Showing posts with label self-defence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label self-defence. Show all posts

Friday, 17 August 2018

Questions to All Politicians Worldwide - Utopia must become a dutiful goal!

General election in Sweden, 9. September 2018. - I suggest the following questions to the politicians.

Before elections in Norway and everywhere else in the World.

How do they view Utopia?
How do they want to work for Utopia?
When do they think that Utopia can be achieved? (Countrywise)
What do they think about The 4 Factors? ("Optional")
How do they want to improve people's human rights (UDHR)?
What do they think about improving the legal system?
How do they want to improve the legal system?
What do they think about pistols or revolvers to the general population?
What do they think about pepper spray to the population?
- What should the required age be for this? 14? 16? 18?
What do they think about the lie detectors, 5 methods +?
- Lie detectors can also aid in combatting crimes against environment...?
- Also to the police and the courts?
What do they think about radio-based scanner portals?
- "Against 500 unwanted conditions in human beings"?
What is the specified list for social justice?
Do you think that pistols, revolvers, pepper spray, lie detectors (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals can be good for industry and business in general? I'm thinking about the business boom in USA vs. mediocracy in "crooked" Europe...

In addition, of course, come all the usual questions... Environmental protection? Ecological measures? Unemployment? (State-) Budget balance responsibility? Central bank politics? Immigration, also by UN recommendation? The rest...

Prediction: The Left is going to stand out negatively!

#Sverige #Val2018 #Election #Politik #TheWorld #Politics #Utopia

The list may well be improved. I'll see what I can add or find elsewhere of information.

Note (1): Our politicians will not get it any easier than in Sweden! (Norway, else...)

Note (2): That will to evil, to torture and murder, to character murder of all people leads to the fact that one is defined as Monster behind the (human) face (Mask of Sanity), Enemy of Humanity! Especially in offices, positions of power and trust, with (much) responsibility, for example, politicians, police, military, lawyers and judges, physicians and journalists and historians (media).

Note (3): The Human Being of Law established! Not the political animals anymore (Aristotle's definition of man as a political animal (zoon politikon)). See here on the blog, Human Being of Law (2013): https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-human-being-of-law-legal-duties-of.html. I can also mention Kantian Moral Psychology for determining accurately the level of ethical/moral mentality in all people!

____

For the Future of a More Perfect World

The path forward is to vote for right wing politics and keep voting right wing politics in order to increase pressure for the good solutions including The 4 Factors.

Bottom line for right wing politics: freedom of thought, privacy rights, laws and regulations including human rights for business life and private initiative! If they fail this, they are logically replaced along with the socialists and the others.

While on the right wing one must seek to demand the best candidates there for leading and take nominations and offices as or when they get elected. If there is this only answer, we choose the best people! Hurray!

All elections and other political events will decide who are Human Beings with sanity and who are Enemies of Humanity, Monsters behind the faces of human beings. The 4 Factors must happen as the ethical duties run deep!

Of course, the socialists (and communists) will continue to be weak on human rights (UDHR/The International Bill of Rights) and fighting crime, improving the legal system, admitting no learning from those other horrible crimes against humanity usually involving torture and character killing of the youngest and upward!

3 Points for the case to arm the general population with pistols and revolvers:

1. The unarmed Jews before Kristallnacht and Holocaust in Nazi-Germany. Much of the history of socialists involves genocides and mass killings. Just check with history: Stalin, Hitler, Red Khmer, Mao Zedong, etc., etc... All atrocities, as analysis at least, by the fact that people have been unarmed.
2. The financial success, might of military forces (NATO and Human Rights vs. Communism w/o any such) and general character of person in USA by allowing the population their self-defence by pepper spray and guns and other.
3. The fact that sadistic perverts, torturers of children, who can't handle guns (pistols, revolvers) and pepper spray get extra protection if the population is denied this self-defence.

* The 4 Factors: revolvers and pistols, pepper spray, lie detection array (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals ("against 500 unwanted ills in human beings").

