Sunday, 2 October 2011

Various Writings from the Former Blogs (by #2 Starting with latest

A New Addition to One of My Ideas/Projects on Philosophical Notes

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-06-14 07:46:56 [CEST]

This pertains to "The Relation Between Syntax and Semantics in Terms of Reduction"!

Robot logics, syntax thinking, also syntactics, has a natural bottom line against the mystical nature of life, incl. the semantics of human beings.

In this way, syntax can never go any lower, or more fundamental than the semantic human thinking. Thus syntax can never generate syntax equal to semantics below this bottom line. At least, this is what I postulate now!

This is also in line with my new writings on "monades" in the sense that people/human beings may take part in a bigger understanding than robots (by syntactic thinking) ever will be able to be programmed to compute/generate.

And the project continues to run...

A Short Comment to the "War on Drugs"

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-06-11 12:11:12 [CEST]

Considering the row of facts from nations that have large drug related conflicts going, I think it's time to draw the line and INCORPORATE the drug networks and cartels into state run businesses while maintaining the respects to the existing networks and cartels (regarding the personnel).

Thus, to make truce quickly, one should in the immediately near future have "Pharmaceutical Company of Mexico" with its directors and department staff as implied by the above. The business should be exhaustive in this relation, maintaining both concerns of distribution and production/refining.

This is a mere suggestion that has the possibility to gather following or not, but I think it has the virtue of effectivity compared with a hypocritic "war on drugs" that's lead by a "priesthood" of naive or deviously lying people with "an alleged religious background". Because these people have no concern for the large amount of capital that's involved or the huge demand that it represents or their own "closets from personal life". The DEA, given the Police reality, is probably more a part of the drugs business than it is in fighting it.

Conclusion: the war on drugs is hypocritic and the only alternative is to "route" (by the IT concept) this differently, to make it state governed and hopefully to make it enter, mostly, monitored/controlled programs by the usual med. doctors' routines, that is, by prescription!

Good? Cheers!

Note: this comment is a reaction to a report by the Norwegian broadcaster, TV2, from today. It's also the result of a longer meditation over the relatively hard topic of applied ethics of how to deal with the drug problem and my longtime attention to related conflicts everywhere in the world.

The Use of Radioactive Material for Mapping Subterrain Resources

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-06-10 08:07:30 [CEST]

It's my recommendation that one pays less respect to U.S. American worries in using plutonium, highly enriched (impl. high radioactivity), or other for locating and mapping subterrain resources of all kinds, possibly, but commonly the oil.

I think USA is playing an unfair game (uhh, again and probably more compulsively than one has reason to believe) with the so-called safety standards. That is, they, themselves, use both "transgressing" amounts and radioactive materials for doing these mapping operations on subterrain resources.

We, the rest of the world, should then just DUMP their alleged honesty and set one for ourselves under, of course, hard and most strict safety standards of transport and handling (because of the idiot terrorist and so forth).

So send these into the ground for safe deposit or possibly retrieval (perhaps not so important, just go for "safe deposit" as standard) and see what signals we can make of it and how far we can take them, please!!!

As I'm thinking about it, there should be plenty of resources for the whole world to enjoy for all foreseeable future!

Have fun! Cheers!

Note: this writing has been made primarily for the possible concern regarding the outright lying or dishonesty by the U.S. Americans in relation to the use of highly enriched, highly radioactive material, most prominently the plutonium, probably to everyone's surprise!

Chinese Aircraft Carrier

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-06-08 14:14:05 [CEST]

With the BBC story of the new-built Chinese aircraft carrier,, I welcome this move for securing world democracy as a whole (by symmetry) and in line with Love to USA (Twitter: #LoveToUSAwar). It's not so much about a cold war, but being about returning symmetric love to USA! You understand, please? Cheers!

Somebody, please keep a tally on those army capacities until we're there!

