The justice (and not only "if not guns then peace and ever so"):
It may very well be that the torture rates of USA are significantly lower because with guns people are able to revenge. In other parts of the World, one is in lack of this and therefore people commit the most awful acts against one another (more so than in USA, not an angel-country itself).
Therefore, I'd like you to consider
* guns equals less torture (less molestation and traumatizing of children)
* no guns equals more torture than if guns are present like in USA, the only country where guns are present to this degree.
Do not forget, please, that USA has become the most powerful nation based on its virtues and one of these virtues is the 2nd amendment right, the right to own arms (preferably only small arms).
One thing is to die from a gunshot, but a whole other thing is to die from torture, perhaps taken to the most extreme, both in terms of time and of mental pain. Torture must be seen as straight evil in today's World when even the military issue may be seen as excess due to overwhelming power from NATO and UN (UN Sec. Council).
Our legal systems worldwide aren't perfect, surely. But the system in USA edges more toward a desired system than in rest of the World.
Just think of where you want to live. Do you want to live in a poor country? One hears of no torture in South Africa, but is it really so beautiful? And so on for every other country...
The victims to gun violence must be seen as a sacrifice for keeping torture and widespread abuse of children to rather low levels. It could be European levels and they are not good at all!
From a citizen in Europe, a system much overrated in terms of legal systems.
The disturbing facts in terms of suicides, separating the "nature" of suicides in USA and everywhere else, purely due to selfdefence (guns being part):
It's stated that "Approximately one-half of suicides are committed by firearm, accounting for two-thirds of all firearms deaths. [21,334 of 33,599 in 2014]"[24-reference]
Those are decent suicides! In Europe we do all sorts of crazy things in order to (finally) die because either it's the corrupt authorities hunting the suicide candidates only to get more torture on them. A corruption we in Europe usually never can do anything about because the self-protection is outlawed, that is, guns, pepperspray, tazers and killer knives. And that's after the 20 times the suicide candidates "bounce" about before they die!
"The same article [USA Today] stated that there are far fewer homicides than suicides in the country; in fact, homicide rates have fallen by half in the U.S. since 1991."
So homicides are bad, but the numbers are improving and the victims have gotten the death by gun shot, not tortured a few times first as in Europe.
For the instances of torture in Europe, pick out the stats for murders, missing people and a good portion of the suicides who "failed" to die when tortured!
At spot no. 48 USA comes in with 12.6 per 100 000 people.
At spot no. 102 Norway comes in with 9.3 per 100 K people.
Hurray! At spot no. 123 United Kingdom comes in with 7.4 per 100 K people.
Now, from the above and given Europe's tendency to sodomy, corruption and lying for the facade, also for protection (because a wounded prey in Europe usually gets "taken" quickly).
You know, I happen to think that USA takes it (accepts the deaths, some also "beautiful"), all factors considered! (Don't say you're young, please, because then you have quite a bit of learning to do!)
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_the_United_States
Some additional:
Warburton, N., 2004, p. 21. The Basics - Philosophy, 4th ed. Routledge: New York The Problem of Evil. "...of the widespread practice of torture." and "...all examples of moral evil or cruelty: human beings inflicting suffering on other human beings..."
There's a further question for this 9-killer shooter. Should he see the death penalty or how long should he sit in prison because of this?
Information to the British public:
I have sent this text (the main text) to BBC Have your say and they should have strong duties in acting on this!
Also in terms of BBC World if not "BBC Europe" (I guess where they are). This is a serious matter in Europe, one that possibly propagates the most grievous torture throughout every day!
Concerning the gun debate, I'd like to question the experts/"experts" and how perverts handle guns.
Not only are perverts likely to shoot themselves in the head ("aaarrrgghh, this head must come OFF!"), but they also, generally, HATE guns, whether the thunder of it or that the shooting is "white"/good, that is, the fear to be shot by goodness, for one strange reason or other (I happen to think they hate justice, as this also is goodness.)
I find that the experts/"experts" hide the facts of perverts handling guns (poorly)!
New news: not that I let go of the corrupt (small) parts of USA, but we in Europe and elsewhere need to understand that Google, Facebook, Intel, AMD and others are purely due to US American character by respect to Human Rights and their own citizens by gun rights and other for self-defence, plus, plus, plus... This is the hard lesson for all places outside USA.
New deal in the gun debate and pro self-defence:
I think that abuse/severe abuse/torture is also about children, most certainly, and some men and women. The leader of the National Association for Victims of Violence is saying that they support lawful pepper spray and tear gas "where the police are unable to do the job". I think maybe pistols/revolvers may be appropriate and maybe, thus, avoid the debate about automatic rifles/submachine guns. As such, rifles should then be used for hunting, primarily. Pistols/revolvers only have this range of 50 m. Perhaps not the worst to control.
(What psychologists and others should have said is:) Perverts/sodomistic people/most hideous criminals handle pistols/revolvers and pepper spray poorly if not blowing their brains out directly, so there is an immediate duty to get self-defence with most people as soon as possible! Get it?!
