So whatever virtue I have _belongs_, as legacy after my death (immediate or not, by New Modal Conception of God etc (incl. inventing a cold war, LoveToUSAWar, an arms race)) goes out to the World in order of Austria, Germany and Denmark ... Lesotho, figuratively, not that they are _any_ less welcome, and at the end, the sh*tslide of Norway with its tail, definitely, of Farsund Commune (eh... "kommune") and its infamous clin-crazy/torture-ic, the f*ck last! So: Norwegians, don't think about carrying my word, my sentiment, my respects or whatever unless, and not before then, my "day" is saved (or my family's, for that matter) throughout HISTORY! F*ck YOU!!!
(However, my family is good and they are "first in my life", the 9 closest to start with!)
Cheers!
Thursday, 29 September 2011
Sunday, 25 September 2011
Demand Non-Hackable Operating Systems NOW (and Don't Excuse Them)!!!
Just demand non-hackable Operating Systems right away because you can, of course, by fairly simple means, control every stream of information going in and out of your computer (to the internet). Thus, most dubiously and most exposed, even the snippet on the pornsite that requests outgoing information can be blocked!
Heck, it may not even need to be allowed to do anything in particular either because it's not taking part in safe conventions of programming! Ultimately, you need to explicitly want the malware, virus and spyware and nobody wants that!
The internet should become very safe in near future if corruption isn't insisted upon and crucial services like ISP, services servers (like your bank) and general routing (leave the "telephone-centrals" alone, uttered by the French!) are safe (guaranteed)! It really takes high level intervention to make this corruption work and it should become obvious every time it happens!!!
So why is this, the information in and out of the system, mixed into an inoperable pool of idiocy by Mozilla Firefox and others? When indeed this could have been laid out nicely and orderly!
Just like Microsoft is adding thousands of services and snippets of programming and offering these for free when indeed crucial, but small programs are being ignored! This is nothing less the subversion of the population at large!
No wonder nowadays then that when one orders 50$ of firewall and anti-virus/-malware/-spyware it feels like sponsoring employment programs for idiots!
(I'm having problems with listing Microsoft as a tag on this post! Is the publicity? :-) )
(Also, concerning some mal-delineation, my host is being generous with the editor that I'm writing this into.)
Heck, it may not even need to be allowed to do anything in particular either because it's not taking part in safe conventions of programming! Ultimately, you need to explicitly want the malware, virus and spyware and nobody wants that!
The internet should become very safe in near future if corruption isn't insisted upon and crucial services like ISP, services servers (like your bank) and general routing (leave the "telephone-centrals" alone, uttered by the French!) are safe (guaranteed)! It really takes high level intervention to make this corruption work and it should become obvious every time it happens!!!
So why is this, the information in and out of the system, mixed into an inoperable pool of idiocy by Mozilla Firefox and others? When indeed this could have been laid out nicely and orderly!
Just like Microsoft is adding thousands of services and snippets of programming and offering these for free when indeed crucial, but small programs are being ignored! This is nothing less the subversion of the population at large!
No wonder nowadays then that when one orders 50$ of firewall and anti-virus/-malware/-spyware it feels like sponsoring employment programs for idiots!
(I'm having problems with listing Microsoft as a tag on this post! Is the publicity? :-) )
(Also, concerning some mal-delineation, my host is being generous with the editor that I'm writing this into.)
Saturday, 24 September 2011
"Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security"
From at least "two of the most undemocratic nations in the World", I have the pleasure to present:
"A/66/359 Item 93 of the provisional agenda –– Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security –– Letter dated 12 September 2011 from the Permanent Representatives of China, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General [A C E F R S] –– 5 pages" from the Journal of the United Nations No. 2011/180!
"A/66/359 Item 93 of the provisional agenda –– Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security –– Letter dated 12 September 2011 from the Permanent Representatives of China, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General [A C E F R S] –– 5 pages" from the Journal of the United Nations No. 2011/180!
Regarding Pres. Obama's Statement of "the Fight of the Social Classes"
I must say right away that I support his statement, "they do what is right for them", it's about getting employed and living life, hopefully as normally as possible. But I also like to add that I support the establishment, loosely or not, a key-system for how wages/salaries are to develop, thus capping this idiot war to a minimum, increasing stability and prospects to people and businesses alike! Good?
About Leadership and Responsibility - Formal Note
I support the view that all people, everywhere in the World (incl. ISS) have the duty to take part in leading the society to a respectful future, one that includes human rights, good ecology and so on. There is also a philosopher you can check up on this topic, urging the academics to take a greater interest in the leadership of society! You will have to identify this philosopher yourself, until I've found the name myself. Check for TedTalks and Philosophy Bites to start with, please.
Friday, 23 September 2011
Today's Issues on the Palestine-Israel Conflict
Newest: The Roadmap to Peace by the Quartet. Where are we (in a plan to lasting peace)? For how long lasts the conflict more (even as estimate) until the final, predictable steps? Land-lease in Palestine by Israel on the Hong Kong accords, Britain to China, i.e., Israel paying Palestine a sum of money each year until land returns to Palestine after some 200 years or other?
Url.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_map_for_peace .
(Y-design of information is erased.)
To solve the stalemate of maps describing Palestine and Israel, here's one suggestion:
As the (most) subverting party should be known as Israel, I hope the Palestinians and UN body/the Quartet together make the move to create a (temporary) reasonable map in partnership, also with several options such as one including this and another including not so much, one being more likely to obtain agreement, the others for display (with description of history/reasoning and legend)!
It should also be known that Israel in the past has rejected NATO membership by an ethical grounding.
(The other comments are to appear here on a row from most recent to most old.)
This blogposting has started like this, now solved by the Quartet and initiative by former French president Sarkozy: The dangerous path toward a possible nuclear strike on Israel in some distant future.
Poverty of Palestinians vs. the status now of these other 3. Why are Palestinians so dangerous, such an existential threat (almost as if the appetite for perversion would need other ways with ending the conflict)? So what is it going to be, you?
More conventionally:
First, if at all, the Palestinians need to get filthy rich just to load that "anti-Israeli nuclear device" onboard (and they are way behind the other 3 countries of relevance, Egypt, Lebanon and Syria). Then, in a state of democracy and thriving business life and vibrant business connections, they, the Palestinians, are supposed to let go of evey civilised advance, possibly over 50 years from now, just to destroy Israel! Plausible? No!!! No, the Palestinians are not those cold, idiotic, senseless, crazy morons! And they don't differ much from these other 3 countries which have far greater liberties for loading aboard this "anti-Israel nuclear device".
Dear Israelis, say "yes to life", please! Pleeeeaaaaaase! (Probably a wanton from most of the World population)
(A nuclear arms issue has been discussed to some extent. But with plausibility and no reality toward any use "against Israel".)
Note: Please read all three blogposts for the Israeli-Palestine conflict, that has lasted for more than 50 years or so.
Url.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_map_for_peace .
(Y-design of information is erased.)
To solve the stalemate of maps describing Palestine and Israel, here's one suggestion:
As the (most) subverting party should be known as Israel, I hope the Palestinians and UN body/the Quartet together make the move to create a (temporary) reasonable map in partnership, also with several options such as one including this and another including not so much, one being more likely to obtain agreement, the others for display (with description of history/reasoning and legend)!
It should also be known that Israel in the past has rejected NATO membership by an ethical grounding.
(The other comments are to appear here on a row from most recent to most old.)
Poverty of Palestinians vs. the status now of these other 3. Why are Palestinians so dangerous, such an existential threat (almost as if the appetite for perversion would need other ways with ending the conflict)? So what is it going to be, you?
More conventionally:
First, if at all, the Palestinians need to get filthy rich just to load that "anti-Israeli nuclear device" onboard (and they are way behind the other 3 countries of relevance, Egypt, Lebanon and Syria). Then, in a state of democracy and thriving business life and vibrant business connections, they, the Palestinians, are supposed to let go of evey civilised advance, possibly over 50 years from now, just to destroy Israel! Plausible? No!!! No, the Palestinians are not those cold, idiotic, senseless, crazy morons! And they don't differ much from these other 3 countries which have far greater liberties for loading aboard this "anti-Israel nuclear device".
Dear Israelis, say "yes to life", please! Pleeeeaaaaaase! (Probably a wanton from most of the World population)
(A nuclear arms issue has been discussed to some extent. But with plausibility and no reality toward any use "against Israel".)
Note: Please read all three blogposts for the Israeli-Palestine conflict, that has lasted for more than 50 years or so.
Wednesday, 21 September 2011
Logical Set-Up for a Pro-Palestinian Position
The logics as argument follows:
1. Israel has been followed in the past with negative results
2. Palestine* has not been followed (for positive results)
3. Palestine* has a suggestion to be followed or not (for positive results)
0.----------------------------------------------------
4. Israel must not be followed
5. Palestine* must be followed
0.----------------------------------------------------
6. One follows the Palestine* suggestion
Universe of Discourse, UD: Israelis, Palestinians, Results (and I guess the rest of the World)
I: Israelis
P: Palestinians
R: Results
Symbolic expression, under SD+:
1. | I -> ~R -----------------------------------A (Assumption)
2. | (~P -> ~R) V (P -> R) -------------------A
3. | ~(~P -> ~R) ------------------------------A
0. |----------------------------------------------------
4. | | ~P -> ~R --------------------------------A
0. | |----------------------------------------------------
5. | | ~(~P -> ~R) ----------------------------3 R
6. | | ~P -> ~R -------------------------------4 R
7. | ~(~P -> ~R) -----------------------------4-6 ~E (also ending injection, one step down again)
8. | (~P -> ~R) V (P -> R) -------------------2 R
9. | ~(~P -> ~R) -----------------------------7 R
0. |----------------------------------------------------
10.| P -> R ----------------------------------8-9 DS (Disjunctive Syllogism)
Sub-argument:
1. P -> R
2. P
0.-----------------------
3. P R (_R_eiteration)
0.-----------------------
4. R Condiitonal elimination
Palestine* is not Palestine yet, it's just a short for its people!
(I'm sorry for this, smarta**es, but you have been severely wrong here to make certain assumptions about this line that's now removed!!!)
1. Israel has been followed in the past with negative results
2. Palestine* has not been followed (for positive results)
3. Palestine* has a suggestion to be followed or not (for positive results)
0.----------------------------------------------------
4. Israel must not be followed
5. Palestine* must be followed
0.----------------------------------------------------
6. One follows the Palestine* suggestion
Universe of Discourse, UD: Israelis, Palestinians, Results (and I guess the rest of the World)
I: Israelis
P: Palestinians
R: Results
Symbolic expression, under SD+:
1. | I -> ~R -----------------------------------A (Assumption)
2. | (~P -> ~R) V (P -> R) -------------------A
3. | ~(~P -> ~R) ------------------------------A
0. |----------------------------------------------------
4. | | ~P -> ~R --------------------------------A
0. | |----------------------------------------------------
5. | | ~(~P -> ~R) ----------------------------3 R
6. | | ~P -> ~R -------------------------------4 R
7. | ~(~P -> ~R) -----------------------------4-6 ~E (also ending injection, one step down again)
8. | (~P -> ~R) V (P -> R) -------------------2 R
9. | ~(~P -> ~R) -----------------------------7 R
0. |----------------------------------------------------
10.| P -> R ----------------------------------8-9 DS (Disjunctive Syllogism)
Sub-argument:
1. P -> R
2. P
0.-----------------------
3. P R (_R_eiteration)
0.-----------------------
4. R Condiitonal elimination
Palestine* is not Palestine yet, it's just a short for its people!
(I'm sorry for this, smarta**es, but you have been severely wrong here to make certain assumptions about this line that's now removed!!!)
Idea for a Xenu Version of Shakespeare's Othello
This is a Key Service Message from Le Presidente de Galactica (heh-heh, just kidding)!
We are or I am planning to make a version of Shakespeare's Othello with Xenu in it in a (sci-fi, thus the far, far, future) Space Opera. I haven't yet figured out the character set just yet, but this is certainly going to provide a shock to the Xenu critics out there, you know, that "Scientology" can be this way, ending with, (epilogue), Thank You for enjoying our show and I can congratulate You on now being Operating Thetans III (3), NOT officially recognised (that means You're rogue) and that You from now on need to watch up the secret Scientology Inquisition! Have a pleasant evening!
We are or I am planning to make a version of Shakespeare's Othello with Xenu in it in a (sci-fi, thus the far, far, future) Space Opera. I haven't yet figured out the character set just yet, but this is certainly going to provide a shock to the Xenu critics out there, you know, that "Scientology" can be this way, ending with, (epilogue), Thank You for enjoying our show and I can congratulate You on now being Operating Thetans III (3), NOT officially recognised (that means You're rogue) and that You from now on need to watch up the secret Scientology Inquisition! Have a pleasant evening!
Sunday, 18 September 2011
My European Commitment
My European commitment:
We are Europeans. We produce better products and we like to compete.
We like the European Union.
Hopefully, the EU will prove to have greater longevity than Pax Romana, avoiding the decadence of that time and in the future and make the infinity. To Europe! Cheers!
I like to think of EU as the New Roman Empire.
This is meant to align with the rythm and cords of the Matrix promotion trailer.
The EU constitution here: (From the old websites I had uploaded the EU constitution which could be downloaded by anyone).
By Terje Lea. Exact creation date of this webpage is unknown, but it's been here a good while now. I'm also proud to have this position throughout my adult life from 1993!
-Frontpage
We are Europeans. We produce better products and we like to compete.
We like the European Union.
Hopefully, the EU will prove to have greater longevity than Pax Romana, avoiding the decadence of that time and in the future and make the infinity. To Europe! Cheers!
I like to think of EU as the New Roman Empire.
This is meant to align with the rythm and cords of the Matrix promotion trailer.
The EU constitution here: (From the old websites I had uploaded the EU constitution which could be downloaded by anyone).
By Terje Lea. Exact creation date of this webpage is unknown, but it's been here a good while now. I'm also proud to have this position throughout my adult life from 1993!
-Frontpage
Saturday, 17 September 2011
The Newest Writings from Facebook
"Blut und Ehre" is another contemporary "Nazi" motto that I'd like to address people with as well as it eclipses with the urge to courage very nicely! I've written, earlier, to Amnesty International (AI) about the necessity of courage for achieving decency and honour and this is worth much more than what "these other people" can ever understand. They just "fly on" whatever (whether it's heroin or something else). This is an important decision for You to make! I just tell you... (Blut und Ehre as Courage has the Blood _to_ Honour in it, yet the writing says Courage to Honour (placed with AI)! This may be found contradictory ...
