First of all, when I write that "Coloristics is restored as science" per linguistic science, I intend to say: Coloristics is restored as science by the written description as account of (coloristics-) impression, much like telepathy, but that coloristics is much more personal and much more refined!!! Don't mess with it! I'm warning you!
You may want to check out:
Url: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coloristic
and
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/coloristic
Well, well, the net says this and that, but Coloristics has a peculiar history, one more successful (now) than fx. Craniology, ref. Philosophy of Science.
Ref. also, the impressions of the German flag, by the 3 colours, being one (prime) example!
To science-"freaks" of CERN: No, ISOLDE is no alchemy! Alpha-radiation? Anybody?
Showing posts with label psychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychology. Show all posts
Sunday, 2 June 2013
Saturday, 16 March 2013
Telepathy - the inquiry continues with new leads too
In terms of Ganzfeld Zimmer experiments (only sound isolation, no special light other than slight dimming of white light), that this way may provide better use:
1. Make sure the participants have open minds for it, that they are prepared to accept such, telepathy, or have a weak/strong suspicion towards it.
2. Make sure they are emotionally prepared, that they are told of the "respects toward own feelings routine" before entering the experiment and that this preparation can be academically improved, by a type of guidance, opposite sex/gender or not. There is also the question whether the participants should bring friends/acquaintances they are confident with, and I think this represents a good beginning, although, there are probably other ways that work too, Helsinki-Declaration in hand, general research ethics...
3. Some (para-)psychologists may have "strong opinions" on the outcome and are not fit or suitable for conducting this type of research, they should be removed from (every) possible set of researchers...
Importantly: There is also a bigger, tacit assumption to this "game" and it is how the senses/the feelings relate to this, FORCING the entire psychology onto a new direction by train rails, that a finding probably sends a battalion of idiots right out to where they belong...!!!
Important 2: That we go with alpha-numbers at 5% or lower, that the Zener cards are kept to 4, that the subjects are to choose a comfort zone as options provide inside the Ganzfeld-zimmers. That an outcome on 8% means success, if not the very numbers higher up!
Good luck!
Further note (beyond Good luck):
I find that lie-detectors can be useful as post-experiment control.
We may use these questions:
1. Have you done your best during this experiment? (Presumably yes.)
2. Have you been open to the question of telepathy? (Presumably yes.)
3. Are you convinced now to the question of telepathy? (Open to yes/no.)
Remember that the presence of lie-detectors can heighten the seriousness of the experiment (to some subjects, maybe not all).
Notes:
1. One book to start with, in determining a whole field of all, papers and books alike, all "meta-studies included", but intelligently... This book fx. has an ESP topic to it: http://www.amazon.ca/Introduction-Psychology-Dr-Rod-Plotnik/dp/0495903442/ - +/- page 139. Introduction to Psychology - Hardcover: 768 pages, Publisher: Wadsworth Publishing; 9 edition (Feb 25 2010), Language: English, ISBN-10: 0495903442, ISBN-13: 978-0495903444.
2. Urls: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganzfeld_experiment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepathy (only Wikipedia for now, sorry.)
3. Remember to add the "Truthiness"-aspects...
as notion to the researchers themselves or others, by the questionnaires to the participants or so...
4. Here is an interesting link further: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=26367.0 that includes "some views/findings" on the Ganzfeld studies altogether...
5. You know, when the god-d*mn sociologists can't f*cking relate to PRIMARY literature, sitting on a "golden degree" that they probably never should have had and poor in reading the very literature, if not the Scientology itself... then what about our "friends", the psychologists... Probably not all...
Monday, 4 February 2013
Over IQ Testing, The Bell Curve and the Future
I have updated the message to you so that it now looks like this:
For political reasons and having entered the US registry first(?), I bring some point of view if you want it:
It should now be noted that the question of intelligence has remained largely/wholly undecided over whether IQ could be connected with humanistic values or not! Now that I've written about insanity and other and achieved reputation more, also for other efforts, I, for one, call for decision IN FAVOUR PRO-humanistic values in connection with the IQ scale that better reflect the actual performance of intelligence with the intellectuals of the World, scientists, engineers, and writers alike, all included!
