Psychiatry and the Modified Somatist Position

Psychiatric Views and Findings

Seriously,

Somatist: I regard the somatist psychiatry in combination with telepathy and telepathic effects, the only possible psychiatric position one can have for real.

Somatism with Telepathy (mSomatism): Concerning telepathy, just laugh, ignorance has never solved anything, but if you're curious and mindful enough, you should know that experiments on telepathy have shown statistical significance and that in one experiment, perhaps in Scotland, two American couples have gotten 100% scores, perfect scores! I'd say a way to telepathy is hypersensitivity and the way to enhance those feelings is to be conscious about them. Not only that, but to make the necessary connection that if it's done correctly, puts you into the telepathic domain, is to analyse the feelings you have by lying on a bench, not being occupied with anything. Some of those feelings are clearly due to you lying on a bench, a comfortable place, preferably, but others are sensations coming from somewhere else, most likely people who are inclined, as the Moon's inclination to the Earth is a natural relationship, to engage with you emotionally or intellectually. There are, beside the telepathy of feelings, also visual, auditory and the combination of all three telepathy. The impressions vary from what you make in your own mind to more reasonable results of various. Telepathy can be very inexact and it can be troubling to discern it all. With telepathy, you may want to investigate "quantum entanglement", "contextualism" and "chaos theory". All of this is just assertions based on personal experience, but I've written it so now you can find out yourselves. Godspeed!

Additional message to Europe (and to the sceptics): Now, do you think they had a boatload of Americans to test? NO, God dammit! I think, by admission, the Americans, 4 of them, landed on the bank of Europe, Scotland, Edinburgh or Glasgow, and made their point! And what a Hell of a point! Are we in Europe dumb or something? I say no more!!!

Additional note: you may want to take notice of the word "truthiness" that has been named the word of the year in USA, 2004(?). I believe this word derives from a certain special relationship akin to a telepathic mechanism, either in relation to other people or aspects from nature itself in the instance of fx. quantum entanglement.

Efficiency in the private sector is known to be far better both in terms of quality (outcome of every consult) and on quantity (they treat more people per day and also perhaps, spend less time on the perverse).

Mental disorders:

The separation of issue. Example: I give here 2 examples of disadvantages, 1 disease and 1 genetic disorder. The first is Syphilis. It is caused by bacteria. The next is Down's Syndrome which is given pre-birth and represented by genetic disorder. These 2 examples are chosen because they were commonly known to be psychiatric illnesses in the past while they are NOT. They cause typical mental characteristics that differ from those found in normal people.

Then we find the proper categories:

Depression. Every depression is the result of a threat to the bond, your body and health. This has been said by an experienced psychologist/psychiatrist. If you suffer a loss of a person, you usually become sad, but in this sense, if the person has been critical to your physical security, you may enter depression. Depression is not a joke! Recently, it has been announced through media that depression may cause suicide at every severity. I have the sense that people who suffer depression are being held to the flames through some informal mechanism of society. It's assumed that this mechanism can be destroyed. I must also say that I see opportunities for Utopia in the future. I like to add this. It's better to die as a person, morality intact, than none at all. Keep yourself alert and have that focus on physical security!

Manic-depressive, bipolar.

Schizophrenia. Rebound of attitudes that the soul cannot carry without creating a personality fracture on the terms of moral in the type of experience. So all of these cases in this view have something to do with an outlook that breaches the natural moral of the inner mental life. When these breaches occur, the soul is suppressed by own negative view and replaced with externally founded personality from single or multiple people. Schizophrenia, I believe, is irreversible. If you go down that road, there's no turning back! I think it can be slowed down to some degree by alcohol or drugs, medicine and thereby be given a better functioning to the social connections, suppressing these tendencies of stupid, bizarre, deviant thoughts. More information on Schizophrenia here. I hope you can make good use of it.

Paranoia. The thought of being persecuted/stalked without being so. I believe, honestly, that few paranoid people haven't experienced something criminal either as a victim or as an offender. The following mistaken view is one of natural consequence, but not one for real. One is about to loose control because of stress due to spin of thoughts.