Additionally, one should make the headline "Viewpoint: A new World (exc. USA) - US American high-tech arms race?" instead of BBC's "Viewpoint: A new Sino-US high-tech arms race?" by this link,

A Comment to Aaron O'Connell's Lecture, Making Sense of a Visible Quantum Object by Ted Talks

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-06-08 11:23:30 [CEST]

I've just some moments ago commented on a bit of lecture presented by Ted Talks. The presentation is given by Aaron O'Connell and has the title, "Making Sense of a Visible Quantum Object". I've written there the following comment:
"First of all, we don't get to see the visible object in action. He refers to a visible object that, allegedly, obtains the quantum dynamics effects, an object vibrating and not vibrating at the same time. The way I see it, this is then nothing more than standard quantum experiment. While this is not criticism as such, this doesn't solve anything and it doesn't explain how apparency or clarity of this experiment is to prefer to others, that are, indeed probably much smaller in scale as noted by the lecturer. It's also unclear how this "magnified" scale is supposed to show this effect in a clearer way, apart from being a much more tangible object to experiment with and refer to. Thus, as conclusion, one may see here two different pedagogics, one in the most visible way, but also smaller, and this one, a lot bigger object, but perhaps not the same clarity of experiment. It may also be that exactly this appreach lies further back BEFORE one has had the possibility to make this smaller scale experiments. But, the lecture and effort [are] well accomplished! My respects to Aaron O'Connell! Cheers!"

Good? Have a nice day!

God's Guidelines or Natural Laws

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-06-05 08:17:30 [CEST]

Given that God may be expressed as guidelines or natural laws insofar as the origin of ALL is from exactly God, it is actually up to us to make this happen accordingly! That is, God may be looking at ten or twenty systems for "human" performance, being the best according to God's words. Thus, if we fail, we fail only our pathetic selves. It's just another system burning in God's eyes, one of insufficient virtue! Beware...

Academic Subjects - The Expert

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-06-05 07:59:46

It should now be possible to delve in academic subjects and become expert in these by no more than 4000 - 5000 pages in each, given that they are properly compiled:
Mathematics - 4000 - 5000 pages
Physics - 4000 - 5000 pages
Chemistry - 4000 - 5000 pages
Psychology - 4000 - 5000 pages
Medicine - 4000 - 5000 pages
Pharmacy - 4000 - 5000 pages
Bio-chemistry - 4000 - 5000 pages
Philosophy - 4000 - 5000 pages
Art History - 4000 - 5000 pages

It's just a thought for you to consider. Fx. IT, Information Technology can probably gather a good 20 000 pages, all of them important. On top of this, you get research reports and all the engineering subjects that probably wind up pages quite rapidly. This is just to say that the 400 - 500 pages book can be quite powerful given the right author and the right reader.

This is much in line with my own condensed style of writing as, in my own opinion, can be found with Thomas Nagel and his "The View From Nowhere".

Begin gathering your power today! Grow your intellectuality! Cheers!

Note: I've added Philosophy and Art History today, 08.06.2011, and I'm sorry they've been left out in the first place.

Say It Right!

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-06-01 22:31:30


Nelly Furtado - Say It Right

In the day
In the night
Say it right
Say it all
You either got it
Or you don't
You either stand or you fall
When your will is broken
When it slips from your hand
When there's no time for joking
There's a hole in the plan

Oh you don't mean nothing at all to me
No you don't mean nothing at all to me
But you got what it takes to set me free
Oh you could mean everything to me

I can't say that I'm not lost and at fault
I can't say that I don't love the light and the dark
I can't say that I don't know that I am alive
And all of what I feel I could show
You tonight you tonight

Oh you don't mean nothing at all to me
No you don't mean nothing at all to me
But you got what it takes to set me free
Oh you could mean everything to me

From my hands I could give you
Something that I made
From my mouth I could sing you another brick that I laid
From my body I could show you a place God knows
You should know the space is holy
Do you really want to go?


The f*cksh*t can jump! JUMP!

Om SvenskeKONGEN!!!

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-05-31 18:43:11

Hva i h*lvete skal dette bety? En ting er at D. Strauss-Kahn "går inn" og at en fransk minister får også på pukkelen, men hvorfor skal SvenskeKONGEN bry seg med denne dritten på grunn av litt decent damehygge!! Gå og heng dere, Norge!

