Questions to All Politicians Worldwide - Utopia must become a dutiful goal!

General election in Sweden, 9. September 2018. - I suggest the following questions to the politicians.

Before elections in Norway and everywhere else in the World.

How do they view Utopia?
How do they want to work for Utopia?
When do they think that Utopia can be achieved? (Countrywise)
What do they think about The 4 Factors? ("Optional")
How do they want to improve people's human rights (UDHR)?
What do they think about improving the legal system?
How do they want to improve the legal system?
What do they think about pistols or revolvers to the general population?
What do they think about pepper spray to the population?
- What should the required age be for this? 14? 16? 18?
What do they think about the lie detectors, 5 methods +?
- Lie detectors can also aid in combatting crimes against environment...?
- Also to the police and the courts?
What do they think about radio-based scanner portals?
- "Against 500 unwanted conditions in human beings"?
What is the specified list for social justice?
Do you think that pistols, revolvers, pepper spray, lie detectors (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals can be good for industry and business in general? I'm thinking about the business boom in USA vs. mediocracy in "crooked" Europe...

In addition, of course, come all the usual questions... Environmental protection? Ecological measures? Unemployment? (State-) Budget balance responsibility? Central bank politics? Immigration, also by UN recommendation? The rest...

Prediction: The Left is going to stand out negatively!

#Sverige #Val2018 #Election #Politik #TheWorld #Politics #Utopia

The list may well be improved. I'll see what I can add or find elsewhere of information.

Note (1): Our politicians will not get it any easier than in Sweden! (Norway, else...)

Note (2): That will to evil, to torture and murder, to character murder of all people leads to the fact that one is defined as Monster behind the (human) face (Mask of Sanity), Enemy of Humanity! Especially in offices, positions of power and trust, with (much) responsibility, for example, politicians, police, military, lawyers and judges, physicians and journalists and historians (media).

Note (3): The Human Being of Law established! Not the political animals anymore (Aristotle's definition of man as a political animal (zoon politikon)). See here on the blog, Human Being of Law (2013): https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-human-being-of-law-legal-duties-of.html. I can also mention Kantian Moral Psychology for determining accurately the level of ethical/moral mentality in all people!

____

For the Future of a More Perfect World

The path forward is to vote for right wing politics and keep voting right wing politics in order to increase pressure for the good solutions including The 4 Factors.

Bottom line for right wing politics: freedom of thought, privacy rights, laws and regulations including human rights for business life and private initiative! If they fail this, they are logically replaced along with the socialists and the others.

While on the right wing one must seek to demand the best candidates there for leading and take nominations and offices as or when they get elected. If there is this only answer, we choose the best people! Hurray!

All elections and other political events will decide who are Human Beings with sanity and who are Enemies of Humanity, Monsters behind the faces of human beings. The 4 Factors must happen as the ethical duties run deep!

Of course, the socialists (and communists) will continue to be weak on human rights (UDHR/The International Bill of Rights) and fighting crime, improving the legal system, admitting no learning from those other horrible crimes against humanity usually involving torture and character killing of the youngest and upward!

3 Points for the case to arm the general population with pistols and revolvers:

1. The unarmed Jews before Kristallnacht and Holocaust in Nazi-Germany. Much of the history of socialists involves genocides and mass killings. Just check with history: Stalin, Hitler, Red Khmer, Mao Zedong, etc., etc... All atrocities, as analysis at least, by the fact that people have been unarmed.
2. The financial success, might of military forces (NATO and Human Rights vs. Communism w/o any such) and general character of person in USA by allowing the population their self-defence by pepper spray and guns and other.
3. The fact that sadistic perverts, torturers of children, who can't handle guns (pistols, revolvers) and pepper spray get extra protection if the population is denied this self-defence.

* The 4 Factors: revolvers and pistols, pepper spray, lie detection array (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals ("against 500 unwanted ills in human beings").

