Sunday, 23 October 2011

Criticism of Today's Tectonic Theory and the Launching of a New Investigation Angle - Relaunching

Criticism of Today's Tectonic Theory and the Launching of a New Investigation Angle
- Also to be known as the New Crust Formation Theory

Today's issue: Tectonic theory, the theory that deals with the Earth's crust, it's "moving plates". I'm sceptical toward the version of tectonic plates that says that mountains extend all the way down to the lava/magma under the crust of the Earth.

While this may be true in some cases, I think most of the time, one finds "sediment layers", very compact at that that can negotiate the roundness of the Earth much better than the harder materials can justify. Thus, the plates are more like the semi-firm/hard "dough" (of peppercake kind) than the rock-hard impression most people have.

But this is of the enormous scale such that our impression of standing on rock-hard ground stays with us. These are just thoughts and I'm not well-read on this matter.

But what this does, is to corroborate or pave the way for how hydrocarbons (fossil fuels, pop. speaking) can be found even under the mountains and that hydrocarbons in this way are _not_ "dead plants, dead dinosaurs" and so on, but are created in a different way, out of the "bio-nuclear" reactor core of Earth.

This way of creating new matter, you know, from the very formation of the Earth may have entirely different origins for coming into being than what is hithertho known/understood/thought of. Your thoughts, please. (It is now made a proper note/document/communiqué.)

In asserting hope for people in terms of water and fuel: Water, estimated findings 0 - 1 km below Earth's surface, Oil/Gas, estimated findings 1 - 15 km below Earth's surface. Agree? :-D (This is without any particular knowledge, but I know of Deep Sea drilling (Mexican Gulf catastrophy) and general water basin consideration, something I find to be function of surrounding sea levels and other, rain etc. You can consider Japan vs. China/Inner China, fx.)

A more serious formulation:
I've now come to name this: new Crust Formation Theory.

It says that, given a certain body of Earth Crust, there is a (steady probability) proportional, "equal" chance to that of fx. USA to actually find oil and gas there, *where-ever* you search!

That everywhere on the planet, given this basic unit of Earth Crust there is a certain precentage chance to identify oil and gas, if not the minerals as well.

What's been stopping us? I believe, the politics, the lies and craving for financial power, the greed, from the "first" powers and the people with them (the powers as nations), like that of Old and Decadent Europe, that of Nazi-Sponsoring USA.

So now what? Yes, on a broader level, big units of political power need to establish "best standards" oil and gas institutes with the heart of the exploration, the resources identifying geological unit very central, to establish the IIT equiv. of oil and gas geology here and there in the World, going head on against companies like Halliburton and Baker-Hughes!

This is my advise and you're now responsible for carrying it through! Go, go, go!

Note: This has originally been posted to Static Display... on Facebook, 17. August 2011 by time 05:58 and 06:39.
Note2: The original note on Facebook, "This is written to the Facebook group, Static Display of Work... today, 17.08.2011, at appx. 05:58 and some 20 minutes backward from this point in time."
Note3: A more serious formulation has been entered today, 2012-12-09.
Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 09:31 0 comments

Labels: deep sea drilling, fossils, gas, minerals, oil, plates, resources, tectonics

Note3: This is the original posting on Blogger with the corresponding data. This has been posted right above the note on Genuineness and Non-Plagiarisation! This writing has also been marked with "Friday, 26 August 2011"!

11 comments:

  1. This writing has originally been marked with "Friday, 26 August 2011" on Blogspot, here! I also believe that 09:31 is 09:31 CEST (as opposed to 21:31 CEST or CET for that matter)! Someone, you have been taken!!! Alright?