11 Minutes ago.
... , but it isn't because "Blut und Ehre" is just the mantra/motto _leading_ to decency and honour, not necessarily being this, Honour (Ehre) -> Honour (impl.), which is of course to write something strange! (What would Honour to Honour mean other than a version of Tarski's meaning theory or Honour from one person to another person (of Honour)?) Not that I'm against one person of Honour to another person of Honour, but this is a very common notion of friendship or of the Philo love to close connections and the love within the family.
4 Minutes ago.
Somewhere in my blog writings I've pointed to "viral game of sickness". This is to change to "viral, venereal, exotica games of sickness"! Just a notice.
30 Minutes ago.
So on top the the "Love to USA War", I make a version over Hitler's speech to the "Reichstag" in 1939, right before the war on Poland, 1. Sept. 1939: Rund 6,5 (komma) Milliarden Bürger und Bürgerinnen standen damals hinter mir! (And now I get a famous poster where I can get money with my "Brazilien" greeting, stolen from a dead Nazi.)
32 Minutes ago.
Some time ago, I've "invented" a new "cold war", i.e., that I propose for a new "cold war" to start against USA for becomming symmetrical to them, in terms of being able, the rest of the World, to deliver so much damage to them that the mere thought about going to nuclear war or abusing its military power against the World in large parts would immediately prove far too costly! Thus the thought would be banished or ridiculed immediately. This "cold war" is given the name "LoveToUSAWar".
37 Minutes ago.
My references to the point under "Schrödinger's theory and Schrödinger's cat" under "Opinions on Physics" are these among others, George Couvalis in Philosophy of Science, Sci. and Obj., 1997 on "indirect observation", p. ...
8. Sept., time, 22:49.
I've been thinking the book has held a point on "indirect observation" for separating "scientific realism" from other types of "realism", one of which is "realism", rather old fashioned now. But as the story goes, I think my books are being tampered with because the index listing of "indirect observation" is gone as well as the instance of "Casui Studies", 1 page, in Research Designs and Methods. Sorry. I'm being sabotaged!
8. september kl. 22:59.
The other is my further work on "indirect observation", being indirect observations that are there by laws of nature, i.e., if you see only half the planet, the other half of the planet has to be there because... and this is found with "The Power of a Single Span of Time - an Instance - Contrary to Hume on Induction - The Refutation of the Problem of Induction" and a smaller writing with the Scribblings file where this proceeds as a shorter writing.
8. september kl. 23:10.
It says on the SAGE publications website that the book should be 224 pp. Mine (now) is 195 before Ref. and Index and 206 and last paged page. (Leaving only 4 pages for the binding.)
8. Sept., time, 23:19.
There are some pages in addition, as some count the preface pages, viii, that is, 8 pages more to this book. But all in all, the book still falls short 2 pages compared to the 224 pp.
10. Sept., time, 18:50.
Indirect observation usually relates to viewing something through a magnifying scope/using a magnifier and using a telescope. One has through the times questioned everything that hasn't been seen with the naked eye. Even then, scientific realism or other versions of it, probably has 99.9 % following, even 100 % if one counts only the serious. In opposition, the philosopher gamers, the rogues, they who are in it for the hair splitting and making idiotic points. Just so you have it.
10. Sept., time, 18:55.
You can compare "indirect observation" with "instrumentalisation" where the data are gathered by the output of the instrument in use by itself and where no direct human sense can perceive. I guess examples of instrumentalisation can be measuring of mass and acidity. You can check it out yourself.
10. Sept., time, 18:57.
The magnifier is also the microscope. I'm not sure to what extent the magnifying _glass_ has been or is questioned, but realism, as above, has usually related to the naked eye as a starting point for human scientific investigation (and doubting everything else...)!
Thursday, time, 21:11.
The above writing is intended to point to other references for my opinions on this matter. This is poorly communicated above. The writing on Schrödinger's theory should otherwise be clear. It's _defeated_ by its cat (now a rat)! Something has to be done and I suggest Physics to be redefined in light of it! (Wave Collapse has already been moved to the subject of Psychology and String Theory is set for destruction, i.e., made implausible and untenable! Good?
17 hours ago.
I've watched an interview today on BBC World where Mrs. Kay of BBC America interviews the US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice. It irritates me slightly how USA keeps demanding this fruitless meeting at the negotiation table, but let's meet them! I have this to say. Sure, let them make their demands to one another at a negotiation table at the UN, in New York, in Israel or in Jerusalem, at least somewhere. So they put the demands on the table and begin to "read Donald Duck or whatever" (because they have met so many times before). Thus we meet with the demand/requirement of USA for making a Palestine state. While these people of Israel and Palestine keep meeting one another, here or there, the Palestinians make a bid to the UN Security Council for an own state, The State of Palestine! This state can very well have limited sovereignty to avoid rapid hostility actions to build. This limited sovereignty is to be described under "a transition to normalcy between the two states" as a normalcy between two developed nations, fx. France and Germany. So there we begin... 1. The negotiation table, 2. The bid to the security council, 3. signing the agreement of limited sovereignty "for a peaceful transition to occur", and by this I think we're set to solve this conflict! [If USA keeps being "subversive" they need to be "reminded" of this/hammered by World presure and independent declaration from the other states at the UN, fx. Security Council and so on. Let's hope this doesn't get necessary. Just a formal point though.]
Yesterday, time, 13:37.
Sorry, it's UNISPAL...
Yesterday, time, 13:38.
Alright, posted!
Yesterday, time, 13:39.
The reporters name is Katty Kay! [Finally right!]
Yesterday, time, 13:43.
Also posted to BBC Have Your Say and CNN IReport.
Yesterday, time, 14:12.
In addition to this input, I've gotten the report of CNN by Richard Roth! Peace! [Add. to the above posted to BBC and CNN.]
Yesterday, time, 14:12.
Salem, Shalom... (Love labours on...)
Yesterday, time, 14:39.
I think I've gotten some laughs from this: I'm going to put String Theory so firmly on a cloud (by power of description, -> plausibility) that not even the cloudheads, i.e., the string theorists, can get their heads to it...!!! :-)
Yesterday, time, 14:17.
I've uttered a few others as well and I hope to greet my new country -men and -women with more in the time to come! Cheers!
Yesterday, time, 14:19.
I have 2 further notifications on Scientology this evening. One is about the question over authority. By this, the two pages of "A New Slant on Life", p. 34 and p. 40, make the cult requirement of authority go away forever. There's no doubt! The other is about how the basics relate to the further levels above clear. The so-called secret material. I think I've read somewhere that "all of Scientology lies in the scope of this/the basics". If this is true and I think it is, then the teachings of Scientology can't lie outside of this scope and should therefore be _uncontroversial_! A corroborative to this is that a symbol of Scientology is a green pyramid on the side of and on the back of "The Evolution of a Science". I think it's a fair assertion to say that with time, all the expert stuff of doctorates' dissertations are included in the fundamentals. The word "fundamentals" are found at least two places in this book, "A New Slant...", p. 37 and p. 40! Good? (I think it's reasonable to expect further attacks to spurious and tendentious allegations of critics with dubious motivations by followers of Scientology and I will of course in the future look a the better phrase, fx. the unfounded one above that I've yet to locate in _my_ basics, not tampered with!
Wednesday time, 21:48
Besides, using the volcano on Dianetics to prove the connection to the Xenu story is leading nowhere. As much as the nuke blast in a desert and not on Tokyo is used for something magnificent so can the volcano in general terms!
Wednesday, time, 22:15.
A final word for now on Scientology is that while Scientologists believe in sentences like "do not harm a person of good will" and other good ethics that they share readily with others, the critics are not known for much ethics AT ALL. I suspect to _them_ to be of all sorts of nasty characters and they don't commit to any investigative honesty standard at all, to my knowledge, thus they risk NOTHING in hammering Scientology!
Wednesday time, 22:20.
Facebook, appx. time: 17:18, date: 17.09.2011. All CEST.
11 Minutes ago.
... , but it isn't because "Blut und Ehre" is just the mantra/motto _leading_ to decency and honour, not necessarily being this, Honour (Ehre) -> Honour (impl.), which is of course to write something strange! (What would Honour to Honour mean other than a version of Tarski's meaning theory or Honour from one person to another person (of Honour)?) Not that I'm against one person of Honour to another person of Honour, but this is a very common notion of friendship or of the Philo love to close connections and the love within the family.
4 Minutes ago.
Somewhere in my blog writings I've pointed to "viral game of sickness". This is to change to "viral, venereal, exotica games of sickness"! Just a notice.
30 Minutes ago.
So on top the the "Love to USA War", I make a version over Hitler's speech to the "Reichstag" in 1939, right before the war on Poland, 1. Sept. 1939: Rund 6,5 (komma) Milliarden Bürger und Bürgerinnen standen damals hinter mir! (And now I get a famous poster where I can get money with my "Brazilien" greeting, stolen from a dead Nazi.)
32 Minutes ago.
Some time ago, I've "invented" a new "cold war", i.e., that I propose for a new "cold war" to start against USA for becomming symmetrical to them, in terms of being able, the rest of the World, to deliver so much damage to them that the mere thought about going to nuclear war or abusing its military power against the World in large parts would immediately prove far too costly! Thus the thought would be banished or ridiculed immediately. This "cold war" is given the name "LoveToUSAWar".
37 Minutes ago.
My references to the point under "Schrödinger's theory and Schrödinger's cat" under "Opinions on Physics" are these among others, George Couvalis in Philosophy of Science, Sci. and Obj., 1997 on "indirect observation", p. ...
8. Sept., time, 22:49.
I've been thinking the book has held a point on "indirect observation" for separating "scientific realism" from other types of "realism", one of which is "realism", rather old fashioned now. But as the story goes, I think my books are being tampered with because the index listing of "indirect observation" is gone as well as the instance of "Casui Studies", 1 page, in Research Designs and Methods. Sorry. I'm being sabotaged!
8. september kl. 22:59.
The other is my further work on "indirect observation", being indirect observations that are there by laws of nature, i.e., if you see only half the planet, the other half of the planet has to be there because... and this is found with "The Power of a Single Span of Time - an Instance - Contrary to Hume on Induction - The Refutation of the Problem of Induction" and a smaller writing with the Scribblings file where this proceeds as a shorter writing.
8. september kl. 23:10.
It says on the SAGE publications website that the book should be 224 pp. Mine (now) is 195 before Ref. and Index and 206 and last paged page. (Leaving only 4 pages for the binding.)
8. Sept., time, 23:19.
There are some pages in addition, as some count the preface pages, viii, that is, 8 pages more to this book. But all in all, the book still falls short 2 pages compared to the 224 pp.
10. Sept., time, 18:50.
Indirect observation usually relates to viewing something through a magnifying scope/using a magnifier and using a telescope. One has through the times questioned everything that hasn't been seen with the naked eye. Even then, scientific realism or other versions of it, probably has 99.9 % following, even 100 % if one counts only the serious. In opposition, the philosopher gamers, the rogues, they who are in it for the hair splitting and making idiotic points. Just so you have it.
10. Sept., time, 18:55.
You can compare "indirect observation" with "instrumentalisation" where the data are gathered by the output of the instrument in use by itself and where no direct human sense can perceive. I guess examples of instrumentalisation can be measuring of mass and acidity. You can check it out yourself.
10. Sept., time, 18:57.
The magnifier is also the microscope. I'm not sure to what extent the magnifying _glass_ has been or is questioned, but realism, as above, has usually related to the naked eye as a starting point for human scientific investigation (and doubting everything else...)!
Thursday, time, 21:11.
The above writing is intended to point to other references for my opinions on this matter. This is poorly communicated above. The writing on Schrödinger's theory should otherwise be clear. It's _defeated_ by its cat (now a rat)! Something has to be done and I suggest Physics to be redefined in light of it! (Wave Collapse has already been moved to the subject of Psychology and String Theory is set for destruction, i.e., made implausible and untenable! Good?
17 hours ago.
I've watched an interview today on BBC World where Mrs. Kay of BBC America interviews the US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice. It irritates me slightly how USA keeps demanding this fruitless meeting at the negotiation table, but let's meet them! I have this to say. Sure, let them make their demands to one another at a negotiation table at the UN, in New York, in Israel or in Jerusalem, at least somewhere. So they put the demands on the table and begin to "read Donald Duck or whatever" (because they have met so many times before). Thus we meet with the demand/requirement of USA for making a Palestine state. While these people of Israel and Palestine keep meeting one another, here or there, the Palestinians make a bid to the UN Security Council for an own state, The State of Palestine! This state can very well have limited sovereignty to avoid rapid hostility actions to build. This limited sovereignty is to be described under "a transition to normalcy between the two states" as a normalcy between two developed nations, fx. France and Germany. So there we begin... 1. The negotiation table, 2. The bid to the security council, 3. signing the agreement of limited sovereignty "for a peaceful transition to occur", and by this I think we're set to solve this conflict! [If USA keeps being "subversive" they need to be "reminded" of this/hammered by World presure and independent declaration from the other states at the UN, fx. Security Council and so on. Let's hope this doesn't get necessary. Just a formal point though.]
Yesterday, time, 13:37.
Sorry, it's UNISPAL...
Yesterday, time, 13:38.
Alright, posted!
Yesterday, time, 13:39.
The reporters name is Katty Kay! [Finally right!]
Yesterday, time, 13:43.
Also posted to BBC Have Your Say and CNN IReport.
Yesterday, time, 14:12.
In addition to this input, I've gotten the report of CNN by Richard Roth! Peace! [Add. to the above posted to BBC and CNN.]
Yesterday, time, 14:12.
Salem, Shalom... (Love labours on...)
Yesterday, time, 14:39.
I think I've gotten some laughs from this: I'm going to put String Theory so firmly on a cloud (by power of description, -> plausibility) that not even the cloudheads, i.e., the string theorists, can get their heads to it...!!! :-)
Yesterday, time, 14:17.
I've uttered a few others as well and I hope to greet my new country -men and -women with more in the time to come! Cheers!
Yesterday, time, 14:19.
I have 2 further notifications on Scientology this evening. One is about the question over authority. By this, the two pages of "A New Slant on Life", p. 34 and p. 40, make the cult requirement of authority go away forever. There's no doubt! The other is about how the basics relate to the further levels above clear. The so-called secret material. I think I've read somewhere that "all of Scientology lies in the scope of this/the basics". If this is true and I think it is, then the teachings of Scientology can't lie outside of this scope and should therefore be _uncontroversial_! A corroborative to this is that a symbol of Scientology is a green pyramid on the side of and on the back of "The Evolution of a Science". I think it's a fair assertion to say that with time, all the expert stuff of doctorates' dissertations are included in the fundamentals. The word "fundamentals" are found at least two places in this book, "A New Slant...", p. 37 and p. 40! Good? (I think it's reasonable to expect further attacks to spurious and tendentious allegations of critics with dubious motivations by followers of Scientology and I will of course in the future look a the better phrase, fx. the unfounded one above that I've yet to locate in _my_ basics, not tampered with!