My latest before the above, "having been involved since the 80s":
In responding to these new "contextual-intelligence" idiots, I just want to say right away that I support the testing standards of intelligence (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and Raven's Progressive Matrices, predominantly, also by the usual Mensa notions or conventions) and not these "contextual-intelligence" idiots. That to refer to contextual intelligence is to me a way to disguise a kind of stupidity, and the "contextual-intelligence" stories are all too easy to mock, as much as the story goes with "Magic-Moment-at-Drinking-Beer-at-the-Local-Pub" in saving the World from nuclear holocaust and acquiring this utmost /highest/ "contextual-intelligence" because at this special moment, and having trained for beer-drinking a very long time, and seeing this moment coming too, Beer-Drinking Jack from the local factory scores the "ultimate point" again!
Be this the "John G." spot of Jochum's Pub in Fars(-e)und "kommune" or not!
I also happen to support the notion that intelligence testing is to happen neutrally, in the absolute sense, and that intelligence is NOT a social phenomenon, but a measure to rate the functioning of a (healthy) brain in order to predict who is the most successful, and that, even by the psychologists, that the scale is meant to, as Adjustment-updated, reflect the direct performance in science and ALL f*cking else!
(Not because you ask for permission for taking a test, under the torture -clinic, being socially "allowed" to score this or that! Also, by tech-eyes, that are invalidating, not because of the victim, but because of this implant-administering retard who has rejected ethics and Helsinki-declaration altogether and "plays" this very important GAM(I)E.)
Also, I find this insistence on the Bell's Curve insulting because it has roots in a (racist-)USA (to Palestinians or poor Africans, because USA is so intelligent is actually scores so high that it moves the "quota" from Africa to its (god-d*mn)self! I also hold it to the Bell Curve people themselves in that they are academically demanded to say "peaceful circumstances for testing or be thrown out of the good society!
"Also scoring 151/200 not under the torture clinic!"
So a new approach to testing on a more *precise* and *real* basis can be this:
1. The test as before.
2. An additional test array involving a kind of strongly limited personality testing, determining a kind of self-confidence
3. The testing management (as people, three perhaps) then gives an additional "aesthetic" value for "police code as requirement of corrupt personality"/"monkey-business"
Final: These 3 steps may be/should be necessary in order to spark a new debate over future progress of human kind and that subversion against this kind of (voluntary) research falls (strictly) outside academic standards. Personality is investigated in line with Jungian traditions.
I think there's also good reason to say that US intelligence by fx. CIA and McCarthyism may have been more interested in the personality issues than hitherto known! A slight point on the pre-WW2 suspicions as history writing.
[For the "worried": THIS IS ABOUT THE VERY RESEARCH. NOT THE CINEMA NEAR YOU.]
The "...additional "aesthetic" value..." may be considered set as a kind of "clairvoyance/"seeing the band-track" or other (see Bem of the Cornell University).
Lastly and most easy to start with:
A comment on IQ - The newest read-out - The Neuro-Values from the forehead "area":
We list "by suspicion":
upward...200 - 1010 mA190 - 1009 mA180 - 1008 mA
...
130 - 1003 mA
Match up yourself... "Get your neuro-reader today!"
(First to my Facebook profile, this last comment added.)
For political reasons and having entered the US registry first(?), I bring some point of view if you want it:
It should now be noted that the question of intelligence has remained largely/wholly undecided over whether IQ could be connected with humanistic values or not! Now that I've written about insanity and other and achieved reputation more, also for other efforts, I, for one, call for decision IN FAVOUR PRO-humanistic values in connection with the IQ scale that better reflect the actual performance of intelligence with the intellectuals of the World, scientists, engineers, and writers alike, all included!
My latest before the above, "having been involved since the 80s":
In responding to these new "contextual-intelligence" idiots, I just want to say right away that I support the testing standards of intelligence (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and Raven's Progressive Matrices, predominantly, also by the usual Mensa notions or conventions) and not these "contextual-intelligence" idiots. That to refer to contextual intelligence is to me a way to disguise a kind of stupidity, and the "contextual-intelligence" stories are all too easy to mock, as much as the story goes with "Magic-Moment-at-Drinking-Beer-at-the-Local-Pub" in saving the World from nuclear holocaust and acquiring this utmost /highest/ "contextual-intelligence" because at this special moment, and having trained for beer-drinking a very long time, and seeing this moment coming too, Beer-Drinking Jack from the local factory scores the "ultimate point" again!
Be this the "John G." spot of Jochum's Pub in Fars(-e)und "kommune" or not!
I also happen to support the notion that intelligence testing is to happen neutrally, in the absolute sense, and that intelligence is NOT a social phenomenon, but a measure to rate the functioning of a (healthy) brain in order to predict who is the most successful, and that, even by the psychologists, that the scale is meant to, as Adjustment-updated, reflect the direct performance in science and ALL f*cking else!