    ReplyDelete
  2. From Wikipedia and under my own Tectonics theory: The oceanic crust of the sheet is different from its continental crust. The oceanic crust is 5 km (3 mi) to 10 km (6 mi) thick[1] and is composed primarily of basalt, diabase, and gabbro. The continental crust is typically from 30 km (20 mi) to 50 km (30 mi) thick and is mostly composed of slightly less dense rocks than those of the oceanic crust. Some of these less dense rocks, such as granite, are common in the continental crust but rare to absent in the oceanic crust. Both the continental and oceanic crust "float" on the mantle. Because the continental crust is thicker, it extends both above and below the oceanic crust. The slightly lighter density of felsic continental rock compared to basaltic ocean rock
    contributes to the higher relative elevation of the top of the continental crust. Because the top of the continental crust is above that of the oceanic, water runs off the continents and collects above the oceanic crust. The continental crust and the
    oceanic crust are sometimes called sial and sima respectively. Because of the change in velocity of seismic waves it is believed that on continents at a certain depth sial becomes close in its physical properties to sima, and the dividing line is called
    the Conrad discontinuity.

    Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/Crust_(geology)

    Crust (geology) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    "In geology, the crust is the outermost solid shell of a rocky planet or natural ..."

    Distinctly from and not relevant: Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/Mantle_(geology)

    Mantle (geology) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    "The mantle is a part of a terrestrial planet or other rocky body large enough to..."

    Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Abundance_of_elements_in_Ea​rth%27s_crust

    Abundance of elements in Earth's crust - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "The table shows the abundance of elements in Earth's crust. Numbers show percentage or parts per million (ppm) in mass; 10,000 ppm = 1%..."

    I have doubts whether it is true as Wikipedia writes that the sea floor is so distinct from the ordinary crust under the surface we walk on, the surface of the Earth because at times the ocean floor only extends 200m down, fx. the North Sea basin that also is home to platforms set onto the ocean floor /directly/! This is a note!

    You can also write North Sea shelf!

    Note: First written to Facebook moments ago and also written to the scientific blog of mine, scientificblog777.blogspot.com ! Check it out yourself and please note that it lies under December, written to this blog a good while later!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've now come to name this: new Crust Formation Theory.

    It says that, given a certain body of Earth Crust, there is a (steady probability) proportional, "equal" chance to that of fx. USA to actually find oil and gas there, *where-ever* you search!
    That everywhere on the planet, given this basic unit of Earth Crust there is a certain precentage chance to identify oil and gas, if not the minerals as well.

    What's been stopping us? I believe, the politics, the lies and craving for financial power, the greed, from the "first" powers and the people with them (the powers as nations), like that of Old and Decadent Europe, that of Nazi-Sponsoring USA.

    So now what? Yes, on a broader level, big units of political power need to establish "best standards" oil and gas institutes with the heart of the exploration, the resources identifying geological unit very central, to establish the IIT equiv. of oil and gas geology here and there in the World, going head on against companies like Halliburton and Baker-Hughes!

    This is my advise and you're now responsible for carrying it through! Go, go, go!