Wednesday time, 21:48
Besides, using the volcano on Dianetics to prove the connection to the Xenu story is leading nowhere. As much as the nuke blast in a desert and not on Tokyo is used for something magnificent so can the volcano in general terms!
Wednesday, time, 22:15.
A final word for now on Scientology is that while Scientologists believe in sentences like "do not harm a person of good will" and other good ethics that they share readily with others, the critics are not known for much ethics AT ALL. I suspect to _them_ to be of all sorts of nasty characters and they don't commit to any investigative honesty standard at all, to my knowledge, thus they risk NOTHING in hammering Scientology!
Wednesday time, 22:20.
Facebook, appx. time: 17:18, date: 17.09.2011. All CEST.
Friday, 16 September 2011
Schrödinger's theory and Schrödinger's cat
"Opinions on Physics" are these among others, George Couvalis in Philosophy of Science, Sci. and Obj., 1997 on "indirect observation", p. ... Well, since my living is in this state, I can recommend you to look up indirect observation in every introductory book to Philosophy of Science, especially those from the 90s and further back in time.
I've been thinking the book has held a point on "indirect observation" for separating "scientific realism" from other types of "realism", one of which is "realism", rather old fashioned now. But as the story goes, I think my books are being tampered with because the index listing of "indirect observation" is gone as well as the instance of "Casui Studies", 1 page, in Research Designs and Methods. Sorry. I'm being sabotaged!
The other is my further work on "indirect observation", being indirect observations that are there by laws of nature, i.e., if you see only half the planet, the other half of the planet has to be there because... and this is found with "The Power of a Single Span of Time - an Instance - Contrary to Hume on Induction - The Refutation of the Problem of Induction" and a smaller writing with the Scribblings file where this proceeds as a shorter writing.
It says on the SAGE publications website that the book should be 224 pp. Mine (now) is 195 before Ref. and Index and 206 and last paged page. (Leaving only 4 pages for the binding.)
There are some pages in addition, as some count the preface pages, viii, that is, 8 pages more to this book. But all in all, the book still falls short 2 pages compared to the 224 pp.
Indirect observation usually relates to viewing something through a magnifying scope/using a magnifier and using a telescope. One has through the times questioned everything that hasn't been seen with the naked eye. Even then, scientific realism or other versions of it, probably has 99.9 % following, even 100 % if one counts only the serious. In opposition, the philosopher gamers, the rogues, they who are in it for the hair splitting and making idiotic points. Just so you have it.
You can compare "indirect observation" with "instrumentalisation" where the data are gathered by the output of the instrument in use by itself and where no direct human sense can perceive. I guess examples of instrumentalisation can be measuring of mass and acidity. You can check it out yourself.
The magnifier is also the microscope. I'm not sure to what extent the magnifying _glass_ has been or is questioned, but realism, as above, has usually related to the naked eye as a starting point for human scientific investigation (and doubting everything else...)!
From Facebook where it has been originally posted!
I've been thinking the book has held a point on "indirect observation" for separating "scientific realism" from other types of "realism", one of which is "realism", rather old fashioned now. But as the story goes, I think my books are being tampered with because the index listing of "indirect observation" is gone as well as the instance of "Casui Studies", 1 page, in Research Designs and Methods. Sorry. I'm being sabotaged!
The other is my further work on "indirect observation", being indirect observations that are there by laws of nature, i.e., if you see only half the planet, the other half of the planet has to be there because... and this is found with "The Power of a Single Span of Time - an Instance - Contrary to Hume on Induction - The Refutation of the Problem of Induction" and a smaller writing with the Scribblings file where this proceeds as a shorter writing.
It says on the SAGE publications website that the book should be 224 pp. Mine (now) is 195 before Ref. and Index and 206 and last paged page. (Leaving only 4 pages for the binding.)
There are some pages in addition, as some count the preface pages, viii, that is, 8 pages more to this book. But all in all, the book still falls short 2 pages compared to the 224 pp.
Indirect observation usually relates to viewing something through a magnifying scope/using a magnifier and using a telescope. One has through the times questioned everything that hasn't been seen with the naked eye. Even then, scientific realism or other versions of it, probably has 99.9 % following, even 100 % if one counts only the serious. In opposition, the philosopher gamers, the rogues, they who are in it for the hair splitting and making idiotic points. Just so you have it.
You can compare "indirect observation" with "instrumentalisation" where the data are gathered by the output of the instrument in use by itself and where no direct human sense can perceive. I guess examples of instrumentalisation can be measuring of mass and acidity. You can check it out yourself.
The magnifier is also the microscope. I'm not sure to what extent the magnifying _glass_ has been or is questioned, but realism, as above, has usually related to the naked eye as a starting point for human scientific investigation (and doubting everything else...)!
From Facebook where it has been originally posted!
Wednesday, 14 September 2011
On the URL of My Blog
First, the name of 777 is based on the Trinity of God, The Holy Ghost and The Soul, in this modified (Unitarian?) version.
And cardinal virtue on all of them, also the soul, the fragment that returns to Heaven! 777 is also well above the 666, the number of the beast, in such a manner that there's no doubt over the Victor, God!
777 is also the address to a part of the UN buildings in New York, perhaps with the same religious interpretation to some. I mean, the UN may be considered one of the greatest political wonders of all time, placing itself on top, in respects of time, of The Republic by Plato and others.
Besides, I've come to name my blog on Angelfire, inadvertently and originally, by the same name as another person here on Blogspot who has named the blog, whatiswritten.blogspot.com. This may not be so cool and the generator over at Angelfire indicated a unique name. This person's blog has been made in 2004 where as my blog, at least for the first blogpost has been made in 2005. So the story goes, that I hope our content to be distinct enough for us to work on each ground, blog, in peace. "What is written" is a name that suggests an unknown status, epistemologically, to a piece of information. It may also give rise to speculations over what is to come of ideas in the future. "What is written" is also a folk wording over a rumour or whatever by writng. This should be it, I carry this name over from Angelfire under BlogT and this is my excuse in addition to naming it 777 on the original name. Good?
And cardinal virtue on all of them, also the soul, the fragment that returns to Heaven! 777 is also well above the 666, the number of the beast, in such a manner that there's no doubt over the Victor, God!
777 is also the address to a part of the UN buildings in New York, perhaps with the same religious interpretation to some. I mean, the UN may be considered one of the greatest political wonders of all time, placing itself on top, in respects of time, of The Republic by Plato and others.
Besides, I've come to name my blog on Angelfire, inadvertently and originally, by the same name as another person here on Blogspot who has named the blog, whatiswritten.blogspot.com. This may not be so cool and the generator over at Angelfire indicated a unique name. This person's blog has been made in 2004 where as my blog, at least for the first blogpost has been made in 2005. So the story goes, that I hope our content to be distinct enough for us to work on each ground, blog, in peace. "What is written" is a name that suggests an unknown status, epistemologically, to a piece of information. It may also give rise to speculations over what is to come of ideas in the future. "What is written" is also a folk wording over a rumour or whatever by writng. This should be it, I carry this name over from Angelfire under BlogT and this is my excuse in addition to naming it 777 on the original name. Good?
Investigations of Corrupt Syndicate of Norway - Approved by the (Powers of) the State - Starting Up Now
On top of this and as a STRONG warning: Norway maybe running a deeply corrupt syndicate/conglomerate by a network rooted in corrupt Police Officers and "military attaches" to most or all of its embassies. With the Oil Fund, the 2nd largest in World, after the Abu Dhabi fund, and its strategy of keeping a liquid "war chest" to be used to all sorts of people with the most dubious motivations, this CAN or WILL get ugly, if it isn't ugly already!!! Norway is a nation with big problems of a "venereal corrupt" type, i.e., the corruption runs in its blood! I can only say, WATCH UP!!!
This remains, though, mostly a background analysis or a "conspiracy theory" as the most serious people want it. Investigations should be well underway already and I suggest that you keep a tab on this nation (of idiocy, of which they don't mind whatsoever)!!!
I must note that this may very well be a kind of "terror against the world at large" and that it falls in line with nutty ideas of "idiots"/severely disturbed people/lunatics who feel that they need to be Gods (decide on their life/death) to other people in order to be respected or receive enough space for their "superior intelligence" to manifest in the World (usually of the human meat shop kind in addition to sufficient number of disasters and human despair according to appetite/sense/whatever, i.e., I have the feeling "now")!
From Facebook, where it was first posted.
This remains, though, mostly a background analysis or a "conspiracy theory" as the most serious people want it. Investigations should be well underway already and I suggest that you keep a tab on this nation (of idiocy, of which they don't mind whatsoever)!!!
I must note that this may very well be a kind of "terror against the world at large" and that it falls in line with nutty ideas of "idiots"/severely disturbed people/lunatics who feel that they need to be Gods (decide on their life/death) to other people in order to be respected or receive enough space for their "superior intelligence" to manifest in the World (usually of the human meat shop kind in addition to sufficient number of disasters and human despair according to appetite/sense/whatever, i.e., I have the feeling "now")!
From Facebook, where it was first posted.
Additional Note - Update on Running Investigations
Note on G. H. W. Bush. From Wikipedia as source and in line with investigations on U. S. American "Financial Radicalism", it's worth noting that a late pres. as Bush sr. (1989 - 1993) has been the Director of CIA for about a year, '76 - '77. He has elite education from Yale University and has been the youngest aviator in US Navy at that time. So the summary: deep military background and into the Oval Office as President of USA to 1993, serving one period, 4 years! (It may be that one should add that many leaders of this time have had experience from WW2.)
Looking at presidents through the recent times, it goes, 2ps, 1p, 2ps and 2ps (George Bush jr.) and now Barack Obama, 1p -> 2ps?
The legacy of the Cold War can also have had its bearing on the military involvement of Bush sr. (to be a bit charitable).
This has been copied from Facebook.
Looking at presidents through the recent times, it goes, 2ps, 1p, 2ps and 2ps (George Bush jr.) and now Barack Obama, 1p -> 2ps?
The legacy of the Cold War can also have had its bearing on the military involvement of Bush sr. (to be a bit charitable).
This has been copied from Facebook.
U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms
U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-02-11 20:00:15
I think the words need to be written and that despite the rather welcoming words of the political kind to the developing countries, I think it's clear that USA remains, at least partly, patriotic radicalist in financial terms and need to be met with both cynicism/hostility and the consequent raw muscle, i.e., having the dentist to remove the fangs!
Just so that I'm clear, my irritation goes back to pre-Nazi-Germany and the WW2.
Putting V12 Ford engines into the Blitz-tanks of the Nazis.
Greatly surprised by the French copper/bronze statue of Liberty when they, USA, infact impelled the WW2 while in the ruins hearing the fragile devastated Nazi-voice: "But we studied New York and Broadway" or "But we studied New York and the letters", a code for being in bed with one another over ideas!!
It's also remarkable that when they say they "love" the world and industry is supposed to happen it happens in USA of the kind of Facebook, Google, Apple (with the i-products) and the rest, yet when the rest of the world is to make industry it needs to comply with the "rules"/"rules of the old money". I take this to be a corroborative of the world pre-1939, that is, the U.S. Americans are not necessarily honest!
Looking at the other parts of America, the continent (5+2), usually named Americas by The Economist, one can easily point to a burning Mexico right underneath the USA border and further point to a United Bananas for the rest, i.e., dictators and shady scheming, just for having the slavery and cheap products! Obviously, I demand new times from the U.S. American business network (singular term), thank you! (Not that I expect any guarantee, with a smile of pain from a soon-to-be-an-abductee. )
Countering/running parallel with the question of involvement of Ford and its factories in Germany, the most important question in my opinion is how much goods has been imported into Germany, esp. from USA, let's say for the period of 1933 to 1941?
To what extent can one say that any imports from USA have contributed to the Nazi-German war machine?
And lastly, what about the sponsoring, the acquisition of funds, money or resources whatever to Nazi-Germany? Did they acquire money from abroad? To what extent?
New (I want to test some "signals" here): Can it also be that USA and Japan had an agreement over Pearl Harbour on the number of vessels that were allowed to dock with the harbour there and that if this (bilateral) clause was to be breached Japan would attack harshly? Thus, did USA also impel/provoke this attack and launch into war with Japan?
Did also USA "nuke"/bomb Tokyo into total destruction for avoiding the aftermath of the WW2 against the Japanese (that is, destroying the convention of settling the post-war matters with the Japanese in a "justified" way)? That is, if you have the "war"-documents stored in the Capital (by convention) and the enemy destroys the Capital so that the documents then it becomes impossible to settle a judgment of the war. This may be a motive by the USA to hide the initial crime of themselves to provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbour by harbouring too many ships/sea vessels there of the military kind.
It must, though, be pointed out that the Japanese have been hard on their own neighbours for some time up to the point to the conflict with USA in WW2 and it can very well be that the Japanese have gotten what they deserved in the end after all. It has been an aggressive power through the whole of the 30s and has engaged in a number of conflicts up to 1945 and its unconditional surrender. I think this note undermines any fact that USA in any way willingly wanted a war with Japan, but rather, as it is uncontroversionally written, that USA has been assaulted in 1941 in Pearl Harbour. Just to clear some air.
My assertion for the Ford V12 engines stems from a documentary I've seen.
"Burning Mexico" simply means the civil unrest there in relation to rife crime, possibly put to a higher level by insisted U.S. American exports of relatively advanced gunnery, i.e., large caliber weapons and what have you. The military walks the streets there which is a state of emergency, honestly speaking.
United Bananas you can check out yourselves. CBS 60 Minutes had it covered a while ago to some extent.
Further: SS KURSK
First it appeared that SS Kursk had sunk as a matter of malfunction by one of its torpedos (fuel failure, complex stuff) and this was allegedly confirmed by footage made by Norwegian underwater services (closest and ready with equipment).
Rather later, it appears that SS Kursk may have been sunk by an MK48 torpedo of the kind that USS Miami may have been equipped with as its location was rumoured to be close to the "accident" of SS Kursk. This was indeed the finding of the very excellent French journalism and that the entry hole in the front of SS Kursk is identical to a typical hole made by an MK48 torpedo!
The suggestion by this very topic makes it indeed likely that SS Kursk was sunk rather than suffered from a mishap simply because this topic envisions such behaviour from the U.S. Americans likely! Now, don't blame this "psychiatrist"/"psychologist" because that's obviously more joke than true, but still... Hmm... I'm still wearing my Sherlock Holmes outfit and it seems that the world makes this necessary in many aspects! Booo! Beware! SS = Submersible Ship.
