For the opposite, I've written about "Fatality of Sentiment" like this: A Fatality of Sentiment
If some members, as routine, of society are pinpointed for this, a gruesome death, and suspected murder, possibly from long and painful medically assisted torture, on a subcultural level, it's devious indeed and should be resolved, a blatant ethical requirement! Yet I sense psychiatry is easily muting such claims for being hysteria and "fantasy"! I'm also by the opinion that this is set up ONLY for the sake of "monkey-business" and assuring the compliance of people, whether this or that!
(This may be the 2nd time this is posted by which I'll later remove it.)
The writing above is also obviously a blatant violation of democratic/principles of human rights and can only be seen as SHAME!
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post107 - This has orignally been written to a blog at the former website, blog.t-lea.net hosted by One.com.
The key to Good Will Hunting. The 6. element. Comment more. The thought is that by acquiring knowledge and achieving competence the 6. element is scored, that Integrity says that one should be pro-active and that, given the ethics is complied with, reasonably [discussion in and by itself], then the social classes are forever protected because it is known that anybody "can do it".
This is mainly theoretical and do not account for the latest findings such as police corruption or other corruption and how widespread the carnivore human nature is in preventing the best of human nature to unfold, such as the freedom to be (entirely) pro-active, to seek to solve problems in society and so on!
[Some deluded people may think this running project is a description of a film. IT IS NOT!]
This Sunday, prayer or not, I'm pleased to announce to you:
A Call for the Total Abolition of Torture: My call for the total abolition (under ethics/applied ethics) has the following grounding as rationale,
1. the military power under UN "letter" of civilisation and progress is overwhelming and superior and it can be uttered that every enemy to this progress of human kind can be sufficiently monitored by other means and undergo "intense"/"hard" interrogation instead and so be reasonably covered for no particular hostile action of any significance to ever arise. Terrorism has been radicalised so much that all the possible rationale pro it is GONE! Torture is no more.
2. The decision for democratic ideas to stand unchallenged is now sufficient so to demand that all discussion is to happen peacefully and by no means by terrorism. Again, the rationale for torture for non-existent terrorism to arise is gone a second time.
3. We now have, collectively, such huge resources to clarify democracies and international understanding that no possible terrorist movement, theoretically, can arise and that no torture needs to counter it. Again, torture is no more.
4. There is seemingly no possibility for military conflict of the rational/intelligent kind to arise at all, thus no torture is needed for countering a military disaster to happen.
5. All other, the monitoring of the World is sufficient as it is now to say that only lunatics remains as challenge for any massmurder to happen, but as these are under no intelligent reasoning, one is effectively prevented the excuse to use torture in the first place and thus one is impelled to commit to work ethics for preventing military conflict or terrorism to happen at all. The conclusion must be that torture is to be effectively BANNED as soon as possible!
(Warning: I am famous for it (Objective Ethics/Integrity)! )
Sincerely yours,
Lenny F. Olsnes-Lea
The ideas, 15 years and running, Integrity and Objective Ethics,
this is also /laid down/ over matters such as the Military Complex of USA, "fixed" world poverty also by subversion, The powers of finances by the big corporations, like in mining, oil and gas, most infamously, also others. I am no idiot. Are we getting there?
Under Palliative Medicine/Care, I may yield a slight point on "making the patients wake up a bit in order to speak (sensibly)" with the closest ones. This also makes a duty to utilise good anasthetic practices like setting the drips, rather than imposing one's presence on the patient and this patient's closest ones as they bond or other.
Palliative Medicine is now largely finished and uncontroversial and remains so with the motto: NO PAINS!!!
As well as this clearly files under Objective Ethics, the Suggestions section, then here also:
The Overpopulation Problem
Suggestion for combatting Overpopulation, a dire condition that brings out the worst in people and against animals and wildlife the same:
The governments of the World issue a (steady) /recommendation/ for only one or two children (for each woman, or other standard, issues may arise with homosexuals who desire children, but this needs separate resolve).
Under the recommendation then, this follows, a 3 pt. list,
1. that families will be required by law to pay partly or wholly for the 3rd child as incentive toward right behaviour.
2. that becoming pregnant with a fourth child or giving birth to a fourth child may provoke forced abortion or forced adoption.
3. that becoming pregnant with a fifth child and beyond may trigger forced abortions, forced adoptions, forced sterilizations and removal of legal rights in representing stupor below normal intelligence.
I hope you bother to take note and that we work together, in moving the politics toward better ecology and a better future for all, with as much people in the future gene-tree as possible! Thanks.