    Best Christmas-wishes,
    L. F. Olsnes-Lea

    ReplyDelete
  4. For the stock markets, the Brent Blend and New York WTI, a state of affairs, report: After (my) Crust Formation Theory, by current name, and formerly "Criticism of Today's Tectonics", there's NO doubt that oil and gas are now priced according to industry agreement, i.e., socially, over the intensity of oil and gas exploration, i.e., identifying new oil and gas reserves. The 2. part of the price setting is now (and all the way to 2500 CE(?)) purely by OPEC and aesthetics, a kind of "Feng Shui" of oil and gas price setting.
    As with the "2500 CE" above scarcity isn't expected any time before, by my prediction, 2500 CE, at least, really having no clue of this and that, including future World population and the average reserve of oil and gas per standard unit of explorable Earth crust. Enjoy yourselves!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Extra note on Halliburton and Baker-Hughes, for "Microsoft"-market positions, also under US (American) sweeping of plutonium and other exploration-related (technical) materials.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Some message, it does look "ugly", outside CSM academia conv.:
    Note6: 1. From my YouTube video, as quick geological surveys by plane, "plutonium based, indústry-grade [enrichment]", When I say plutonium-based, I do not say that this is a /definite/ demand, as I have read little of the literature for this, and there is no problem for me to say that "use very-god-d*mn-thing", all to a type of radio-frequency-generator because these generators can generate every frequency there is, I think, not even necessarily inside the "radio-frequencies". No, the target for this is USA (again) and Baker-Hughes and Halliburton! 2. for 1 uge siden I'm supposed to add the tag, mSomatism, for some people and I'm pleased to do this now. 3. for 1 uge sidenTags should be: science, philosophy, modal logics, logics, NDNID, new crust formation theory, Mr. Oil and Gas, Lenny F. Olsnes-Lea, Olsnes-Lea, Photon Theory,Schrödinger's Cat, Schrödinger's Rat, Opinions on Physics.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Not that I would charge anyone (yet), formally, but please stay OFF my ideas as Creator because
    either they are matters of public education OR I HAVE CREATED THEM, i.e., the copyright that aligns perfectly
    with my genes!

    2nd: I'm not sure if there now will be 3 New Crust Formation Theories, duplicated here and there.
    Don't you think I check where my former ideas have gone as I locate the back-up?!

    And not to say, as I've made a back-up, worried about what IDIOTS this time... that I am to make sure
    all is in place, now that I've been "granted", gleefully, both sides, the original of August 2011
    and October 2011 (the first back-up).'

    I have lived through very severe crimes, abductions and much f*cking IDIOTS, totally headless of whatever...

    I know these matters very well. That I move aggressively when I see the chances and that I'm f*cking famous for
    my contributions to the World. Alright? Please, READ them as you like!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Beware of the 2, two, versions of this (important) idea (cast and idea, minimally, unfinished paper/book)

    SUNDAY, 23 OCTOBER 2011 (the relaunching)
    FRIDAY, 26 AUGUST 2011.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have also referred earlier to BOTH, TWO, you f***¤"#%%&%¤&&%¤&%¤&&%¤, because of the difficulties in getting the information to the World, "under much surveillance", that they have tried to stop me from saying this to the World for their own economic interests!

    ReplyDelete
  10. There's this statement from PR office of the US (American) military in Afghanistan stating that Afghanistan holds great mineral resources.

    To this statement, that's really general and true about the whole of the Earth, I'd say I admit none of my work to this particular person from USA having stated this because:
    * I have contributed science to Statoil, 1990(?) with the same hidden assumptions.
    * I have sent an email to the Geological Association of Norway, asking them to invite the World with the insights of this, remniscient of an old school-book of mine, showing much oil resources for USA, but little for other parts of the World. Also for the point above.
    * An online text of mine has been available to this person by my Scribblings-file to Angelfire.com and online-open forum hosted by Philosophy Now in London, England. From where he has probably obtained it, stating it after I'd been making this text available here.
    * I have had the sense to take it further, than this "copycat", in making the New Crust Formation Theory, showing that I have had a deeper connection to the idea, than him merely picking it up from the internet.

    This text is a formality. I have no problem with what my own work is and that I have clear rights to defend my work from these imposterous people.

    (In addition, they are also violating the deeper aspects of intellectuality by gene and meaning in the World... That is, all intellectual work is considered to have deep nature.)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Germany reports that it has NOT performed the radiological surveys, geologically speaking down to at least 5 km, of its land and sea territory!
    France reports the same.
    Spain, Italy, Portugal, United Kingdom and Ireland too!
    (Plus many other countries.)

    OPEC, in the wake of New Crust Formation Theory and "holding prices steady by production data and consumption only"-strategy, is inviting to the GRAND World economics recipé talks, on how the World can come together, "in the UN spirits", to agree on a just arrangement for all (at least so far that "stretches" by the nations as parties making the agreement, suggesting long talks).

    ReplyDelete