By example of Sweden.
#Election in #Sweden: 9 September! 16 days to go! Voting is already open until and including 9 September. Election day: voting stations open 8 am to 8 pm (8:00 to 20:00). #The4Factors #Progress #Val2018 #Sverige #Countdown

All #elections and other #political events will decide who are #HumanBeings with sanity and who are #EnemiesofHumanity - #Monsters behind the faces of human beings. #The4Factors must happen! #AgainstEvil #Evilmustdie! @CNN @UN @cnni #Humanity #UDHR #HumanRights #Morality #Ethics

____

Rejection of Socialism in Future Politics

It seems important to reject Socialism from politics in order to achieve Utopia.
Socialism has a history of lying and deceit to the voters. It fails to respect Human Rights (UDHR) and its improvement, it fails to respect people's dignity, it fails to respect laws and regulations, it fails to respect the legal system and its improvement and Kantian ethical and moral character in people, especially the children (kindness).

As I write this, I also think it's important to keep the Labour Movement and to win them over to center politics or right wing politics by making a better case for their future than the betrayal of Socialism ever can.

In this regard, on the way to Utopia, The 4 Factors, revolvers or pistols, pepper spray, lie detection array (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals ("against 500 ills in human beings") are incredibly important and are likely to never be promoted by Socialism or beyond on the grounds mentioned above.

Indeed, they say the welfare system and the case for all the (very) insane people piling up there, but fail people miserably in all other regards, only to facilitate the character killing of families in the shadows for sustaining evil in the World.

____

The Blood of Idiot Pacifism

Unarmed people killed under Josef Stalin, twice, also in Ukraine, Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong or Red Khmer, etc.

How much blood should the "monster pacifists" have before they realize the best democracy is the one where many are relied upon for justice, honesty, anti-corruption and human rights? Whether they are "monster pacifists" by idiocy or other is beyond me.

As such, it should be evident that all atrocities of the World have taken place or are taking place because of the fact that people are unarmed, have no revolvers or pistols. The fact that they are unarmed generates the most horrible circumstances, also, as we see from history, leading to genocides and mass killings. Note on corrupt military and most certainly corrupt police. Also corrupt military attacking other nations.

Link, Blogspot, Charleston Shooting and Justice - Guns or Not: https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.com/2015/06/charleston-shooting-and-justice-guns-or.html

Note on the glaring connection of cowards against guns to the populations and Atheism and socialism and communism, in the most unholy union known to human kind!

#AgainstSocialism #Socialism #Democracy #HumanRights #UDHR #Utopia #Progress #MoralProgress

--------------------------

Original text in Norwegian:
Valg i Sverige - Jeg foreslår følgende spørsmål til politikerne

Før valg i Norge og alle andre steder i Verden.

Hvordan stiller de seg til Utopia?
Hvordan vil de arbeide for Utopia?
Når tenker de at Utopia kan oppnås?
Hva tenker de om De 4 Faktorer? ("Valgfritt")
Hvordan ønsker de å forbedre folks menneskerettigheter?
Hva tenker de om forbedring av rettssystemet?
Hva tenker de om pistoler eller revolvere til befolkningen?
Hva tenker de om pepperspray til befolkningen?
- Hvilken aldersgrense for dette? 14? 16?
Hva tenker de om løgndetektorer, 5 metoder +?
- Løgndetektorer kan hjelpe mye mot miljøkriminalitet...?
- Også til politiet og rettssalene?
Hva tenker de om radio-baserte skanner portaler?
- "Mot 500 uønskede tilstander i mennesker"?
Hva er den spesifiserte listen for sosial rettferdighet?
Tenker dere at pistoler, revolvere, pepperspray, løgndetektorer (5 metoder +) og radio-baserte skanner portaler kan være bra for industri og forretninger (business)? Jeg tenker på boomen i USA vs. middelmådighet i "crooked" Europa...

I tillegg kommer alle de vanlige spørsmålene... Miljøet? Økologiske tiltak? Arbeidsløshet? (Stats-)Budsjettbalanse? Pengepolitikken? Resten...

Prediksjon: Venstresiden kommer til å utmerke seg negativt!

Listen kan gjerne forbedres. Jeg får se hva jeg finner på eller finner av informasjon.

Merknad (1): Våre politikere får det ikke noe lettere enn i Sverige!