Further on USA foreign policy. Relating to the State Department, USA is less than neutral in matter of aid and development to the developing world! Indeed, the UN has for a number of years recommended that this amount of money-value should be about 1 - 3% of GDP. The U.S. Americans can smile all they want, but I want it clear who they are and what their numbers are!
Thus, aid contribution from USA to the developing world speaks for itself: it stands at 0.001 % of GDP or so and has been this way for many, many years!!! So who are they to claim world leadership??? Because they are NOT world leaders!!!
Correction: It appears they do comply with new standards of contribution to the UN and also paying the highest amount of money. The source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations#Funding! However, in the past, USA has been critisised for this for exactly this rule of 1 - 3 % GDP.
Considerations for 2001 - 2002(?).
I can note that it's evident that USA has little or no qualms over deceiving the whole world and the most prominent case for this is, of course, the case for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq (that didn't exist), presented to the UN Security Council and leading to the invasion of Iraq, with its many hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties!
I can also be noted that the direct negotiations between Iraq, by Saddam Hussein, and USA, right before the war, are kept secret (in the hidden, emphasis), for no apparent reason!
I'm going to add a point to the OP on East Timor and Noam Chomsky, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky%27s_political_views#East_Timor_activism:
"Chomsky argued that decisive military, financial and diplomatic support was provided to Suharto’s regime by successive U.S. administrations; beginning with Gerald Ford who, with Henry Kissinger as Secretary of State, provided a ‘green light’ to the brutal invasion. Prior to the invasion, the U.S. had supplied the Indonesian army with 90% of its arms, and “by 1977 Indonesia found itself short of weapons, an indication of the scale of its attack. The Carter Administration accelerated the arms flow. Britain joined in as atrocities peaked in 1978, while France announced that it would sell arms to Indonesia and protect it from any public "embarrassment". Others, too, sought to gain what profit they could from the slaughter and torture of Timorese.”[48] This humanitarian catastrophe went virtually unnoticed by the international community.[49]"
Tentatively, you may add Accenture to this set-up that I think has military/para-military facets to it. Adding this to calculated flaws of programming combined with social code of Microsoft and Google (by special indexing), prominently, with the rest following suit (i.e., AMD/Intel incl, other.), the world may well be dug thoroughly down already!
It's almost as if I can say: "Millionen stehen hinter mir" with Adolf Hitler being handed the millions of U.S. American dollars!!! This poster is, by the way, quite famous! This concerns the (pre-WW2) funding mentioned on top of this writing.
This looks now dead set! There should be no doubt any longer that U.S. American radicalism is a fact in this way!
If I remember correctly, USA has been less than encouraging in wanting the employees the coffeeproducing/farming industry to organise and they have been extremely absent in making the coffee industry, the farmers, itself organise to demand the right price for the products. USA itself has an incredibly dubious worker's organisation history (less than 30% of the workers are organised compared with over 50% in Europe with a strong labour movement, the numbers may be incorrect to some extent). Thus I have big expectations to CNN's Freedom Project (heh-heh-heh)! Let's see if they can come off it, so to speak!
(This is brought to you with "Jon Stewart's venereal sponsorship"!!!)
Not that I see it immensely critical, but I think it's useful that USA and U.S. American culture, especially in terms of business life and attitudes toward the the world outside USA, get its fair share of criticism and to large extent the duties (if not outright subversiveness on grounds of superior culture/genes) USA has failed in this regard. This is simply the overall point. That the world is brought level and that world power is now a lot of places and even shifting places, more rarely.
It must be the goal of any politics of the kind that belongs with the UN that people are indeed considered equal and subjects under The Universal Declaration of the Human Rights. This implies a lot of stuff!!! It has implications on how we share knowledge, how we behave in terms of business relations, internationally, and that world justice has a chance of rightful scrutiny and intra-country/state of justice can be mediated into its proper place. I also add, although earlier cited, that UN has the umbrella of ILO, the International Labour Organisation under its wings! This organisation can prove very important if not critical in the future!
Generally, considering the possibility for system and engineering I find it somewhat strange that society has this slow pace. If the good will would carry maximum weight and work effort, the world should have been looking different by now.
Also adding to the picture, the reported 42600 unsolved cases of "disappeared" people in 82 countries by Amnesty International one may meditate over how many "monsters" there are out there in the world.
Even thinking about the "calm, sedate" Norway, at least I am thinking over the levels of corruption that lead people to run "meat shops", "torture clinics (some of which are "portable" and readily set up)" or "glass works", all of which harbour, potentially (cynically: yes, they are for real), all the sh*ttyness you can muster to swallow!
Even the small issues like adoption and childcare cases by the Childcare units/institution have their Kings and Queens of sh*t! You know, outright corruption!
So, what the heck to make of this grim picture?
A major concern is also to what extent U.S. American expertise is sponsoring European sh*ttyness and how they, cynically, undermine our good efforts, relating the "rules" to a certain kind of personality type they approve of in Europe just to spin this sh*t further. So, the "monsters" are sent abroad or let to chew on the lower social levels (esp. the homeless) and the good are confined/naively or by information held domestically, perhaps scared of the dangerous places abroad or subversely made so by their fellow U.S. American "wolves"/"monsters" when/if they go abroad.
A small note on presentation of Wall Street by CNN and others finishes this text: you get Alison Kosik to present numbers and reports and she has the education of a Bachelor of Arts by Political Science and Broadcasting Journalism! Why is this? Why should this political scientist be presenting numbers and reports from Wall Street unless they present this pretty face to you, facetiously, and yet have this powerful/brutal knock-down from behind, i.e., Political Science (to the World)! Not that I blame this person, but it's this bloody presentation and having the knowledge of this qualification!
The link to the presentation of her by CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/kosik.alison.html
It says:"Kosik received her Bachelor of Arts degrees in Broadcast Journalism and Political Science from The American University in Washington, DC." (Accessed 13.04.2011.)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/HinduSwastika.svg/1000px-HinduSwastika.svg.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg/1000px-Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg.png
From "Post subject: U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:24 am" of the Philosophy Now forum. This writing has been edited six times, 12.02.2011, 13.02.2011, 09.03.2011, 13.04.2011, 26.04.2011, 10.05.2011, 25.05.2011 and today, 12.06.2011.
Note: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post134.
Note2: "U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms" has been changed to "U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms"!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-02-11 20:00:15
I think the words need to be written and that despite the rather welcoming words of the political kind to the developing countries, I think it's clear that USA remains, at least partly, patriotic radicalist in financial terms and need to be met with both cynicism/hostility and the consequent raw muscle, i.e., having the dentist to remove the fangs!
Just so that I'm clear, my irritation goes back to pre-Nazi-Germany and the WW2.
Putting V12 Ford engines into the Blitz-tanks of the Nazis.
Greatly surprised by the French copper/bronze statue of Liberty when they, USA, infact impelled the WW2 while in the ruins hearing the fragile devastated Nazi-voice: "But we studied New York and Broadway" or "But we studied New York and the letters", a code for being in bed with one another over ideas!!
It's also remarkable that when they say they "love" the world and industry is supposed to happen it happens in USA of the kind of Facebook, Google, Apple (with the i-products) and the rest, yet when the rest of the world is to make industry it needs to comply with the "rules"/"rules of the old money". I take this to be a corroborative of the world pre-1939, that is, the U.S. Americans are not necessarily honest!
Looking at the other parts of America, the continent (5+2), usually named Americas by The Economist, one can easily point to a burning Mexico right underneath the USA border and further point to a United Bananas for the rest, i.e., dictators and shady scheming, just for having the slavery and cheap products! Obviously, I demand new times from the U.S. American business network (singular term), thank you! (Not that I expect any guarantee, with a smile of pain from a soon-to-be-an-abductee. )
Countering/running parallel with the question of involvement of Ford and its factories in Germany, the most important question in my opinion is how much goods has been imported into Germany, esp. from USA, let's say for the period of 1933 to 1941?
To what extent can one say that any imports from USA have contributed to the Nazi-German war machine?
And lastly, what about the sponsoring, the acquisition of funds, money or resources whatever to Nazi-Germany? Did they acquire money from abroad? To what extent?
New (I want to test some "signals" here): Can it also be that USA and Japan had an agreement over Pearl Harbour on the number of vessels that were allowed to dock with the harbour there and that if this (bilateral) clause was to be breached Japan would attack harshly? Thus, did USA also impel/provoke this attack and launch into war with Japan?
Did also USA "nuke"/bomb Tokyo into total destruction for avoiding the aftermath of the WW2 against the Japanese (that is, destroying the convention of settling the post-war matters with the Japanese in a "justified" way)? That is, if you have the "war"-documents stored in the Capital (by convention) and the enemy destroys the Capital so that the documents then it becomes impossible to settle a judgment of the war. This may be a motive by the USA to hide the initial crime of themselves to provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbour by harbouring too many ships/sea vessels there of the military kind.
It must, though, be pointed out that the Japanese have been hard on their own neighbours for some time up to the point to the conflict with USA in WW2 and it can very well be that the Japanese have gotten what they deserved in the end after all. It has been an aggressive power through the whole of the 30s and has engaged in a number of conflicts up to 1945 and its unconditional surrender. I think this note undermines any fact that USA in any way willingly wanted a war with Japan, but rather, as it is uncontroversionally written, that USA has been assaulted in 1941 in Pearl Harbour. Just to clear some air.
My assertion for the Ford V12 engines stems from a documentary I've seen.
"Burning Mexico" simply means the civil unrest there in relation to rife crime, possibly put to a higher level by insisted U.S. American exports of relatively advanced gunnery, i.e., large caliber weapons and what have you. The military walks the streets there which is a state of emergency, honestly speaking.
United Bananas you can check out yourselves. CBS 60 Minutes had it covered a while ago to some extent.
Further: SS KURSK
First it appeared that SS Kursk had sunk as a matter of malfunction by one of its torpedos (fuel failure, complex stuff) and this was allegedly confirmed by footage made by Norwegian underwater services (closest and ready with equipment).
Rather later, it appears that SS Kursk may have been sunk by an MK48 torpedo of the kind that USS Miami may have been equipped with as its location was rumoured to be close to the "accident" of SS Kursk. This was indeed the finding of the very excellent French journalism and that the entry hole in the front of SS Kursk is identical to a typical hole made by an MK48 torpedo!
The suggestion by this very topic makes it indeed likely that SS Kursk was sunk rather than suffered from a mishap simply because this topic envisions such behaviour from the U.S. Americans likely! Now, don't blame this "psychiatrist"/"psychologist" because that's obviously more joke than true, but still... Hmm... I'm still wearing my Sherlock Holmes outfit and it seems that the world makes this necessary in many aspects! Booo! Beware! SS = Submersible Ship.
Further on USA foreign policy. Relating to the State Department, USA is less than neutral in matter of aid and development to the developing world! Indeed, the UN has for a number of years recommended that this amount of money-value should be about 1 - 3% of GDP. The U.S. Americans can smile all they want, but I want it clear who they are and what their numbers are!
Thus, aid contribution from USA to the developing world speaks for itself: it stands at 0.001 % of GDP or so and has been this way for many, many years!!! So who are they to claim world leadership??? Because they are NOT world leaders!!!
Correction: It appears they do comply with new standards of contribution to the UN and also paying the highest amount of money. The source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations#Funding! However, in the past, USA has been critisised for this for exactly this rule of 1 - 3 % GDP.
Considerations for 2001 - 2002(?).
I can note that it's evident that USA has little or no qualms over deceiving the whole world and the most prominent case for this is, of course, the case for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq (that didn't exist), presented to the UN Security Council and leading to the invasion of Iraq, with its many hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties!
I can also be noted that the direct negotiations between Iraq, by Saddam Hussein, and USA, right before the war, are kept secret (in the hidden, emphasis), for no apparent reason!
I'm going to add a point to the OP on East Timor and Noam Chomsky, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky%27s_political_views#East_Timor_activism:
"Chomsky argued that decisive military, financial and diplomatic support was provided to Suharto’s regime by successive U.S. administrations; beginning with Gerald Ford who, with Henry Kissinger as Secretary of State, provided a ‘green light’ to the brutal invasion. Prior to the invasion, the U.S. had supplied the Indonesian army with 90% of its arms, and “by 1977 Indonesia found itself short of weapons, an indication of the scale of its attack. The Carter Administration accelerated the arms flow. Britain joined in as atrocities peaked in 1978, while France announced that it would sell arms to Indonesia and protect it from any public "embarrassment". Others, too, sought to gain what profit they could from the slaughter and torture of Timorese.”[48] This humanitarian catastrophe went virtually unnoticed by the international community.[49]"
Tentatively, you may add Accenture to this set-up that I think has military/para-military facets to it. Adding this to calculated flaws of programming combined with social code of Microsoft and Google (by special indexing), prominently, with the rest following suit (i.e., AMD/Intel incl, other.), the world may well be dug thoroughly down already!
It's almost as if I can say: "Millionen stehen hinter mir" with Adolf Hitler being handed the millions of U.S. American dollars!!! This poster is, by the way, quite famous! This concerns the (pre-WW2) funding mentioned on top of this writing.
This looks now dead set! There should be no doubt any longer that U.S. American radicalism is a fact in this way!
If I remember correctly, USA has been less than encouraging in wanting the employees the coffeeproducing/farming industry to organise and they have been extremely absent in making the coffee industry, the farmers, itself organise to demand the right price for the products. USA itself has an incredibly dubious worker's organisation history (less than 30% of the workers are organised compared with over 50% in Europe with a strong labour movement, the numbers may be incorrect to some extent). Thus I have big expectations to CNN's Freedom Project (heh-heh-heh)! Let's see if they can come off it, so to speak!
(This is brought to you with "Jon Stewart's venereal sponsorship"!!!)
Not that I see it immensely critical, but I think it's useful that USA and U.S. American culture, especially in terms of business life and attitudes toward the the world outside USA, get its fair share of criticism and to large extent the duties (if not outright subversiveness on grounds of superior culture/genes) USA has failed in this regard. This is simply the overall point. That the world is brought level and that world power is now a lot of places and even shifting places, more rarely.
It must be the goal of any politics of the kind that belongs with the UN that people are indeed considered equal and subjects under The Universal Declaration of the Human Rights. This implies a lot of stuff!!! It has implications on how we share knowledge, how we behave in terms of business relations, internationally, and that world justice has a chance of rightful scrutiny and intra-country/state of justice can be mediated into its proper place. I also add, although earlier cited, that UN has the umbrella of ILO, the International Labour Organisation under its wings! This organisation can prove very important if not critical in the future!
