First of all, when I write that "Coloristics is restored as science" per linguistic science, I intend to say: Coloristics is restored as science by the written description as account of (coloristics-) impression, much like telepathy, but that coloristics is much more personal and much more refined!!! Don't mess with it! I'm warning you!
You may want to check out:
Well, well, the net says this and that, but Coloristics has a peculiar history, one more successful (now) than fx. Craniology, ref. Philosophy of Science.
Ref. also, the impressions of the German flag, by the 3 colours, being one (prime) example!
To science-"freaks" of CERN: No, ISOLDE is no alchemy! Alpha-radiation? Anybody?