(Not because you ask for permission for taking a test, under the torture -clinic, being socially "allowed" to score this or that! Also, by tech-eyes, that are invalidating, not because of the victim, but because of this implant-administering retard who has rejected ethics and Helsinki-declaration altogether and "plays" this very important GAM(I)E.)
Also, I find this insistence on the Bell's Curve insulting because it has roots in a (racist-)USA (to Palestinians or poor Africans, because USA is so intelligent is actually scores so high that it moves the "quota" from Africa to its (god-d*mn)self! I also hold it to the Bell Curve people themselves in that they are academically demanded to say "peaceful circumstances for testing or be thrown out of the good society!
"Also scoring 151/200 not under the torture clinic!"
So a new approach to testing on a more *precise* and *real* basis can be this:
1. The test as before.
2. An additional test array involving a kind of strongly limited personality testing, determining a kind of self-confidence
3. The testing management (as people, three perhaps) then gives an additional "aesthetic" value for "police code as requirement of corrupt personality"/"monkey-business"
Final: These 3 steps may be/should be necessary in order to spark a new debate over future progress of human kind and that subversion against this kind of (voluntary) research falls (strictly) outside academic standards. Personality is investigated in line with Jungian traditions.
I think there's also good reason to say that US intelligence by fx. CIA and McCarthyism may have been more interested in the personality issues than hitherto known! A slight point on the pre-WW2 suspicions as history writing.
[For the "worried": THIS IS ABOUT THE VERY RESEARCH. NOT THE CINEMA NEAR YOU.]
The "...additional "aesthetic" value..." may be considered set as a kind of "clairvoyance/"seeing the band-track" or other (see Bem of the Cornell University).
Lastly and most easy to start with:
A comment on IQ - The newest read-out - The Neuro-Values from the forehead "area":
We list "by suspicion":
upward...200 - 1010 mA190 - 1009 mA180 - 1008 mA
...
130 - 1003 mA
Match up yourself... "Get your neuro-reader today!"
(First to my Facebook profile, this last comment added.)
Sunday, 9 December 2012
The Psychologists' Insistence on Social Scheming and Murder (of Old)!
One voice says, telepathic or not, to its followers, that former pres. "de Gaulle" [a name relevant to France in this matter] is to die inside the next 10 years.
The psychologists follow up with the usual "gaming" of carnivore nature, vowing and displaying "much feelings", drama!
Then the former pres. of France actually dies within the next 10 years, but nobody can say whether it has occured naturally or whether it has been a murder, the circumstances are indeed obscured.
Not only this, but some time after, another "head in the clouds" take on the blame for what he says is murder and that he now holds this great man's murder in his soul, that he is THIS BIG!
Now what does this mean, that if I say it's my nature to kill people and to present myself as an insult to the public at the same time, what is the significance of this?
And as this must be said to be self-confirming prophesis, then what? Aren't they insults all in all if they are to say this in FULL seriousness, in full academic honesty?
What if one is managing to present another case "on the other side", that people are by and large law-abiding, what is the meaning of this to the above?
And finally, why do we then have something that we call "the legal system" and consider this to be a brand-mark of civilisation, the meter we measure civilisation by?
So I just keep questioning these "carnivore-notions of old fashioned psychology"! Let's see where this goes! Cheers!
PS: Unnecessary to say perhaps that this places it with the demanded, of mine at least, Quality Revision of Psychology incl. the Erich Fromm dispositions and fascinations with diseases and the Scientism-Scientists debate against Resp.towardMysteries-Scientists, ethics in hand, soundly!
PS2: You may add some hidden assumptions by the police, the tacit "hate-management" assumptions of the old tradition, the "material" presented and the mSomatism of mine, relating to the cognition of right from wrong in describing Schizophrenia, a not-yet-dead-concept, to say it mildly!
The psychologists follow up with the usual "gaming" of carnivore nature, vowing and displaying "much feelings", drama!
Then the former pres. of France actually dies within the next 10 years, but nobody can say whether it has occured naturally or whether it has been a murder, the circumstances are indeed obscured.
Not only this, but some time after, another "head in the clouds" take on the blame for what he says is murder and that he now holds this great man's murder in his soul, that he is THIS BIG!
Now what does this mean, that if I say it's my nature to kill people and to present myself as an insult to the public at the same time, what is the significance of this?
And as this must be said to be self-confirming prophesis, then what? Aren't they insults all in all if they are to say this in FULL seriousness, in full academic honesty?