Merknad (2) også om at vilje til ondskap, til tortur og drap, til karakterdrap på alle mennesker fører til at man defineres som Monster bak ansiktet (Mask of Sanity), Fiende av menneskeheten! Spesielt i stillinger med (mye) ansvar, for eksempel politikere, politi, militæret, advokater og dommere, legene og journalister og historikere (media).

Monday, 22 June 2015

Charleston Shooting and Justice - Guns or Not

The justice (and not only "if not guns then peace and ever so"):

It may very well be that the torture rates of USA are significantly lower because with guns people are able to revenge. In other parts of the World, one is in lack of this and therefore people commit the most awful acts against one another (more so than in USA, not an angel-country itself).

Therefore, I'd like you to consider
* guns equals less torture (less molestation and traumatizing of children)
* no guns equals more torture than if guns are present like in USA, the only country where guns are present to this degree.

Do not forget, please, that USA has become the most powerful nation based on its virtues and one of these virtues is the 2nd amendment right, the right to own arms (preferably only small arms).

One thing is to die from a gunshot, but a whole other thing is to die from torture, perhaps taken to the most extreme, both in terms of time and of mental pain. Torture must be seen as straight evil in today's World when even the military issue may be seen as excess due to overwhelming power from NATO and UN (UN Sec. Council).

Our legal systems worldwide aren't perfect, surely. But the system in USA edges more toward a desired system than in rest of the World.

Just think of where you want to live. Do you want to live in a poor country? One hears of no torture in South Africa, but is it really so beautiful? And so on for every other country...

The victims to gun violence must be seen as a sacrifice for keeping torture and widespread abuse of children to rather low levels. It could be European levels and they are not good at all!

From a citizen in Europe, a system much overrated in terms of legal systems.

The disturbing facts in terms of suicides, separating the "nature" of suicides in USA and everywhere else, purely due to selfdefence (guns being part):
It's stated that "Approximately one-half of suicides are committed by firearm, accounting for two-thirds of all firearms deaths. [21,334 of 33,599 in 2014]"[24-reference]
Those are decent suicides! In Europe we do all sorts of crazy things in order to (finally) die because either it's the corrupt authorities hunting the suicide candidates only to get more torture on them. A corruption we in Europe usually never can do anything about because the self-protection is outlawed, that is, guns, pepperspray, tazers and killer knives. And that's after the 20 times the suicide candidates "bounce" about before they die!

"The same article [USA Today] stated that there are far fewer homicides than suicides in the country; in fact, homicide rates have fallen by half in the U.S. since 1991."
So homicides are bad, but the numbers are improving and the victims have gotten the death by gun shot, not tortured a few times first as in Europe.

For the instances of torture in Europe, pick out the stats for murders, missing people and a good portion of the suicides who "failed" to die when tortured!

At spot no. 48 USA comes in with 12.6 per 100 000 people.
At spot no. 102 Norway comes in with 9.3 per 100 K people.
Hurray! At spot no. 123 United Kingdom comes in with 7.4 per 100 K people.
Now, from the above and given Europe's tendency to sodomy, corruption and lying for the facade, also for protection (because a wounded prey in Europe usually gets "taken" quickly).

You know, I happen to think that USA takes it (accepts the deaths, some also "beautiful"), all factors considered! (Don't say you're young, please, because then you have quite a bit of learning to do!)

Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_the_United_States

Some additional:
Warburton, N., 2004, p. 21. The Basics - Philosophy, 4th ed. Routledge: New York The Problem of Evil. "...of the widespread practice of torture." and "...all examples of moral evil or cruelty: human beings inflicting suffering on other human beings..."

There's a further question for this 9-killer shooter. Should he see the death penalty or how long should he sit in prison because of this?

Information to the British public:
I have sent this text (the main text) to BBC Have your say and they should have strong duties in acting on this!

Also in terms of BBC World if not "BBC Europe" (I guess where they are). This is a serious matter in Europe, one that possibly propagates the most grievous torture throughout every day!

Concerning the gun debate, I'd like to question the experts/"experts" and how perverts handle guns.

Not only are perverts likely to shoot themselves in the head ("aaarrrgghh, this head must come OFF!"), but they also, generally, HATE guns, whether the thunder of it or that the shooting is "white"/good, that is, the fear to be shot by goodness, for one strange reason or other (I happen to think they hate justice, as this also is goodness.)