Hva Krompen våres driver på med med eller uten den norske kongen på ryggen skal gudene vite (hint, hint), men hva f*en skal vi kritisere svenskeKONGEN for? I Norge hadde vi kalt det der RESPEKT, men i Sverige er det skandale.

Bare fordi svenskeKONGEN har noe så sjeldent som SAMVITTIGHET så skal liksom han tas??? Republikanere, brenn i h*lvete!!! Hva f*en er det ikke den vanlige nordmann driver på med? Det finnes ikke noen lov og rett igjen lengre så det skal ikke være noen grunn for svenskeKONGEN å ta på seg noen særlig skam eller skyld eller innrømme noe spesielt etikette brudd!! Det må imidlertid sies at jeg ikke vil høre om noe spesielt mer alvorlig enn dette fra et Kongehus hvor som helst.

Dette er KONGEN av Sverige for svarte!!! Konge, ikke sant??!!! Presse, pakk sakene og kom dere hjem og pul dere glade fordi dere gjør f*en ikke noen (som helst) jobb bedre! Ihvertfall ikke i forhold til rettspraksis!!!

Leve verdens monarkier!!! Ha en fortsatt fin uke!!!

Threats to Police - Corruption

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-05-31 18:02:49 [CEST]

I find it to be the duty of the Police to (almost absolutely) accept threats (of the lethal kind) to the idiots who serve in their forces and take part in sinister and severely corrupt schemes that are no less than outright crime! In this relation, I (re-)find the great contribution of Ice-T toward a more just society to be very pleasing. I present (on top of the attempt):

Body Count/Ice-T


I got my black shirt on.
I got my black gloves on.
I got my ski mask on.
This shit's been too long.

I got my twelve gauge sawed off.
I got my headlights turned off.
I'm 'bout to bust some shots off.
I'm 'bout to dust some cops off.

I'm a cop killer, better you than me.
Cop killer, f*ck police brutality!
Cop killer, I know your family's grieving,
(f*ck 'em!)
Cop killer, but tonight we get even, ha ha.

I got my brain on hype.
Tonight will be your night.
I got this long-assed knife.
And your neck looks just right.

My adrenaline's pumpin'.
I got my stereo bumpin'.
I'm 'bout to kill me somethin'.
A pig stopped me for nuthin'!

Cop killer, better you than me.
Cop killer, f*ck police brutality!
Cop killer, I know your momma's grieving,
(f*ck her!)
Cop killer, but tonight we get even, yeah!

Die, die, die pig, die!
F*ck the police!
F*ck the police!
F*ck the police!
F*ck the police!

I don’t know the status of the Special Affairs/Internal Affairs units around the world who are supposed to keep the Police forces in check, but the world is corrupt more than the commoners imagine and there is simply very little attention. Why is this? Are these internal affairs services properly separated from the ordinary Police forces?

My impression from the "calm and sedate" Norway is that they are involved in everything from running drugs, taking part in crimes of passion more than anybody else and being more than willing to commit war-crimes (you know, these people travel and yes, drugs networks span the whole world) and acts of the worst torture with no special hesitation! The world is crazy… Where is the press in this regard? It’s funny that this Amnesty International is here to look after our rights in case something goes wrong when I’ve disclosed that they are as dysfunctional as the rest of society and are merely playing the façade game!!! I say this: You are WARNED!!! Take care!

Two Scientific Notices - Eye Impairment and Cancer Signatures

Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-05-31 16:26:52 [CEST]

I'd like to write about two scientific ideas, speculatively.
1. Eye Impairment - in the wake of bacteria zapping of eyes written into the Scribblings, I think I can now add that the various types of bacteria also define the severity of the eye impairment (up to the genetic flaw). This means there are specific bacteria for up to +3 or down to -3 and so on. It's here for you, specialists or not, to find out for real.
New note: it may also be that all that is required is to make a sample be needle into the side of the eyeball and from the sample, prescribe the proper antibiotics to heal the eye impairment! Common in USA?