What if one is managing to present another case "on the other side", that people are by and large law-abiding, what is the meaning of this to the above?
And finally, why do we then have something that we call "the legal system" and consider this to be a brand-mark of civilisation, the meter we measure civilisation by?
So I just keep questioning these "carnivore-notions of old fashioned psychology"! Let's see where this goes! Cheers!
PS: Unnecessary to say perhaps that this places it with the demanded, of mine at least, Quality Revision of Psychology incl. the Erich Fromm dispositions and fascinations with diseases and the Scientism-Scientists debate against Resp.towardMysteries-Scientists, ethics in hand, soundly!
PS2: You may add some hidden assumptions by the police, the tacit "hate-management" assumptions of the old tradition, the "material" presented and the mSomatism of mine, relating to the cognition of right from wrong in describing Schizophrenia, a not-yet-dead-concept, to say it mildly!
Monday, 10 September 2012
The Insect Test for "Some" People - Last thing this week?
The test in spirit of Turing:
I'm sure that some people would answer dishonestly (inherently/by impulse) to the question of them being human being (i.e., the question whether they consider themselves Homo Sapiens (Sapiens)) and confirm the question of being an insect instead by the use of lie detectors (all 4 simult. or not) to make it all seriously investigated!
Good?
(Also a bit humourous, under McCarthyism?)
PS: Can the www.regjeringen.no soon make the premiere for Newsspeak, "bitte", as you have the fly-man himself right there?
I'm sure that some people would answer dishonestly (inherently/by impulse) to the question of them being human being (i.e., the question whether they consider themselves Homo Sapiens (Sapiens)) and confirm the question of being an insect instead by the use of lie detectors (all 4 simult. or not) to make it all seriously investigated!
Good?
(Also a bit humourous, under McCarthyism?)
PS: Can the www.regjeringen.no soon make the premiere for Newsspeak, "bitte", as you have the fly-man himself right there?
Tuesday, 7 August 2012
An Addition to the Cyberpunk Corpus as Prediction
What I'm trying to add to the note: The Theorem in Political Science for the Break against Nazi-Ideology or NOT! The theorem in political science for the break against Nazi-ideology or NOT! Over the code sentence as a matter of (the) "highest" intelligence of the Earth, "Microsoft is working", meaning to imply a World _in chains_, NO KIDDING, all carnivore included, to a World that is leaving its best ideals in the hands of the legacy of Nazi-Germany and Nazi-ideology where people have been (and WILL BE) systematically killed, this is the urgent call to download, at least, one other Operating System, outside Microsoft Operating System and Apple Operating System, as a matter of emergency or exclusively on own system!!! This is now or never! These people are actually moving in for IT!!! After this, given that they are successful, people WILL BE primates forever, potentially, the direct implication from above is the danger I warn you of now! Please, hurry (nr. 2)! (The first one is to act to reduce the Overpopulation problem, by natural means, by encouraging 1 or 2 (or rarely 3) kids, set into action by 1 - 3 Ministers of various departments, in a possible joint statement!) Not to kill you or anything, I hope you can contemplate it for some time to come (if at all). I feel as if this is the Cyberpunk version over 1984, almost as if reading William Gibson *live*!!! Well, well, I think you get it! Good luck! Remember also the code/key sentence "Microsoft is working", almost as in "Twelve Monkeys", that this includes all the most sick set-up, including all corrupt Police, all torturing health personnel and all of the rest of f*ck and hell on Earth, obviously including Monkey-biz!!!
Under this theorem:
Formal declaration of science: I hereby declare that Mysticism has deafeated the Scientism, the Scientists! This is a final verdict for what I consider the remaining time of humanity!Additionally, I predict that unless the obstructive part to this understanding dies away, the consequences will be severe for the entire Earth because of their, the Scientists, lack of sensitivity toward Ethics! So, Zeta, (greek letter) all matters considered the Earth is in a (strange) way HALTED in achieving progress in all fields, science broadly interpreted!Not that Scientism by this is any more serious. No, the primary matter here is how one considers Ethics to be a part of the Scientist's education, discipline and attitude in conducting science and in being a leader of science in society, i.e., how science plays out in the World by itself or in the expression of technology!
BTW, this addresses in particular the psychologists and psychiatrists and what "that industry generates", given by the above and as last section under the Theorem!
