To the UN Security Council:
This is the suggestion for a statement to the World in providing a reliable signal of leadership "to the acting parties toward a better World".
For example: "That we, UN Sec. Council, want to declare that unjustified surveillance of other countries need to END! That we, by this, want to emphasise, also by military power Worldwide, that all nations are entitled their own free sky and destinies. That this person in Afghanistan with an AK-47 (part of Afghan military) represents NO terrorism to the World, in particular not to USA, and that we think that a kind of military "dream" has come through where the democratic nations are no longer threatened by other military powers, and true, we are now down to more basic duties, acting as citizens to oversee the progress of Human Rights (UDHR etc.) and the improvement of legal systems everywhere, also supported by economic/financial progress everywhere too!"
Good?
--------
This includes the argument for Abolition of All "Justified" Torture under democratic governments, universally. Url: http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2013/01/the-call-for-total-abolition-of-torture.html - Header: The Call for the Total Abolition of Torture, time: SATURDAY, 19 JANUARY 2013.
Showing posts with label military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military. Show all posts
Sunday, 27 October 2013
Sunday, 11 August 2013
On the Crisis of Egypt - Following Egypt into the Developed State as Developed Nation
I support the Military of Egypt in them electing an interim leader and to encourage people of Egypt into the streets in celebration. I also find the name reliable.
This has two premises:
1. The Military is the people. Their decision also speaks of all Egyptian strength.
2. The leader is the leader for only a (very) limited time, 2 - 3 years.
(3. The appointed man comes out as decent, i.e., not against Egyptian values, against Islam and so on.)
(4.) The last point is that as the Egyptian military has asked the Egyptian people to come out into the streets in _celebration_, I hope the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt has the wisdom to recall/stop the demonstrations and to set the democratic clock instead, 2 - 3 years into time, for the democratic election to take place!
It is also noted that the Egyptian Military has to keep their Word, their promise, to deliver on their duty. Executions if not?
Good luck to all of Egypt, people and business!
Urls for Egypt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt. General outlook. GDP number. Also PPP.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt#Military. Protecting peaceful Middle East targets. Maybe NATO?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood. Religious organisation. How their religious society is to develop.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Union. One parent to Egypt of 2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_League. The other parent to Egypt of 2.
Note: Arabic League and African Union get my word anytime.
Note2: I am no Egypt-expert. I don't know the Egypt "system", so to speak.
---------
For Egypt and many other countries, whether in group or not, in sympathy:
A Suggestion for UN Declaration
That we now can rate countries into the two categories,
* Developed Countries
* Countries Developing - Level 2
By this it is acknowledged that High-Tech factories can "land" into any country, even to off-shore platforms by will to spend more money. It must also be certain that there are no more these obstacles to various communication needs given the phone/wi-fi systems for a start, internet cables possibly representing higher qualities.
That transportation routes can easily be set into construction and omitted effectively by other means suitably quick so that this aspect for every of these "lowest" countries are well covered.
This declaration makes it a reality that the World has now moved on in terms of connectivity and possible hostility given the vast returns of people communicating internationally and seeing happiness in actually enjoying the corresponding tourism opportunities too, "specialising into one's own interest area or other tourist behaviour".
It's now for UN to step up planning intensity for World Bank initiatives for these potentials by possibilities to be fully or credibly exploited. Good luck! End.
This has two premises:
1. The Military is the people. Their decision also speaks of all Egyptian strength.
2. The leader is the leader for only a (very) limited time, 2 - 3 years.
(3. The appointed man comes out as decent, i.e., not against Egyptian values, against Islam and so on.)
(4.) The last point is that as the Egyptian military has asked the Egyptian people to come out into the streets in _celebration_, I hope the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt has the wisdom to recall/stop the demonstrations and to set the democratic clock instead, 2 - 3 years into time, for the democratic election to take place!
It is also noted that the Egyptian Military has to keep their Word, their promise, to deliver on their duty. Executions if not?
Good luck to all of Egypt, people and business!
Urls for Egypt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt. General outlook. GDP number. Also PPP.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt#Military. Protecting peaceful Middle East targets. Maybe NATO?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood. Religious organisation. How their religious society is to develop.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Union. One parent to Egypt of 2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_League. The other parent to Egypt of 2.
Note2: I am no Egypt-expert. I don't know the Egypt "system", so to speak.