Generally, considering the possibility for system and engineering I find it somewhat strange that society has this slow pace. If the good will would carry maximum weight and work effort, the world should have been looking different by now.
Also adding to the picture, the reported 42600 unsolved cases of "disappeared" people in 82 countries by Amnesty International one may meditate over how many "monsters" there are out there in the world.
Even thinking about the "calm, sedate" Norway, at least I am thinking over the levels of corruption that lead people to run "meat shops", "torture clinics (some of which are "portable" and readily set up)" or "glass works", all of which harbour, potentially (cynically: yes, they are for real), all the sh*ttyness you can muster to swallow!
Even the small issues like adoption and childcare cases by the Childcare units/institution have their Kings and Queens of sh*t! You know, outright corruption!
So, what the heck to make of this grim picture?
A major concern is also to what extent U.S. American expertise is sponsoring European sh*ttyness and how they, cynically, undermine our good efforts, relating the "rules" to a certain kind of personality type they approve of in Europe just to spin this sh*t further. So, the "monsters" are sent abroad or let to chew on the lower social levels (esp. the homeless) and the good are confined/naively or by information held domestically, perhaps scared of the dangerous places abroad or subversely made so by their fellow U.S. American "wolves"/"monsters" when/if they go abroad.
A small note on presentation of Wall Street by CNN and others finishes this text: you get Alison Kosik to present numbers and reports and she has the education of a Bachelor of Arts by Political Science and Broadcasting Journalism! Why is this? Why should this political scientist be presenting numbers and reports from Wall Street unless they present this pretty face to you, facetiously, and yet have this powerful/brutal knock-down from behind, i.e., Political Science (to the World)! Not that I blame this person, but it's this bloody presentation and having the knowledge of this qualification!
The link to the presentation of her by CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/kosik.alison.html
It says:"Kosik received her Bachelor of Arts degrees in Broadcast Journalism and Political Science from The American University in Washington, DC." (Accessed 13.04.2011.)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/HinduSwastika.svg/1000px-HinduSwastika.svg.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg/1000px-Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg.png
From "Post subject: U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:24 am" of the Philosophy Now forum. This writing has been edited six times, 12.02.2011, 13.02.2011, 09.03.2011, 13.04.2011, 26.04.2011, 10.05.2011, 25.05.2011 and today, 12.06.2011.
Note: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post134.
Note2: "U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms" has been changed to "U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms"!
The Considerations of U.S. American Military Presence ->
The Considerations of U.S. American Military Presence ->
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-10 21:39:00
This is now the activists' page for the surveillance of US American influence in the world, mainly outside Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq (10 000?) and South Korea! I hope people are with me in gathering and pointing out discrepancies to the information presented on the Wikipedia pages and that we, together, can force the Wikipedia pages to become more accurate and possibly set this kind of information up elsewhere!
Under the new world order, I can imagine a shift from the #coldwar/cold war against Soviet Union/#Russia and toward making super-power truly global by ramping up military power all over the world in order to become #symmetric to USA under "LoveToUSA-war" / #LoveToUSAwar and that this war is not really any war at all (and it also sounds a lot better than "The Cold War"! World, engage your people for a better future, please!!! #coldwar #Russia #China #superpower #global.
This time it's about #military #presence by #USA around the world. I mean, the bases USA has, have thousands of people in them, not just a couple of hundred. You can check with their presence yourself in terms of #bases around the world. I can mention #Germany, Saudi Arabia / #SaudiArabia, #Japan and various other engagements around the world that I see as nothing LESS than #downright #regionally #subversive #economic #suppression! On the other hand, I do have sympathy to the military presence in (in descending respects) #Iraq and in South Korea / #SouthKorea and in #Afghanistan, obviously. I also support presence in Somalia and (with caution) the ongoing operations against Libya! But this is it! These other countries, like Germany, have presence on grounding that can only be described as "misty"!
I therefore call for the removal/withdrawal, as soon as possible/ASAP, of these bases that don't take part in a CLEAR/#clear #threat #scenario (of war). Thus, in my opinion, the bases in Germany, Saudi Arabia ( #SaudiArabia ) and Japan should go, at least!!!
Some links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... tary_bases (Funnily enough, Wikipedia IS incredibly accessible! Thank Heaven for Se...!!!) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... eployments.
I almost forgot: when #911 happened, USA suddenly got another excuse for its miliary "play"!!!
The above relates to #NineEleven.
When I write military presence, do not stick only to military terms of thinking!!! No, please, think in terms of all the crazy range of actions, like: "#psychiatric #techniques", #torture, #rape, #suppression, #gang #tricks, #biological #foul #play, #sabotage, "#doctors' #games" (whatever the interpretation you "like" to add!) and the whole range of sh*t!!! So, military presence CAN/DOES mean A LOT!!!
Just some thoughts on the military stuff: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... in_Germany - NO number on personnel stationed there! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novo_Selo_Range - NO number on the personnel stationed there! So how many are they? I mean, the list on Germany is #Satanic! Even the Novo Selo Range is "surface area of 144 km2" ("note on 12X12"). "The US Army started in late 2008 a 61.15 m USD investment"! "...stationed troops in Vicenza to 5,000", just as an example!
This looks to be a lasting project just for the surveillance, but they say "with more than 369,000 of its 1,580,255[2] active-duty personnel serving outside the United States and its territories." Alright.
Some more on these numbers:
Total: 369,000+ (2009(?))
Minus: 28,500 (South Korea, uncontroversial, 2011)
Minus: 90,000 (Afghanistan, uncontroversial, 2011)
Total2: 250,500 (hundred thousands and five hundred, possible nutcases doing all sorts of crazy stuff in the world, see list above, i.e., #gang tricks and so on...)
Then,
Germany: [numbers]
Spain: [numbers]
Japan: [numbers]
Italy: [numbers]
Greece: [numbers]
Brazil: [numbers]
Cuba: [numbers]
Note on Iraq: "By December 31, 2011, all U.S. military forces will withdraw from the country." by http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/6804.htm!
A side note on diversity of operations:
Tentatively, you may add Accenture to this set-up that I think has military/para-military facets to it. Adding this to calculated flaws of programming combined with social code of Microsoft and Google (by special indexing), prominently, with the rest following suit (i.e., AMD/Intel incl, other.), the world may well be dug thoroughly down already!
It's almost as if I can say: "Millionen stehen hinter mir" with Adolf Hitler being handed the millions of U.S. American dollars!!! This poster is, by the way, quite famous! This concerns the (pre-WW2) funding mentioned on top of this/the other writing.
This looks now dead set! There should be no doubt any longer that U.S. American radicalism is a fact in this way!
USA! You get the Tommy Gun from Emily Thompson (known for the etiquette), that's for sure!
Note: this has first been published on Twitter and later added to the Philosophy Now, just today, 12.05.2011.
Note2: This has been edited today, 12.05.2011.
Note3: This has been edited today, 12.06.2011 with Accenture and other added.
Note4: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post181.
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-10 21:39:00
This is now the activists' page for the surveillance of US American influence in the world, mainly outside Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq (10 000?) and South Korea! I hope people are with me in gathering and pointing out discrepancies to the information presented on the Wikipedia pages and that we, together, can force the Wikipedia pages to become more accurate and possibly set this kind of information up elsewhere!
Under the new world order, I can imagine a shift from the #coldwar/cold war against Soviet Union/#Russia and toward making super-power truly global by ramping up military power all over the world in order to become #symmetric to USA under "LoveToUSA-war" / #LoveToUSAwar and that this war is not really any war at all (and it also sounds a lot better than "The Cold War"! World, engage your people for a better future, please!!! #coldwar #Russia #China #superpower #global.
This time it's about #military #presence by #USA around the world. I mean, the bases USA has, have thousands of people in them, not just a couple of hundred. You can check with their presence yourself in terms of #bases around the world. I can mention #Germany, Saudi Arabia / #SaudiArabia, #Japan and various other engagements around the world that I see as nothing LESS than #downright #regionally #subversive #economic #suppression! On the other hand, I do have sympathy to the military presence in (in descending respects) #Iraq and in South Korea / #SouthKorea and in #Afghanistan, obviously. I also support presence in Somalia and (with caution) the ongoing operations against Libya! But this is it! These other countries, like Germany, have presence on grounding that can only be described as "misty"!
I therefore call for the removal/withdrawal, as soon as possible/ASAP, of these bases that don't take part in a CLEAR/#clear #threat #scenario (of war). Thus, in my opinion, the bases in Germany, Saudi Arabia ( #SaudiArabia ) and Japan should go, at least!!!
Some links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... tary_bases (Funnily enough, Wikipedia IS incredibly accessible! Thank Heaven for Se...!!!) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... eployments.
I almost forgot: when #911 happened, USA suddenly got another excuse for its miliary "play"!!!
The above relates to #NineEleven.
When I write military presence, do not stick only to military terms of thinking!!! No, please, think in terms of all the crazy range of actions, like: "#psychiatric #techniques", #torture, #rape, #suppression, #gang #tricks, #biological #foul #play, #sabotage, "#doctors' #games" (whatever the interpretation you "like" to add!) and the whole range of sh*t!!! So, military presence CAN/DOES mean A LOT!!!
Just some thoughts on the military stuff: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un ... in_Germany - NO number on personnel stationed there! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novo_Selo_Range - NO number on the personnel stationed there! So how many are they? I mean, the list on Germany is #Satanic! Even the Novo Selo Range is "surface area of 144 km2" ("note on 12X12"). "The US Army started in late 2008 a 61.15 m USD investment"! "...stationed troops in Vicenza to 5,000", just as an example!
This looks to be a lasting project just for the surveillance, but they say "with more than 369,000 of its 1,580,255[2] active-duty personnel serving outside the United States and its territories." Alright.
Some more on these numbers:
Total: 369,000+ (2009(?))
Minus: 28,500 (South Korea, uncontroversial, 2011)
Minus: 90,000 (Afghanistan, uncontroversial, 2011)
Total2: 250,500 (hundred thousands and five hundred, possible nutcases doing all sorts of crazy stuff in the world, see list above, i.e., #gang tricks and so on...)
Then,
Germany: [numbers]
Spain: [numbers]
Japan: [numbers]
Italy: [numbers]
Greece: [numbers]
Brazil: [numbers]
Cuba: [numbers]
Note on Iraq: "By December 31, 2011, all U.S. military forces will withdraw from the country." by http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/6804.htm!
A side note on diversity of operations:
Tentatively, you may add Accenture to this set-up that I think has military/para-military facets to it. Adding this to calculated flaws of programming combined with social code of Microsoft and Google (by special indexing), prominently, with the rest following suit (i.e., AMD/Intel incl, other.), the world may well be dug thoroughly down already!
It's almost as if I can say: "Millionen stehen hinter mir" with Adolf Hitler being handed the millions of U.S. American dollars!!! This poster is, by the way, quite famous! This concerns the (pre-WW2) funding mentioned on top of this/the other writing.
This looks now dead set! There should be no doubt any longer that U.S. American radicalism is a fact in this way!
USA! You get the Tommy Gun from Emily Thompson (known for the etiquette), that's for sure!
Note: this has first been published on Twitter and later added to the Philosophy Now, just today, 12.05.2011.
Note2: This has been edited today, 12.05.2011.
Note3: This has been edited today, 12.06.2011 with Accenture and other added.
Note4: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post181.
Informally, U.S. Americans and Nuclear War!
Informally, U.S. Americans and Nuclear War!
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-04-27 16:42:59
I want to speculate on the reason why U.S. Americans never really can press the "Nuke the World"-button!
First of all, would the U.S. Americans be able to live with the controversy aftermath considering their very mixed society/societies, with all the ethnicities?
Secondly, are U.S. Americans now dependent on the good "energies" of foreigners now to sustain themselves?
Thirdly, there would be vast environmental impacts and would USA be able to live with this in retrospect? The full nuclear holocaust would destroy vast areas of surface terrain on land and would destroy a vast number of species in addition to the humans.
So I bet that the U.S. Americans are playing with the button in the sense that the great Atlantic and the Pacific will protect them from any aftermath effects and that they are self-sufficient with food capacities and most other minerals and mines and what have you. In theory, there might be a chance then "to create a self-delusion" to self-justify the nuclear destruction to the rest of the world, pending South America in consideration, i.e., how much of our Southies to preserve?
This is of course not entirely serious. I just want to entertain the thought with you and inform people of this notion.
I must also say that this is probably the most cynical thought you may ever get from the U.S. Americans!!! If this thought is utterly removed, the world will have nudged forward a little toward (emotional) world peace (in everyone).
One fine gesture from the U.S. Americans may be to "offer"/"allow" devastating damage to be inflicted on the themselves to remove such an absolutely idiotic thought, thus creating the military/foreign policy of "The Devastating Damage to USA" doctrine! This should make the trick, I think!
So to calm down a few people, I think we need to see an escalation before we happen to think that "U.S. Americans may be pushing the button". I also don't want our good political leaders and business leaders to lie down/back down because some idiot U.S. American is hinting toward this ridiculous notion of pushing the nuclear war button. In every case I want the fear communicated to the right people before our good political leaders and business leaders of EU/Europe/Russia(/China) are to lie down/back down!!! That is, the fear must become expressed! This is normative and please don't make any mistake about it!!!
As I understand it, MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) has been a negative notion in that it has been the main impeller behind the missile defence shield. Thus, MAD in this sense has been the scenario that one has wanted to avoid. Now, on the other hand, I suggest that in case of the World against USA, such a scenario would be seen as so crazy that the sentiment toward MAD, i.e., in the sense of the World (exc. USA) against USA, even in USA would be seen as positive and I think this is an important difference, i.e., seeing MAD in this (new) positive sense and in the negative sense (traditionally thought of as USA vs. Russia/Soviet Union).
Because the momentum for the World (exc. USA) would of course be democracy and not the (evil) communism of Russia/Soviet Union. Thus, ethically, obviously, the World is justified in devastating/destroying USA, possibly in a MAD scenario, and reasonably so in the face of such lunacy altogether.
For world peace and democracy! Cheers!
Note: I've edited this writing today, 2nd May, 2011, with MAD and (evil) communism.
Note2: Originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post171.
Synes godt om · Stop med at følge opslag · 8. august kl. 04:38
This document relates directly to my comment on SCRAMJETS below.
8. august kl. 04:38 · Synes godt om
This document has been uploaded twice. Sorry.
8. august kl. 07:15 · Synes godt om
From Facebook
Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-04-27 16:42:59
I want to speculate on the reason why U.S. Americans never really can press the "Nuke the World"-button!
