Sunday 18 August 2013

The Call to Stop the Efforts against Terror by Use of Military Forces!

The World with my support, by this, is now in position to demand the efforts against terrorism for STOPPED, plainly. The foundation for this is the Terror-Organisations List from EU that looks embarrassingly regional-like, that is, they are all from Middle East and Africa, except 2, with one from Europe to be soon "disbanded", and by U. S. American levels of corruption (i.e., the Financial Radicalism from them), it's easy, really easy, to understand that they can be instigated, under poverty and global injustice, toward waging terrorism. It seems to me that the questions of terrorism can be worked against in different ways than by the "terror of the Red Mask", returning the lunacy nature of terrorism nowadays, 2013, everywhere.

So the first action is to label terrorism for lunacy under poverty and global injustice.

Conclusion: the efforts against terrorism must be stopped NOW because we have achieved systematic control everywhere on the planet and that plain human nature wants peace and well-being. The surveillance possibilities are also now many, supporting heavy weapons teams of police rather than a clampdown on populations altogether.

Supporting facts.
USA is indeed not that superior:

USA work of Stanley Milgram's Learning Experiment is not needed in the World. People don't, commonly, accept torture as means for learning (and not to themselves either). (Stanley  Milgram can be accused of corruption "for the door, the phone to police and on campus people and companion with the actor.)
USA work of Stanford Prison Experiment is not needed. Corrupt investigation can be a plausible objection to it and punishment is either way common-sense!
USA perception of Slipknot Laws is not needed. It's about the Payment Slip (laws) in being able to conduct work under legal protection, the working society.

USA isn't always intelligence (services) and can at times be easily objected too!

2. Premises of modern society and information society alike put "terrorism" into the lunacy category and not the intention of putting an entire people under terror!

2nd: Nations/states which are suffering under "unrest", i.e., the civil unrest, are subject to UN peace keeping forces and not something else. Terrorism however can enter in parallel.

Note: for the terror-organisations list, see Wikipedia and EU too, please.
Note2: USA is known for "War on Terror", but with massive idiocy such as Echelon/Prism and much destruction and human suffering all over the World!
Note3: for use of drones to terror-fighting countries, advanced surveillance options, minimal use of "military capacities".
Note4: There are many nations involved in UN Peacekeeping Operations and just to mention two groups of people from other places than the "Western",  Gurkha and Egyptian forces.

Sunday 11 August 2013

On the Crisis of Egypt - Following Egypt into the Developed State as Developed Nation

I support the Military of Egypt in them electing an interim leader and to encourage people of Egypt into the streets in celebration. I also find the name reliable.

This has two premises:
1. The Military is the people. Their decision also speaks of all Egyptian strength.
2. The leader is the leader for only a (very) limited time, 2 - 3 years.
(3. The appointed man comes out as decent, i.e., not against Egyptian values, against Islam and so on.)
(4.) The last point is that as the Egyptian military has asked the Egyptian people to come out into the streets in _celebration_, I hope the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt has the wisdom to recall/stop the demonstrations and to set the democratic clock instead, 2 - 3 years into time, for the democratic election to take place!

It is also noted that the Egyptian Military has to keep their Word, their promise, to deliver on their duty. Executions if not?

Good luck to all of Egypt, people and business!

Urls for Egypt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt. General outlook. GDP number. Also PPP.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt#Military. Protecting peaceful Middle East targets. Maybe NATO?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood. Religious organisation. How their  religious society is to develop.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Union. One parent to Egypt of 2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_League. The other parent to Egypt of 2.

Note: Arabic League and African Union get my word anytime.
Note2: I am no Egypt-expert. I don't know the Egypt "system", so to speak.

---------

For Egypt and many other countries, whether in group or not, in sympathy:

A Suggestion for UN Declaration

That we now can rate countries into the two categories,

* Developed Countries
* Countries Developing - Level 2

By this it is acknowledged that High-Tech factories can "land" into any country, even to off-shore platforms by will to spend more money. It must also be certain that there are no more these obstacles to various communication needs given the phone/wi-fi systems for a start, internet cables possibly representing higher qualities.

That transportation routes can easily be set into construction and omitted effectively by other means suitably quick so that this aspect for every of these "lowest" countries are well covered.

This declaration makes it a reality that the World has now moved on in terms of connectivity and possible hostility given the vast returns of people communicating internationally and seeing happiness in actually enjoying the corresponding tourism opportunities too, "specialising into one's own interest area or other tourist behaviour".

It's now for UN to step up planning intensity for World Bank initiatives for these potentials by possibilities to be fully or credibly exploited. Good luck! End.