Showing posts with label Aesthetics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aesthetics. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 April 2013

The Catholic Seven Virtues and Seven Sins - Also by my "Rejection of the Cardinal Sins" Argument, in line with Kierkegaard Aesthetics

Catholic - Seven Virtues - Catholic - Seven Sins!


-. Virtue Latin Pedagogics


1. Chastity Castitas Modesty, also fidelity toward spouse, moderation in balanced quantities, as matter of personal discipline toward balance in life

2. Temperance Temperantia Balanced mind, sense of justice

3. Charity Caritas Caring for those who are in need, for the suffering, for those in despair

4. Diligence Industria Politeness, to be timely, to act with manner, the work ethics, the work duty

5. Patience Patientia To wait and be disciplined about it too

6. Kindness Humanitas Goodness, that one has the ability to care and respect, properly

7. Humility Humilitas Humility by sense, a type of respect, (NOT acceptance of slavery of accept any unlawful submission)

(In between here lies the 10 Commandments, one that translates into the laws and regulations for the modern Christian.)


-. Vice Latin Pedagogics


1. Lust Luxuria Lust, plainly, the excessive disposition toward lust as drive in life

2. Gluttony Gula Overweight, that one eats too much and care little else than for food

3. Greed Avaritia That money becomes an obsession in one's life

4. Sloth Socordia That inactivity and complacency replaces job and the drive to use one's body, to work

5. Wrath Ira Unrestrained anger, aggression toward "this and that", the random anger/hate/aggression

6. Envy Invidia The possession of others becomes an obsession

7. Pride Superbia Disrespect for the 10 commandments, do not abide by the laws and regulations in the modern sense

"The Roman Catholic Church also recognizes seven virtues, which correspond inversely to each of the seven deadly sins."


Quote marks, from Wikipedia. The very virtues and sins are also copied from Wikipedia.


I present this list for exactly the purpose by the text and especially over the irritation with the "Pride" sin that is probably the most misunderstood, quenching the notion that religious aren't supposed to be proud people (because I think they/we are mostly entitled this by the undertaking of community responsibility and so on, setting the good example.


(Some idiot formatting is still on Blogger for preventing "delete"-action, to mention one.)

Tuesday, 13 September 2011

(A Part of) The Easy Way to Religion and Stalwartly So

Fast sentences on Søren Kierkegaard: first, you score 66% on accepting the Aesthetics and the Ethics and you launch into the Religious at last by conceiving the necessity of meaning of Religious intellect apart from the (determined/inanimate soul) of Animalistic. This is for a younger audience, straight from Religious class/Biblical School, 13 - 20 (or whatever). Good?

Of the religious thinkers I have enjoyed the most I find Søren Kierkegaard and St. Thomas Aquinas and Giordano Bruno and Lady Conway and Leibniz to be a highly recommended reading list! Enjoy yourselves! Cheers!

Bruno is added for making the assertion that "monads" have extension, that they are of a kind of material!

I've also found St. Augustinus interesting in the past, but after closer examination he's laid to rest...

It's more common to write St. Augustine! Excuse me!

A good supporting beam is also _TO STAY WITHIN_ and not to commit the Cardinal SIN of Pride. This is the sin to become one's own God and to become deviant to the REAL God, "by our Heavenly Father"!