First of all, would the U.S. Americans be able to live with the controversy aftermath considering their very mixed society/societies, with all the ethnicities?
Secondly, are U.S. Americans now dependent on the good "energies" of foreigners now to sustain themselves?
Thirdly, there would be vast environmental impacts and would USA be able to live with this in retrospect? The full nuclear holocaust would destroy vast areas of surface terrain on land and would destroy a vast number of species in addition to the humans.
So I bet that the U.S. Americans are playing with the button in the sense that the great Atlantic and the Pacific will protect them from any aftermath effects and that they are self-sufficient with food capacities and most other minerals and mines and what have you. In theory, there might be a chance then "to create a self-delusion" to self-justify the nuclear destruction to the rest of the world, pending South America in consideration, i.e., how much of our Southies to preserve?
This is of course not entirely serious. I just want to entertain the thought with you and inform people of this notion.
I must also say that this is probably the most cynical thought you may ever get from the U.S. Americans!!! If this thought is utterly removed, the world will have nudged forward a little toward (emotional) world peace (in everyone).
One fine gesture from the U.S. Americans may be to "offer"/"allow" devastating damage to be inflicted on the themselves to remove such an absolutely idiotic thought, thus creating the military/foreign policy of "The Devastating Damage to USA" doctrine! This should make the trick, I think!
So to calm down a few people, I think we need to see an escalation before we happen to think that "U.S. Americans may be pushing the button". I also don't want our good political leaders and business leaders to lie down/back down because some idiot U.S. American is hinting toward this ridiculous notion of pushing the nuclear war button. In every case I want the fear communicated to the right people before our good political leaders and business leaders of EU/Europe/Russia(/China) are to lie down/back down!!! That is, the fear must become expressed! This is normative and please don't make any mistake about it!!!
As I understand it, MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) has been a negative notion in that it has been the main impeller behind the missile defence shield. Thus, MAD in this sense has been the scenario that one has wanted to avoid. Now, on the other hand, I suggest that in case of the World against USA, such a scenario would be seen as so crazy that the sentiment toward MAD, i.e., in the sense of the World (exc. USA) against USA, even in USA would be seen as positive and I think this is an important difference, i.e., seeing MAD in this (new) positive sense and in the negative sense (traditionally thought of as USA vs. Russia/Soviet Union).
Because the momentum for the World (exc. USA) would of course be democracy and not the (evil) communism of Russia/Soviet Union. Thus, ethically, obviously, the World is justified in devastating/destroying USA, possibly in a MAD scenario, and reasonably so in the face of such lunacy altogether.
For world peace and democracy! Cheers!
Note: I've edited this writing today, 2nd May, 2011, with MAD and (evil) communism.
Note2: Originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post171.
Synes godt om · Stop med at følge opslag · 8. august kl. 04:38
This document relates directly to my comment on SCRAMJETS below.
8. august kl. 04:38 · Synes godt om
This document has been uploaded twice. Sorry.
8. august kl. 07:15 · Synes godt om
From Facebook
Tuesday, 13 September 2011
(A Part of) The Easy Way to Religion and Stalwartly So
Fast sentences on Søren Kierkegaard: first, you score 66% on accepting the Aesthetics and the Ethics and you launch into the Religious at last by conceiving the necessity of meaning of Religious intellect apart from the (determined/inanimate soul) of Animalistic. This is for a younger audience, straight from Religious class/Biblical School, 13 - 20 (or whatever). Good?
Of the religious thinkers I have enjoyed the most I find Søren Kierkegaard and St. Thomas Aquinas and Giordano Bruno and Lady Conway and Leibniz to be a highly recommended reading list! Enjoy yourselves! Cheers!
Bruno is added for making the assertion that "monads" have extension, that they are of a kind of material!
I've also found St. Augustinus interesting in the past, but after closer examination he's laid to rest...
It's more common to write St. Augustine! Excuse me!
A good supporting beam is also _TO STAY WITHIN_ and not to commit the Cardinal SIN of Pride. This is the sin to become one's own God and to become deviant to the REAL God, "by our Heavenly Father"!
Of the religious thinkers I have enjoyed the most I find Søren Kierkegaard and St. Thomas Aquinas and Giordano Bruno and Lady Conway and Leibniz to be a highly recommended reading list! Enjoy yourselves! Cheers!
Bruno is added for making the assertion that "monads" have extension, that they are of a kind of material!
I've also found St. Augustinus interesting in the past, but after closer examination he's laid to rest...
It's more common to write St. Augustine! Excuse me!
A good supporting beam is also _TO STAY WITHIN_ and not to commit the Cardinal SIN of Pride. This is the sin to become one's own God and to become deviant to the REAL God, "by our Heavenly Father"!
Monday, 12 September 2011
To be added to Evolution!
Now that I've added most or all subjects of Universities to the science chart as valid sciences (mostly by adding description to the HDM chart, as opposed to the experiment of the hard sciences, investigation replaces the experiment in the other sciences). I intend, consequently, to add my invention of a cold war against USA by all other nations on Earth. Now this idea is rather of the docile kind with the effect that NO other nation can threaten or attack another nation, unreasonably, without itself to sustain severe damage. This is the idea of basic deterrence especially meant for USA according to its abused words and its dubious track-record with the added comment that one is venturing into unknown space every year and that power abuse has been a common trait of human kind where the Information Era of the Internet now has a harder say on this issue. This is therefore an effect of living in the 21. Century and may be nothing more than a trait of being human where we need to seek a more symmetric world society for living respectfully with one another _on a global scale_!
The Work to End the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
The Israel-Palestine conflict - Seeking to solve it!
Various! Written by Terje Lea 2010-12-31 13:24:49 [on blog.t-lea.net]
I've written this writing (in Norwegian) to the Committee of Palestine, a Norwegian
committee, I believe, 02:44 AM (night...), Tue 16. Nov.
The writing basically consists in this:
* Why isn't the UN and the EU (among others) on the spot/in the area
with their own, coordinated, observers and work-groups (engineers and
leaders/organisers) on both the Gaza-strip and the West Bank?
[Edit, Unsp.:]
* (Loosely with/by unrealist42:) The observers should use the latest technology in their mission, possibly web-cams for observing the check-points! unrealist42 suggests the use of web-cams for monitoring the check-points directly to the internet by full publicity. This may be too radical, but a moderated use by the observers can be a valuable contribution! Indeed, the latest technology should be applied as in all other (modern) countries so that Palestine can enter contemporary standards on all fronts, including industry! [End of edit.]
* There should be an updated map for the areas of conflict where (as on
the Google maps) one can find check-points, surveillance cameras,
the Wall, the settlements, special conflict-zones, operating UN/EU/others'
activities and all other activity (like "finally" imported goods to the Palestine
areas)!
* I also think there should be a COMMON web-portal for this conflict that is leaded
by UN (in the same fashion as WWF's web-presence). Here I suggest that all activities, in progress and in planning, are being presented/communicated. One should also emphasise the importance of transparency (no side "fools"/"undermines" the other).
* One may also have a money-effort surveillance page under this common portal that displays the actual effort (and direction) to the Palestine areas (and in the long run seriously undermines any hidden support for the tunnels into the Gaza-strip).
* One may also have a "tally" count on the number of people involved and what they do!
* I may come to add more points as we go, but I must say that I think the quality of the "engineering" work for ending this conflict could have been far better and had a better progression! I hope this improves in the immediate future!
[Edit, as extra compared to the email:]
* An addition to this writing on this forum: It should be a standing requirement that the representatives for Palestine accept Israel as a Jewish state on EQUAL footing as Palestine probably announces itself/looks upon itself as a Muslim state (i.e., the sound/massive support of Hamas, a rather (moderately/strongly) Islamic oriented political party). Poor people also tend to mind religious matters more strongly than fx. the affluent Europeans without this being a point, but rather a remark one can lend one's eye to.
* Also, I think the Israeli rhetoric has improved greatly for the last month or so. Though, it's seen as quite provoking that they push on these settlements to this degree.
* One report I've read, says that Israelis choose the settlements mostly for economic reasons and it should be possible to change this incentive or at least highlight it.
* (Loosely by Typist:) The world should support both Israel and Palestine as equal/symmetric states. Hopefully spurring both nations into prosperous, peaceful economic cycles of partnership, cooperation and to the service and benefit from and to the world.
[Edit, 17.11.2010:]
* In relation to the conflict (I-P), I'm also interested in the status of the Palestinian airport and the arrangement for Palestinians to communicate with one another between the Gaza strip and the West Bank. I'd also like to know the routines for moving between these two areas (physically, as the areas are indeed physically apart).
* Communications do include phone connections, mobile and "regular", as well as internet. I'd also include the aspect of communications from the Palestinian areas and to the world at large!
* It must be pointed out that despite the long coast line of the Gaza strip, the Palestinians have no harbour whatsoever! Even the fishing vessels have come under fire or harassment from time to time. There is no problem in conceiving an Israeli administration of a Palestinian harbour during a period of transition!
* There should be no problem in incorporating these concerns into this web-portal if only as static reports or points. [End of edit.]
[Edit, 12.09.2011:]
* It needs to be a part of reporting that incidents and wounded and killed are included in the (web-)reports! Formerly, I've hoped that active policing (by the Police forces, Palestinian, internationally strengthened (by non-Israeli) or not and the mere presence of international observers (and set-ups as described above) would reduce incidents and wounded and killed (in direct connection to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, i.e., Israeli killing Palestinian or vice versa). [End of edit.]
[Edit, 12.12.2010:]
* It should be mentioned that as Israel is a perpetrator and that it is reluctant to acknowledge valid borders to Palestine, its victim, this may be pathological and the issue should therefore be openly demanded as a few countries already have recognised Palestine an own state. Thus the next point on my "list" for an underlying plan to highlight steps that are needed, is that Israel makes it clear what borders it recognises so that this "pathology" can be safely scrapped, which is most welcomed by the whole world, I assume.
* This website with this map should clearly mark the 1967-borders and the eventual contemporary borders Israel accepts today if any. [End of edit.]
(Sincerely yours,
Mr. Terje Lea)
[Edit, 16.11.2010:] A comment on the side, pertaining to the settlements. It's a fact that the Swiss have been
addressing the Israelis for making Palestine look like a Swiss cheese (a cheese, as we all know, is known for
for its "holes" (bubbles)). [End of edit.]
PS: Let's end this together! (Joke?)
PS2: Typist is a user at the Philosophy Now forum. This entire writing has first been written on this forum.
PS3: unrealist42 is a user over at http://www.philosophyforums.com.
PS4: This plan is updated today, 15.12.2010, despite my protest by not writing. However, don't interpret this as I'm beginning to write again (on my websites).
(From the original blog: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/blogT/index.blog/1420534/the-israelpalestine-conflict-seeking-to-solve-it/.)
Original URL: http://blog.t-lea.net/#post97
2 further notes to the conflict:
1. note.
Note I side with Turkey over the verdict that "leaked copy of the United Nations report ... But the report also concludes that Israel's naval blockade of Gaza is legal - a move that has angered Turkey" because I think there's no convention (legal) or precedent for such a "legality" in international relations. On the other hand, I suspect "the Patient of Palestine" is suffering under "the Doctor, with split personality", overtly Israel and USA, and covertly, EU and Norway and Colombia shoved in by FDI (foreign direct investment, handler: USA) and "blackened Arab personality/corrupt money (sorry to suggest this). Solution: be aggressive on expressing frustration to friendly/charitable nations so that they can relay the political pressure, both media and diplomatic toward the _un_friendly nations! Good?
End of 1. note.
2. note.
On Israel and 900 new settlement-housing units planned in East Jerusalem: In light of the planning of 900 new housing units, I call for "cautious" sanctions against Israel on all sorts of signal products as Champagne and Parma-ham for their _consistent_ undermining of solutions with their neighbouring Palestinians. This should be discussed at UN. And even though this definite undermining of disciplinary reactions to Israel by USA takes place, I think the other nations are fully entitled to announce their dissatisfaction, thus _increasing_ global pressure against Israel for getting more serious in the conflict. The sanctions can be justified citing worldwide security concerns as incitement for conflict and the obvious idiot will to this incitement by the Israeli. This means that I hope these countries can come together and give these declarations against Israel despite the idiot vetoing by USA for making the full _other_ 6,5 - 7,0 Bn (Billion!) people heard and that _they_ (not USA) get to give this dearly welcomed voice to the Palestinians and their cause for a rightful state with some borders if not directly the 1967 borders to start with! Cheers!
This has also been posted United Nations Division for Palestinian Rights, http://www.facebook.com/UN.palestinianrights.
United Nations Division for Palestinian Rights
The Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People...
I'm sorry. The world population number on Wikip. said 7,4 Bn people. US Census says 6 937 326 780 _right now_!
Thus deducting some here and there making it 6,5 rather than 7 at any chance!
The Israelis should be well aware also of the possibility to build larger housing complexes and especially _taller_ so that NO people need to live on occupied territory/settlements obstructing peace with the Palestinians.
This comment of mine comes as reaction, slightly delayed, by the story brought by TV2 with "Publisert 04.04.2011 20.28", that is published on 04.04.2011.
The link: http://www.tv2.no/nyheter/utenriks/midtosten/israel-utvider-bosetning-paa-okkupert-land-3461347.html.
[Israel utvider bosetning på okkupert land]
End of 2. note.
Note: this is meant to continue until the conflict has ended. Thus, more is likely to be added!
Various! Written by Terje Lea 2010-12-31 13:24:49 [on blog.t-lea.net]
I've written this writing (in Norwegian) to the Committee of Palestine, a Norwegian
committee, I believe, 02:44 AM (night...), Tue 16. Nov.
The writing basically consists in this:
* Why isn't the UN and the EU (among others) on the spot/in the area
with their own, coordinated, observers and work-groups (engineers and
leaders/organisers) on both the Gaza-strip and the West Bank?
[Edit, Unsp.:]
* (Loosely with/by unrealist42:) The observers should use the latest technology in their mission, possibly web-cams for observing the check-points! unrealist42 suggests the use of web-cams for monitoring the check-points directly to the internet by full publicity. This may be too radical, but a moderated use by the observers can be a valuable contribution! Indeed, the latest technology should be applied as in all other (modern) countries so that Palestine can enter contemporary standards on all fronts, including industry! [End of edit.]
* There should be an updated map for the areas of conflict where (as on
the Google maps) one can find check-points, surveillance cameras,
the Wall, the settlements, special conflict-zones, operating UN/EU/others'
activities and all other activity (like "finally" imported goods to the Palestine
areas)!
* I also think there should be a COMMON web-portal for this conflict that is leaded
by UN (in the same fashion as WWF's web-presence). Here I suggest that all activities, in progress and in planning, are being presented/communicated. One should also emphasise the importance of transparency (no side "fools"/"undermines" the other).