Psychology - Relating to recent tv about Psychopaths (and other morally depraved people), they sure do know to pick a weaker opponent. Maybe they are the more likely abuser part of domestic violence, men beating their women and children.
For the military battlefield, also weak combatants?
Again, the self-defence speaks more for the good people than for the "moral deviants"/devious criminals. ("Professional") Criminals are always involved in criminal networks and therefore have an easy/easier access to self-defence (at least in Europe) as so often pointed out. Again, the self-defence can move mountains in terms of Human Rights (UDHR). Please, don't use Amnesty International as counter-argument...
It must be recognized that the weapon has always defended the faith of the religious and I am sure the religious has the toughness for the gunfight as well in such order that they usually win or get out of harms way, one of two!
You may say that you are peaceful when you are against the revolvers (or pistols), but if the World is that peaceful then the revolver is hung up on the office wall and becomes a symbol of that very peace!
(Don't try it, you "peace-lovers"!)
And don't you forget about the situation for the gun-less Jews upon the Kristallnacht! Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht
Message to NRA - National Rifle Association of America
I suggest that it may be useful to split up the 2nd Amendment into two parts.
1. that deals with militia aspects, securing the nation in face of despotism with considerations of Home Guard and Embedded Infantry and other military with the general population in such a fashion that no Despotism can take place. Also, the State by State considerations.
2. the one that deals with general security person by person. Thus I mention the removal of gun-free zones and importance of carry permit and concealed carry permit. The bump-stocks seem to be disappearing and the magazines may be regulated to proper sizes, eg. no more than 20 bullets or other. Camera-directed (automatic?) gun-turrets may also be considered. Other? You get my point.
By this, one can possibly remove some of the craziest set-ups for weapons of the military calm and also apply a more calm psychology to the population.
#DraintheSwamp #Corruptionmustdie #Evilmustdie #NRA #2A
[#TheWorld @UN] Evil gets educated in two ways. It gets free passes in the formal education system, to the very top, and goes up the road in "systematic" sadistic #sodomy. #EvilEducation #Evilmustdie #2A #2ADefenders #Religion #Ethics #Morality #AntiCorruption #UDHR #Education
#Justice #Law @FBI @INTERPOL_HQ #The4FactorsRPSL #The4Factors Step to "kill"/remove evil: #Revolvers to every home, 1-3, #Pepperspray, #LieDetectionArray, 5 methods+, Radio-based "airport" #scannerportals #NotKidding #Duty #Immediately #ASAP #Peace
To highlight the status of a legal system, USA vs. EU, for example:
Imagine to get tortured... Would you fear getting tortured? A week?
Imagine getting blasted in a bombing or shot to death... Would you fear getting blasted in a bombing or shot to death?
What would fear the most? What would prevent you from doing your daily business?
I, for one, find it impossible to take action when under the perceived threat of torture while not fearing to any particular degree getting shot to death or blasted to death by bombing.
As such, Media and or government is hiding something from the public, especially here in Norway, as the Breivik "terrorism" has done very little to scare the general public from conducting their lives.
So the silent terror of torture is recveiving very little publicity or attention in the Main Stream Media. I think this should speak louder for the case of guns as well as The 4 Factors. This is about creating a possible World of friends, not a World of "peaceful" monsters acting to your advantage.
The basic reasoning for guns to your aid, whether only for yourself or for your family:
The Bible
New International Version
"Even though I walk through the darkest valley, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me."
You may think that guns are awful, but the invisible hand of torture (threats) is much, much worse!
In addition, those who are in desperate situations, on the average, gets a much easier way out of unbearable psychological/physical pains!
Suicides and guns in USA
I think it's short-sighted to ban guns from "suspected suicide candidates" because it removes a part of their escape from actual pains, mental and physical, as well as the fact that one obscures the real causes to their condition. Thus, in order to prevent suicides, one should rather work against the causes for suicides. Can one part of the causes be crime including the corruption? To worsen the ways for suicide in terms of pain and other anguish comes across as plain evil, IMO!
I am therefore compelled to see guns "to everyone" as one, fine virtue, as much as self-defence, in USA.
One solution...
I can think of, is the one to improve society by The 4 Factors. Now, USA has these guns "everywhere" and also pepper spray, but what about the other 2: lie detection array (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals ("against 500 conditions in human beings").
Clearly, lie detection array can be used by police internal affairs, by FBI, by common police and by the courts.
Radio-based scanner portals can reveal the abuse of science by detecting criminal implants put there by monster-physicians, including the monster-surgeons, etc. They can also make the job much easier for ordinary physicians in detecting a given condition.
So:
We have one shooting. The shooter has a history. Let's say bullying. So who failed this shooter? We use lie detection array to reveal and punish failing school services, failing police services, failing other services which may have received cries for help from the shooter before the person becomes the shooter.