By example of Sweden.
#Election in #Sweden: 9 September! 16 days to go! Voting is already open until and including 9 September. Election day: voting stations open 8 am to 8 pm (8:00 to 20:00). #The4Factors #Progress #Val2018 #Sverige #Countdown

All #elections and other #political events will decide who are #HumanBeings with sanity and who are #EnemiesofHumanity - #Monsters behind the faces of human beings. #The4Factors must happen! #AgainstEvil #Evilmustdie! @CNN @UN @cnni #Humanity #UDHR #HumanRights #Morality #Ethics

____

Rejection of Socialism in Future Politics

It seems important to reject Socialism from politics in order to achieve Utopia.
Socialism has a history of lying and deceit to the voters. It fails to respect Human Rights (UDHR) and its improvement, it fails to respect people's dignity, it fails to respect laws and regulations, it fails to respect the legal system and its improvement and Kantian ethical and moral character in people, especially the children (kindness).

As I write this, I also think it's important to keep the Labour Movement and to win them over to center politics or right wing politics by making a better case for their future than the betrayal of Socialism ever can.

In this regard, on the way to Utopia, The 4 Factors, revolvers or pistols, pepper spray, lie detection array (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals ("against 500 ills in human beings") are incredibly important and are likely to never be promoted by Socialism or beyond on the grounds mentioned above.

Indeed, they say the welfare system and the case for all the (very) insane people piling up there, but fail people miserably in all other regards, only to facilitate the character killing of families in the shadows for sustaining evil in the World.

____

The Blood of Idiot Pacifism

Unarmed people killed under Josef Stalin, twice, also in Ukraine, Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong or Red Khmer, etc.

How much blood should the "monster pacifists" have before they realize the best democracy is the one where many are relied upon for justice, honesty, anti-corruption and human rights? Whether they are "monster pacifists" by idiocy or other is beyond me.

As such, it should be evident that all atrocities of the World have taken place or are taking place because of the fact that people are unarmed, have no revolvers or pistols. The fact that they are unarmed generates the most horrible circumstances, also, as we see from history, leading to genocides and mass killings. Note on corrupt military and most certainly corrupt police. Also corrupt military attacking other nations.

Link, Blogspot, Charleston Shooting and Justice - Guns or Not: https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.com/2015/06/charleston-shooting-and-justice-guns-or.html

Note on the glaring connection of cowards against guns to the populations and Atheism and socialism and communism, in the most unholy union known to human kind!

#AgainstSocialism #Socialism #Democracy #HumanRights #UDHR #Utopia #Progress #MoralProgress

--------------------------

Original text in Norwegian:

Valg i Sverige - Jeg foreslår følgende spørsmål til politikerne

Før valg i Norge og alle andre steder i Verden.

Hvordan stiller de seg til Utopia?
Hvordan vil de arbeide for Utopia?
Når tenker de at Utopia kan oppnås?
Hva tenker de om De 4 Faktorer? ("Valgfritt")
Hvordan ønsker de å forbedre folks menneskerettigheter?
Hva tenker de om forbedring av rettssystemet?
Hva tenker de om pistoler eller revolvere til befolkningen?
Hva tenker de om pepperspray til befolkningen?
- Hvilken aldersgrense for dette? 14? 16?
Hva tenker de om løgndetektorer, 5 metoder +?
- Løgndetektorer kan hjelpe mye mot miljøkriminalitet...?
- Også til politiet og rettssalene?
Hva tenker de om radio-baserte skanner portaler?
- "Mot 500 uønskede tilstander i mennesker"?
Hva er den spesifiserte listen for sosial rettferdighet?
Tenker dere at pistoler, revolvere, pepperspray, løgndetektorer (5 metoder +) og radio-baserte skanner portaler kan være bra for industri og forretninger (business)? Jeg tenker på boomen i USA vs. middelmådighet i "crooked" Europa...

I tillegg kommer alle de vanlige spørsmålene... Miljøet? Økologiske tiltak? Arbeidsløshet? (Stats-)Budsjettbalanse? Pengepolitikken? Resten...

