Sunday 16 June 2013

Against Unemployment

The list for combatting unemployment is (for now):

1. Weapons against unemployment: personal security (personal weapon, pistol, and other).

2. Increased security gives greater optimism and lesser corruption because people become less vulnerable.

3. Increased security gives by these two points a further increased initiative (toward industry).

4. That the people should exert pressure to make the Central Bank adjust its parameters to fit a kind of people's interest rate, one that enables moderate aggression toward investment and fighting unemployment.
5. The banks' views on investments and "come on, be part!"-mentality, also a kind of moderate lending aggression (on line with sportly aggression), possibly with a bank-to-bank competetive attitude to generate as much investments per company/corporation as possible.

6. The part that the financial network plays is a particularly active one, also by popularity inventive, possibly too, with extra support or government assurances or, indeed, "investor-insurances" by "private/public investments".

7. That the state-engagement is (pro-)active, that is supports the small profit/no profit enterprises not seen as attractive. That it also considers small losses enterprises.

8. Enterprises are "entertained" even if the work seems needlessly manual and ineffective, merely because it generates "better people tomorrow, also by the workers' kids".

9. Yes, believe it or not, the business arrangements are now more important than ever, reducing the so-called "free competition" significantly. So my recommendation is that a "social" business arrangement by singular, nationally/regionally loyal/patriot businesses and state(s) working together by the business network's organisation, fx. the French and German ones. What I'm talking about: something like Volkswagen to Germans and Renault to the French. However, the arrangements should be held to only certain types of industry. You can't demand people to turn in the small ideas, like those for a type of special store of clothing, to these BIG arrangements. We need to designate the industries to start with and for now these are: insurance, banking, car industry, energy, communications, air industry ... (the rest like these).

10. Increased coursing of the unemployed is surely recommended. Not that it generates so much "aloofness", but rather the fact that firstly sparetime becomes far more interesting. Secondly, job opportunities increase. Thirdly, with a new job, with the new knowledge, they can provide good social effects and generate new insights that may improve the workplace if not the entire company itself. Fourthly, with a new job or not, the new knowledge may have good effects on mood and that the new job can very well arise merely from this new smile with more confidence. (Don't be petty, Labour Services!)

Result as best practice: toward or virtually 0 % unemployment.
Status now: most of the unemployment is to be blamed on crime, including corruption.

Watch up: As always, leadership is an art. One has to understand the requirements for leadeship, i.e., what it takes to generate high activity industrially, again against zero unemployment (also as greater degree of  happiness/satisfaction).

This is written upon news of Euro-zone unemployment of 12,2 %, not acceptable.
To compare, USA: 7,5 %.
Eurostat: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics .
Wikipedia number for USA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_unemployment_rate .

(I've played a significant part in Norway (outside criminal relations) for fighting unemployment for a number of years before leaving the Norwegian efforts more and more due to corruption/crime/indecent treatment of my person. Most messages going to the Norwegian Banks' Association.)

19 comments:

  1. "Against Unemployment" is to be updated for latest unemployment numbers as we go by.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 10. Increased coursing of the unemployed is surely recommended. Not that it generates so much "aloofness", but rather the fact that firstly sparetime becomes far more interesting. Secondly, job opportunities increase. Thirdly, with a new job, with the new knowledge, they can provide good social effects and generate new insights that may improve the workplace if not the entire company itself. Fourthly, with a new job or not, the new knowledge may have good effects on mood and that the new job can very well arise merely from this new smile with more confidence.

    Dr. L. F. Olsnes-Lea

    The supporting note: Doctor's work means doctor.
    The subjects:
    Doctor of physics
    Doctor of philosophy in combination with psychology.
    That, "before Norway", universities have (been intellectually forced to) admit talented/intelligent people with novel work a "secured seat" whereto finish and graduate by their work. This is also under the older notions of "the priest's calling" and "to see the light/intelligence from every human being through", i.e., to let nature finish a significant person's nature, that is, the founding letters of every university by the European/"Western" culture.

    ReplyDelete
  3. (Don't be petty, Labour Services!) - This is supposed to follow at the end of the above.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In light of this latest finding and "genius'" European moves in removing/"preventing" personal security from the European population in preventing them personal weapons/non-lethal weapons, I suspend my judgment for Europe in reaching 5 % unemployment cross-Europe/EU-27/EU-Euro because it represents outright stupidity.

    Consequently*: Europe can slob its way to its d*mn well deserved 20 % unemployment or more!

