner!
Ulp... I'm aware that you're 510 ehm... Million and that ehh... well... I love you so much! Have a nice day, you too, European!! Kisses.
Note: I'm rusty in German so please notify me on any mistakes despite this is not serious. smiley Given the sunglasses, I almost feel like a man in black from the Men in Black! I'm so cool!
Suggestions to Fukushima and Japan Over the Problem Ridden Nuclear Plant
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-06 06:03:12
It may very well be possible to take out/save/remove a good deal of the reactive fuel stuck inside by divers/"smoke"-divers to reduce the crisis and people's uncertainty. 2nd suggestion is to quickly, after this, to drain the reactors of water by heavy pumps and then initiate a warm shutdown! I acknowledge that the 2nd suggestion is risky, but the first should be more than feasible!
Have a nice day! Cheers! :-)
Note: this has first been published by Twitter some moments ago!
A Small Note on the Mathematical Point
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-05 00:46:48
Mathematics of Point!
A point is an illusory representation for a point on a deeper level that's without extension and only given by a single set of the tri-part, xyz-coordinates (not accounting for any coordinates in a alternative multi-, more than 3, dimensional system of coordinates in terms of space)! This means it's dimensionless, it's without space coordinates (given by a lined/defined shape that holds space in a coordinate system) and remains represented only by the best physical approximation, both ways, i.e., for pedagogics and for the theoretical approximation for exactly this point, given that it's a drawn point in the physical world (that may lie over the actual, exact point and also miss the actual, exact point when one increases the actual depth (toward the theoretical point) of this drawn point in the physical world.
I know, it's very useful!
Here's the more serious mathematics:
Concerning a point and mathematics, Grigori Perelman has proved the Poincaré conjecture, by Wikipedia, link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_conjecture.
His solution, also by Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solution_of_the_Poincar%C3%A9_conjecture.
Note: It's this way for all geometrical forms, they are approximations to their form in the physical world! This doesn't mean that you're confined to the absurd. No, they are both pedagogically and theoretically sufficient for the discourses of domain/systems to obtain!
Note2: Private time of writing: 09:30:50 3rd May 2011 CEST.
Note3: A small editing has taken place 01:11:50 5th May 2011 CEST.
Note4: Unimportant addition of words has been made 15:29 5th May 2011 CEST.
Note5: Clarifying addition of words has been made 20:06 - 20:10 12th May 2011 CEST.
Google Idiocy! A Matter for European Trade Enforcement!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-04 20:11:18
This is what I get from Google.co.uk, http://www.google.co.uk/ by searching for "european medical companies":
http://www.linkedin.com/company/europea ... ufacturing
This is inline with the usual U.S. American hype from those people, all the way to Fortune 500 by Forbes, ahh, another U.S. American company!
By exhibit A: http://www.google.no/search?q=european+medical+companies&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=iUL&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=ivns&ei=tYPBTdnmH4bMswa6zcjDBQ&start=20&sa=N
No, the list should have contained:
File the f*cking
Google (GB) to the Police or some EU trade surveillance authority!!!!
I've also notified BBC on the matter!!! I hope they get them by their beast behaviour.
God, I'm p*ssed off!!! I wonder if I soon get to the point: USA out of Europe/EU!!!
Crazy or what????
I take the point, however, that I should have used "pharmaceutical" instead of "medical", but then again, by common parlance, medical should be associated with pharmaceutical by the search results!
I mean, what is medicine without pharmacy? And "medical" is often used interchangeably with "pharmaceutical", to my knowledge! Bottom line: Google should know this and I still blame them for being idiots!
Even then, shouldn't I rightfully claim at least BBC Business and Financial Times!!! (And other financial sources.)
Because I was not looking for the medical services centre around the corner from your cafe!!!
Something to relax to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9-uUzPHDzI The good song by Madonna, Don't Tell Me or Don't Tell Us in Europe/EU to stop! Because we own science too, incl. search engine technology!!!!!
3/12 (Next 20 to go, to nr. 4)