Prediksjon: Venstresiden kommer til å utmerke seg negativt!

Listen kan gjerne forbedres. Jeg får se hva jeg finner på eller finner av informasjon.

Merknad (1): Våre politikere får det ikke noe lettere enn i Sverige!

Merknad (2) også om at vilje til ondskap, til tortur og drap, til karakterdrap på alle mennesker fører til at man defineres som Monster bak ansiktet (Mask of Sanity), Fiende av menneskeheten! Spesielt i stillinger med (mye) ansvar, for eksempel politikere, politi, militæret, advokater og dommere, legene og journalister og historikere (media).

On the Red-Blue Divide of Politics - The Left and Right Turns to Centrist and Right?

I see no opportunity for Red parties to hold on to the Socialism or the Socialist-Red (please, remember Nazi-Socialism). Their next move should be to declare themselves Purple and turn to Centrist politics.

It is the Socialists and Communists who are known to cause genocides. They have been quick to say "common good" without defining the Ethics and living the morality for it! We do have a tax-system (VAT and income tax etc.) that is meant to pay for public services. We have indeed the Democracy to provide the sensitivity for decision-making and I do not see how their insistence on "social justice" is supposed to be so right without the very justice itself. Is then the constant citation of social justice just an excuse for furthering the attack on humanity?

Mao Zedong, Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, whether Stalinism or Ukraine "mass death". You should know what I mean, what I imply and that lying publicly is going to be much harder in the time to come! Especially when facing the lawful scrutiny! Reds, be gone!

Ukraine and the genocide by rulers of Soviet Union: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor.

The Israeli parties have been divided for a while already by blue, blueish and purple colours. Indeed, they have been the first in the World to "abolish" the Red side of politics. Check out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Israel.

Of the colour red, see also The Masque of the Red Death (The Terror of the Red Mask) and State-terror in France. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Masque_of_the_Red_Death by Edgar Allan Poe.

Atheist North Korea seems to be no bragging post either.

Red or not, not really religious people as such, I believe, committing sadism as part of genocide, the genocide of the Armenians by the Ottoman empire: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_of_Union_and_Progress. At least there was dictatorship by ideals of Germany and Japan.

Either way, my opinion is here for you to read!

Over Fake news/Fake media - Media better take the d*mn message because they're guilty!

The media are whining in being blamed for reporting "fake news", but there they are and must have known about phenomena like Operation Dark Room (by police of Norway, "Operasjon Dark Room, pedophile network) and Darknet/Blacknet for years without saying anything, silent about Rwanda and slaughtering people there without bothering It took a long time before the world became familiar with the massacre in Srebrenica before they reported anything!

And they can not even say illegal immigrants without bringing up all immigrants around the world!
Do not tell me they are accused of "fake news" without having earnt it! I just need to mention the journalism from our legal system of various crime around the country where they (the media) fail to say much and mention something just to seem credible!

Media is occupied with explaining "so well" that they are not "fake news" and apologise so much, but never if it is possible to comment freely on the media about it anyway. Conclusion: they HIDE something / much!

Honestly media, it says self-criticism! Where is media self-criticism in the media?

On these monsters, the very morally depraved, psychologists have a definite responsibility to inform society!

(Norwegian:)
Mediene syter over å bli beskyldt for å være "fake news", men der sitter de og må ha visst om fenomener som Operasjon Dark Room og Darknet/Blacknet i årevis uten å si noe, tause om Rwanda og slaktingen av mennesker der uten å bry seg, lot det gå svært lang tid før verden ble kjent med massakren i Srebrenica før de rapporterte noe!

Og de klarer fa*n ikke enda å si "illegal immigrants" uten å ta med alle immigranter over hele verden!

Ikke kom å si til meg at de blir beskyldt for "fake news" uten å fa*n meg fortjene det!

Jeg trenger bare å nevne journalistikken fra vårt rettssystem om diverse kriminalitet rundt om i landet hvor de (fa*ns media) unnlater å si mye og nevner noe bare for å virke troverdige!