Over the Scientism-Scientists and (Respects-to-Mysteries/)Mysticism-Scientists, I have the following: The Scientism-Scientists can use all implants they want and commit all the moron monkey-biz sh*t, but they _will never_ achieve anything more than being mere academic (male/female) sl*ts, no matter what fraud they take part in! This is now more or less settled from my side. Let's see how they (try to) comply with the academic standards into the future!
Take care!
Note: NOT in any can it be perceived that the "Mystics" in this weak sense, respecting the mysteries of Nature, stand lower than the Scientists in terms of science and scientific seriousness and productivity! This writing is simply not for the (religious) Mystics!!!
(This may be considered a part of Cyberpunk aspects of prediction, as conceived by William Gibson.).
Note2: I've entered the Theorem here also, url: http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2012/02/theorem-in-political-science-for-break.html !
Note3: BTW, this addresses in particular the psychologists and psychiatrists and what "that industry generates", given by the above and as last section under the Theorem!
Note4: Over the Scientism-Scientists and (Respects-to-Mysteries/)Mysticism-Scientists, I have the following: The Scientism-Scientists can use all implants they want and commit all the moron monkey-biz sh*t, but they _will never_ achieve anything more than being mere academic (male/female) sl*ts, no matter what fraud they take part in! This is now more or less settled from my side. Let's see how they (try to) comply with the academic standards into the future!
Under this theorem:
Formal declaration of science: I hereby declare that Mysticism has deafeated the Scientism, the Scientists! This is a final verdict for what I consider the remaining time of humanity!Additionally, I predict that unless the obstructive part to this understanding dies away, the consequences will be severe for the entire Earth because of their, the Scientists, lack of sensitivity toward Ethics! So, Zeta, (greek letter) all matters considered the Earth is in a (strange) way HALTED in achieving progress in all fields, science broadly interpreted!Not that Scientism by this is any more serious. No, the primary matter here is how one considers Ethics to be a part of the Scientist's education, discipline and attitude in conducting science and in being a leader of science in society, i.e., how science plays out in the World by itself or in the expression of technology!
BTW, this addresses in particular the psychologists and psychiatrists and what "that industry generates", given by the above and as last section under the Theorem!
Over the Scientism-Scientists and (Respects-to-Mysteries/)Mysticism-Scientists, I have the following: The Scientism-Scientists can use all implants they want and commit all the moron monkey-biz sh*t, but they _will never_ achieve anything more than being mere academic (male/female) sl*ts, no matter what fraud they take part in! This is now more or less settled from my side. Let's see how they (try to) comply with the academic standards into the future!
Take care!
Note: NOT in any can it be perceived that the "Mystics" in this weak sense, respecting the mysteries of Nature, stand lower than the Scientists in terms of science and scientific seriousness and productivity! This writing is simply not for the (religious) Mystics!!!
(This may be considered a part of Cyberpunk aspects of prediction, as conceived by William Gibson.).
Note2: I've entered the Theorem here also, url: http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2012/02/theorem-in-political-science-for-break.html !
Note3: BTW, this addresses in particular the psychologists and psychiatrists and what "that industry generates", given by the above and as last section under the Theorem!
Note4: Over the Scientism-Scientists and (Respects-to-Mysteries/)Mysticism-Scientists, I have the following: The Scientism-Scientists can use all implants they want and commit all the moron monkey-biz sh*t, but they _will never_ achieve anything more than being mere academic (male/female) sl*ts, no matter what fraud they take part in! This is now more or less settled from my side. Let's see how they (try to) comply with the academic standards into the future!
Over the Scientism-Scientists and Mysticism-Scientists... - Applied Ethics +
Formal declaration of science: I hereby declare that Mysticism has deafeated the Scientism, the Scientists! This is a final verdict for what I consider the remaining time of humanity!Additionally, I predict that unless the obstructive part to this understanding dies away, the consequences will be severe for the entire Earth because of their, the Scientists, lack of sensitivity toward Ethics! So, Zeta, (greek letter) all matters considered the Earth is in a (strange) way HALTED in achieving progress in all fields, science broadly interpreted!Not that Scientism by this is any more serious. No, the primary matter here is how one considers Ethics to be a part of the Scientist's education, discipline and attitude in conducting science and in being a leader of science in society, i.e., how science plays out in the World by itself or in the expression of technology!
BTW, this addresses in particular the psychologists and psychiatrists and what "that industry generates", given by the above and as last section under the Theorem, The Theorem for the Break against Nazi-Ideology or Not!