Dissociative Identity Disorder. I'd say there's no doubt that suffering from DID puts one on the ladder of Schizophrenia, but the person is at the lowest level and there should be good possibility of reversing the condition. The person, presumably, has been living under conditions that have been life threatening, but in a special kind of way, in that the person has been forced to accept deep immorality in order to survive and therefore the condition arises. What then? I suggest that as quickly as the situation is normal, safe, stable again and the specific threat to one's life is removed "forever", one should begin to perceive a healthy personal ethics that guide this person through the rest of the good life and this has to be exercised discipline, otherwise one climbs the ladder of Schizophrenia, I think. Typically, maybe, there's this stem of some assumed 3 identities, personalities and that depending on what forces and social anticipations that play on person XYZ, XYZ having 3 identities, personalities, XYZ plays out the relevant personality. For actual survival?
I can imagine that the personality that can be developed in "normal/ideal" circumstances is the "main" personality of the person, "inner" person. I'm not a skeptic in getting to know people, quite the other way around, but it's busy these days, you're supposed to work hard and earn money and so on.

Eating disorders, Anorexia/Bulimia. The two eating disorders, I think, can be separated into the two large groups of Depression/Schizophrenia with Anorexia belonging in Depression and Bulimia belonging in Schizophrenia.

General note: The heart of this theory is of course that I think that psychiatric disorders are largely caused by immorality in society. Victims of immorality becoming depressed and perpetrators becoming schizophrenic inluding psychopathic. I seek to confirm this by trying to find the most precise ways in examining mental illnesses.
In the smallest sense, immorality causes remorse that puts a load on your brain and works as an obstacle to your serius efforts. Your flow is disturbed by immorality. This is theory, but I bet it gets proven somewhere in the future. Sound moral gives you a better death, better health in life, sharper mind and better approach to problems. So if all this is caused by immorality, what about the mental health business itself? It's my perception that people generally find sound moral code to be boring and uninteresting and that this doesn't make it any better in the actual practice of those who work in mental health business who should be properly introduced to the importance of ethics, morals. Practitioners may find it illusionary meaningful to play political, society organisers and take part in the creation of very immoral stories of people's lives. I suspect detriment tendencies and the actual finding of these. I can only do this much, to the strongest of my belief, to encourage the fine moral approach as an intrinsic value in itself and for the benefit of all! Stay healthy!

There may be some concern that this represents pseudo-science and quackery. I detest having any views that can be categorised as pseudo-science and quackery. I will therefore make it perfectly clear:
My hypothesis: when people are blind to ethical/moral concerns of the type "it's important to follow the laws and be a morally decent person", they can fall victim to conditions that result in schizophrenia and that this path in life in self-reinforcing, f.x. inflicting violence become less and less a concern to you as a person. Consequently, the other side of it is the people who fall prey to these morally ignorant people.
The scientific procedure: I can confirm or defeat this by 2 possible ways. One is to be precise in getting knowledge about people's backgrounds and correlate this with their diagnosis, schizophrenia and depression being the interesting, correlation value of .5 being a total defeat.
The next possibility is this. One can study either societies that are strict on moral code and check with the insanity rate of schizophrenia and depression, these being the only factors of this or I can somehow urge and get people to behave more morally (extremely unlikely, but may be possible) and check for improvements on reported mental health statistics, again, schizophrenia and depression being the interesting.

Not only that, but you also deny future generations to get to know how great an ethical/moral life can be in avoiding schizophrenia/psychopathy. Is this really something you want? What if I'm right, proven by the research, wouldn't it be incredibly nice to know that this ethical/moral life by the general public can eradicate the insanity of schizophrenia and depression and possibly more? If one is to subdue by denial this possible confirmation, one might/may be unscientific in providing truth of the causes to schizophrenia and depression. I think my writing carries a deeply ethical/moral message and I have only the good intentions by coming forward with this.

