What I'm saying is that ethical living may lead to (better) after-life! If not only the good consequences of ethical living in this life, that is, both for society and family and friends and yourself, ethical living proves valuable (given that there may only be this "cold grave")!
The logic:
Prem. 1: Ethical living -> hope of (great) after-life "and possibly more, i.e., God/Heaven"
Prem. 2: If not (great) after-life -> ethical living -> Very good consequences in this life, society, family, friends, yourself
(Deduction)
Conclusion: Ethical living proves worthwhile in every respect!
What if ethical living proves crucial for all this hope in God or what if there's something fantastic in death by living ethically? What is the responsibility for those against this? It seems they risk very little by insisting on a "cold grave" and being "scientific" despite the very stories of the many Near-Death Experiences and Out-of-body experiences! Why do they bother if the answer isn't to spread the corrupt mind?
(By this, finally, I hope to shove all Atheists into Secular Humanism or Humanism with Atheism!)
Speculation, suggestion for inquiry:
ReplyDeleteAre there more Atheists on heroin than religious people?
Heroin may be an indicator for several issues in society.
The dishonest #Atheism
ReplyDeleteI would say, today and possibly before, that to be an Atheist seems straightforward dishonest! They are hiding something. Can it be their immorality? Their war on "dignified" human kind? Why are they not (secular/Atheist) Humanists instead? They have the urge to fight any investigation that declares souls, telepathy, regeneration and reincarnation to be true? That they fight parts of science that can lead to moral progress? That they fight progress that may lead to more religious people?
Thus, the World should embrace #Christianity and other religions!
"It's dangerous to be an (#immoral) #Atheist in a group with other (immoral) Atheists because some of us are #monsters!"
ReplyDelete(Immoral Atheist because they choose tobe Atheists and not (Secular/Atheist) good Humanists!) #Morality #Christian #ChristianLife #Kantianism #ChristianEthics
I would say, today and possibly before, that to be an Atheist seems straightforward dishonest! They are hiding something. Can it be their immorality? Their war on "dignified" human kind? Why are they not (secular/Atheist) Humanists instead? They have the urge to fight any investigation that declares souls, telepathy, regeneration and reincarnation to be true? That they fight parts of science that can lead to moral progress? That they fight progress that may lead to more religious people?
ReplyDeleteOne word: DISHONESTY!
I'm curious and wondering:
How does it feel to be an Atheist? Are you sad a lot, being without the hope for Heaven? Do you think about evil a lot? Do you try to relate to the World as objects so that you do not think so much about the ethical and moral issues? Are you paranoid a lot over the evil in the World? Tell us more about your lives as Atheists!
How is it exactly that you are more scientific than others, especially the religious? How do you practice the scientific life? Do you read a lot? Do you like to contribute to society? In what ways? What type of charity work do you like the most? Working with homeless and drug addicts? Working with housing issues? Being against capitalism? Occupy the stock exchanges of the World?
Note: INXS, Questions, youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8uzPSEery0
I think an extreme point is whether belief in God or not makes people worse or better in relating to reality.
ReplyDeleteI can't see that Atheists are supposed to be superior at all. Actually, I regard Atheists to be inferior by far in their general disregard for morality by common ethics so to cause in themselves all these schizophrenic delusions and other stupidity which I also suspect is a passion of theirs!
You need to understand the plain messages... Atheism is going nowhere... Dead in... x years?