I find that the experts/"experts" hide the facts of perverts handling guns (poorly)!

New news: not that I let go of the corrupt (small) parts of USA, but we in Europe and elsewhere need to understand that Google, Facebook, Intel, AMD and others are purely due to US American character by respect to Human Rights and their own citizens by gun rights and other for self-defence, plus, plus, plus... This is the hard lesson for all places outside USA.

New deal in the gun debate and pro self-defence:
I think that abuse/severe abuse/torture is also about children, most certainly, and some men and women. The leader of the National Association for Victims of Violence is saying that they support lawful pepper spray and tear gas "where the police are unable to do the job". I think maybe pistols/revolvers may be appropriate and maybe, thus, avoid the debate about automatic rifles/submachine guns. As such, rifles should then be used for hunting, primarily. Pistols/revolvers only have this range of 50 m. Perhaps not the worst to control.

(What psychologists and others should have said is:) Perverts/sodomistic people/most hideous criminals handle pistols/revolvers and pepper spray poorly if not blowing their brains out directly, so there is an immediate duty to get self-defence with most people as soon as possible! Get it?!

Psychology - Relating to recent tv about Psychopaths (and other morally depraved people), they sure do know to pick a weaker opponent. Maybe they are the more likely abuser part of domestic violence, men beating their women and children.

For the military battlefield, also weak combatants?

Again, the self-defence speaks more for the good people than for the "moral deviants"/devious criminals. ("Professional") Criminals are always involved in criminal networks and therefore have an easy/easier access to self-defence (at least in Europe) as so often pointed out. Again, the self-defence can move mountains in terms of Human Rights (UDHR). Please, don't use Amnesty International as counter-argument...

It must be recognized that the weapon has always defended the faith of the religious and I am sure the religious has the toughness for the gunfight as well in such order that they usually win or get out of harms way, one of two!

You may say that you are peaceful when you are against the revolvers (or pistols), but if the World is that peaceful then the revolver is hung up on the office wall and becomes a symbol of that very peace!

(Don't try it, you "peace-lovers"!)

And don't you forget about the situation for the gun-less Jews upon the Kristallnacht! Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht

Message to NRA - National Rifle Association of America

I suggest that it may be useful to split up the 2nd Amendment into two parts.
1. that deals with militia aspects, securing the nation in face of despotism with considerations of Home Guard and Embedded Infantry and other military with the general population in such a fashion that no Despotism can take place. Also, the State by State considerations.
2. the one that deals with general security person by person. Thus I mention the removal of gun-free zones and importance of carry permit and concealed carry permit. The bump-stocks seem to be disappearing and the magazines may be regulated to proper sizes, eg. no more than 20 bullets or other. Camera-directed (automatic?) gun-turrets may also be considered. Other? You get my point.

By this, one can possibly remove some of the craziest set-ups for weapons of the military calm and also apply a more calm psychology to the population.

#DraintheSwamp #Corruptionmustdie #Evilmustdie #NRA #2A

[#TheWorld @UN] Evil gets educated in two ways. It gets free passes in the formal education system, to the very top, and goes up the road in "systematic" sadistic #sodomy. #EvilEducation #Evilmustdie #2A #2ADefenders #Religion #Ethics #Morality #AntiCorruption #UDHR #Education

#Justice #Law @FBI @INTERPOL_HQ #The4FactorsRPSL #The4Factors Step to "kill"/remove evil: #Revolvers to every home, 1-3, #Pepperspray, #LieDetectionArray, 5 methods+, Radio-based "airport" #scannerportals #NotKidding #Duty #Immediately #ASAP #Peace

To highlight the status of a legal system, USA vs. EU, for example:
Imagine to get tortured... Would you fear getting tortured? A week?
Imagine getting blasted in a bombing or shot to death... Would you fear getting blasted in a bombing or shot to death?
What would fear the most? What would prevent you from doing your daily business?

I, for one, find it impossible to take action when under the perceived threat of torture while not fearing to any particular degree getting shot to death or blasted to death by bombing.

As such, Media and or government is hiding something from the public, especially here in Norway, as the Breivik "terrorism" has done very little to scare the general public from conducting their lives.