* One may also have a money-effort surveillance page under this common portal that displays the actual effort (and direction) to the Palestine areas (and in the long run seriously undermines any hidden support for the tunnels into the Gaza-strip).
* One may also have a "tally" count on the number of people involved and what they do!
* I may come to add more points as we go, but I must say that I think the quality of the "engineering" work for ending this conflict could have been far better and had a better progression! I hope this improves in the immediate future!
[Edit, as extra compared to the email:]
* An addition to this writing on this forum: It should be a standing requirement that the representatives for Palestine accept Israel as a Jewish state on EQUAL footing as Palestine probably announces itself/looks upon itself as a Muslim state (i.e., the sound/massive support of Hamas, a rather (moderately/strongly) Islamic oriented political party). Poor people also tend to mind religious matters more strongly than fx. the affluent Europeans without this being a point, but rather a remark one can lend one's eye to.
* Also, I think the Israeli rhetoric has improved greatly for the last month or so. Though, it's seen as quite provoking that they push on these settlements to this degree.
* One report I've read, says that Israelis choose the settlements mostly for economic reasons and it should be possible to change this incentive or at least highlight it.
* (Loosely by Typist:) The world should support both Israel and Palestine as equal/symmetric states. Hopefully spurring both nations into prosperous, peaceful economic cycles of partnership, cooperation and to the service and benefit from and to the world.
[Edit, 17.11.2010:]
* In relation to the conflict (I-P), I'm also interested in the status of the Palestinian airport and the arrangement for Palestinians to communicate with one another between the Gaza strip and the West Bank. I'd also like to know the routines for moving between these two areas (physically, as the areas are indeed physically apart).
* Communications do include phone connections, mobile and "regular", as well as internet. I'd also include the aspect of communications from the Palestinian areas and to the world at large!
* It must be pointed out that despite the long coast line of the Gaza strip, the Palestinians have no harbour whatsoever! Even the fishing vessels have come under fire or harassment from time to time. There is no problem in conceiving an Israeli administration of a Palestinian harbour during a period of transition!
* There should be no problem in incorporating these concerns into this web-portal if only as static reports or points. [End of edit.]
[Edit, 12.09.2011:]
* It needs to be a part of reporting that incidents and wounded and killed are included in the (web-)reports! Formerly, I've hoped that active policing (by the Police forces, Palestinian, internationally strengthened (by non-Israeli) or not and the mere presence of international observers (and set-ups as described above) would reduce incidents and wounded and killed (in direct connection to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, i.e., Israeli killing Palestinian or vice versa). [End of edit.]
[Edit, 12.12.2010:]
* It should be mentioned that as Israel is a perpetrator and that it is reluctant to acknowledge valid borders to Palestine, its victim, this may be pathological and the issue should therefore be openly demanded as a few countries already have recognised Palestine an own state. Thus the next point on my "list" for an underlying plan to highlight steps that are needed, is that Israel makes it clear what borders it recognises so that this "pathology" can be safely scrapped, which is most welcomed by the whole world, I assume.
* This website with this map should clearly mark the 1967-borders and the eventual contemporary borders Israel accepts today if any. [End of edit.]
(Sincerely yours,
Mr. Terje Lea)
[Edit, 16.11.2010:] A comment on the side, pertaining to the settlements. It's a fact that the Swiss have been
addressing the Israelis for making Palestine look like a Swiss cheese (a cheese, as we all know, is known for
for its "holes" (bubbles)). [End of edit.]
PS: Let's end this together! (Joke?)
PS2: Typist is a user at the Philosophy Now forum. This entire writing has first been written on this forum.
PS3: unrealist42 is a user over at http://www.philosophyforums.com.
PS4: This plan is updated today, 15.12.2010, despite my protest by not writing. However, don't interpret this as I'm beginning to write again (on my websites).
(From the original blog: http://www.angelfire.com/realm/t_daemon_lea/blogT/index.blog/1420534/the-israelpalestine-conflict-seeking-to-solve-it/.)
Original URL: http://blog.t-lea.net/#post97
2 further notes to the conflict:
1. note.
Note I side with Turkey over the verdict that "leaked copy of the United Nations report ... But the report also concludes that Israel's naval blockade of Gaza is legal - a move that has angered Turkey" because I think there's no convention (legal) or precedent for such a "legality" in international relations. On the other hand, I suspect "the Patient of Palestine" is suffering under "the Doctor, with split personality", overtly Israel and USA, and covertly, EU and Norway and Colombia shoved in by FDI (foreign direct investment, handler: USA) and "blackened Arab personality/corrupt money (sorry to suggest this). Solution: be aggressive on expressing frustration to friendly/charitable nations so that they can relay the political pressure, both media and diplomatic toward the _un_friendly nations! Good?
End of 1. note.
2. note.
On Israel and 900 new settlement-housing units planned in East Jerusalem: In light of the planning of 900 new housing units, I call for "cautious" sanctions against Israel on all sorts of signal products as Champagne and Parma-ham for their _consistent_ undermining of solutions with their neighbouring Palestinians. This should be discussed at UN. And even though this definite undermining of disciplinary reactions to Israel by USA takes place, I think the other nations are fully entitled to announce their dissatisfaction, thus _increasing_ global pressure against Israel for getting more serious in the conflict. The sanctions can be justified citing worldwide security concerns as incitement for conflict and the obvious idiot will to this incitement by the Israeli. This means that I hope these countries can come together and give these declarations against Israel despite the idiot vetoing by USA for making the full _other_ 6,5 - 7,0 Bn (Billion!) people heard and that _they_ (not USA) get to give this dearly welcomed voice to the Palestinians and their cause for a rightful state with some borders if not directly the 1967 borders to start with! Cheers!
This has also been posted United Nations Division for Palestinian Rights, http://www.facebook.com/UN.palestinianrights.
United Nations Division for Palestinian Rights
The Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People...
I'm sorry. The world population number on Wikip. said 7,4 Bn people. US Census says 6 937 326 780 _right now_!
Thus deducting some here and there making it 6,5 rather than 7 at any chance!
The Israelis should be well aware also of the possibility to build larger housing complexes and especially _taller_ so that NO people need to live on occupied territory/settlements obstructing peace with the Palestinians.
This comment of mine comes as reaction, slightly delayed, by the story brought by TV2 with "Publisert 04.04.2011 20.28", that is published on 04.04.2011.
The link: http://www.tv2.no/nyheter/utenriks/midtosten/israel-utvider-bosetning-paa-okkupert-land-3461347.html.
[Israel utvider bosetning på okkupert land]
End of 2. note.
Note: this is meant to continue until the conflict has ended. Thus, more is likely to be added!
On Sociobiology and E. O. Wilson's Book (1975)
Just to stop some idiocy, I'd like to make a formal note concerning E. O. Wilson's Sociobiology, 1975. E O Wilson's book can be seen in at least two major ways. I like to point out the positive normative one and this is the view that we need to stop "celebrating" the degenerate, the diseased and the unable! This should be a plain extract to make of his book! Enjoy!
I guess many conspiracy theories and speculations have been made in the wake of this book and one is plausibly this. One may have feared that Wilson has been advocating a kind of "sociological nazism" where one is constantly putting the population under pressure to see if the population "evolves faster or better". Now this is very deranged, I think, because the "experiementers" are usually referring to consequences well beyond themselves and where there is little or no factual results to point to other than Darwin's Theory of Evolution and the study of animals. Animals are not people and fantasies of Alpha Males and Superhumans quickly overtake the proponents, rather than seeing, of course, the natural hierarchy of predators and prey, where the kills are of course, again, not that of human made torture, but by bite, poison and various other natural features the animals have! Please, be a little moderate and restrain yourself from "cheap arguments" that are more fantasy than of rigour and proper scientific quality!
Philip Kitcher has made a very prudent comment over E. O. Wilson's book in his Science, Truth, and Democracy!
My view is of course that concerns of evolutionary kinds can be taken care of by human self-discipline out of Homo _Sapiens Sapiens_! Thus, any ugly admittance of human nature is by this removed, soundly!
Note: this is originally written to Facebook, by "Static Display of Work..." on 6. Sept. 2011.
I guess many conspiracy theories and speculations have been made in the wake of this book and one is plausibly this. One may have feared that Wilson has been advocating a kind of "sociological nazism" where one is constantly putting the population under pressure to see if the population "evolves faster or better". Now this is very deranged, I think, because the "experiementers" are usually referring to consequences well beyond themselves and where there is little or no factual results to point to other than Darwin's Theory of Evolution and the study of animals. Animals are not people and fantasies of Alpha Males and Superhumans quickly overtake the proponents, rather than seeing, of course, the natural hierarchy of predators and prey, where the kills are of course, again, not that of human made torture, but by bite, poison and various other natural features the animals have! Please, be a little moderate and restrain yourself from "cheap arguments" that are more fantasy than of rigour and proper scientific quality!
Philip Kitcher has made a very prudent comment over E. O. Wilson's book in his Science, Truth, and Democracy!
My view is of course that concerns of evolutionary kinds can be taken care of by human self-discipline out of Homo _Sapiens Sapiens_! Thus, any ugly admittance of human nature is by this removed, soundly!
Note: this is originally written to Facebook, by "Static Display of Work..." on 6. Sept. 2011.
Activation of Customer-Data-Less Internet Access
Activation of customer data-less internet access. Automated routines by signed/marked (SIM-card/MAC-address similarity) gadgets that are activated on first use by payment-details. Typically, first period (month?) is bought on exactly first connection to the internet. This can be in the fashion of Buypass or other, by buying a modem/router with an identifier-number, marked as noted above. If the payment happens on a up-front basis, you will never have payment problems from the customers and customers who are not... can choose to go elsewhere!
The up-front/pre-paid solutions can be handled also as the customer buy the device and from there on needs to visit a website to renew the subscription!
This idea makes it apparent that no customer data ever needs to be handled and that IP's that take part in illegal stuff can still be traced by Police authorities by the usual mechanisms... Good?
The up-front/pre-paid solutions can be handled also as the customer buy the device and from there on needs to visit a website to renew the subscription!
This idea makes it apparent that no customer data ever needs to be handled and that IP's that take part in illegal stuff can still be traced by Police authorities by the usual mechanisms... Good?
Idea for Peer-2-Peer Search Engine Application
Here's an idea for a peer-to-peer client search engine:
you use a client side application and this application has two sides,
one to your own computer (watch the permissions) and one to your peers of
choice, whatever registry you choose to visit. You pick up these registries with
a central registry _consisting of nothing else than a pure listing by text_! These may be Wikipedia and all else (Europeana incl.).
Good?
Note: I may have shared this idea with two other people, one from Google and one from Germany from the last 12 hrs.
you use a client side application and this application has two sides,
one to your own computer (watch the permissions) and one to your peers of
choice, whatever registry you choose to visit. You pick up these registries with
a central registry _consisting of nothing else than a pure listing by text_! These may be Wikipedia and all else (Europeana incl.).
Good?
Note: I may have shared this idea with two other people, one from Google and one from Germany from the last 12 hrs.
Wednesday, 7 September 2011
Security for Fixed Shielded Data Cables
I've seen an internet cable over a bridge on TV once (New York?). By this, I have an idea for safe internet cabling (intrusion secure by illegal access), in the hard sense, by physical cables.
The physical cables are simply shielded, whatever they contain, fiber or something else, by an outer layer of electricity carrying material that is monitored for abnormal fluctuations indicating breach of integrity and attempt of getting access to the (data) cables!
This is merely an idea. I don't know if you would rather use magnetic or electrical detection.
You can investigate yourself. Good luck!
Endnote: This idea is likely to carry strict engineering requirements. All from the right detection strength to insulation that produce the sufficient quality for this idea to happen!
Perhaps the shielding can carry 10 000 Volt and merely signalling Amperage... Your job to find out... (or mine if I get there)! Cheers!
Perhaps a possible breach could cause "earthquake effect" and thus you would know where the breach would be in the system.
...On this line! Other alternatives are direct surveillance monitoring of the cable areas or some patrolling of kind, by security company or all 3 combined! Whatever the degree of security you want! (2 comments more made to Facebook.)
Note: First posted to Facebook some 10 minutes ago (from 9/07/2011 10:28:00 PM).
Note2: two more comments first made to Facebook with datestamp on the comment below.
The physical cables are simply shielded, whatever they contain, fiber or something else, by an outer layer of electricity carrying material that is monitored for abnormal fluctuations indicating breach of integrity and attempt of getting access to the (data) cables!
This is merely an idea. I don't know if you would rather use magnetic or electrical detection.
You can investigate yourself. Good luck!
Endnote: This idea is likely to carry strict engineering requirements. All from the right detection strength to insulation that produce the sufficient quality for this idea to happen!
Perhaps the shielding can carry 10 000 Volt and merely signalling Amperage... Your job to find out... (or mine if I get there)! Cheers!
Perhaps a possible breach could cause "earthquake effect" and thus you would know where the breach would be in the system.
...On this line! Other alternatives are direct surveillance monitoring of the cable areas or some patrolling of kind, by security company or all 3 combined! Whatever the degree of security you want! (2 comments more made to Facebook.)
Note: First posted to Facebook some 10 minutes ago (from 9/07/2011 10:28:00 PM).
Note2: two more comments first made to Facebook with datestamp on the comment below.
A Further Basis for the Foundherentist and the Foundationalist - A Remark
I've written the Photon Theory and from this I've shifted from Coherentist in Epistemology to Foundherentist "because we now know what we stand on, so to speak" which has been a problem for the earlier position of Foundationalism. In addition to the smallest particles of Photons, allegedly, by myself, I just like to remind people of the biggest fact we know of, the image of the Microwave Background Radioactivity. This is found under Universe by Wikipedia, 07.09.2011. This image is gathered by a special radiotelescope. You can read more about it on Wikipedia, anyhow. Well, we haven't reached, by an actual human being, any particular beyond the Moon (to the Earth) and these planets and various other outer space phenomena remain unknown to us. Thus, I think this radiotelescope image is a bit weak in presenting comfort of "complete knowledge" to us, but it's a fine fact to add to one's own knowledge base in enjoying science and life in general. Enjoy yourself!
Note: You may spare a little room just in case it turns out there are more than one universe, i.e., a multiverse!
Note: You may spare a little room just in case it turns out there are more than one universe, i.e., a multiverse!
Monday, 5 September 2011
Opinions on Philosophy of Law (Maybe a Bit Immature/Uninformed)
I see from the Jurisprudence article on Wikipedia, that people may want some words on Philosophy of Law from me. These are (rather quickly):
1. There should be no holes in a good system of legal practice/legislation system!
2. The laws are absolute and they can't be reasonably dodged. This point is supported by point 1.
3. (if nec.) The laws are complete and describe only objective circumstances (pertaining to HDM and quality of evidence) and most certainly only real life.