(Me? A hard-liner Ecology Philosopher? This files under Applied Ethics and only as suggestion for discussion. Also, point is made for making the discussion /move/ somewhere whatsoever.)
Applied ethics, suggestion/bearing:
From some time now, given the accessibility to information, I think it's mandated that the relevant leaders of the World are to be considered MONSTERS, "well suspended over all humanity", i.e., the inhumanity in them, by the direct consequence of failing people their chance (not instantly guaranteed, I'm sorry to say) to human rights, please see UDHR under UN, as matter of reality, i.e., in practice, in life.
The data-sets of crime (crime statistics) may have been "fixed"/left in the dark, in the social sense, for much of time we know, entire families practically "run over", abused, tortured, maimed, killed, whatever, very much outside the facade official stories we've been told of.
So if they provide leadership counter to human rights, they are to be named MONSTERS!
(See esp. UDHR Art. 3, please.)
The corrupt mind is a very serious condition that may agree/act with all cruelty the World can offer them, EVERYTHING, H*llraiser, so on!
Url: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ .
There are much people living under the letters of human rights, the entire 7,1 Bn people, a number that has 8 0s after the 7 and 1.
(This text, plus the above, as you may infer, carries deep economical consequences.)
Under Objective Ethics and Integrity:
given the inhumanity notions, "to commit inhuman acts against others", that we find,
* to commit inhuman acts against other people must "stand thousand-folds" deeper into inhumanity
than to
* be a victim to inhuman acts because the victim doesn't need to take part in an inhuman psychology/personality (pathology, still under the investigation of level of corrupt mind) to be this victim.
Also, and importantly, to blame a victim for being a victim under inhuman acts is to give way to inhuman psychology (mind the pathology notion, please) on the "idiot's" side, perhaps malignantly or detrimental to the person who is blaming the victim for this!
BEWARE!
(Also in providing character by the Cardinal Virtues.)
Over Ethics and the Modern Society
3 "smoking/charismatic" bulbs/globules of Ethics for the modern society. The apparatus becomes:
1. Main: The Cognitive Ethics - also known as rule-following for laws and regulations in expressing the ethics to live by.
2. Supportive: The Virtue Ethics - the best examples are the cardinal virtues and courage and conscience.
3. Rescue/Emergency Ethics - The Non-Cognitive Ethics, best known as feelings or feeling what's proper for a given situation.
Then it's all up to the courts if you perpetrate. Say it right, will you! ;-)
The practical guide under Practical Philosophy known as Ethics/Applied Ethics. Thank you.
By Lenny F. Olsnes-Lea, 2014-02-27.
(A note, formerly, may have been stolen from me at a nearby bus-junction. Sorry to say.)
To enter a Kantian response is to kill as few people as possible by the original problem by Foot.
- To be the driver of the runaway tram is to say that it's better to be a driver who kills 1 person than 5 persons. That is, by "an idea in the Kingdom of ideas, one chooses the idea in such a manner that ...", paraphrased.
- Either way, one should know that being on the rails poses an increased rate of risk for something to happen (to you) and in some cases "5 people die from it"!
However, it's not obvious that one should (actively) kill to save people. Therefore, in the 2nd example of the article, the Kantian way would be to "cry out a warning as loud as it gets" or other, that is, to do your best so that people do not get killed despite the example says that 5 people are going to die. Well, well, in this example, I let them die.
- Because, if there is a screwed up idea that killing 5 people of a corrupt regime with your bomb to your body is going to save 1000 people the connection isn't that evident and that there are ways in the world where these 1000 people may fend for themselves in a better way, say.
- So there is this rather natural way for events to flow in order to either save people in one way or another or to prevent people falling prone to killings, whatever the reason, natural or man-made.
You work for train-safety in order to prevent train (or tram for the others) deaths or you become a political activist to prevent corrupt people from wielding power. This is the natural vein for being a truly good, Kantian person!
The above relates to the Trolley Problem as proposed solution.
Citizens' action for Democracy:
It should be plain to ask for the medical removal of criminal implants and the complaint to the police for this criminal insertion. To make this easy for people, also in providing the walk-through scanner, should be a duty and an issue for the medical associations in Europe. For Norway, the Legeforeningen.
I'm thinking of tech-eyes, tech-ears, antennaes, neurological chips for bio-electrical-value and brain-implants etc.