Media driver og forklarer så godt de kan at de ikke er "fake news" og beklager seg så veldig, men aldri om det er mulig å kommentere fritt på media om det likevel. Konklusjon: de SKJULER noe/mye!

Ærlig talt, media, det heter selvkritikk! Hvor er selvkritikken av media i media?

Capital in the Twenty-First Century - The book from T. Piketty

Thomas Piketty has been mentioned by Fareed Zakaria on GPS and I agree. It's just to take this in straight!

Corruption and other crime is in all aspects so vastly present that to combat crime needs to take priority! However, one does not need to declare oneself a Socialist for this reason. The (blue, lighter or stronger) VICTORY over Marx is in every way fundamental and with Piketty's solution, as he writes, Leadership and Intelligence are either way ensured! We only become more lightly BLUE!

The way forward is to secure a BETTER World, ecologically and with less CRIME too!

Other than Marx, there are these other traditional values of family, monarchy, human rights, privacy, democracy etc. All of these have been successfully defended by Capitalism. The way from 10 000 BC and upto today, 2014, has been the development of natural morals, the ETHICS, from clan wars and barbarism to a civilised society of today!

The word from Piketty's book: Regulation!

A url link to Gurdian report on his book: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/may/02/thomas-piketty-capital-in-the-twenty-first-century-french-economist.
Thomas Piketty: the French economist bringing capitalism to book

Another url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx

The different story of unfolded Capitalism in history:
The Triangle Trade - Europe - Africa - USA (as account of the Human Being from this time)

The political map of this time, The Triangle Trade

The monarchies and the others

Industrial revolution

Establishment of the Workers' Movement

Establishment of the negotiating parties of working life

The fight for workers' rights!

Universal voting rights, men first and then women

1. World War

The New Deal

2. World War

UN

Further development of laws and regulations

Established mass education by law (time span)

Here and now!

The head of K. Marx (with NSDAP, Stalin and Mao) hangs by this as well as the accusations from the (Joseph) McCarthyism time:

"Gravestone for Communism (until Utopia)"

I find that capitalism is better at controlling corruption than communism. That is, capitalism is more fault tolerant. While communism almost demands that people are like angels, capitalism can deal with a relatively large amount of not so good people.

Besides, in capitalism people can settle with less and be pleased with it while those who want it can work themselves to death and enjoy their fortune from it. This is almost impossible in communism, I think.

I want to mention:

- communism focuses on work of people and this can be way harder to make a just issue of in that system

- capitalism focuses on money and money can be made to adjust for all kind of relationships, from capitalisation of ideas to the amount of stress from work

Who is supposed to kick the hardest work in communism without having advantages for doing it? If workload is supposed to be equal, should one make elaborate psychologies of work to make sure nobody stresses, carry more workload, than others? Communism seems to me to be more complex to incorporate.

Soviet Union has been marked by two very bad ideas: Communism and Atheism!

China is not any communist country anymore, mind you. It has officially described itself as socialist some years ago and even then their communism may just be a kind of "communism" through which their need for control in overcoming severe problems and a vast population may have called for it.

It's true that China has only one party, but they do elect electives to the "party congress" and I also happen to believe that there's more than 1 possible candidate in most or all of these elections to the "party congress" beside having the possibility to vote blank or not to vote at all, going into some kind of system opposition, trying to change the political machinery, at least!

The elections? You will have to check, but I think the last has been reported within a year or two. Thanks for asking the question, Wootah. One thing is for certain, China does not fulfill the the communist ideal of everyone being equally rich or poor, quite the opposite. There are quite large economic differences in China. It's true though that they have only one party and that this is typical for a communist country, perhaps even for a social one as they describe themselves as.

The type of democracy (in case it really is) is one that goes along a line of culture and a certain scope of politics and it is of this kind, I think a one-party democracy can be effective. That you want progress and control over this fast and steady and thus the political system is set up as it is. Remember that the Chinese political system is handling 1,2 Billion people and a good deal of these are quite poor! So what should one do? I think the Chinese have chosen a fine middle way, preserving own culture and emphasising the important aims beside of this.