The absurd privacy argument: the unserious mental health business seems to hide behind an alleged, rather dubiously, privacy vulnerability on behalf of the patients. I must say it's implausible given that they already store medical information, physically or digitally, that's incredibly sensitive and does represent a significant embarassment to the patient in case in gets into the wrong hands. There are also good examples of relatively (equal to all other standards, even the existing ones) safe storage and in digital network like the Police, banking, (health) insurance, communication businesses (telephone and internet companies) and other places that keep information people like to be private.

Obviously, the uneducated have little use in this, except as instilling good ethics/morals in their children and urging the society at large to also conduct according to good ethics/morals.
It's sincerely meant as a just that: the hypothesis/theory. One has to conduct more research into this and apply at the same time greater rigour to procedure, including great care of one's integrity to what one's doing.
It doesn't help you to research rape by raping someone and by raping someone you put yourself in an awkward position to other rape victims you're supposed to help and understand. This is just a notice regarding the practice.
It is enough to have the angle of immorality (by action and/or attitude) toward mental illness, especially schizophrenia. Besides, as schizophrenics "might" be the immoral group, you deny the group of depressed, mentally ill any right to know what is going on in case my hypothesis/theory turns out to be right.

The German flag, an impo-ortant lesson: It may occur funny to you that I write about the German flag on this page, but it has a natural and important cause. This cause is on the issue of the arrangement of the colours. The bottom line is yellow and it is yellow because the white that is supposed to be the bottom line is what makes the money. In earlier times, money, coins, has been yellow or gold, all how you want to see it. White in this regard, is considered a generally good ethics of behaviour to such degree that your being gives a super/subtle impression of white. Going up one level, one is at the red colour and red represents the super/subtle impression of your being when you're not only good, but particularly good, such that you excel in your goodness. Now, the last colour, black, is the colour of super/subtle impression of your being when you're even topping the red level. So in a sense, you're being super-good when you're black. Being black in my experience only happens in short bursts and it requires fine moments of highest intelligence. Above this, there can only be God! Suggesting the flag to be interpreted in its diabolical meaning, moving from the black colour down to the white, can also be done, but I don't want to bother with that now.

Cover: Black can also be a cover at every level. Black cover usually occurs when you're in danger or when something is at stake. It's also possible to "turn on" this black cover by tuning in on that particular emotion that yields a black cover impression. You'll have to test it for yourselves. I've found that "schizophrenics/psychopaths" feed on the good/white(soul impression) people because they have the desired energies of a certain quality. So the encouragement is this. Try to make use of this "black cover" that conceals your good person from being identified by the lunatics and thus being preyed upon. I don't know how good the lunatics are in using this kind of hiding, but I suspect they are less able than the good people.

This writing means that the German flag is a universal flag for all of us and should be celebrated accordingly. Of course, the French, we don't want to talk about! :-)

I think there are blatant holes in procedures such as non-existence of watermarked logging files and lack of logging procedures.
There's a general lack of possibility for having one's therapy sessions properly documented by video, possibly making this a quality criterium.
The whole psychiatric practices should be certified by some kind of ISO-standard what concerns document flows and quality criteria of these, possibly also quality-certifying other aspects of the psychiatry.
There should be a possibility of having common spaces monitored by video in cases of rumbles and ensuring security for both staff and patients, possibly making any police work far easier.

It's assumed psychiatry complies with best practices, that it's strictly legal and that this is reflected in the psychiatric hospital departments and institutions. This should include qualified transparency and the possibility to retrace history of treatment.

There may be a good and fast solution as part of diagnostication in correlating with measuring metabolism (by blood sample).

A small remark on Sigmund Freud: I'd like to add by saying that I think there's NO coincidence that the Germans burnt his books after WW2, presumably after having applied Freud's theories on a grand scale! Truly Madness! Long live Humanity, it was indeed the victory of Good over Evil back then!

For ending the serious section of this webpage, I add two links that I think some people may come to appreciate:
Link 1 - Modern Signs in Modern Times
Link 2 - The Warts of Perversion. Taint of Corruption.
Link 3 - Tips and tricks for people who are involved in psychiatry, i.e., the patients.

Yet another link is coming. This one is for good advise that you can set into motion if or when you're in a difficult situation.