So, have you encountered criminal implants? What is your view? Can it be that "haters" exist with Transhumanism? Can Transhumanism be a potential hate-campaign against the (best) natural human being? Other? Thoughts?
The Good People are Superior. Here's why:
* They handle guns and pepperspray well
* They handle economy well
* They are the most intelligent, no cheating included
* They are the most moral and trustworthy
* They can regenerate
* They can reincarnate
* They have superior immune systems
* They are more independent
* They have better cognition
* They have better perception
* They have superior bodies (I guess) and neurologies
* They have superior endurance
* They have superior people skills (for real)
* They are served by superior quantum effects! (Too!)
* Good people also have superior reproductive capacities
- Investigations into telepathy (priming issues etc.) have shown that
* Good people have superior telepathic ability too
(Because "schizophrenics" require physical connection.)
* Etc. etc.
Utilitiarianism and the Trolley Problem "joke" as Reductio ad absurdum of this type of ethics
Let's say that we have this train-conductor that has a choice of running over and killing this one person instead of the group of 5 people on a different track.
If we repeat this "procedure" infinitely, then these 5 people can put themselves in harms way and "present" one person on the other track and in this way kill "infinitely" many people which reduces the group of 5 "cynical" people to a very small group.
Conclusion: Utilitiarianism is not plausible as viable way for ethics!
Link, Reductio ad absurdum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum.
A comment to the Good People List (see above):
To all good people, 1. Don't take the assurances of death by physicians or others. If the situation turns lethal, prepare to start thinking and use the feelings of the soul, the sensitivities of the brain instead. You can "use" death, the other side of life to all sorts of things, including that good revenge on an idiot (of grande, too). So, please, take it from me: you can regenerate, you can reincarnate, plus 100 tricks more. Life has so much to offer, including that of the soul experience that you will come to know, if not later than dying from old age. So for real, life has two sides for you all: the one in flesh and blood and the one on the other side of "death", that you can undo if you want.
This could have been a scientific statement, but because of a World with great problems, I offer this only as a "religious" statement, one that you can have the pleasure to discover as you see fit! Best wishes.
By the Good people list (see also below)
that good people have best reproductive abilities, I think it's safe to say that good people also have the best sex lives.
At an extreme for the bad people, when their remaining sex life comes down to "enjoying" sewage and watching or taking part in hideous torture, then, clearly, the victory goes to the human being, the good people!
It should now be known as (Kantian) "ethical and moral character" and not only "moral character" in describing people's character!
Updated, full(!) Good People List on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/lukas-f-olsnes-lea/the-good-people-list/1809193219389223/
A trick for all Good People being annoyed by crazies:
Just "whisper on the wind" (use telepathy) to them and ask them how evil they are and they go completely bust, mentally, forcing them to "flee away" from their immoral mentality and into thinking and doing good/moral (usually by remaining passive because them and morality...) actions, usually turning their minds to other activities. Even them, they may forget that they have had an issue with you! "Out of sight, out of mind!"
*Unless on PCP drug or similar.
Over Ethics and the Modern Society
Addition.
Comment: It must be clear that you train the nervous system by being Kantian ethically and morally minded. So if a situation threatens you, you try to comply with virtue and if situation gets even worse, you feel your way through by your Kantian trained nervous system.
Then (repeated, see above as comment):
3 "smoking/charismatic" bulbs/globules of Ethics for the modern society. The apparatus becomes:
1. Main: The Cognitive Ethics - also known as rule-following for laws and regulations in expressing the ethics to live by.
2. Supportive: The Virtue Ethics - the best examples are the cardinal virtues and courage and conscience.
3. Rescue/Emergency Ethics - The Non-Cognitive Ethics, best known as feelings or feeling what's proper for a given situation.
Kantian ethics says:
"...every rational being must act as if it were through its maxims always a legislative member in a universal realm of ends. The formal principle of these maxims is: ‘Act as though your maxim should serve at the same time as a universal law (for all rational beings)’."
Thus, (most) people are cognitively defending their rights as these "rational beings" and I say that universal, Kantian ethics is proved by that. You should also make it clear that in the name of moral relativism there is no problem with torturing children in Cambodia because they are poor, for example, and then travel back home to USA and be law-abiding because they are generally rich. And it is by this "flaw" in moral relativism that I find it not credible. Moral relativism is without merit. It does not seem to defend anything at all and given possible longitudinal effects of living according to moral relativism, there is no guarantee against people becoming morally blind in living by it because of the severe immorality people can commit under its lieu!