You can look up yourselves the democracies of USA with its 310 million people and downwards...

As well (the above text has been edited from the source, Issues from the Internet, on this blog:

"I've earlier written these on [forum] where you can find the original writings. I find them to be so striking that I post them here as well:

[Dead for all foreseeable future?]

--------

Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!

The future looks really BRIGHT!

--------

Communism and ("pure") Socialism has a fundamental problem in accepting Human Rights (UDHR by UN) by their fanatical hunt for "equality ideal" (even when "equality" isn't further defined by them). Therefore, all Communistic groups (or thereof, Antifa?) can pack their things because they are in this always presenting themselves as liars on one level or another.

From a review of Klassekampen, a "Communistic"(?) newspaper in Norway, the original Norwegian version:
"Kommunisme og ("ren") Sosialisme har et fundamentalt problem med å akseptere Menneskerettighetene (UDHR ved FN) etter sin fanatiske jakt på "likhetsidealet" (uten at "likhet" er videre definert av dem). Derfor kan Klassekampen pakke sakene for på et nivå eller et annet så blir de dømt til å være løgnere!"

Norway and Its Failures - maybe even hysterically celebrated, "because you, the other countries..."

Norway and Its Failures - maybe even hysterically celebrated, "because you, the other countries..., that contextualism has it this way, infact YOU're the MOST guilty!!!"

I name:

Norway and Serbia - FAIL (accomplice to Srebr. /itself/? 700 Bn NOK?)!
Norway to Sri Lanka and Tamils/Tamil Tigers - FAIL!
Norway to Palestinians and Israelis - FAIL!

My time to make it f¤#%#¤%&¤%& RIGHT??? YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!
Assets: high intelligence, steadiness, thoroughness, moral character and accomplishments to go!


Serbia: In 1992, Thorvald Stoltenberg, together with 9 Baltic Ministers of Foreign Affairs and an EU commissioner, founded the Council of the Baltic Sea States (CBSS) and the EuroFaculty.[2] In 1993 appointed Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for the former Yugoslavia and UN Co-Chairman of the Steering Committee of the International Conference on the former Yugoslavia. Thorvald Stoltenberg was also witness of the United Nations on signing of Erdut Agreement. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorvald_Stoltenberg .

Sri Lanka: 2006 Peace talks
Solheim announced on 12 September 2006, that the Government of Sri Lanka and the Tamil Tigers had agreed to hold "unconditional peace talks" in October in Oslo, Norway.[6]
Solheim told BBC News officials that "Both parties have expressed willingness to come back to the table. We expect the violence will be stopped. The government has throughout its existence for 10 months repeatedly told us that they are ready for talks without any preconditions and the LTTE has today confirmed that they are ready for talks without any preconditions." - Aftermath
His attempts of peacemaking was in the end unsuccessful, with the Asian Tribune concluding that "his handling relationship with Sri Lanka" was an "utter failure". - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Solheim .

Israel-Palestine: Criticisms
The Oslo Accords may appear not to have considered factors that would influence its interpretation. For example, the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre, in which 29 Palestinians were killed and 125 wounded,[15] is often blamed...

THEY'VE FAILED X3 (and this is no BMW SUV) - and they can whine about my 3.60 from Sr. High School and the fact that I have no degree until they puke themselves BLUE!!! THEY'VE FAILED!!! FAILURE!!!

After living under these morons (all syndication incl.) for 25 years, something, I have now a Nobel-list and greatness/great fun to impart with people of better minds!
I WIN! I WIN! I WIN!
By legacy, dead or not!!! - The list: [see below, for now]

(Quote from "Collateral", loosely, in retrieving a list.)

By verdict and not sentence, today, 25. Feb. 2013, f*ckshow of legal-Norway (Hurwegen, of blown immaterial values, at least from a /point/) rolls on as that full-brown hot-dog "to another day"!!!
That Norway is still pushing me actively, but also in hidden terms!!! (Therefore this text to you now.)