Update:
The "categories" above are now reduced to only two, namely, Schizophrenia and Depression. All disorders now fall under these two categories. Please, take note of this. These 2 categories and the way to set up an analysis chart is an invention and result of _my work_ that started out in 2003, formally on the Internet!

As for treatment strategy, psychiatric strategy, and given a few hidden assumptions/customs (by the schema of my suicide argument), I think it's fair to have the position that natural death is to prefer over other strategies that involve these hidden assumptions/customs! That is, if alcohol works (along with medication) then death can be enjoyed too by that vector! (Perhaps "enjoyed" is to go too far, but I think you get it.)

I've formerly written that I think that ADMB should file under the Schizophrenic category, although, unknown how far out from the "normal", separating the two categories of Schizophrenia and Depression!
I have been writing also that I place Psychopathy the furthest out in the Schizophrenia category, at least in lack of any "worse" diagnosis. However, schizophrenia itself can probably be placed in various places in its own category, possibly making this as ugly!

The "category" of "Other", not being a category, but a "category"/folder/registry for unplotted/uncertain illnesses in this "Other" category. Which these are, is basically for yourself to decide, but I think Autism is a good choice as a start. This "category" reflects uncertainty about the data sets and how a good description is supposed to relate to the above!
The above relates to The _Two_ Category System of Schizophrenia and Depression!

This is of course a part of my ongoing analysis and work for a more complete Philosophy of Psychiatry as I've been successful in the past on other projects! I also think the Somatist point is a fine one (emphasising careful personal behaviour and personal physical security)!

It may be, incredibly enough, that psychopaths, when on the "psycho path by primary inclination, unrestrained by observers or some or not", picks up a trait in the face or head that makes them appear different, like with a forehead extending from the usual image of the forehead of this person!

This may sound weird and out of place, but these people are "a special club" and "dangerous at that" and that there are _actually_ features, even today, in nature/reality that your little head doesn't know about just yet! Now, it may also be that these people are curiously inclined, because of the _hard_ nature of people they're with, toward "magic with people" and "experiments with people" and that sort, still VERY dangerous and not very known! For you to discover! Be careful!

I just like to insert here the notion of "Normative Research Methods of Psychiatry"! Psychiatry, at least by myself, isn't to be considered as some "trip into a jungle". No, there are probably strict guidelines in place for this and that and that psychiatry is usually guided, officially, by the primary councils, The Scientific Council and The Ethical Council. These two bodies are usually attached to the professional Guilds! For research standards, please see NEM! NEM - Norwegian Research Ethics below.

NEM - Den Nasjonale forskningsEtiske komité for Medisin og helsefag (The National Research Ethical Committee for Medicine and Health Sciences)
https://www.etikkom.no/en/ethical-guidelines-for-research/medical-and-health-research/
https://www.etikkom.no/en/ethical-guidelines-for-research/medical-and-health-research/guidelines-drawn-up-by-the-norwegian-national-research-ethics-committee-for-medical-and-health-research-nem/
Additional URLs:
http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki
http://www.codex.uu.se/en/forskningmedicin.shtml!

Further on Telepathy to Ganzfeldraum and all the rest...
On telepathy: If telepathy, whatever way you see it, provides nothing, 0 results, then you're justified in not believing in it, but if it gives you 10/100 then these 10 results may be worth something very special, on skill, almost the same as when jet-fighter pilots begin using their eyes on the sky and get better in it! Not only this, but what fantastic nature doesn't these 10 results hold? I'm telling you, START believing!

Further on the plotting: Megalomania sorts under Schizophrenia because of the inclinations to see oneself as a kind of God! That is, Schizophrenics has a tendency to overrate one's own capacity, even saying they're Gods who decide over life and death here and there in the World! Concl: Megalomania under the category of Schizophrenia!

The manic depression, bipolar disorder as it's also named, should be placed under depression. It's really a misnomer to place it elsewhere, I think, because people may become depressed, but pushed upward to a kind of happy manic state by biological inclination toward life (and joy).
Those who have placed people with schizophrenic symptoms under the label of manic-depression are wrong by this system!!!
Manic-depression or Bipolar disorder have formerly been placed under Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). I disagree deeply with this because DID blurs up the diagnostic system and I can't see the definite use for the concept of DID in its current form!