    There's more too: by my latest thoughts on the period of history between the World War 1 and the World War 2 and the Rise to Power by Hitler, I've come to the conclusion that UN deserves an important notification, one that I'm presently short of time for writing. You may very well want to notify them ASAP on the importance of personal weapons to all of the World population insofar as they can afford them and insofar as they are not, truly, no f*cking allowed (flat permit), medically prevented from having one, i.e., the above-18 requirement, not Alzheimer's/Parkinson's, plus the rest, "the usual", I recon.

    From earlier:
    Killing myth about USA: the Social Security
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_(United_States)

    That this entrenches U. S. political intelligence, not that they are without problems, but that they are progressing and we still discuss a fundamental issue over whether people should have weapons for personal security. They are also further rewarded by a lower unemployment of some 7%, one that they take as WINNERS of many aspects.

    We need to step up to it as well here in Europe/EU. Are you coming along, please?

    (Their Social Security Act is supported by, to people of 50,898,244, 615,344,000,000 $ (2008-numbers).)

    We are now "more lies than them", as "we have had the electric chair on them" and other... We are NOT human rights in Europe, no, we seem to be overloaded with corrupt mentalities. This is a REAL challenge for us and if we "celebrate" it too, we can d*mn well "climb up" to 20 % unemployment (or more), and with a glee (of Schdenfr#¤%¤%&%¤&).

    Extra: Under EU (Facebook, Community) Erasmus:
    I'm so educated. Why don't you educate in Norway too, they have good monkey-biz there, with some tasty Nobel Prizes doled out on street (the Whore too?):

    Killing myth about USA: the Social Security
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_(United_States)

    That this entrenches U. S. political intelligence, not that they are without problems, but that they are progressing and we still discuss a fundamental issue over whether people should have weapons for personal security. They are also further rewarded by a lower unemployment of some 7%, one that they take as WINNERS of many aspects.

    We need to step up to it as well here in Europe/EU. Are you coming along, please?

    (Their Social Security Act is supported by, to people of 50,898,244, 615,344,000,000 $ (2008-numbers).)

    We are now "more lies than them", as "we have had the electric chair on them" and other... We are NOT human rights in Europe, no, we seem to be overloaded with corrupt mentalities. This is a REAL challenge for us and if we "celebrate" it too, we can d*mn well "climb up" to 20 % unemployment, and with a glee (of Schdenfr#¤%¤%&%¤&).

    And that jokes about the "torture-shops"/"human meatshops" fuming all the way to "a cinema near you" are only that cool. I hate to say the word... "Dumb"?

    ReplyDelete
  5. From some time now, given the accessibility to information, I think it's mandated that the relevant leaders of the World are to be considered MONSTERS, "well suspended over all humanity", i.e., the inhumanity in them, by the direct consequence of failing people their chance (not instantly guaranteed, I'm sorry to say) to human rights, please see UDHR under UN, as matter of reality, i.e., in practice, in life.

    The data-sets of crime (crime statistics) may have been "fixed"/left in the dark, in the social sense, for much of time we know, entire families practically "run over", abused, tortured, maimed, killed, whatever, very much outside the facade official stories we've been told of.

    So if they provide leadership counter to human rights, they are to be named MONSTERS!
    (See esp. UDHR Art. 3, please.)

    The corrupt mind is a very serious condition that may agree/act with all cruelty the World can offer them, EVERYTHING, H*llraiser, so on!

    Url: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ .

    ReplyDelete
  6. There are much people living under the letters of human rights, the entire 7,1 Bn people, a number that has 8 0s after the 7 and 1.

    (This text, plus the above, as you may infer, carries deep economical consequences.)

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Question of Personal Weapon and Personal Security - UDHR Article 3

    There's a question to NRA (National Rifles Association) if they are supporting the World in acquiring weapons for all, making it law or making it a Right in their nation...

    I expect them to give an affirmative and that they are therefore in-line with the State Department. I want to write this as a heads-up for UN and most/all other nations in expecting a given behaviour from USA in aftermath of "Financial Radicalism" charges to Nazi-Germany, in making their efforts to improve the World, also in terms of humanism/human rights/humanistic progress.

    So it goes:
    * U. S. (American) State Department gives its public statement for the normative personal weapons rights to everywhere in the World
    * So does the NRA.
    * So does the UN.
    * And Pentagon plays with it, displaying the use of the personal weapon.

    This is inline with the sales, Worldwide, of the non-lethal weapons. That USA owes us, outside its nation, these efforts, until we too have achieved it, as far as possible.

    In short, I WANT/RECOMMEND MUCH CAMPAIGNING for all and everywhere, having suggested the (mobilised) army to take part, over a 14 days period. Remember that this is about the decent family life for everyone. If not decent families, then life everywhere maybe broken DOWN!