For the above citation, see for example p. 54 of Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals by I. Kant. (Classic Books International)
It isn't true that morality is relative to the individual because the psychological "flaws" are the same whether a torturer of a child is from Vietnam or USA.
The objective morality, i.e. Kantian Ethics, carries weight everywhere in the World and you can't claim a right to do evil in China just because human rights (UDHR) are weaker there. The Evil-doers know they do evil everywhere and they become psychologically afflicted by that whether here or there in the World.
That's PROOF that morality is objective! (Even though this follows logically from "Kantian Moral Psychology" that I've founded not long ago.
Ethical inferences - Though reading Kant grants you more beauty of Ethics
To say you only have moral obligation to yourself can actually entail a lot of issues.
So in having a moral obligation to yourself, you may have an interest in supporting others so that they may support you. Agree? So it follows, the net of people with whom you are connected to may see the same for you in you supporting them.
In a sense, therefore, we get to the point of The Golden Rule of the Bible:
Matthew 7:12 ESV
The Golden Rule - 12 "So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets."
And further, let's say that morality reflects a kind of traffic, whether planes, ships, cars, buses, trains, the rest... Only that this "traffic" is that between human beings and all relations to human beings, also nature, that's described by (Kantian) Ethics and the actual actions as (Kantian) Morality.
For the flow of society, in saying you have an interest in you, "but of no other", why should you have a value above others in all of this "traffic" of society?
Can you on behalf of society say that only you are supposed to be valued? No! Everybody must be valued and every "traffic accident" (between human beings and the rest) should be reported on given all people's self-interest.
And still, why live in a society if you only value yourself? Is it not that one lives in a society for the love of life, for the genuine interest in other people and all that takes place in terms of (democratically) lawful behaviour?
Note: To absurd people complaining about "all the rules of ethical and moral life", you may want to point to the fact they never complain about the traffic regulations for their driver's license.
On Intellectualism and Ethics as Intuitive, comment on Jeremy David Fix and his paper, Intellectual Isolation
Given that you can grow up with intelligence and the senses, there's nothing better than to be informed so to make judgments based on (ever) growing wisdom or intellectualism.
Intellectualism doesn't mean absence of intelligence or senses. It means knowledge of the World and knowledge does indeed empower the ability for an intelligent agenda along with the senses. You don't become stupid by increased knowledge, your ability to act more intelligently becomes greater!
Intellectualism also including intelligence and the senses must thus be victorious!
"Though intellectualism can be expressed as a computer program like this: ‘the facts, reality, are prior and dictate what is to be said, if it is knowledge’, it doesn't remove intelligence and the senses to do what's right or good according to Kantian ethics."
Jeremy David Fix; Intellectual Isolation, Mind, Volume 127, Issue 506, 1 April 2018, Pages 491–520, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzx046
Note: rather than taking part in a silly exercise, it must be said that Kantian Ethics is now the Gold Standard and basis for Kantian Moral Psychology in determining the level of morality in a person quite accurately. See also metabolism reading or electrometer reading off-the-skin nervous system reader.
Let's say knowledge of reality on issues such as the death penalty, assisted suicide, prison sentence or psychiatric incarceration for this or other length, favourism for women or minor ethnicities... The children are simply not up for it.
The Bad People List
* Apart from "at the very last, they risk dying of stupidity by nervous system breakdown, spine, feelings and brain being parts."
* They tend to divert from normal, straight sexuality to sado-masochism to sadistic pedophilia to torture of kids for satisfaction to all out seeking the worst forms of sadistic, sodomistic acts. Note that there is mild schizophrenia and to the very end of "category"-schizophrenia which is the all out search for sadistic, sodomistic acts. They also risk losing their penises (by "cancer") and their wombs (the cellular walls come out the vagina, also a kind of "cancer"). At the very end, their sex is nothing what we regard normally as on-screen porn.
* Failure and errors tend to grow on them as they decline in their downward spiral of insanity.
* When they're not stimulated they tend to become more and more stupid.
* You have the usual list of schizophrenic symptoms like language breakdown, cognitive breakdown (inability to think), demons and angels by voices in their heads become more and more common to their decision-making. At the end, they are only these voices.
* They consider themselves as sh*t and of no value. This goes for others too and whatever the World "outside" is.
* They lose possibility for using words like intelligence, mind, morality, ethics, dingity and so on and they stick to physical objects in "navigating the World". Physical objects confirm them of their beings, especially when they hold on to them.
* They can stare for hours into air for tiniest particles (given they have vision for this) and "generate thoughts about them".