The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems - On the Use of Torture

The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems - On the Use of Torture

by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 20:02 CEST.

With Breivik, it may have proven to be a trick for the police to charge him with terror, so as to provide themselves an excuse to torture. Because we don't know if they have tortured, do we? And that he isn't this terrorist of convention, as they are so fixated to think, isn't this so? Sorry for this Socrates-chain of words. So here we have a legal paradox "from a strange and deficient legal system, that of Norway", that has actualised or blurred when torture on people is supposed to take place, BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T USED THE LIST OF EU AND THEY HAVEN'T ALLOWED THE TERRORIST ORGANISATION TO FORM EVEN, BEFORE THEY STRIKE AND CATCH "ONE DAMN EVIL MAN", (muted) one, perhaps, more Christian than them... "Ohh, is there a chance for that...?"

Note: First written to Facebook under my Facebook profile (by public setting, Sunday, 24 June 2012. Note2: Today, I've tried to inform the ECtHR of serious problems in Norway relating to the formulation of the Breivik Pradox. I've tried to phone them by official number: 00 33388412018 and getting "this number is not in use" by NetCom mob.ph.-services. Note3: The message to ECtHR has been (upon sending):
Note3: I'd like You to know about the Breivik Paradox and the very serious problems it offers in terms of legal practice with a police force already marked by corruption and now is looking for individuals, "whether they remember it or not", traumatic experiences can /easily/ disappear from memory! Here:
The Breivik Paradox of Legal Systems - On the Use of Torture
by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 20:02 CEST.
With Breivik, it may have proven to be a trick for the police to charge him with terror, so as to provide themselves an excuse to torture. Because we don't know if they have tortured, do we? And that he isn't this terrorist of convention, as they are so fixated to think, isn't this so? Sorry for this Socrates-chain of words. So here we have a legal paradox "from a strange and deficient legal system, that of Norway", that has actualised or blurred when torture on people is supposed to take place, BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T USED THE LIST OF EU AND THEY HAVEN'T ALLOWED THE TERRORIST ORGANISATION TO FORM EVEN, BEFORE THEY STRIKE AND CATCH "ONE DAMN EVIL MAN", (muted) one, perhaps, more Christian than them... "Ohh, is there a chance for that...?"
(Note: under the message to ECtHR) First written to Facebook under my Facebook profile (by public setting, Sunday, 24 June 2012.
So this should be it.

The 100% Society - A Matter of Political Science

The 100% Society - A Matter of Political Science" is this: In relation to the "100% Society", I think there are 2 major concerns. One is the justice system and how to achieve this society by what kind of regulation/laws. The other is how business is supposed to be organised everywhere in the world for people to be employed (<95, that is, maximally 5% unemployment) and for rewarding profit and utility to be made along with it. I'll deliberate more on this as the days pass by...

100% Society: the business plan... I'm coming back to this, but it should already be clear that this is about symmetry of both competence and industry between nations all over planet earth (and other potential places as well). So how to do it? I'll think about it... Symmetry in this sense is understood as competence and industry divided over the nation's citizens. You can't assume that Belgium is capable of setting up everything from complete aircraft factories to assembly lines for spacecrafts and satellites and building aircraft carriers in the same breath. Belgium has only 10,8 Mill. inhabitants and it can only do this much...

