On the Meaning of Life - No other way than to the proven Deity

There is only one meaning of life (now that we have the existence of souls, telepathy and other phenomena)! It is to "return" to God/Allah/Yahweh (or any other "white-list" Deity) according to the innermost meaning of the Bible (or of the other valid Holy Books)! This is that special Deity domain where one is given the Deity perspective of all that exists.

That some people find a "limited" outside the "white-list" religion Deity means only that they are wrong! They are measurably smaller people in terms of (Kantian) Ethics and Morality given bodily measurements of metabolism and the nervous system by electrometer or other, etc.

So I say that to be a kind of fully Kantian Ethical and Moral human being entails as necessity to be a follower of "white-list" religion and corresponding Deity.

I expect the science to match up with religious views in near future as one may more safely and demonstrably enjoy Out-of-Body Experiences and to have fun with the destruction of the body well knowing that one can also reincarnate if one so pleases!

The future still looks very bright!

Idea for Film: The Telepaths and Reincarnators - A kind of near/immediate Sci-Fi...

Idea for film: The Telepaths and Reincarnators fighting crime and cooperating from afar, across the planet Earth. That the heros and heroines can use telepathy as communication and being able to destroy themselves and reincarnate somewhere conveniently close to an action scene or another. A kind of (near/immediate) Sci-Fi! Wearing special "Agent" clothing or something else...

Cool?

Another idea: Cult of the Wart!
Special members of a cult in for example New York (or somewhere else, fittingly) are living special lives according to the Code of Wart. Warts in this culture, be they "expensive" or "cheap", yields a kind of genealogy and remains the religion for them in a strict hierarchical group. They do crime and take pleasure in the most sodomistic ways. The filthy ways make their lives, in all social interaction and certainly mentally! "Coming to a screen near you!" Genre: Thriller/horror.

Coloristics is restored as science on par with linguistic science

First of all, when I write that "Coloristics is restored as science" per linguistic science, I intend to say: Coloristics is restored as science by the written description as account of (coloristics-) impression, much like telepathy, but that coloristics is much more personal and much more refined!!! Don't mess with it! I'm warning you!

You may want to check out:
Url: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coloristic
and
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/coloristic

Well, well, the net says this and that, but Coloristics has a peculiar history, one more successful (now) than fx. Craniology, ref. Philosophy of Science.

Ref. also, the impressions of the German flag, by the 3 colours, being one (prime) example!

To science-"freaks" of CERN: No, ISOLDE is no alchemy! Alpha-radiation? Anybody?

Telepathy - the inquiry continues with new leads too

In terms of Ganzfeld Zimmer experiments (only sound isolation, no special light other than slight dimming of white light), that this way may provide better use:

1. Make sure the participants have open minds for it, that they are prepared to accept such, telepathy, or have a weak/strong suspicion towards it.

2. Make sure they are emotionally prepared, that they are told of the "respects toward own feelings routine" before entering the experiment and that this preparation can be academically improved, by a type of guidance, opposite sex/gender or not. There is also the question whether the participants should bring friends/acquaintances they are confident with, and I think this represents a good beginning, although, there are probably other ways that work too, Helsinki-Declaration in hand, general research ethics...

3. Some (para-)psychologists may have "strong opinions" on the outcome and are not fit or suitable for conducting this type of research, they should be removed from (every) possible set of researchers...

Importantly: There is also a bigger, tacit assumption to this "game" and it is how the senses/the feelings relate to this, FORCING the entire psychology onto a new direction by train rails, that a finding probably sends a battalion of idiots right out to where they belong...!!!

Important 2: That we go with alpha-numbers at 5% or lower, that the Zener cards are kept to 4, that the subjects are to choose a comfort zone as options provide inside the Ganzfeld-zimmers. That an outcome on 8% means success, if not the very numbers higher up!

Good luck!

Further note (beyond Good luck):
I find that lie-detectors can be useful as post-experiment control.
We may use these questions:

1. Have you done your best during this experiment? (Presumably yes.)

2. Have you been open to the question of telepathy? (Presumably yes.)

3. Are you convinced now to the question of telepathy? (Open to yes/no.)

Remember that the presence of lie-detectors can heighten the seriousness of the experiment (to some subjects, maybe not all).