On the Telepathy article of Wikipedia again, I have this to say: Though I agree on "voices in the head as a matter of Schizophrenia", I must add that "the fact of voices in the head doesn't mean that Telepathy is untrue. No, the issue is this: IF you do according to voices in the head, fx. assault someone, then you're Schizophrenic. But if you have voices in the head and you "are right over it" then you know telepathy. The issue is that of cognition. Sane people know how to separate crazy thoughts of voices in the head vs. the actual voices in the head. Insane people don't get that or they make wrong judgments on them, thus they make mistakes and THEY become dangerous because they lack cognition of it. So the fact that I support telepathy doesn't mean that I reduce the criteria for determining a case of Schizophrenia.

This relates to my "2-category system of Schizophrenia and Depression on each side of the Normality psychology". This means of course that only two categories are considered mental illnesses and that they accommodate successfully ALL mental illnesses. At least it's my ambition to fit in all mental illnesses in this fashion!

Adding to the two categories system, under Modified Somatism or stand-alone as description:
Psychosis is a condition where judgment is suspended and the person suffering from it lacks cognition of reality. As such, Psychosis is to be entered under the two-category system all over both sides of the scale, both categories in the same manner as under 4-party political scale system, by two-dimensional system, placing psychosis in parallel to the usual scale and all over both categories so that one writes, effectively that psychosis has NO special place on the scale, but can occur to everyone, regardless of their mental illness!
On the other hand, psychosis can be pointed out _as a condition_ and one only needs to note the condition of psychosis and move to investigate the underlying or developed mental illness at hand. Investigating patients under psychosis may not be an entirely serious undertaking in itself as they are usually in crisis and to larger or smaller extents incapacitated by this, necessitating hospitalisation and rest/sleep/anasthetics.

On the Telepathy article of Wikipedia again, I have this to say: Though I agree on "voices in the head as a matter of Schizophrenia", I must add that "the fact of voices in the head doesn't mean that Telepathy is untrue. No, the issue is this: IF you do according to voices in the head, fx. assault someone, then you're Schizophrenic. But if you have voices in the head and you "are right over it" then you know telepathy. The issue is that of cognition. Sane people know how to separate crazy thoughts of voices in the head vs. the actual voices in the head. Insane people don't get that or they make wrong judgments on them, thus they make mistakes and THEY become dangerous because they lack cognition of it. So the fact that I support telepathy doesn't mean that I reduce the criteria for determining a case of Schizophrenia.
This relates to my "2-category system of Schizophrenia and Depression on each side of the Normality psychology". This means of course that only two categories are considered mental illnesses and that they accommodate successfully ALL mental illnesses. At least it's my ambition to fit in all mental illnesses in this fashion!

That is, of course, by the above, that I support both the view on Telepathy as in "Modified" and classical symptoms of Schizophrenia, i.e., hearing voices in /this/ manner, as "demon commands" or whatever. To not believe in Telepathy nowadays may be viewed as idiotic, that is, one may now be found to be an idiot if one hasn't "found out"/figured it out yet, believe in it! (Truthiness as before mentioned in USA.)

Considering the anti-"old-hate-management", it may very well be that we find ourselves together with for example Mexico in stifling pains in people by allowing more common access to "pain-relievers" of all kinds, under less doctor-dogmatism, and consequently under more med. administrated programs where the leading principle is "absence of pains", that is, ALL pains of physical and mental kinds, for example "the child inside me is crying" or "the child inside me is driving me nuts" or other notions of demons and what-have-you, you know, all sorts of mental pains out of the usual social contexts where "crime is not yet at satisfying levels, incl. corruption"!
I pertain (and approve of) this definition of "psychosis" /only/ and everything that falls into its scope, that is, description of symptoms, mainly!!! It is (from Wikipedia and not "more"): Psychosis (from the Ancient Greek ψυχή "psyche", for mind/soul, and -ωσις "-osis", for abnormal condition) means abnormal condition of the mind, and is a generic psychiatric term for a mental state often described as involving a "loss of contact with reality". People suffering from psychosis are described as psychotic. Psychosis is given to the more severe forms of psychiatric disorder, during which hallucinations and delusions and impaired insight may occur.[2] [You can check up these numbers in brackets yourself. I have only included them so as to be more genuine to the text (at hand).]