So the silent terror of torture is recveiving very little publicity or attention in the Main Stream Media. I think this should speak louder for the case of guns as well as The 4 Factors. This is about creating a possible World of friends, not a World of "peaceful" monsters acting to your advantage.

The basic reasoning for guns to your aid, whether only for yourself or for your family:
The Bible
New International Version
"Even though I walk through the darkest valley, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me."

You may think that guns are awful, but the invisible hand of torture (threats) is much, much worse!
In addition, those who are in desperate situations, on the average, gets a much easier way out of unbearable psychological/physical pains!

Suicides and guns in USA

I think it's short-sighted to ban guns from "suspected suicide candidates" because it removes a part of their escape from actual pains, mental and physical, as well as the fact that one obscures the real causes to their condition. Thus, in order to prevent suicides, one should rather work against the causes for suicides. Can one part of the causes be crime including the corruption? To worsen the ways for suicide in terms of pain and other anguish comes across as plain evil, IMO!

I am therefore compelled to see guns "to everyone" as one, fine virtue, as much as self-defence, in USA.

One solution...
I can think of, is the one to improve society by The 4 Factors. Now, USA has these guns "everywhere" and also pepper spray, but what about the other 2: lie detection array (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals ("against 500 conditions in human beings").

Clearly, lie detection array can be used by police internal affairs, by FBI, by common police and by the courts.

Radio-based scanner portals can reveal the abuse of science by detecting criminal implants put there by monster-physicians, including the monster-surgeons, etc. They can also make the job much easier for ordinary physicians in detecting a given condition.

So:
We have one shooting. The shooter has a history. Let's say bullying. So who failed this shooter? We use lie detection array to reveal and punish failing school services, failing police services, failing other services which may have received cries for help from the shooter before the person becomes the shooter.

One important point is to feed the aftermath to Media (MainStreamMedia and other) and local society of these steps to reveal these failing services and the punishing of them so that future failures to provide services will be stopped or deeply warned against. In this way, one can start to provide young people and others with ever-increasing quality of services so to prevent (all) abuse of people so that the thoughts of wanting to shoot other people never come to mind.

People must also be able to object to corruption in society hence The Political Attempt must be respected, Blogspot, The Political Attempt: https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2017/07/the-definition-of-political-attempt.html .

See The Declaration of Independence and "train of abuse - Despotism" in it for justifying The Political Attempt.

The 3. point is of course that the sadistic perverts, torturers of children, who can't handle guns (pistols, revolvers) and pepper spray get extra protection if the population is denied this self-defence.

The other 2:
1. The unarmed Jews before Kristallnacht and Holocaust in Nazi-Germany.
2. The financial success, might of military forces and general character of person in USA by allowing the population their self-defence by pepper spray and guns and other.

(To be edited.)

Monday, 5 September 2011

Article 3 of the Human Rights and Access to Non-Violent Self-Defence

To the discussion of tasers/stun guns and peppersprays (I'm in _STRONG_ favour): I have this to relay.
Who has the lowest threshold for hurting people and committing crime?
Who has the least respect for both cranium and head/brain?
Who has the least respect for people in general?
Thus it should be clear who has the initiative to hit people on the basis of bare knuckles (by hands/bones). This hurts law-abiding citizens unreasonably hard and serves to incite "silent" anger/hate. It's also hurtful to live under a threat from people who are more willing to commit this kind of act, i.e., to crack the skulls of people, with no special regard for the human they destroy the life of.
The conclusion must be clear: tasers/stun guns and peppersprays must be allowed, and in the face of (vast/"vast") corruption within the Police forces, we have NO time to waste! Act now! To Europe!!! (And business...)

It may be an objection that people may have a lower threshold for stunning/incapacitating other people if these means become available, but I think the strength of this is lower than the strength of the following, that law-abiding citizens, people of primary priority, are better protected both in self-defence, but also in case they may feel threatened and want to do something about it, let's say in the face of absurd rudeness from a bigger "caveman", to "save the day of one's date/business" and so on. In this way, the law-abiding citizen is allowed a milder tool and a mechanism for escalation of conflict and injury if these are allowed, again, tasers/stun guns and peppersprays. I hope you get the importance of this!

You know, this is for the prevention of the escalation of conflict and for the prevention of injury, that is, beyond necessity of circumstances like injury from merely falling to the ground!