2. Cancer Signatures - I think it's now fairly well known that cancers (benign or not) carry a portion of the genetic code that is epigenetic, that is, the cancer types are also marked by your life-development in terms of how your genetics change hence epi-genetics. It can also be interesting to check out whether or not one can read out personality types out of these longitudinal epigenetic researches and finally, tentatively, give verdicts or estimates how different cancer types will develop in people and based on typical "runs" also give predictions to people who have or or haven't yet acquired cancer (also benign or not).

Good? Good luck with your research, serious or not! Cheers!

Note is added today, 08.06.2011, by sample and antibiotics.

A Certain Distinction over Terms of Violence

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-31 03:17:35 [CEST]

I just like to mention these three concepts:
Attempt (French: Attentat), mostly political

Coup (Coup d'etat), political revolution, armed revolt

Terrorism, the act of imposing general fear/terror on a certain population or on a scope of population

Now as these are listed, I just like to point out the excellent distinction of "attempt". As a part of the political "game", one can expect to be having the possibility of committing an attempt. An attempt is important in the sense that hard impact (mostly implying damage and killing) can be made to some justified extent. I'm not sure if RAF (Rote Arme Fraktion) has been admitted this term or if they were just some kind of terror group. What I find interesting is that violent behaviour to a dysfunctional aspect of society is warranted. You know, that you have a good and justified violence to turn to in case you make the case for it and I think this avenue should be used more rather than seeing people blowing themselves up in apparently aimless acts of "terrorism", that the fashionable words have gone too far, like the ecological movements call for nuclear free world while flaunting increased fossil fuel dependence and overpopulation issues or the Doha debates for cultural understanding when the reality is really about business obstacles and the domination game. But then again, I find these harder activities void of the good intellectual leadership. An extraordinary example in this relation is the separation between Sinn Fein and its armed political activism of the IRA (Irish Republican Army). So, all in all, the intellectuals are missing their chances of getting the good data and descriptions presented and the media only gets to present the base, factual occurrence of violence taking place. This is not very helpful and I think we who can should work to amend these explanatory deficits! Good?

About a Conspiracy Connection Between Star Wars and USA

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-30 06:53:24

About a Conspiracy Connection Between Star Wars and USA: what if USA is the (white) Death Star that has the tractor beam aimed toward all those rebel "falcons", i.e., good people (everywhere) and inside the Death Star reside Lord Vader, the Emperor and all the red cloaked "cardinals", i.e., the highest subordinates and what is all this fuelled by? Yes, the biggest "machine" ever, the largest torture/terror scheme ever deviced, the "Proton Reactor" or whatever you want to call it! Yes...?

Let me add to this: the satanic/cultish "cardinals" with of course Lord Vader and the crazy "rich and old/decadent" leader on top, the Emperor himself!

Is Dark Matter a Joke in Light of No Existing Central Sun?

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-29 08:48:43

Upon the NASA news of this:
Are the planets without the gravity center of a sun/star making up for the alleged Dark Matter? Is therefore Dark Matter a bad physics/astronomy joke?

I don't know for how long the central stars of gravitational systems last (there is literature that you can check with), but as they explode in becoming dwarfs, the other planets, undeniably whir off to other orbits, taking on a whole new orbital life (insofar as they survive the explosion). So are these whirring planets of orphanage the secret behind "Dark Matter"?

I happen to have a Norwegian book on the subject, Astronomi - Fra strålende objekter til sorte hull - Vol. 2 (only) by Øystein Elgarøy and Øyvind Hauge with even a third title - Stjernehimmelen (perhaps name for the 2 volume series). Maybe I should buy another one in English and also bigger than this, 195 pages. It has, though, a strict university level content. There are no jokes in this book!!! :) It also has a chart for the typical life span of stars on page 85/92. This chart goes under "Main Series" of stars.

Another person also has questioned the nature of "Dark Matter" by suggesting the exact same thing as I do, but a little earlier, May 19, 2011 6:24 PM, and this person has posted a reply to the NASA on the Physics World site, by this link,

Note: this has first been published on the Philosophy Now forum under "Post subject: Is DarkMatter a Joke in Light of No Existing Central Sun? PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2011 6:49 am".