First, 2 urls that I like:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/somatist
http://medicine.academic.ru/44344/somatist

Then a definition (2 versions) of "somatism" that /I/ can support:
somatist — ˈsōməd.ə̇st noun ( s) Etymology: International Scientific Vocabulary somat + ist 1. : an advocate of medical organicism 2. : one who seeks the causes of mental disorders in brain lesions and _other physical conditions_! [Typically such as violence and abuse.]

somatist — somatism, n. /soh meuh tist/, n. Psychiatry. a psychiatrist who considers all mental illnesses to have physical origins. [Typically such as violence and abuse.] [1670 80, in sense materialist ; SOMAT + IST]

Yes, on my psychiatric program, the "psychopath and miso-/misaphiles" (very serious illnesses) get placed seriously in addition to description, but with ordinary psychiatry you only get "DID, dissociative identity disorder" and "sexual disorder", not really reflecting the very serious matters at hand!

Considering these pervasive "mis-"perceptions on Telepathy, I'm willing to "fall back" to "emotional awareness"-Somatism as an alternative kind of mSomatism.
You should take note of the brains as part of "the central nervous system" as organ in the human body/of the human body.
This does not mean, however, that I touch a type (as in typewriting) of what I've written. I have only added a parallel.

Schizophrenia also leading to "Locked-In Syndrome" one the very extreme end of schizophrenia, away from Normal Psychology (as pseudo-category in terms of mental illnesses category system)?!

Out of mSomatism, I can soundly write (as if from the scientific/ethical board already): I also like to address the very dubious psychiatric (mal-)practice of "personality conversion" that amounts to nothing more than plain instances of torture, /I/ think!
The serious side is the ethically justified "corrective behaviour treatment" to people who "have survived bad homes / abusive parents who may have had various (unattended) addictions/alcohol abuses.

The "corrective behaviour treatment" always finds its place inside consensus psychiatry of medical ethics and approved medical procedures and do not hold any controversy of setting up appropriate rewards/punishment methods for the corrective behaviour to obtain!

First in the World to do this: Eating disorders, Anorexia/Bulimia. The two eating disorders, I think, can be separated into the two large groups of Depression/Schizophrenia with Anorexia belonging in Depression and Bulimia belonging in Schizophrenia.

As I am the holder of the idea of mSomatism, I have additional information for you concerning it: (my) mSomatism relates to the underpinning of (physical) violence in addition to the standing of morality to the psychology. But physical violence relates also to morality, don't forget, please! Traffic accidents do not (like that).

On the earliest stages, my writing on mSomatism has held the notions of physical violence, but this has somehow slipped out of the writing.

So to add: mSomatism in this relation to these illnesses by two categories, is about staying safe/reasonably safe/most safe (contextual) for maintaining sound psychological health, also from "the hand of torture" and all other relations that harm or possibly harm (through the brain) the mind, including perverting yourself by video/audio input and other by various means, the morality aspect again.

The coloristics that may be restored as impression only is only a guide for impressions, one that never serves primary input of information, primarily the audio/video input, also feelings. This is the German flag notion and has no crucial relation to mSomatism as such!

Substance Abuse
Substance abuse: One theory, also under mSomatism, that abundant access makes for no substance abuse on an idea level.
Supporting theory, for realism: all substance-abuse therefore arises from a combination of "need for sedation" of kind, one liking to another, and the need for killing/removing worries, "nightmares", i.e., the horror-stories of real life or awful impressions!
Note: Please, remember the (in theory) the potential medical alterations of substance abuse by direct, forced needle-feed into veins of patient (under restrainment (straps/medical/anasthetics). Main attack target: the hate-management with "illegal"/"horrible" film contents!
Note2: There is considerable "lying"/contradictions among doctors and the use of "derivatives", i.e., from the opiates and the cocaine. That my idea is to work this out from the conventions of medical marihuana/Subutex/Methadone as complementary and approved use of substance through a (certified) medical program, in the "generous sense", not by moralism, one type, accusing the patient... etc.