100% Society: I've already written about the Data Storage Directory on my blog that I think should be implemented as part of this idea. There should also be sufficient possibilities to defend oneself by guns, tazers and pepperspray canisters. I would also let the Police do the necessary surveillance by video cameras either by possible harddisk review from scenery or by actual monitoring and control. The 2 options are both good. This surveillance should cover the most used places, the places by most people-traffic. One should also allow private people do their own video-surveillance of private space and property including estate-entrance. The rest of the laws can basically remain as they are. Social justice: I think it's fair to allow people who "fall through" a kind of safety net, an arrangement of benefits for the newborn/kids, unemployed, the disabled and the retired. This should secure decency and stable society (without desperation). I've yet to consider the definite divide between a kind of private arrangement and public arrangement, but there should be no doubt that the 2 can go well together, with the private option being more rewarding than the public one, especially in the scope of retirement. This should be mostly it. The other laws can remain basically the same. By guns, I mean primarily the handguns (I favour the pistols). I see absolutely NO need for automatic weapons in private hands except as part of the home-guard, possibly, but not necessarily. Today there are storage places all over the country (Norway) for the home-guard and the army and sufficiently so for preventing any Police State/Dictatorship to take place. Also by handguns, I'm thinking of the 9mms or some thereof as it provides sufficient "stopping power". Important remark: I've not implied a single, tiny intrusion on people's privacy, classically speaking, i.e., within your private space, at the loos, at the private meeting where ever, every private place and property, and also not in all public buildings. You're right, of course, potentially, I see every little inch of public space, "under the blue sky", as surveilled, but only potentially. (By response to Impenitent on the PN forum.)

100% Society: Everybody knows there are hidden and tacit business routines around the world even if OPEC remains the most open, I've already asked for the syndication of all primary industry like aquaculture, fishing, agriculture, mining and all else. This is for the betterment of workers in these kinds of industry simply. We already know that most agriculture is very organised in the "Western" world to the point where we can't anymore claim those profits are given by competition, but rather the reasonable demand from the industry itself due to expenses of making the agriculture go around and for the workers to receive decent salary. We should admit this elegance to the rest of the world, obviously for the same betterment of living and opportunities that we enjoy ourselves or those next door. 100% Society further: This is not all, however, we need to start out projects that evaluate what kind of diversion of industry over this same kind of symmetry is needed in respect to cost and opportunity for abolishing unemployment. This can easily be socialised and effectuated by import barriers to make the desired level of price of product and for giving the "right" (social) message to the exporting country that its prices for this particular product is too low for this area to be (safely) sustainable most importantly in terms of employment! This SHOULD be accepted by the WTO given that the members begin to agree on this kind of agenda that makes the symmetry formula to the world the norm/normative! I would be HARD on this issue, making a ferocious campaign if necessary! Comment as precursor to the Idea of the 100% Society: I'll also write some on the "100% Society" in some time to come, both in response to Popper's political comment and to the much hated and paranoid Welles' "1984", according to myself. Much of "1984" is deeply unfounded, I think. And to be educated is also to seek rationality in others, thus this Police State regime is probably put away for ever. More later...

(This has first been written on the open group on Facebook by the name, Thoughts from mr. Terje Lea, 16.12.2010, 18.12.2010 and 20.12.2010.)
http://blog.t-lea.net/#post119 I now find that the idea of The 100% Society now has grown so big that it needs its own text. This will continue to grow until all compilation ´has taken place and the idea itself has been completely desribed! Special thanks go to other people who, like myself (now, according to my text on descriptive science as minimum) have strong views about the political science as science in line with engineering ideas and other and not something else!
Some notes below due to Blogger services idiocy and psychopathy(!!!):
Posted by L.F.O.-L. at 03:05:00
Labels: Karl Popper's LSE, Open Society and Its Enemies, political science, response to Karl Popper, The 100% Society
2 comments:
1.
L.F.O.-L.22 May 2012 03:08
This is /the/ serious addition of mine to the (serious) contribution of Karl Popper to this field, on how society should be shaped and how it should look!
2.
L.F.O.-L.22 May 2012 03:10
The poor formatting of this text is due to the unknown mr. Editor out there on the Internet, working with Blogger or Mozilla or other (like standards work)...
Special thanks go to other people who, like myself (now, according to my text on descriptive science as minimum) have strong views about the political science as science in line with engineering ideas and other and not something else!
This is /the/ serious addition of mine to the (serious) contribution of Karl Popper to this field, on how society should be shaped and how it should look!