Over the Scientism-Scientists and (Respects-to-Mysteries/)Mysticism-Scientists, I have the following: The Scientism-Scientists can use all implants they want and commit all the moron monkey-biz sh*t, but they _will never_ achieve anything more than being mere academic (male/female) sl*ts, no matter what fraud they take part in! This is now more or less settled from my side. Let's see how they (try to) comply with the academic standards into the future!
Take care!
Note: NOT in any can it be perceived that the "Mystics" in this weak sense, respecting the mysteries of Nature, stand lower than the Scientists in terms of science and scientific seriousness and productivity! This writing is simply not for the (religious) Mystics!!!
Note: A note has been made on Facebook by this time-stamp, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 at 15:36 CEST, from another note concerning the Cyberpunk Corpus of all sorts writers.
BTW, this addresses in particular the psychologists and psychiatrists and what "that industry generates", given by the above and as last section under the Theorem, The Theorem for the Break against Nazi-Ideology or Not!
Over the Scientism-Scientists and (Respects-to-Mysteries/)Mysticism-Scientists, I have the following: The Scientism-Scientists can use all implants they want and commit all the moron monkey-biz sh*t, but they _will never_ achieve anything more than being mere academic (male/female) sl*ts, no matter what fraud they take part in! This is now more or less settled from my side. Let's see how they (try to) comply with the academic standards into the future!
That they see me as one of greatest worth, doesn't of course mean that I submit to their lunatic gambles (with everything worthwhile gambled FOR, all measures used, down to the hardest (medical) torture) because I've chosen side, I KNOW!!!
Take care!
Note: NOT in any can it be perceived that the "Mystics" in this weak sense, respecting the mysteries of Nature, stand lower than the Scientists in terms of science and scientific seriousness and productivity! This writing is simply not for the (religious) Mystics!!!
Note: A note has been made on Facebook by this time-stamp, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 at 15:36 CEST, from another note concerning the Cyberpunk Corpus of all sorts writers.
Saturday, 12 November 2011
About Steely Character and the Controversy of Displaying Good Character
To you, good people,: when speaking about character, today's society, I think, wants the steely character as opposed to "angelic, i.e. avenging angel, angel of vengeance, the angel of Gabriel, champion of justice, white knight etc.! Actually, I think these more evident labels are controversial and struck down upon by "idiots"/bastards/f*ck-ups and people who are destructive to society! This is therefore a STRICT recommendation that you describe yourself as "of steely character" rather than trying to stick out a foot! Besides, "steely character" can be better to oneself, own mentality in being of the weapon, snake/"snake", blade/killer-knife, reminding oneself of the urgent and vigilant need for action in society, and bravely so!!! As before to Amn. Int., Courage is the requirement, decency and honour are the rewards!! Cheers!
Note1: Yes, this post has been removed by Facebook one time earlier (as far as I know, deducting for the possibility of "shadow programming", but this is...)!!!
Note2: Perhaps they own my posts more than I do? ;-)
Note3: This has thus been posted on Facebook twice earlier!
Note1: Yes, this post has been removed by Facebook one time earlier (as far as I know, deducting for the possibility of "shadow programming", but this is...)!!!
Note2: Perhaps they own my posts more than I do? ;-)
Note3: This has thus been posted on Facebook twice earlier!
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
My CV (Hasn't been very useful lately, but perhaps changes can take place!)
Epost: LukasFOlsnesLea@gmail.com
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea
"Red Khmer Norway presents this CV of Terje Lea", under Norwegian corruption, has made this track of life necessary:
Mål nr. 1:
***** ----------------- ;-)
Mål nr. 2:
Gjøre så mye filosofi som mulig
Update: Competence in philosophy: having been with Carl Hempel and Karl Popper at Hauglia, 1983/1984, by our house there, and delivered "doctor work" else for (appx.) 35 years, I think it's safe to say that my level in philosophy is at the PhD/"internet professor"/Dr. level!
Reminder:
To all corrupt people/those with corrupt minds trying to exploit my situation, here's the deal: "Vincent! Go fuck yourself!"
From Collateral (2004) with Jamie Foxx and Tom Cruise:
Collateral - "Go fuck yourself." [1080p HD] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0VeVaNxinc
"Cool?" (Norway may not have had the best motives in keeping me this way, rather rewarding criminals and subverting good people and the good connections! Formally, under this main text, there are 21 comments by myself which are the only ones I can see!)