I do not "approve" of Anorexia as such. If the underlying data-set contains "undesired" facts then this has certain consequences for the diagnostication that's supposed to identify the mental illness.
That I've mentioned it (here) is merely because I write from existing literature, not that I'm uncritical of it or fail to suggest improvements for whatever it should be in order to deliver trust and confidence to psychiatry as science.
(Also, to "redefine" Anorexia to the schizophrenic scale needs a thorough symptoms list to follow. It must, by this move, necessarily, also contain the schizophrenic symptoms, one way or another.)

Anorexia:
I have been the one to report to Oslo, Norway, about the dubious medical reports on Anorexia to such extent that Oslo "would not like to hear about a single case ever again!"
Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anorexia_(symptom).
Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anorexia_nervosa.
To my information: Anorexia "strikes" most often young girls and "not somebody else". Why not addressing the legal matters more openly, please? It gets ridiculous.
Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anorexia_mirabilis.

There's been developed a kind of auto-dispensing medical pad that injects, through the skin, the necessary medication. The pad can be suitably enlarged to make 1 week/14 days effective pads possible, with an electronic possibility to open side-by-side pads into one pad-device so make the pads demand less time/attention from managing/administering physician/nurse "under duty".

Pacification medicine on level 1, with necessity to lock ancle-pad into place or not.
Pacification medicine on level 2, with necessity to lock ancle-pad into place and to make the patient wear a ancle-lock GPS reporting device too, only to make "Hannibal Lecter" look better (Anthony Hopkins playing the character).

Remember that the subliminal level vs. conscious level of medication can be calculated for every patient and that through a "down period", a kind of depressed state, the medication aims toward this subliminal level or under this level, with this auto-medication-ancle device. This will make the medication work more elegantly and make the patient look better, while still achieving the medical targets of serious psychiatry and decency.

Legal premise beside: Full (pistol/revolver in house + non-lethal weapons, 1 or more) armament for home protection/personal protection. That pacification routines to the misbehaving and increased security capacity to the healthy/obedient should place the progress of societies in soundly.

(...Delivering trust and confidence to the science of psychiatry, also as promising Nobel Prize work to Medicine.)

Emphasis:
Excerpts, as one of the first in the World, the ISO: I think there are blatant holes in procedures such as non-existence of watermarked logging files and lack of logging procedures.
There's a general lack of possibility for having one's therapy sessions properly documented by video, possibly making this a quality criterium. The whole psychiatric practices should be certified by some kind of ISO-standard what concerns document flows and quality criteria of these, possibly also quality-certifying other aspects of the psychiatry.
Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO.
-- If [they] go down that road, there's no turning back! I think it can *be slowed down to some degree by alcohol or drugs, medicine and thereby be given a better functioning to the social connections*, suppressing these tendencies of stupid, bizarre, deviant thoughts. More information on Schizophrenia here. I hope you can make good use of it.
----
That is, the duties to good etihcal practice come as strict to the physicians as the requirements to the public of respecting the absolute demand to toward ethics/moral behaviour in preserving the good mental health. It should be embarrassing to the establishment of medicine, all physicians, to see that one is corrected by a "commoner", the ordinary patient, who is seeking medical assistance, in presenting more senses. I think you know what the implications are by this text here...

The Bible under mSomatism, the divide between right and wrong, ethics, morality and law
I want you to take note of a few matters from the Bible, historically speaking, upto the creation of mSomatism with "Mask of Sanity" by (M.D.) Harvey Cleckley in mind to see how history has played out:
The Bible, Exodus
* 23:1 - 8, some good character points.
21:1 for only two words(?) - "legal rules".
20:1 - 17 - the 10 Commandments.
This means that they've had, the writers of the Hebrew Bible, quite sophisticated thoughts about right and wrong, being the fundamentals of our academic subjects of ethics, morality and law, all the way from exactly the Hebrew Bible, the earliest "books"/books, let's say the 5 first ones, some 2500 years ago or more.