    Note: That to mention the (central) Article 3 of the UDHR doesn't necessarily entail only one article. No, the consequences are thought to influence, critically or not, many/all the others.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association , note on singular vs. text above.

    National Rifle Association - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) is an American nonprofit organiz...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Department .

    United States Department of State - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    The United States Department of State (DoS),[3] often referred to as the State D...

    This also connects with explanations of universal duties from and to one-another and in being human one-self and bringing this humanity to others as well, from old, "making other people able to _hold_ the Bible" themselves too"!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_values .

    Universal value - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Something is of universal value if it has the same value or worth for all, or al...

    (Much to my Facebook profile on two occasions, some days ago, and more days ago.)

    ReplyDelete
  8. There are 3 primary, very important concerns in the World that need to be addressed for substantial progress to be achieved:
    * Human Rights, most importantly by personal weapons and personal non-lethal weapon, under UDHR, Art. 3.
    * Overpopulation, to "die" by one child or two children family policy throughout the World, ideally, valid/approved for every country.
    * Unemployment, also by proper leadership, seeing corruption disappear.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I may d*mn well accept 100 %
    Un-employment if logcis fail to take hold/get to the relevant heads!

    Besides, Under Hitler and under Unemployment by my Blog!

    I may be entitled to have solved ALL Critical Theory by a suggested solution to A. Hitler's way to power and Nazi-Germany as read about in history books.

    So I do this NOW! (And by this contribution, I'm awarded quite a bit of honour in European history of thinking!) Thanks for the attention.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Moving the society into action for getting all people equipped toward Human Rights (expressed as Universal Agenda by UN, given the UDHR), we have 3 options:

    1. Getting the army mobilised directly, securing the equipment to the population.

    2. Using the Labour and Employer organisations in shoving the army into action by mass-shutdown of production, giving the national assembly the order to get it done, using the army or not, in "war"-general sense, all people into the mix.

    3. Labour and Employer again, but this time by mass-demonstrations and mass-"bombardment" to the Internet message groups, email lists, all and all, leading to the same result as above.

    Equipment: yes, minimally 1 pistol/revolver per home, + optional non-lethal weapons, 2 or 1 only, pepperspray or tazer.

    This text is implying a further general availability to the people for rifles, shotguns, combi-rifles, revolvers, pistols, peppersprays, tazers and stun-guns by weapons/sports shops.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Please, remember the important Universality Principle of Ethics.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universality_(philosophy)#Universality_in_ethics

    Saying: "Universality in ethics"

    "When used in the context of ethics, the meaning of universal {from Gk. katholikos) refers to that which is true for "all similarly situated individuals." [1] Rights, for example in natural rights, or in the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, for those heavily influenced by the philosophy of the Enlightenment and its conception of a human nature, could be considered as universal. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights is inspired by such principles."

    ReplyDelete
  12. The Case for USA above Europe and Everywhere Else

    1. Industry production (by reliability also) is high in USA, entailing healthy, functional people with beliefs in their society.

    2. I understand the corrupt minds very well and how the guilt from failure to duties abroad influxes into USA on the "macro-scale".

    3. USA has now carried out a large social welfare reform gently moved in, to remove much contradiction inside its nation in terms of Human Rights. Importantly too, the legal system ... allowing the citizens autonomy and initiative to react to deeply upsetting criminial scenes in the public and not in particular fear either to tip the police.

    Sub-point: Insecurity to neighbour... dire consequences.

    To cut the usual "smile of idiocy" from European thinking, that the Universality Principle of Ethics as safety-webbing is easily DESTROYED if one sits there trying to say that the Principle and Insecurity to the neighbour (with a possible disposition of acceptance by torture to the neighbour) by refusing to accept the personal weapons (max. 5?) and non-lethal weapons to ALL, denying these bloated psychiatrists these aloof statements over sanity as THEY have allowed "vampires to walk in broad daylight", like "educated torturers" and serial-killers, 10 or more!

    The academic usual at the end: Instantly, I submit to the Objectivity and more powerful arguments if they exist as well as the best data-sets to these (academic) matters of political science/legal forensics.

    Text is not entirely finished!

    ReplyDelete
  13. The court issues: theology and psychiatry are traditionally alike banned from the courts in terms of presenting Legal Objectivity. They are only, especially psychiatry now, allowed to enter for testifying as experts to a given (narrow) aspect.

    In addition, legal blindness is the Cardinal Sin that condemns either of the acting parties of the court, including the judge. (The judge is continuously under the duty to not become legally blind, i.e., corrupt or "insane".)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Two "missing" sentences above:
    3. Importantly too, their legal system has higher standing in terms of crime, allowing the citizens autonomy and initiative to react to deeply upsetting criminial scenes in the public and not in particular fear either to tip the police and for deeper intuitions of decency, dignity and human worth (than in Europe, elsewhere, hence the "necessity" of "meatshops", crime you can't talk about, the "necessity" of torture, etc.).

