Criticism of Today's Tectonic Theory and the Launching of a New Investigation Angle
- Also to be known as the New Crust Formation Theory
Today's issue: Tectonic theory, the theory that deals with the Earth's crust, it's "moving plates". I'm sceptical toward the version of tectonic plates that says that mountains extend all the way down to the lava/magma under the crust of the Earth.
While this may be true in some cases, I think most of the time, one finds "sediment layers", very compact at that that can negotiate the roundness of the Earth much better than the harder materials can justify. Thus, the plates are more like the semi-firm/hard "dough" (of peppercake kind) than the rock-hard impression most people have.
But this is of the enormous scale such that our impression of standing on rock-hard ground stays with us. These are just thoughts and I'm not well-read on this matter.
But what this does, is to corroborate or pave the way for how hydrocarbons (fossil fuels, pop. speaking) can be found even under the mountains and that hydrocarbons in this way are _not_ "dead plants, dead dinosaurs" and so on, but are created in a different way, out of the "bio-nuclear" reactor core of Earth.
This way of creating new matter, you know, from the very formation of the Earth may have entirely different origins for coming into being than what is hithertho known/understood/thought of. Your thoughts, please. (It is now made a proper note/document/communiqué.)
In asserting hope for people in terms of water and fuel: Water, estimated findings 0 - 1 km below Earth's surface, Oil/Gas, estimated findings 1 - 15 km below Earth's surface. Agree? :-D (This is without any particular knowledge, but I know of Deep Sea drilling (Mexican Gulf catastrophy) and general water basin consideration, something I find to be function of surrounding sea levels and other, rain etc. You can consider Japan vs. China/Inner China, fx.)
A more serious formulation:
I've now come to name this: new
Crust Formation Theory.
It says that, given a certain body of Earth
Crust, there is a (steady probability) proportional, "equal" chance to that of
fx. USA to actually find oil and gas there, *where-ever* you search!
everywhere on the planet, given this basic unit of Earth Crust there is a
certain precentage chance to identify oil and gas, if not the minerals as
What's been stopping us? I believe, the politics, the lies and
craving for financial power, the greed, from the "first" powers and the people
with them (the powers as nations), like that of Old and Decadent Europe, that of
So now what? Yes, on a broader level, big units of
political power need to establish "best standards" oil and gas institutes with
the heart of the exploration, the resources identifying geological unit very
central, to establish the IIT equiv. of oil and gas geology here and there in
the World, going head on against companies like Halliburton and
This is my advise and you're now responsible for carrying
it through! Go, go, go!
Note: This has originally been posted to Static Display... on Facebook, 17. August 2011 by time 05:58 and 06:39.
Note2: The original note on Facebook, "This is written to the Facebook group, Static Display of Work... today, 17.08.2011, at appx. 05:58 and some 20 minutes backward from this point in time."
Note3: A more serious formulation has been entered today, 2012-12-09.
Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 09:31 0 comments
Labels: deep sea drilling, fossils, gas, minerals, oil, plates, resources, tectonics
Note3: This is the original posting on Blogger with the corresponding data. This has been posted right above the note on Genuineness and Non-Plagiarisation! This writing has also been marked with "Friday, 26 August 2011"!