Monday 23 July 2012

The Turing Test Forever Defeated - Challenges for the Turing Test

Concerning the Turing test, I find that the requirements toward _generic language output_ should be definite and that the programming needs to _not_ extend certain limits of size so that the computer _really_ generates language of human quality and not that it is allowed such extension that one enters all sorts of typical pattern of human behaviour that the programming by this notion *defeats itse...lf*, making the whole programming ridiculous and more apt for artificial intelligence _emulating_ human behaviour *only*!!! One should also take into account the phenomenon of "Truthiness" and "telepathy" so as to see that the "Turing test" is now utterly defeated regardless, because computers can't pick up these extraordinary capacities of human kind!!! Good?


Urls: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test !

Url2: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/truthiness?rdfrom=Truthiness !

Quote: "truthy +‎ -ness. First attested in 1824."

Quote: American Dialect Society's Word of the Year (2005)

Url3: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness ! Quote from this: "Truthiness, although a "stunt word", was named Word of the Year for 2005 by the American Dialect Society and for 2006 by Merriam-Webster.[7][8] Linguist and OED consultant Benjamin Zimmer[2][9] pointed out that the word truthiness[10] already had a history in literature and appears in the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), as a derivation of truthy, and The Century Dictionary, both of which indicate it as rare or dialectal, and to be defined more straightforwardly as "truthfulness, faithfulness".[2]"


Conclusion either way is that the Turing test is forever defeated, given all honesty, and that the matters that remain now is how long the computer can hold and "small questions" of challenges merely for having the computer to behave like a human being in being engaged in a speech, very advanced, all allowed, or not!


First written to Facebook, both under my profile and as a note with the same header as above.

Monday 9 July 2012

The Free Air-Industry - Patents and Production Process

Considering the air industry and certain expensive patents connected to air-plane production I find that we have now agree upon, the whole air industry, China, Russia, Brazil, USA, France and others, that the planes can be produced by side-placed factory lines, robotically tracked (partially manual proxy) to "feeding" the plane assembly line with (manuf.) sections, also using these special vehicles for this, by 2-tier placement actuation, first one crude then finer tuning-knob. Not only this, by we find that "the strong French insistence on wires can be side-stepped and that bolts for the sections are sufficient for air-plane security! Not only this, but "suspending sections in air by wires" can be side-stepped as well!
The overall target is of course to "admit the alphabet" to people and nations so that not every idea is shot at in this or that manner! And that the production of air-planes that is really the enterprise of entire 7 Bn and not only Airbus and Boing! I hope you enjoy this and that we get to see a happier World, symmetrical with planes "in hand", noting the general statement from the industry meeting in Brazil a while ago, always flying high!!! Good?
The point is of course that the robot side-feed vehicle tracks can be temporarily covered with special sections covers so as to allow the planes to roll over as soon as they are completely assembled! Good again?