Notes:
1. One book to start with, in determining a whole field of all, papers and books alike, all "meta-studies included", but intelligently... This book fx. has an ESP topic to it: http://www.amazon.ca/Introduction-Psychology-Dr-Rod-Plotnik/dp/0495903442/ - +/- page 139. Introduction to Psychology - Hardcover: 768 pages, Publisher: Wadsworth Publishing; 9 edition (Feb 25 2010), Language: English, ISBN-10: 0495903442, ISBN-13: 978-0495903444.

2. Urls: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganzfeld_experiment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepathy (only Wikipedia for now, sorry.)

3. Remember to add the "Truthiness"-aspects...
as notion to the researchers themselves or others, by the questionnaires to the participants or so...

4. Here is an interesting link further: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=26367.0 that includes "some views/findings" on the Ganzfeld studies altogether...

5. You know, when the god-d*mn sociologists can't f*cking relate to PRIMARY literature, sitting on a "golden degree" that they probably never should have had and poor in reading the very literature, if not the Scientology itself... then what about our "friends", the psychologists... Probably not all...

The Turing Test Forever Defeated - Challenges for the Turing Test

Concerning the Turing test, I find that the requirements toward _generic language output_ should be definite and that the programming needs to _not_ extend certain limits of size so that the computer _really_ generates language of human quality and not that it is allowed such extension that one enters all sorts of typical pattern of human behaviour that the programming by this notion *defeats itse...lf*, making the whole programming ridiculous and more apt for artificial intelligence _emulating_ human behaviour *only*!!! One should also take into account the phenomenon of "Truthiness" and "telepathy" so as to see that the "Turing test" is now utterly defeated regardless, because computers can't pick up these extraordinary capacities of human kind!!! Good?

Urls: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test !

Url2: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/truthiness?rdfrom=Truthiness !

Quote: "truthy +‎ -ness. First attested in 1824."

Quote: American Dialect Society's Word of the Year (2005)

Url3: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness ! Quote from this: "Truthiness, although a "stunt word", was named Word of the Year for 2005 by the American Dialect Society and for 2006 by Merriam-Webster.[7][8] Linguist and OED consultant Benjamin Zimmer[2][9] pointed out that the word truthiness[10] already had a history in literature and appears in the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), as a derivation of truthy, and The Century Dictionary, both of which indicate it as rare or dialectal, and to be defined more straightforwardly as "truthfulness, faithfulness".[2]"

Conclusion either way is that the Turing test is forever defeated, given all honesty, and that the matters that remain now is how long the computer can hold and "small questions" of challenges merely for having the computer to behave like a human being in being engaged in a speech, very advanced, all allowed, or not!

First written to Facebook, both under my profile and as a note with the same header as above.

Over Traditional Communication - And not /that/ nonsense of subjective character...

I will accept NO duty that's based on (loose) claims "that I've sent you, mr. Olsnes-Lea, a signal (of the telepathic nature) and that you therefore should have done this and that!" No, only duties that are based on traditional communication are committed to (and acted upon) and it is /defined/ to be speech and the written word, "usually", you know, the peaceful, physical meeting, the mail, the email and the phone call! Other than that, there's NOTHING! Now, I do hope you understand what "nothing" means! Alright? I leave you to it! Cheers!

Note: This should really have been unnecessary and it only relates to the many Jangling Jacks and Janes, of this country in particular, who are unable to determine what a relation is and what a /friendly/ relation is, i.e., people with many deficiencies!

Further on Telepathy -> Ganzfeldraum and all the rest...

On telepathy: If telepathy, whatever way you see it, provides nothing, 0 results, _then_ you're justified in NOT believing in it, but if it gives you 10/100 then these 10 results may be worth something very special, on skill, almost the same as when jet-fighter pilots begin using their eyes on the sky and get better in it! Not only this, but what fantastic nature doesn't these 10 results hold? I'm telling you, START believing!!!