"Friend" or Friend (truly) - The character to go

As I may be accused of being this awful danger to everybody (by Norwegian state crime missile turret from the light-house), I can add this to "common people over humanity" today, 2013-09-29 CEST:

When do you know that

* you try to make contact with another tech-eyes/tech-ears (can be two and one only, on and off, separately) person, these problems and other?
* you try to make contact with this (very) corrupt mind, serial killer or other? Psychiatrist class or other, i.e., serial killer club issues?
* you try to make contact, but come across as impolite because your "style" (or your smell of a**, incredibly enough) does not suit (the misjudgment of character as matter of clothes, behaviour, features of the body because of the state of society in being corrupt) the recipient and that therefore you are ripe for killing directly or to do great harm to you first?

NO! Because you DON'T! See for yourself how easy it is when everybody is supposed to accuse of "hundred character flaws", usually falsely, I presume! Very easy... Try to mean anything, try to be somebody... (Heh-heh-heh, staring death right into the face yourself!)

"Pleased to meet you! I hope you guess my name!"

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAgT8FpJbPY

Concerning character traits, more explicit or not (Mother takes over Norman's mind, Psycho by Alfred Hitchcock):

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYDxxHrlmUg

PS: In the meanwhile, your friend-to-be may have received a bit of "police-approved" personality conversion. Now where to JUMP, mr./mrs./ms. BUNNY?!

As matter of "Philosophy of Friendship":

1. point: Weapons, conventional, non-military and non-lethal to ALL!

Before this, the European friend is a duality at best, 10 dangers around the corner instantly. Well, well, write it off as self-pity to the strangeness in the World all you bother..., but it comes down to a good neighbour and the sense that people can reach, can enjoy life as much as yourself, the "Love to next of kin/human being" by Jesus and the New Testament, if not the point from 10 Commandments.

The Forms after Plato - Some History of Christianity - Respects to Rev. Luther of Germany

- If one seeks to hold the forms, by Plato/Augustine, the highest with any church, one commits a worse deadly sin than any other deadly sin and it is, by consequence, to strike away these 3 important groups from the Bible, out of which one is "only" ignorance:

- Stricken: The 7/8 Virtues (8th as "Conscientia".)
- Stricken: The 10 Commandments
- Ignored: The 7/8 Vices
-- with the 8th Vice being stick with the Forms, i.e., the rituals, the words themselves only formally, the invokes, by theory of theology, an Induction to Christianity as a kind of religious test of nature to actually make Christians by having them to say words and to undergo religious rituals, the liturgy, the highest, that is, to support the formalities of the Church, any set, incl. possibly all, higher than the Word of God to one's own soul, the Bible, also by the deepest understanding itself.

Therefore, considering the Evangelical-Lutheran Church today, by Christianity, there is only one thing to conclude with: it holds STRENGTH and so much so too, honouring St. Peter, the Rock of Faith, higher/highest too, equal to the honours that St. Peter evidently receives by the Catholic Church.

(Please follow the Bible primarily, and with heart and soul too. Respects.)