4. Legislation is on TOP. The courts are nr. 2 and the Police are nr. 3. There are various security concerns to this. I think the Police need clear rules/procedures as they do their work. I think the Judges only need to set a precedent if the Legislative Assembly (National Parliament) feigns its duties. So I want/hold a theory for a sharp and pro-active Legislative Body and "Judges only to the rescue", acting secondarily so to speak! Good?
Just in case of interest, I find Antonin Scalia's Originalist position compatible with a "Legislationist" position. Thus I pay respect to forming laws "in the spirit of the Book of Laws (fx. Norges Lover)". Or when you sit there writing, that you are "in a spirit of the Law". This should be the beginning bricks for foundation! (Not having read a book, but generally (very) interested for a long time (I'm 35).
You should note my point on Godel (Goedel) in Phil. Notes. I'm hard and I know it. There will be no excuses if the future is properly cared for!!!
The header of it says: Opinions on Gödel's Theorems of Incompleteness and Possibly Tarski and link is (one of them): http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.com/2011/08/philosophical-notes-of-intellectual.html.
What is Written...: Philosophical Notes of Intellectual Music,
whatiswritten777.blogspot.com.
Also take note on the meditative state for making laws. Legislation happens at most meditative state, down to the Judges (by the heat of the Trial and direct Justice down further to Police under fire, so to speak! Thus, this comes natural!
You can get good lessons from Court TV (Nancy Grace) and various interviews from your or U.S. American Supreme Court Members by 60 Minutes. General media awareness isn't so bad either...
I must add that Europe can do well with its own Courts reporting (by example of Nancy Grace) and Justice section on CNN U.S. American edition and a Situation Room type of Legal Practice reporting (in media where there is "interest"). I welcome a more aware and active Legal Practice reporting in Europe. Also in the Pan-European sense (to close some holes for these "U.S. Americans" if not the "Colombians"... :-D
I believe it has been Clarence Thomas who has uttered the words on an interview with CBS 60 Minutes that "you _need_ legislation to make verdicts". Consequently, I have the "Legislationist" position from him, but I'm uncertain if it is he who says the words or somebody else because a fair amount of time has passed since then.
When I write "Absolutist", I mean of course that there should be (normativity) little or no room for "interpretation". Burglary is thus burglary and rape, even for the sexist or crazy, is still the rape. The victim can never be the burglar oneself and the victim can't either be the rapist oneself. Some people are blind to this, they fail to make proper distinctions of words or situations or whatever. I also think that today's systems across the world seeks brevity of law as description of law on a rather unfounded basis. Therefore, I can imagine a more complete description to go with the law as it's delivered from the Legislative Assembly. Fx. in case it's needed, a better description can be given as a secondary compilation to the laws by corresponding documents to the collection of laws where these are needed. A law concerning The Protection of Private Information as fx. one's private address can be given a better description until it reaches a level of descriptive completeness, possibly adding 1, 2 or 3 pages. Better now?
Even if we speak of filming for the press, there is still no valid objection to having this filmed by Court's Archiving Services! Thus, Courts would have the pressure to do the job right and appeals could become much more clear. Corruption could also get rooted out much faster and idiot judges would never be allowed. But corruption to the archiving system makes every problem return again! I say, attack! (Because the world really looks retarded!)
So under the "Issues from the Internet", under the header of "What are your philosophical positions?" you can now add on me, Philosophy of Law: Absolutist, Legislationist and Originalist. Just for the update.
Note: last comment has been added a few minutes ago!
1. There should be no holes in a good system of legal practice/legislation system!
2. The laws are absolute and they can't be reasonably dodged. This point is supported by point 1.
3. (if nec.) The laws are complete and describe only objective circumstances (pertaining to HDM and quality of evidence) and most certainly only real life.
4. Legislation is on TOP. The courts are nr. 2 and the Police are nr. 3. There are various security concerns to this. I think the Police need clear rules/procedures as they do their work. I think the Judges only need to set a precedent if the Legislative Assembly (National Parliament) feigns its duties. So I want/hold a theory for a sharp and pro-active Legislative Body and "Judges only to the rescue", acting secondarily so to speak! Good?
Just in case of interest, I find Antonin Scalia's Originalist position compatible with a "Legislationist" position. Thus I pay respect to forming laws "in the spirit of the Book of Laws (fx. Norges Lover)". Or when you sit there writing, that you are "in a spirit of the Law". This should be the beginning bricks for foundation! (Not having read a book, but generally (very) interested for a long time (I'm 35).
You should note my point on Godel (Goedel) in Phil. Notes. I'm hard and I know it. There will be no excuses if the future is properly cared for!!!
The header of it says: Opinions on Gödel's Theorems of Incompleteness and Possibly Tarski and link is (one of them): http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.com/2011/08/philosophical-notes-of-intellectual.html.
What is Written...: Philosophical Notes of Intellectual Music,
whatiswritten777.blogspot.com.
Also take note on the meditative state for making laws. Legislation happens at most meditative state, down to the Judges (by the heat of the Trial and direct Justice down further to Police under fire, so to speak! Thus, this comes natural!
You can get good lessons from Court TV (Nancy Grace) and various interviews from your or U.S. American Supreme Court Members by 60 Minutes. General media awareness isn't so bad either...
I must add that Europe can do well with its own Courts reporting (by example of Nancy Grace) and Justice section on CNN U.S. American edition and a Situation Room type of Legal Practice reporting (in media where there is "interest"). I welcome a more aware and active Legal Practice reporting in Europe. Also in the Pan-European sense (to close some holes for these "U.S. Americans" if not the "Colombians"... :-D
I believe it has been Clarence Thomas who has uttered the words on an interview with CBS 60 Minutes that "you _need_ legislation to make verdicts". Consequently, I have the "Legislationist" position from him, but I'm uncertain if it is he who says the words or somebody else because a fair amount of time has passed since then.
When I write "Absolutist", I mean of course that there should be (normativity) little or no room for "interpretation". Burglary is thus burglary and rape, even for the sexist or crazy, is still the rape. The victim can never be the burglar oneself and the victim can't either be the rapist oneself. Some people are blind to this, they fail to make proper distinctions of words or situations or whatever. I also think that today's systems across the world seeks brevity of law as description of law on a rather unfounded basis. Therefore, I can imagine a more complete description to go with the law as it's delivered from the Legislative Assembly. Fx. in case it's needed, a better description can be given as a secondary compilation to the laws by corresponding documents to the collection of laws where these are needed. A law concerning The Protection of Private Information as fx. one's private address can be given a better description until it reaches a level of descriptive completeness, possibly adding 1, 2 or 3 pages. Better now?
Even if we speak of filming for the press, there is still no valid objection to having this filmed by Court's Archiving Services! Thus, Courts would have the pressure to do the job right and appeals could become much more clear. Corruption could also get rooted out much faster and idiot judges would never be allowed. But corruption to the archiving system makes every problem return again! I say, attack! (Because the world really looks retarded!)
So under the "Issues from the Internet", under the header of "What are your philosophical positions?" you can now add on me, Philosophy of Law: Absolutist, Legislationist and Originalist. Just for the update.
Note: last comment has been added a few minutes ago!
Article 3 of the Human Rights and Access to Non-Violent Self-Defence
To the discussion of tasers/stun guns and peppersprays (I'm in _STRONG_ favour): I have this to relay.
Who has the lowest threshold for hurting people and committing crime?
Who has the least respect for both cranium and head/brain?
Who has the least respect for people in general?
Thus it should be clear who has the initiative to hit people on the basis of bare knuckles (by hands/bones). This hurts law-abiding citizens unreasonably hard and serves to incite "silent" anger/hate. It's also hurtful to live under a threat from people who are more willing to commit this kind of act, i.e., to crack the skulls of people, with no special regard for the human they destroy the life of.
The conclusion must be clear: tasers/stun guns and peppersprays must be allowed, and in the face of (vast/"vast") corruption within the Police forces, we have NO time to waste! Act now! To Europe!!! (And business...)
It may be an objection that people may have a lower threshold for stunning/incapacitating other people if these means become available, but I think the strength of this is lower than the strength of the following, that law-abiding citizens, people of primary priority, are better protected both in self-defence, but also in case they may feel threatened and want to do something about it, let's say in the face of absurd rudeness from a bigger "caveman", to "save the day of one's date/business" and so on. In this way, the law-abiding citizen is allowed a milder tool and a mechanism for escalation of conflict and injury if these are allowed, again, tasers/stun guns and peppersprays. I hope you get the importance of this!
You know, this is for the prevention of the escalation of conflict and for the prevention of injury, that is, beyond necessity of circumstances like injury from merely falling to the ground!
Who has the lowest threshold for hurting people and committing crime?
Who has the least respect for both cranium and head/brain?
Who has the least respect for people in general?
Thus it should be clear who has the initiative to hit people on the basis of bare knuckles (by hands/bones). This hurts law-abiding citizens unreasonably hard and serves to incite "silent" anger/hate. It's also hurtful to live under a threat from people who are more willing to commit this kind of act, i.e., to crack the skulls of people, with no special regard for the human they destroy the life of.
The conclusion must be clear: tasers/stun guns and peppersprays must be allowed, and in the face of (vast/"vast") corruption within the Police forces, we have NO time to waste! Act now! To Europe!!! (And business...)
It may be an objection that people may have a lower threshold for stunning/incapacitating other people if these means become available, but I think the strength of this is lower than the strength of the following, that law-abiding citizens, people of primary priority, are better protected both in self-defence, but also in case they may feel threatened and want to do something about it, let's say in the face of absurd rudeness from a bigger "caveman", to "save the day of one's date/business" and so on. In this way, the law-abiding citizen is allowed a milder tool and a mechanism for escalation of conflict and injury if these are allowed, again, tasers/stun guns and peppersprays. I hope you get the importance of this!
You know, this is for the prevention of the escalation of conflict and for the prevention of injury, that is, beyond necessity of circumstances like injury from merely falling to the ground!
Over Ecology Simulation Shortcomings
I think it's a pity that BBC writes this when one can simulate something very easy as _decrease_ in world population!!! That is, these people are not willing to go into handling _the OVERPOPULATION PROBLEM_ and this is a scientific weakness opening for contempt to IPCC and environment/ecology scientists. Please, change, you scientists!
This relates to Climate prediction: No model for success, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7381250.stm.
Therefore, I demand/want a computer simulation on world population growth, the negative, and world population decrease, the normatively positive!!!
Posted to WWF on Facebook, both the above and this, "I still think The Overpopulation problem should be the world's top priority, acknowledging that the world works on several issues at once, but speeding up/getting harder on this very important challenge for us... "Think about the Bluefin Tuna, all the animals on the verge to extinction (the white tiger)..." or with Michael Jackson, "Think about the world and how we can make it a better place..." *sob* *sob*"
"And with basic stuff too: "think about your sex-education and how you're expected to use contraception pills and condoms. To grow up and become responsible parents..." You know the lesson. Enjoy your weekend! :-)"
I don't know how it is, but I've managed to report on some old history of the BBC: the story is "last updated at 08:12 GMT, Tuesday, 6 May 2008 09:12 UK".
This relates to Climate prediction: No model for success, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7381250.stm.
Therefore, I demand/want a computer simulation on world population growth, the negative, and world population decrease, the normatively positive!!!
Posted to WWF on Facebook, both the above and this, "I still think The Overpopulation problem should be the world's top priority, acknowledging that the world works on several issues at once, but speeding up/getting harder on this very important challenge for us... "Think about the Bluefin Tuna, all the animals on the verge to extinction (the white tiger)..." or with Michael Jackson, "Think about the world and how we can make it a better place..." *sob* *sob*"
"And with basic stuff too: "think about your sex-education and how you're expected to use contraception pills and condoms. To grow up and become responsible parents..." You know the lesson. Enjoy your weekend! :-)"
I don't know how it is, but I've managed to report on some old history of the BBC: the story is "last updated at 08:12 GMT, Tuesday, 6 May 2008 09:12 UK".
Virtual 3D Walk as Search Engine Presentation
For search engines interface, I have at least the idea that one can make a kind of interacting story to unfold, where the users are introduced to an alternative virtual 3D walk to "pick the fruits of information" as the "boring" plain interface is presented directly as the fastest choice, rather than some computing power intensive presentation of information. I've also been thinking one can engage a kind of art gallery walkabout in collaboration with artists for the same set-up. Thus this can be of benefit of both artists and the search engine itself. Just the idea! Like it?
Thus the search engine can present a cycle of taste, irregular or not, while maintaining the fastest choice as well. Probably mostly for children... :-)
This goes for a possible Europeana Search Engine too! Too! Too! Tooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!
Yandex too, if we should cross our legs too much. They should be invited into Europe/EU and made diligent approaches to... Now! NOW!!!
I'll just remind you of how Altavista easily introduced itself everywhere in the world because the searches were "universal" (based on character/type set (only)).
Thus the search engine can present a cycle of taste, irregular or not, while maintaining the fastest choice as well. Probably mostly for children... :-)
This goes for a possible Europeana Search Engine too! Too! Too! Tooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!
Yandex too, if we should cross our legs too much. They should be invited into Europe/EU and made diligent approaches to... Now! NOW!!!
I'll just remind you of how Altavista easily introduced itself everywhere in the world because the searches were "universal" (based on character/type set (only)).
Sunday, 4 September 2011
Additional Writings to Watch
There is a bigger body of writings called "Scribblings" that you may want to read. Do as you like, please!
(You are now notified. The file also only exists on Facebook where you can check for material both on the profile and on the "Static Display of Work...")
I'm unable to present a link for now, but it's one of the first documents on the Facebook group of "Static Display of Work..." if not the first, and sometimes Facebook just spins and refuses to yield logical results, i.e., the full data of the group. Alright?
You should perhaps, as a matter of friendly advise in a hostile world, the "Security Package for Normal Homes", link, https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150235722137117 . Take care!
(Normal in this sense also includes psychological normality, as the French like it.)
(You are now notified. The file also only exists on Facebook where you can check for material both on the profile and on the "Static Display of Work...")
I'm unable to present a link for now, but it's one of the first documents on the Facebook group of "Static Display of Work..." if not the first, and sometimes Facebook just spins and refuses to yield logical results, i.e., the full data of the group. Alright?
You should perhaps, as a matter of friendly advise in a hostile world, the "Security Package for Normal Homes", link, https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150235722137117 . Take care!
(Normal in this sense also includes psychological normality, as the French like it.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)