* Some lose the ability to live inside a proper home they own, "professional homeless people".
* At the very end, they enjoy darkness and sit and stare into it in a basement or something, perhaps humid, and think the most immoral thoughts, "unable to stand light".
* They do not handle money or finances very well or entirely losing that ability.
* They may be a hazard to themselves in an instant, doing injury to themselves or killing themselves with whatever that seems suitable or is perceived as possibility.
* They start to enjoy feces and urine and at the very end has a passion for sewage and for "special kinds of feces", believe it or not.
* They have no regard for people's health or well-being, most certainly at the extreme end. Even at a medium stage, they can't stand children or they hurt them or worse.
* As the body starts to attack itself, (self-generated) voices in the head as a possible symptom, they generate infections more and more. Their risky behaviour makes them acquire all sorts of bacteria, viruses and parasites.
* Some BAD people are so utterly bad that they are treated as special waste in terms of "garbage handling". This is a secret from the trade of the coroner! Add this to the special insurance trade secret of "tainted buildings" by "creepy animal/spectre/phantom" making the building unusable.
* They also die easily, with blood flowing out of a single gun wound! This comes in addition to them not handling weapons "very well", that is, they handle weapons poorly or have no handling at all.
* May be intensely obsessed with work, doing work in order to present themselves as people. Though, with poor or very poor job execution most or all the time!
* Their poor brains may even require little energy and thus, paradoxically, enable them to do unnaturally long work shifts, do much (manual?) work. Possible medical comparison to being under the effects of amphetamine? Or perhaps they are cheating with amphetamine more often because crime and illegal drugs...
* Bad people may take on colours of evil, their skin (here or there on the body) becomes suddenly or other coloured, be they blue, purple, pink, gray, black, orange, red, brown or green. The colours make no good impression. The most evil people turn entirely black, top to toe, before something else
* More... ???
Warning! Investigating this stuff can be very dangerous! Please, be very cautious!
Already, you may say that the moral blindness is certainly not desirable and I can't warn people enough of going that way to moral blindness and the schizophrenia downward spiral.
You can, of course, read Hervey Cleckley's The Mask of Sanity (or what I will call: The Monster Behind the Mask of Human Being). Buy any you like, but note they vary in length. I have the 3rd ed., 1955.
"Tell me if I'm wrong!"
It's important to note that psychiatry can do a lot for people suffering mental illness, also those suffering from schizophrenia. Some way get to appear quite normal with much of the symptoms nullified for time of medication and other treatment. See comments under mSomatism (Modified Somatism).
Note to the Good People List: The World is full of troubles and these can be severe to you. Therefore, be sure to get your antidepressants medication in order to fight "stupid thoughts" that give rise to worries or deep worries. These are early symptoms. Severe depression immobilize you, puts you in bed, "freezing stiff" with anxieties and very dark thoughts. See the Development (SSRI/SNRI) here, on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_and_discovery_of_SSRI_drugs . Also see The Good People List on Facebook.
With respects to The Bad People List and the incredible advantages of being a (Kantian) ethical and moral person, I have this:
What are they supposed to offer us? More evil? As they are evil, can they ever be trusted? As "b*tt-stupid" is their name, they are unlikely to be able to offer you anything of significance to your life!
Suggested addition to Medical Ethics Code:
It should be seen as correct to euthanise or palliatively give an overdose of anaesthetics if it takes extra measures in order to treat a patient. That is, one can not be required to become a monster in order to provide treatment to an extreme personality which commands you to make it leave the surface of the Earth or becoming a monster with it!
I must note that it can't be a necessity to become a monster in order to provide medicine to people!
Note: Kantian Ethics is the Gold Standard of the World, "now or earlier", also by science (psychology, Kantian Moral Psychology).
Update, The Good People List
* "magic" ejection by fantastic nature of objects that imply great dangers or pains, such as bullets, criminal implants, small or larger, impaling objects, etc. - only to people and animals of sufficient worth or character
Relating to Hunger Strikers
First, an objection to the rather strict procedural routine for physicians. It's my view that, as long one passes the "test" as urge for dying because of pains, mental and physical in rejecting food and drink, one should have the right to die with no further delay!
The "patient", the starving can d*mn well communicate any need or change of plans for as long the starving goes on, appx. 2-3 months of starving, depending on the rejection of drink that can hasten the ordeal to only 12-15 days.