Maybe it doesn't spell out clearly in the main text above, but a symptom that I hold high in respects to schizophrenia is the failure of cognition to right and wrong, that schizophrenics fail to make the right moral/ethical judgments as symptom of this mental illness. This is a classical symptom for schizophrenia and I have kept this symptom central in my analysis of all mental illnesses, building on some suspicions, yes...

The area defined zapper (tazer/stun-gun), whether internally (maybe unethical/dishonest) or externally by foot-chain around ancle set up by "area defines", GPS (esp. outdoors) or land-based GPS (esp. indoors).
This concludes definitely all administration problems of these people suffering from mental illnesses. Zapping (by tazer/stun-gun) may also simulatenously trigger administration alarms for calling on assistants working with the patients.
Secondarily as example of group concern in the World, i.e., some Utopia mindedness. Also under Aims of Scientology, in insanity being key to solving war and crime together. I am also pleased to see that this work is finalised now under mSomatism and that police forces around the World has sorted out these zapping (by tazer/stun-gun) possibilities way ahead of me, given the notions of criminal care outside the prisons, i.e., I am probably not the one who has solved the zapping (by tazer/stun-gun) foot link "problem" first.

Plain remark. The only ends of psychiatry, aside from diagnostication,
Schizophrenic side: Pacification and Reward (and Punishment) Behavioural Correction.
Generally (both Schizophrenic- and Depression-spectrum): Increased/Sufficient protection toward (better) health, also making room for the depressed "to get one's head together" and deal with any legal problems being obstacles to the most healthy life possible for this individual.

Under mSomatism
Somatic Experiencing is the therapeutic side of (m)Somatism where one goes through one's emotions in a meditative state of security and contemplation, "feeling" oneself through what is one's history.
Beware: Note that "Somatic Experiencing" as one version, is defined (by some or others) as a mental illness (Hysteria?).
Thus,
Somatic Experiencing is a highly conscious brain activity and has no particular
emotional side other than to wonder how these (central-) nervous system signals may have gotten there in the first place, creating a greater consciousness of your person's events and by the emotional awareness in place, one learns to enjoy a more secure, thoughtful and intelligent person, being yourself.
Peter A. Levine, PhD, has a fine presentation for this, url: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByalBx85iC8.
I do not take part in coursing people on how you best achieve results with Somatic Experiencing.
It obtains a different side than the (technical) Philosophy of Science/Medical side that I've been investigating.
Also
Brian D Mahan, Somatic Experiencing FAQ #2 - Does Somatic Experiencing Help with [Traumas?] - url: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMoRBSEKZns.

Note that, under mSomatism and by the Hand of Torture as the torture-practitioner lurks nearby, people can experience freak nature, sudden fatigue, frozen body and loss of consciousness because the modern society with the clinic has moved "up" from the classics of hot irons and ropes/chains/hand-foot-cuffs, medieval times.
"The Evil that Men Do" (Charles Bronson) further.

The super-consideration for all schizophrenia, IMO:
People are so geared toward violence against other people that hate becomes their driving motive as way of life.
If one is to remove schizophrenia from the World completely, one (UN? Nations?) needs to work for reliable security and true justice for everyone. Final!
Note: The symptoms are therefore as we see them: incoherency (by detachment to people), disregard for dignity, sh*t as value in life, some aspects of rationality can be present, etc. See ICD-10 or DSM 5/IV for correlation.
---------------------------
Internet support is here to The Scientific Council and The Ethical Council to the guilds worldwide, especially under my idea of mSomatism and my scientific name/leadership!

Later. I write on the above as I go along. (I will fill in this issue more closely once I get the information into sentences.)

--------

This whole (web-)page of my writings belongs to my person, i.e., © Terje Lea / Terje L. F. Olsnes-Lea / L. F. Olsnes-Lea 2005 - 2017. Make no mistake about it!

Update: 08.10.2017. Written by Terje Lea / Terje L. F. Olsnes-Lea / L. F. Olsnes-Lea. 20.12.2005(?)-2017.