The National Parks and the Future – The Parks Become Wisely Old

In the spirit of national wilderness parks/areas/ranges (also with WWF and Greenpeace), I suggest concreted (on site, possibly) steel mantelled (“light”) tunneling of existing roads and rails through these “critical” areas in order to allow the wilderness animals and other (like insects) to CALM DOWN. Do you like it? Let’s do it!

(Remember that a WiFi-mast/tower can mean activity in two directions, one of them being “to chain animals” away from their natural freedom “to Darthmouth malpractice of insanity to nature”!)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tunel_en_Guanajuato.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Joralemon_Street_Tunnel_postcard,_1913.jpg

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunnel.

http://isisinform.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/tunnel.jpg

Source: http://www.isisinform.com/

One natural goal now must be to corroborate and “build” these natural parks/areas bigger by demolishing ALL human-made buildings and structures (radio-/transmitting-towers, roads, rails, ALL).

Failures of leadership, 2 cases to start plus one that we leave alone:

1. WWF, data-set: 1993 – 2014. Delivery on promise and agency: Nothing!
Premises/Quality criteria/Qualification:
1. Failure to curb overpopulation.
2. Failure to curb CO2 emissions.
3. Failure to introduce anti-overpopulation policies (1 child or 2 children, economic incentives to any other nation than China.
4. Failure to increase the total World-area of national parks beyond the number of 1999.
5. Failure to communicate the stress on animals by the oversized number of human beings on the planet.

2. Adolf Hitler, data-set, primary: 1933 – 1945. Havoc of an idiot!
Failures: the most a man can accomplish in dying to early!

(3. A man with a Blood-Whore (NO:Blod hore) problem of a nation down veneral south.)

Reminder. I'd like to remind the responsible parties how demoralising / stupid (stoopid) it appears when they can use 2 seconds to arrive at a sound conclusion and these "high" leaders "of honour" fail to do so in 20 years, even when it's their full-time job! What a signal to send to members and World in general!

Not only this, but also the trending "bad behaviour". That if one is suitably bad in the World, you can become something depending on your willingness...! What is "work code" in being wicked and what is work completed as expected...? "No, nobody knows!" As if one is willing to accept such an excuse! "Hasn't the salary been acceptable?"

Conclusion: We may be looking at a perfect storm here...! (Despite Pugwash movement too! By end of January, 2014, CO2-reading hits 397,80 ppm. Read about it on www.CO2now.org.)

You know, I'm speaking in terms of completeness, that no option toward the better is left out. This means that all sensible policies toward sound ecology should be put into effect, such as the common economic incentives for nudging the population in the right, ecological direction.

The Ecology Points - By Applied Ethics, Most Importantly and Further...

Combatting the Overpopulation

Suggestion for combatting Overpopulation, a dire condition that brings out the worst in people and against animals and wildlife the same:
The governments of the World issue a (steady) recommendation for only one or two children (for each woman, or other standard, issues may arise with homosexuals who desire children, but this needs separate resolve).
Under the recommendation then, this follows, a 3 pt. list,
1. that families will be required by law to pay partly or wholly for the 3rd child as incentive toward right behaviour.
2. that becoming pregnant with a fourth child or giving birth to a fourth child may provoke forced abortion or forced adoption.
3. that becoming pregnant with a fifth child and beyond may trigger forced abortions, forced adoptions, forced sterilizations and removal of legal rights in representing stupor below normal intelligence.

I hope you bother to take note and that we work together, in moving the politics toward better ecology and a better future for all, with as much people in the future gene-tree as possible! Thanks.

(Me? A hard-liner Ecology Philosopher? This files under Applied Ethics and only as suggestion for discussion. Also, point is made for making the discussion /move/ somewhere whatsoever.)

I've written a notice lately to WWF suggesting the Ecological Victory option to the Civ 5 (Sid Meier) games, such that 2 kids now make one's gene-tree 4 the next turn for your 2 kids. In this way, ultimately, one's genes become the World "some gene-steps" up the World history. This is also possible with only one kid, but takes a generation extra...! So contraception pills MUST be seen as World solution to all pollution problems, in overcoming Overpopulation toward 3.4 Bn people, figuratively speaking, "half the population of every nation now"!

Re-Issuing, the CO2 Problem

In relation to CO2 measurements, it's worth noting that CO2 level HAS NEVER BEEN HIGHER than today's at a little lower than 400 ppm. Over 800 000 years, it has never gone higher than than mere 300 ppm until lately. So not only do we suffer from high World population that distresses nature greatly, but we also guzzle ourselves down on own mass of people and gurp about in something like 385 ppm of CO2. I must say, this is a VERY interesting experiment and that I hold WWF, IPCC and Greenpeace the most responsible, even though, as much as Pugwash "boldly" says no to nuclear weapons, common people are now betrayed by their governments and intellectuals alike! (Heh-heh, unless they DO something... but /can/ they squeeze out the necessary words and the display the necessary leadership? Yet to see...!
(Still the words of Mr. Al Gore are ringing in the ears as GREAT! See the movie, please, An Inconvenient Truth!)

(I'll use this blog posting to highlight a very important ethics/applied ethics matter, one that seems to move slowly in terms of (acting/effectuating/legislative) politics...)

Also remarks to brilliant writers, activists, Greenpeace (who should pick up on /seriousness/), World Wildlife Fund, IPCC, the former Environmentalist movement, people who support Deep Ecology and other people who move the these matters into scope and place.

PS: Overpopulation is now centered on the most because I see it as /the/ most important ecological issue today.

Over Ecology Simulation Shortcomings

I think it's a pity that BBC writes this when one can simulate something very easy as _decrease_ in world population!!! That is, these people are not willing to go into handling _the OVERPOPULATION PROBLEM_ and this is a scientific weakness opening for contempt to IPCC and environment/ecology scientists. Please, change, you scientists!

This relates to Climate prediction: No model for success, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7381250.stm.

Therefore, I demand/want a computer simulation on world population growth, the negative, and world population decrease, the normatively positive!!!

Posted to WWF on Facebook, both the above and this, "I still think The Overpopulation problem should be the world's top priority, acknowledging that the world works on several issues at once, but speeding up/getting harder on this very important challenge for us... "Think about the Bluefin Tuna, all the animals on the verge to extinction (the white tiger)..." or with Michael Jackson, "Think about the world and how we can make it a better place..." *sob* *sob*"
"And with basic stuff too: "think about your sex-education and how you're expected to use contraception pills and condoms. To grow up and become responsible parents..." You know the lesson. Enjoy your weekend! :-)"

I don't know how it is, but I've managed to report on some old history of the BBC: the story is "last updated at 08:12 GMT, Tuesday, 6 May 2008 09:12 UK".