Various notes on my work in physics - By email to the Physics World

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-29 01:00:27 [CEST]

The content of the email is this, exactly:
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 08:20:32 +0200
From: "Mr. [ed.] L. F. Olsnes-Lea"
User-Agent: [info]

Subject: Some information you may like: On Physics
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Physicsworld

I have a few links to some physics work I've been doing:
Note on Gravity Probe B and Its Relation to Space by
(most importantly Cascading Gravity Effects of Weak/Strong Interaction Forces (inclusive vee)

Some Words on the Standard Model by
(scepticism toward gluons, numbering the particles 27/35 and entering
the quality criteria for new particles to enter the model

Cascading Effects of Weak and Strong Interaction Forces by (new explanation in light of the impossibility of the Graviton)

The Standard Model of Elementary Particles May Now Be Complete! by (writing on the Nr. 1 (To be known as the Photon Theory)

On Standard Model and the Future of It and Nr. 2 On Impossibility of the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson

Lastly, as underlying writing, by
Schrodinger's theory and Schrodinger's cat (the cat destroys the theory
by describing chance as unknown rather than 2-state and also questions
the experiment set-up in light of (classical) HDM and the notion of the
_normal_ descriptions of indirect observation (Couvalis and others)
rendering the whole problem idiotic [the paradox, see above]).

Over Problems with Schrodinger's theory and other - New Angles

On Standard Model and the Future of It

(Aether Aesthetics and) a More Credible View on Gravity by Strong and Weak Interactions

My Successful Prediction of Mini-Black Holes by CERN Experiment

On Big-Bang, Natural Laws, Asymmetry and Symmetry

On the Complexity of the Standard Model and Particles in Nature

On Impossibility of the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson

(On the Nature of Radio Signals From Space and how They Fit the Big Picture)

On the Bending of Light(-Streams as Photons) by Electro-Magnetic Field, a Very Strong One

(Note on My Competence to These Respects)

I hope you're happy with being informed on these matters.

Best wishes to your continued work.

Sincerely yours,
Mr. Terje Lea / Mr. [ed.] L. F. Olsnes-Lea
[part of address] / Akershus / Norway"

So the point: I've been writing people. There are also some nice comments in the parentheses that you may want.

Note: originally posted as

My Neighbourhood and My Living

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-28 08:44:17

[Removed, posting no longer of any importance!]

It's My Life - Go and F*ck Yourselves, Idiots!

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-25 02:49:18

It's My Life - Go and F*ck Yourselves, Idiots!

"It's My Life" by Dr. Alban, the lyrics:

A couple of YouTube links, and

It's my life, take it or leave it, set me free
What's that crap papa, know it all?
I got my own life, you got your own life
Live your own life and set me free
Mind your own business and leave my business
You know everything, papa know it all
Very little knowledge is dangerous

Stop bugging me, stop bothering me
Stop bugging me, stop forcing me
Stop fighting me, stop yelling me
It's my life

(It's my life)
It's my life my worries
(It's my life)
It's my life my problems
(It's my life)
It's my life my worries
(It's my life)
It's my life my problems
(It's my life)

Do you understand? I live the way I want to live
I make decisions day and night
Show me signs and good examples
Stop telling people how to run your business
Take a trip to east and west
You'll find that you don't know anything

Every's getting tired of you
Sometimes you have to look and listen
You can even learn from me
Little knowledge is dangerous, it's my life

(It's my life)
It's my life my worries
(It's my life)
[ From: ]
It's my life my problems
(It's my life)
It's my life my worries
(It's my life)
It's my life my problems
(It's my life)

Set me free, so you bed, so you lie
What you see is what you get
Listen to people and sort things out
Things I do, I do them no more
Things I say, I say them no more
Changes come once in life

Stop bugging me, stop bothering me
Stop bugging me, stop forcing me
Stop fighting me, stop yelling me
Stop telling me, stop seeing me, it's my life