Personlige opplysninger
Alder:
42 år
Sivilstand:
Ugift
Fødested:
Stavanger
Nasjonalitet:
Norsk
Yrkeserfaring:
2004 - 2018
Finansiert av forsikringspenger og av fondet til en hemmelig organisasjon
Sted: Univers' Senter for Forskning i Filosofi
Forskning Filosofi - Nå: Vitenskapsfilosofi
2002 - 2004
Gilde Vest BA
Sted: Forus
Fast ansatt - Kjøttekspedisjonen
2001 - 2002
Gilde Vest BA
Sted: Forus
Deltid- og ferievikar – Produksjon og Lager
2000 - 2001
Proffice AS
Sted: Stavanger
Vikar
1998 - 1999
Høgskolen i Oslo
Sted: Oslo
Sivilarbeider (Vitenskapelig assistent)
1996 - 1999
Elkem Aluminium ANS Lista
Sted: Lista
Ferievikar, lærling og fagoperatør
1995
Agro Fellesslakteri (Gilde Vest)
Sted: Forus
Ferievikar
Utdanning:
2004 - 2018
Meg selv
Sted: Bærum
· Gradene Bachelor, Master og muligens Phd i Filosofi tildeles meg selv av meg selv. Dette skjer i lys av betydelig korrupsjon og er derfor en justering i vurderingen av min egen kompetanse, først og fremst for andre
2007 - 2009
Universitetet i Oslo
Sted: Oslo
· Enkeltkurs
2001
Noroff Instituttet
Sted: Stavanger
· 1. del Nettv.adm. Høsten 2001
2001
Næringsakademiet
Sted: Stavanger
· 1. del IT-Prosjekt Våren 2001 (Resultat: 2.0)
1998 - 2000
Universitetet i Oslo
Sted: Oslo
· Examen Philosophicum Høsten 1998 (5 vekttall)
· Examen Facultatum–Humaniora Høsten 1999 (5 vektt.)
· 2 semestere Filosofi Høsten 1999 - Våren 2000
1994 - 1998
Lista Videreg. Sk.
Sted: Lista
Kvadraturen V.G.S.
Sted: Kristiansand
Elkem Aluminium Lista ANS
Sted: Lista
· Fagbrev i metallurgiske prosessfag
1991 - 1994
Eilert Sundt V.G.S.
Sted: Farsund
· Examen artium - Generell studiekompetanse
Interesser:
Dykking, fotball, løping, filosofi og data
Datakunnskaper:
Dype bidrag til IT industrien helt fra 1983. Microsoft og Intel. Digital. 1/0.
Operativsystemer: Windows 10 og noe Linux
Programmer: Diverse office programmer og grunnleggende programmering
Tidligere:
· Datakortet kompetansebevis (ECDL) Alle 7 moduler
· MOUS Master-sert. i Excel (Expert), Word (Expert), Access (Core), Powerpoint (Core) og Outlook (Core)
· CIW-Associate (-Certified Internet Webmaster)
Språk:
Flytende i engelsk, skriftlig og muntlig. Grunnleggende i tysk, skriftlig og muntlig. "Noe" svensk og dansk også naturligvis.
Jeg er også generelt interessert i språk, alle språk, inkludert programmeringsspråk.
Referanser:
Hemmelig! :-) Alle TL selskapene, TL = Terje Lea.
________
For real: Excellent in all subjects, acing them, making integrals a reality from a special mathematics book on sets or something from the Farsund library etc. World fame in 1983 if not earlier.
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea
So by the World class contributions in science as well as in composition/artistry/writing, being "The
Boy from Hauglia" and "The Genius from Lista", Terje Lea, by my father Jan Terje Lea,
"Quattro"-Doctor by
Terje Lea, 240975 - The University of Oxford, 2 doctorates
Terje Lea, 240975 - The University of Oslo, 2 doctorates
I am primarily "interested" in these subjects:
Boy from Hauglia" and "The Genius from Lista", Terje Lea, by my father Jan Terje Lea,
"Quattro"-Doctor by
Terje Lea, 240975 - The University of Oxford, 2 doctorates
Terje Lea, 240975 - The University of Oslo, 2 doctorates
I am primarily "interested" in these subjects:
Philosophy
Psychology
Physics
Chemistry and bio-chemistry
Genetics
Pharmacy
Chemistry and bio-chemistry
Genetics
Pharmacy
Secondarily:
History
Political Science
Economy
Law
Information Technology
Information Technology
Tertiarily:
Forensics, Theology and ALL the others
"Red Khmer Norway presents this CV of Terje Lea", under Norwegian corruption, has made this track of life necessary:
Mål nr. 1:
***** ----------------- ;-)
Mål nr. 2:
Gjøre så mye filosofi som mulig
Update: Competence in philosophy: having been with Carl Hempel and Karl Popper at Hauglia, 1983/1984, by our house there, and delivered "doctor work" else for (appx.) 35 years, I think it's safe to say that my level in philosophy is at the PhD/"internet professor"/Dr. level!