Note too: It actually takes a lot of moral character or stiff consequences (of torture/difficult life whatever/abuse whatever/etc.). Therefore, this regiment seems "a bit" unappropriate given the usual character of a physician ("who are likely to be no angels").
Link, WMA: WMA DECLARATION OF MALTA ON HUNGER STRIKERS
https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-malta-on-hunger-strikers/
For the Hunger Strikers, see also "The Intellectual Defence for Suicide" and "Rational Suicide" on Wikipedia by note on Jews in concentration camps throwing themselves on the electrical fence so to die!
Either way, the (Kantian) ethical command for people who are dying is that they are entitled to die in peace and silence!
Reminder, the duties toward animals:
Please use tazers set specifically for the type of animals (even whales, yes, a really powertool of a tazer) to slaughter so that their pains are limited as much as possible!
The veterinary duty to animals noted.
#VetsEthics #AnimalEthics #PETA #KantianEthics #AnimalWelfare #Veterinary #Science
Animal ethics and being vegan (Veganism)
Statement on being Vegan
I now support veganism (being vegan) as the likely future (Kantian) ethical and moral way of being and it is scientifically unproblematic too! With no dependency on meat, either indirectly or directly. Thus, being vegan is going to be worldwide in some 50 years or beyond.
Clearly as well, vegetarianism is a step in that direction too and good for now!
The science for now:
beta-Carotene and long-tracted electro-petri-dish involved as science, what I can figure now, as well as the ordinary "soup" for generating meat...
More on this later. (The science for it and so on.)
Reminder, The Future Is GeoThermal for Electrical Power Generation!
I'd like to add my voice to those who say the future is GeoThermal. There seems to be abundance of energy to be drawn from Earth itself.
GeoThermal Power, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_power
#BatteryParks #BatteryEnergy #UN @UN #WorldBank @UNDP
#GeoThermal #FutureisBright #UDHR #HumanRights @IMF - The Future is Electrical Power!
(Norwegian:)
Valg i Sverige - Jeg foreslår følgende spørsmål til politikerne
Vorspiel for valg i Norge og for det som kommer!
Hvordan stiller de seg til Utopia?
Hvordan vil de arbeide for Utopia?
Når tenker de at Utopia kan oppnås?
Hva tenker de om De 4 Faktorer? ("Valgfritt")
Hvordan ønsker de å forbedre folks menneskerettigheter?
Hva tenker de om forbedring av rettssystemet?
Hva tenker de om pistoler eller revolvere til befolkningen?
Hva tenker de om pepperspray til befolkningen?
- Hvilken aldersgrense for dette? 14? 16?
Hva tenker de om løgndetektorer, 5 metoder +?
- Løgndetektorer kan hjelpe mye mot miljøkriminalitet...?
- Også til politiet og rettssalene?
Hva tenker de om radio-baserte skanner portaler?
- "Mot 500 uønskede tilstander i mennesker"?
Hva er den spesifiserte listen for sosial rettferdighet?
Tenker dere at pistoler, revolvere, pepperspray, løgndetektorer (5 metoder +) og radio-baserte skanner portaler kan være bra for industri og forretninger? Jeg tenker på boomen i USA vs. middelmådighet i "crooked" Europa...
I tillegg kommer alle de vanlige spørsmålene... Miljøet? Økologiske tiltak? Arbeidsløshet? (Stats-)Budsjettbalanse? Pengepolitikken? Resten...
Prediksjon: Venstresiden kommer til å utmerke seg negativt!
#Sverige #Val #Valg #Politik #Politikk
Listen kan gjerne forbedres. Jeg får se hva jeg finner på eller finner av informasjon.
Mrk.: Våre politikere får det ikke noe lettere enn i Sverige! "Nå tar vi dem! Revolusjon!"
Merknad også om at vilje til ondskap, til tortur og drap, til karakterdrap på alle mennesker fører til at man defineres som Monster bak ansiktet (Mask of Sanity), Fiende av menneskeheten! Spesielt i stillinger med (mye) ansvar, for eksempel politikere, politi, militæret, advokater og dommere, legene og journalister og historikere (media).
Animal Ethics - "Personality Disorder of Horses"
The notion of "cold-blooded" horses has to die! To produce cold blooded horses must be considered abuse of animals!
Enemies of animals? #PETA @PETA #VetsMedicine #AnimalEthics #VeterinaryScience #Careforanimals
General election in Sweden, 9. September 2018. - I suggest the following questions to the politicians.
Before elections in Norway and everywhere else in the World.
How do they view Utopia?