    Sub-point ("reiteration"): Insecurity (by physical insecurity, "a door open") as insistence to the neighbour, universally, can have dire, negative consequences.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Corruption analysis - given the fact that the population lacks (personal) weapons, also the non-lethal, the lack of legal system journalism/crime journalism (CNN does in fact have a "Justice"-section under its U.S. edition) and use of threats against the population to extended degrees, widely and deeply. Then the subconscious aspects by this, assessed by non-carnivore-psychologists, the ethical assessments to how much mental burden this implies.

    Let us say that the lawyers'/barristers' is "governing" prior to this analysis of corruption in the World as premise. We get:

    1. Lawyers/barristers (repr. The Lawyers Association, see special English name)
    - who are:
    the lawyers/barristers
    judges (also the divide between former police-lawyers vs. the barristers/(U.S.) lawyers of finances/banking)

    2. The police (w/ the police lawyers)
    - who are:
    The police (3 years or less of college education)
    The prison guards, the prison authorities (same)
    The customs (same)
    Scotland Yard/FBI/Equivalent
    The internal affairs/Special affairs for police corruption/misconduct
    The finances authorities
    The credit exchange authorities
    The data-information authorities
    Postal- and tele-communication authorities

    3. The military - parts or much people, unknown

    4. The physicians association - parts or much people, unknown

    Legal blindness defined: in the courts, psychiatrists/psychologists and theologians, please, make the confirmation with history books (for yourself to be convinced, straight), are not to make any particular judgment on matters of right and wrong, legally. They are held outside entirely, down to being ordinary people for this aspect. So the truth is that "legal blindness" has its own special standing in the courts for making the correct ruling, the dutiful parties, first and foremost, judge and two lawyers/barristers. Psychiatrists/psychologists and theologians are only called in for expert statements/assessments/verdicts and that this is told to you given very special considerations over "power in the courts" for the benefit of the entire population it serves.

    So when this is being read, this must be considered to relate to a special type of autocracy-/despotism-rule that results from POWER-FIXATED (first and foremost in physical sense - brutal violence, torture, weapons, threats, everything) people who act in what most people name a democracy, given the media reports "of shining weather and happy faces"!

    So for the two dots in history, span or not, given the pan-out, you can figure out the very time-relation yourself, the French state-terrorism and the rise of A. Hitler to POWER!

    Note that Europe has no particular weapons history for the weapons in its general population after the swords and spears have been put on the heap. Especially for Germany, this must present itself absolutely... serious? That they have special incentives for acting unless utter shame? Thus, I may be correct, right?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Regarding Elie Wiezel, all respects, in Aftenposten, 2014-01-27, also being of North European descent through several hundred years (esp. 1900 – 1946 and Nuremberg), I’ll choose instead the more factual route for now by “USA Theory”, so to speak, computer-simulating (by USA data-set, inviting both mathematicians, Applied Mathematics and Wolfram, the program) a possible other destiny for our uneducated Hitler, setting necessary Kripke lines by 1925 and 1933 up to 1939.

    (Holding of course on to two others, the non-lethal weapons and the neuro-meters, unsettling to read L. Ron Hubbard’s “0 – 8 The Basics” and the Ethics tone scale!)

    ReplyDelete
  17. While we're waiting to stand up _by_ the gun, here's the "Under the gun" by The Sisters of Mercy as inspiration. - "To fire at will...!"

    All political attempts man_dated for as appropriate!

    One version:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XozUZF3ml5w - Ehh, good blood?

    ReplyDelete
  18. The main sentiment for "Weapons to the Population" is that it is easier "to take a bullet" than to endure (threats of) torture!
    Implicitly then, by these weapons, the instances of torture are (significantly) reduced!
    This is inline with Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International in "Stopping the torture"!

    Mind you also how torture plays a bigger part in both generating widespread mental burdens by only one instance and how torture "helps" generating the corrupt minds, also in being a significant threat (to family life).

    ReplyDelete
  19. Over the Perfect Employment in the World and the Story of Hitler (more...)

    By S5 modality logics, one CORRUPT decision leads to "5 others", necessarily the monster arises...! (In God's name...)

    Here on the Blog, these together:
    What is Written...: Against Unemployment
    What is Written...: New Theory for the Rise of Adolf Hitler - Letter to the Colleagues
    What is Written...: Psychiatry and the Modified Somatist Position
    What is Written...: The 100% Society - A Matter of Political Science

    ReplyDelete