(It's my life)
It's my life my worries
(It's my life)
It's my life my problems
(It's my life)
It's my life my worries
(It's my life)
It's my life my problems
(It's my life)
It's my life
(It's my life)
It's my life
(It's my life)
(It's my life)

(It's my life)
Stop fighting me, stop fighting me
(It's my life)
Stop forcing me, stop yelling me
(It's my life)
It's my life, it's my life
(It's my life)
Stop fighting me, stop fighting me
(It's my life)
Stop forcing me, stop yelling me
(It's my life)
It's my life
(It's my life)

The lyrics are provided by

A Comment on the "New Type of Planets"

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-22 20:18:56

Relating to these two links, and The blog is by Knut Jørgen Røed Ødegaard and National Broadcasting of Norway, NRK, and the NASA link is of course by the renowned NASA by USA.

At about 18:35 CEST, 22nd May, 2011, I write the following message as comment to the blog:
"Jeg vil bare si at selv vår egen Sol kommer til å eksplodere en gang og hva skjer med de øvrige planetene da, som Venus og _utover_ (til dvergen Pluto)? Jo de kommer til å "virre" omkring som disse 10 planetene. Det trenger ikke å stamme fra Big Bang alt sammen...

It translates appx. to this:
I only want to say that our own Sun [thus the Solar system by the center, the Sun] is going to explode sometime and what happens with the other planets[/heavenly objects] then, like Venus and beyond [outwardly, away from the Sun] (to the dwarf Pluto)? Yes, they're going to float freely about in about the same manner as these 10 planets. It doesn't need to originate from the Big Bang all of it... smiley

This is a direct consequence from the life-span of stars that usually enter the end-destiny/fate as dwarf-objects in outer space. You can consider/look up White Dwarfs and Brown Dwarfs. Before they enter the "life"-stage as Dwarf objects, they undergo a massive explosion that "throws off" most of their mass and all that will remain after it is a relatively small object called a "dwarf". Good?

Quantum Physics, Psychology and Foreseeing

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-21 20:50:57

There's some discussion on the ability of "foreseeing"/"telling accurately what the future holds" and in this relation I can't find a plausible reason why this phenomenon should start/exist on a quantum/atom level prior to actual and perceived ability of "foreseeing"/"telling accurately what the future holds" and not enter the actual and perceived ability of "foreseeing"/"telling accurately what the future holds" with the same level of accuracy as on the quantum/atom level!

This relates to the research of prof. Daryl Bem's, Cornell University, work of actual and real capacity of foreseeing the future and the excellent work by Dick Bierman, PhD, quantum physicist and psychologist by the University of Amsterdam in Holland.

Note on Gravity Probe B and Its Relation to Space

Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-20 22:56:19

I've written some words on the news of the results from Gravity Probe B in relation to how these scientists define space.
By 20:21, 7th May, 2011, I write that even if the results are interpreted as a "distortion"/"warping" of time-space, it doesn't mean that there are particular problems with naming these same effects as time-gravitation and so on or time-Cascading Effects of Strong/Weak Nuclear Interaction Forces! This is of course in the sense that both of these other concepts of "space", i.e., gravitation and Cascading Effects of Strong/Weak Nuclear Interaction Forces, can replace this use of "space". This occurs because I think these particular scientists are seeking the string-theory description of nature. So please don't be scared that they now "see"/"imagine" space as being "distorted"/"warped" because it's just a description of what normal people consider gravitation and it's fairly plain to see what the results are once you get into the jargon and remove the excess fancy of words. Funny: jargon=nomenclature, just so they get it.

Note: the original text from which this is written, "Hei dere. Selv om dette defineres som en "distortion"/"warping" av tid-rom så er det ikke noen spesielle problemer med å kalle disse samme effekter ...av tid-gravitasjon og videre ...av tid-Cascading Effects of Strong/Weak Nuclear Interaction Forces! Bare så dere er klar over det!"

2/12 (Next 20 to go, to nr. 3)

1 comment:

  1. Alright, I may have been a bit flimsy myself so I've deleted a possible unfair accusation against the Mozilla Firefox, but I must warn, there is dubious stuff going on with the internet! Take care!