---------
For Egypt and many other countries, whether in group or not, in sympathy:
A Suggestion for UN Declaration
That we now can rate countries into the two categories,
* Developed Countries
* Countries Developing - Level 2
By this it is acknowledged that High-Tech factories can "land" into any country, even to off-shore platforms by will to spend more money. It must also be certain that there are no more these obstacles to various communication needs given the phone/wi-fi systems for a start, internet cables possibly representing higher qualities.
That transportation routes can easily be set into construction and omitted effectively by other means suitably quick so that this aspect for every of these "lowest" countries are well covered.
This declaration makes it a reality that the World has now moved on in terms of connectivity and possible hostility given the vast returns of people communicating internationally and seeing happiness in actually enjoying the corresponding tourism opportunities too, "specialising into one's own interest area or other tourist behaviour".
It's now for UN to step up planning intensity for World Bank initiatives for these potentials by possibilities to be fully or credibly exploited. Good luck! End.
Sunday, 16 October 2011
Is NATO a Possible Peace-Keeper? Issue Regarding Mexico and Other Countries! Suggestion for Solution Provided!
You know, when it happens, the World gets its round of military power, when NATO becomes an office, Kosovo/Yugoslavia blows up and another round of military power (and NATO steps back into shape and importance). So I suspect the "code" is with the various Police forces around the World also! The whole civilisation is under threat from various corrupt regimes (think twice, please) of "gaming" all over the World, ranging from Intelligence Services to Police forces to economists and lawyers and what have you! This needs to be addressed and as a first remedy, I advise people everywhere to get sharp by arming themselves and take care of home/personal security as best as possible!!! Next turn is to spread this condition as best as possible again and see how far you get!
Now, the consideration of NATO enters as problem areas outside "established democracies" are in trouble and fail to advance/progress as quickly as they should! This can be corrected by entering a military alliance, under own, national set of rules on how to regulate this, where other countries can step in by volition to provide correction to the problem at hand!
We have two "slow engineering" cases, in the World, at least, Colombia and Mexico. These countries have struggled for a very long time with alleged "drug trafficking" problems. Now who is to step in as a military unless a friend? And even as friend then also affirmed by the country which is to be helped? It's now clear, democracy is an unbeatable premise that all sciences support as progressive, both in terms of humanity, but also a business partners and places for making serious interaction on all other levels, including the cultural. Given then the premise of"mixed economies" to be established, it's just to move resolutely straight ahead (much like a tank through every obstacle)! You get it? In this way, NATO gets to be a kind of forum of discussion, possibly under the UN and the Security Council, where national security is discussed both formally and informally, and "where interested parties, i.e., countries can provide sense as requested" (see above). What do you think? Any good?
To the future! To the UN! Cheers!
Additionally:
And if you are not a NATO member, then make "NATO2" (because there is no
copyright on military organisations names) and because the World is
probably best with only one! Thus "we want to get in, but since you
won't let us..." and then proceed as above! (Sounds as a script? I'm
sorry!) Good luck to you all!
Now, the consideration of NATO enters as problem areas outside "established democracies" are in trouble and fail to advance/progress as quickly as they should! This can be corrected by entering a military alliance, under own, national set of rules on how to regulate this, where other countries can step in by volition to provide correction to the problem at hand!
We have two "slow engineering" cases, in the World, at least, Colombia and Mexico. These countries have struggled for a very long time with alleged "drug trafficking" problems. Now who is to step in as a military unless a friend? And even as friend then also affirmed by the country which is to be helped? It's now clear, democracy is an unbeatable premise that all sciences support as progressive, both in terms of humanity, but also a business partners and places for making serious interaction on all other levels, including the cultural. Given then the premise of"mixed economies" to be established, it's just to move resolutely straight ahead (much like a tank through every obstacle)! You get it? In this way, NATO gets to be a kind of forum of discussion, possibly under the UN and the Security Council, where national security is discussed both formally and informally, and "where interested parties, i.e., countries can provide sense as requested" (see above). What do you think? Any good?
To the future! To the UN! Cheers!
Additionally:
And if you are not a NATO member, then make "NATO2" (because there is no
copyright on military organisations names) and because the World is
probably best with only one! Thus "we want to get in, but since you
won't let us..." and then proceed as above! (Sounds as a script? I'm
sorry!) Good luck to you all!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)