Reminder:
To all corrupt people/those with corrupt minds trying to exploit my situation, here's the deal: "Vincent! Go fuck yourself!"
From Collateral (2004) with Jamie Foxx and Tom Cruise:
Collateral - "Go fuck yourself." [1080p HD] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0VeVaNxinc
"Cool?" (Norway may not have had the best motives in keeping me this way, rather rewarding criminals and subverting good people and the good connections! Formally, under this main text, there are 21 comments by myself which are the only ones I can see!)
Personlige opplysninger
Alder:
42 år
Sivilstand:
Ugift
Fødested:
Stavanger
Nasjonalitet:
Norsk
Yrkeserfaring:
2004 - 2018
Finansiert av forsikringspenger og av fondet til en hemmelig organisasjon
Sted: Univers' Senter for Forskning i Filosofi
Forskning Filosofi - Nå: Vitenskapsfilosofi
2002 - 2004
Gilde Vest BA
Sted: Forus
Fast ansatt - Kjøttekspedisjonen
2001 - 2002
Gilde Vest BA
Sted: Forus
Deltid- og ferievikar – Produksjon og Lager
2000 - 2001
Proffice AS
Sted: Stavanger
Vikar
1998 - 1999
Høgskolen i Oslo
Sted: Oslo
Sivilarbeider (Vitenskapelig assistent)
1996 - 1999
Elkem Aluminium ANS Lista
Sted: Lista
Ferievikar, lærling og fagoperatør
1995
Agro Fellesslakteri (Gilde Vest)
Sted: Forus
Ferievikar
Utdanning:
2004 - 2018
Meg selv
Sted: Bærum
· Gradene Bachelor, Master og muligens Phd i Filosofi tildeles meg selv av meg selv. Dette skjer i lys av betydelig korrupsjon og er derfor en justering i vurderingen av min egen kompetanse, først og fremst for andre
2007 - 2009
Universitetet i Oslo
Sted: Oslo
· Enkeltkurs
2001
Noroff Instituttet
Sted: Stavanger
· 1. del Nettv.adm. Høsten 2001
2001
Næringsakademiet
Sted: Stavanger
· 1. del IT-Prosjekt Våren 2001 (Resultat: 2.0)
1998 - 2000
Universitetet i Oslo
Sted: Oslo
· Examen Philosophicum Høsten 1998 (5 vekttall)
· Examen Facultatum–Humaniora Høsten 1999 (5 vektt.)
· 2 semestere Filosofi Høsten 1999 - Våren 2000
1994 - 1998
Lista Videreg. Sk.
Sted: Lista
Kvadraturen V.G.S.
Sted: Kristiansand
Elkem Aluminium Lista ANS
Sted: Lista
· Fagbrev i metallurgiske prosessfag
1991 - 1994
Eilert Sundt V.G.S.
Sted: Farsund
· Examen artium - Generell studiekompetanse
Interesser:
Dykking, fotball, løping, filosofi og data
Datakunnskaper:
Dype bidrag til IT industrien helt fra 1983. Microsoft og Intel. Digital. 1/0.
Operativsystemer: Windows 10 og noe Linux
Programmer: Diverse office programmer og grunnleggende programmering
Tidligere:
· Datakortet kompetansebevis (ECDL) Alle 7 moduler
· MOUS Master-sert. i Excel (Expert), Word (Expert), Access (Core), Powerpoint (Core) og Outlook (Core)
· CIW-Associate (-Certified Internet Webmaster)
Språk:
Flytende i engelsk, skriftlig og muntlig. Grunnleggende i tysk, skriftlig og muntlig. "Noe" svensk og dansk også naturligvis.
Jeg er også generelt interessert i språk, alle språk, inkludert programmeringsspråk.
Referanser:
Hemmelig! :-) Alle TL selskapene, TL = Terje Lea.
________
For real: Excellent in all subjects, acing them, making integrals a reality from a special mathematics book on sets or something from the Farsund library etc. World fame in 1983 if not earlier.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
And further, we (of Mysticism) say insanity MORE and they will _not_ even be allowed the smallest excuse for it even, no matter how hard HIT they may be!
Q.E.D.