How do they want to work for Utopia?
When do they think that Utopia can be achieved? (Countrywise)
What do they think about The 4 Factors? ("Optional")
How do they want to improve people's human rights (UDHR)?
What do they think about improving the legal system?
How do they want to improve the legal system?
What do they think about pistols or revolvers to the general population?
What do they think about pepper spray to the population?
- What should the required age be for this? 14? 16? 18?
What do they think about the lie detectors, 5 methods +?
- Lie detectors can also aid in combatting crimes against environment...?
- Also to the police and the courts?
What do they think about radio-based scanner portals?
- "Against 500 unwanted conditions in human beings"?
What is the specified list for social justice?
Do you think that pistols, revolvers, pepper spray, lie detectors (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals can be good for industry and business in general? I'm thinking about the business boom in USA vs. mediocracy in "crooked" Europe...
In addition, of course, come all the usual questions... Environmental protection? Ecological measures? Unemployment? (State-) Budget balance responsibility? Central bank politics? Immigration, also by UN recommendation? The rest...
Prediction: The Left is going to stand out negatively!
#Sverige #Val2018 #Election #Politik #TheWorld #Politics #Utopia
The list may well be improved. I'll see what I can add or find elsewhere of information.
Note (1): Our politicians will not get it any easier than in Sweden! (Norway, else...)
Note (2): That will to evil, to torture and murder, to character murder of all people leads to the fact that one is defined as Monster behind the (human) face (Mask of Sanity), Enemy of Humanity! Especially in offices, positions of power and trust, with (much) responsibility, for example, politicians, police, military, lawyers and judges, physicians and journalists and historians (media).
Note (3): The Human Being of Law established! Not the political animals anymore (Aristotle's definition of man as a political animal (zoon politikon)). See here on the blog, Human Being of Law (2013): https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-human-being-of-law-legal-duties-of.html. I can also mention Kantian Moral Psychology for determining accurately the level of ethical/moral mentality in all people!
#Election in #Sweden: 9 September! 16 days to go! Voting is already open until and including 9 September. Election day: voting stations open 8 am to 8 pm (8:00 to 20:00). #The4Factors #Progress #Val2018 #Sverige #Countdown
All #elections and other #political events will decide who are #HumanBeings with sanity and who are #EnemiesofHumanity - #Monsters behind the faces of human beings. #The4Factors must happen! #AgainstEvil #Evilmustdie! @CNN @UN @cnni #Humanity #UDHR #HumanRights #Morality #Ethics
For the Future of a More Perfect World
The path forward is to vote for right wing politics and keep voting right wing politics in order to increase pressure for the good solutions including The 4 Factors.
Bottom line for right wing politics: freedom of thought, privacy rights, laws and regulations including human rights for business life and private initiative! If they fail this, they are logically replaced along with the socialists and the others.
Of course, the socialists (and communists) will continue to be weak on human rights (UDHR/The International Bill of Rights) and fighting crime, improving the legal system, admitting no learning from those other horrible crimes against humanity usually involving torture and character killing of the youngest and upward!
Much of the history of socialists involves genocides and mass killings. Just check with history: Stalin, Hitler, Red Khmer, Mao Zedong, etc., etc...
* The 4 Factors: revolvers and pistols, pepper spray, lie detection array (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals ("against 500 unwanted ills in human beings"). (Now The 5 Factors, including Best Practice Psychiatry.)
For the Future of a More Perfect World (2)
While on the right wing one must seek to demand the best candidates there for leading and take nominations and offices as or when they get elected. If there is this only answer, we choose the best people! Hurray!
On Disturbing Corruption - Warning! I warn you!
Let's assume that it's hard or very risky to speak about corruption and torture in very corrupt places.
Thus, very corrupt places may not have much discussion of corruption and torture at all.
Thus further, all the marks of democracy broken down similarly!
Applied Ethics - Prisoners and Long Prison Sentences
I think one should grant prisoners who serve long prison sentences to be offered lethal palliative care (by approved medication). Prison life can be tough to deal with and if one has little to live for then lethal palliative care can be a good way out for them and their victims. This can also make prisons no more "evil" than necessary.
As before, the only ways of execution that I support are by firing squad and guillotine.
People should know there are consequences in being immoral. Such that an estimate of mine says that 50 (very) immoral people die for every 1 good person (USA). That number may change to 100 vs. 1 in ("crooked") Europe. Also because there are fewer good people here (in Europe).
The Bad People are much more afraid of abuse and torture than The Good People! And it gets no better the more insane they are, i.e., deeper down the "category"-schizophrenia! Ref.: Activisation of bad memories and with it, bad behaviour, bad attitudes.
Stem Cell "Technology" - Reminder
It may very well be that stem cell research and technology are pseudo-science. I have yet to see that there is a single commercial product of it now, many years after the start.
Fraud? Corrupt physicians? Has it ever moved beyond "experimental status"? Just very dubious how slow this looks!
For Veganism further
Rather than using fish oil from "grained sources", one may use bio-technology and electrode-petri-dish principle to produce the substance from which one can make fish oil!
Against insanity in the World - Professional ethics update for IT administrators
There is a way by OR gate testing in the operationalized sense that can prevent servers self-ignite and prevent insane material of the most horrible and evil kind from being sent from one place to another. Thus, we can prevent a lot of insanity in the World if action is taken to incorporate such a mechanism.
I suggest also that this pertains to professional ethics for IT administrators to see through!
Given the nukes issues:
why shouldn't war be costly?
especially the unjust ones?
It seems to me that abandoning nukes can make a nation think that conventional war can be a viable option with mayhem and abuse of the population to go!
The full issues of the nukes debate, thank you! All arguments must be in place!
Abolition of Torture, see main post at the top, I add:
Given My Argument for Total Prohibition of Torture by Overwhelming Military Force and Technology
Facts about torture: only ethical and moral people can stand hard torture! Suggesting they have ethical and moral force and therefore are not needed to torture unless violating international agreement on treatment of P.O.W.s
The unethical and immoral people, however, they are interrogated the most easily. You only need to threaten them with torture and possibly roughen them up in the process to make them talk and in addition, you can set them up for one small dose of e.g. opiates and then wait some and then they start squealing like the kids and talk comes out in streams for their usual addiction to whatever that is found on them on the combat field!
Judgment: the blame for all or most heroin abuse and other goes primarily to the (corrupt) psychiatrists of the World. They have been making deals with corrupt police to make people heroin addicts or thereof. At least there are many indicators pointing to the foul workings of corrupt psychiatrists in unison with corrupt police and others.
Again: The 4 Factors with the Best Practice Psychiatry will eradicate all drug abuse. Proper work and all drug abuse can be eradicated Worldwide the next 20 years.
Thus, The 5 Factors, including Best Practice Psychiatry. Shootie, peppie, lie detect and scanning.
#ProfessionalEthics #KantianEthics
On Black Money (#BlackMoney): Greed -> Black Money / "Easy money" -> Schizophrenia (deeper or other) -> Evil, straight -> Secretly social client, no sense of money, fixated on evil, passion for s*wage! #NoHumanBeing #Evil #Schizophrenia #S3wageLife #Monster #Greed #AgainstEvil
Further to the Kantian Ethics descriptive program:
A couple objections to the whining of good people's lives,
1. They always enjoy the results of the work from good people yet hate g.p.'s lives.
2. They always complain about g.p.'s character, but never the horrible, evil people!
You know what? Get a $%&($%+×÷$% GRIP!
#KantianEthics #GoodPeople
Kantian Ethics is no easier than your average buying of insurance, for home, for car, for anything.
Thus for murder it may say:
1. You should not murder
1.1 Except in self-defence
1.1.1 Except when intervening to avoid mass shooting by an active shooter or so
1.2 Except when qualifying for the death sentence
1.2.1 Except when mandated by the Business Conventions under the lack of action by corrupt people (Perhaps!!!)
1.3 Except when in need of terminal palliative treatment
This is only for instances of killing. But life is complex and complex Kantian Ethics is far better in providing ethics compass in life than all the other choices. Compare with democratic laws and regulations, please!
Kantian Ethics is no easier than your average buying of insurance, for home, for car, for anything.
Thus for murder it may say:
1. You should not murder
1.1 Except in self-defence
1.1.1 Except when intervening to avoid mass shooting by an active shooter or so
1.2 Except when qualifying for the death sentence
1.2.1 Except when mandated by the Business Conventions under the lack of action by corrupt people (Perhaps!!!)
1.3 Except when in need of terminal palliative treatment
This is only for instances of killing. But life is complex and complex Kantian Ethics is far better in providing ethics compass in life than all the other choices. Compare with democratic laws and regulations, please!
And further, we (of Mysticism) say insanity MORE and they will _not_ even be allowed the smallest excuse for it even, no matter how hard HIT they may be!
Q.E.D.