One important point is to feed the aftermath to Media (MainStreamMedia and other) and local society of these steps to reveal these failing services and the punishing of them so that future failures to provide services will be stopped or deeply warned against. In this way, one can start to provide young people and others with ever-increasing quality of services so to prevent (all) abuse of people so that the thoughts of wanting to shoot other people never come to mind.
People must also be able to object to corruption in society hence The Political Attempt must be respected, Blogspot, The Political Attempt: https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2017/07/the-definition-of-political-attempt.html .
See The Declaration of Independence and "train of abuse - Despotism" in it for justifying The Political Attempt.
The 3. point is of course that the sadistic perverts, torturers of children, who can't handle guns (pistols, revolvers) and pepper spray get extra protection if the population is denied this self-defence.
The other 2:
1. The unarmed Jews before Kristallnacht and Holocaust in Nazi-Germany.
2. The financial success, might of military forces and general character of person in USA by allowing the population their self-defence by pepper spray and guns and other.
(To be edited.)
Monday, 22 June 2015
Saturday, 25 April 2015
My Philosophical Positions - Reiteration
Ethics: Kantian (Neo-Kantian), Deontologist, Moral Realist, Ethical Objectivist, I'll include Cognitivist also so that it doesn't escape in it all
Applied Ethics: Deep Ecology Philosopher and Pro-Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Philosopher.
Philosophy of Language: Artificial Language Philosopher, De Dicto - Propositional - Philosopher, Gricean in meaning theory
- Formally settling the question of language philosophy (also including logical contorversies). This is it: The further development of my position on "Artificial Language Philosophy" is this simplicity, that more or less settles it, is that as the logical connectives enter the artificial language in non-contradictory way and maintaining the strict logical requirements of being consistent, the logical connectives can be read aloud like this fx. "the logical connective NOT" to [entity] "by parantheses" and reading onwards and that this, principally makes Carnap's project crossing the finishing line! - Carnap is the Winner along with the rest of us!
Epistemology: Foundherentist (Foundationalism by photons and other quants, you can also add time and space to this, although, by Smolin, I don't bother to support more than 4 dimensions, 3 space and 1 time) and Internalist Externalist Compatibilist
Philosophy of Science: Scientific Realist, Fallback strategy to heuristic Instrumentalism and Operationalism which both include Conventionalism, Formally: Phenomenologist, Revisionist Standard Model Philosopher and Cumulative Growth of Knowledge Philosopher or Anti-Kuhnian
Metaphysics: Interactionist, Solipsist and Quietist (there's a problem relating to the status of reality. I believe in God, being a deist, status of the mind effecting matter, the brain, taking part in the kingdom of ideas, and so on. I'd really like to put Realism in here, but I find it impossible because it's likely to cut me short), Free Will Philosopher, Truth Realist, Universalism and Particularism Compatibilist
Philosophy of Mind: Reductionist/Substance Dualist (It depends on the development of Standard Model in Physics)
Logics: Logical Realist
Philosophy of Mathematics: Mathematical Realist and Tarski-Gödel Compatibilist
Philosophy of Politics: Utopian, Activist, Welfare-Capitalist, Conservative, Cosmopolitanist, Realist, Pragmatist, Idealist (maybe synonymous with Utopian), Multiculturalist, Patriotist and Secularist (!)
- Accordance Realist Pragmatist Idealist with the all-important word Accordance. - This enters in light of my little notice that pays respect to all of these three concepts inline, properly
Philosophy of Law (as formerly written): Absolutist, Legislationist and Originalist (!), Formalist Philosopher and Legal Reasoning Closure Principle Philosopher, legal reasoning, being valid, has to comply with logical entailment and that this is minimally the claim that it does, apart from the (many book) examples that it does. (This is only a formal note, not the text for lawyers to actually having to sit and make these logical texts themselves, i.e., to burden them with much extra work.)
Philosophy of Business: Minimalist (rather jokingly, as earlier noted) (!)
Philosophy of Religion: Scientific Deist, Modern Christian, Moderate Christian, Reasonable Christian, Scientologist, Ecumenical Philosopher, Deist: (Deism & Christianity = compatible "with Bible belief intact", 10 Comm., the rest) and All-Interpretationist (math. "union-U"), but only the best acc. to sense, pref. my own, also by "The Scientific Bible 2.0 - Commentary to the Bible, All Versions".
Philosophy of Aesthetics: Kantian
Philosophy of Public Relations: That under Philosophy of Public Relations (PR), I declare myself "white-side"/anti-Goebbels.
- By this, I also note that (black-side-)Goebbels is a bloody negative study and that one must remember that he has been a core-Nazi-German and all that this brings with a personhood of deep corruption. Despite this, Goebbels must have set into operation such vastness that it would have made Aristotle drool for months after witnessing it. USA has no poss. to object to this position of mine, formal note.
Note: This is taken from my Issues from the Internet.
Applied Ethics: Deep Ecology Philosopher and Pro-Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Philosopher.
Philosophy of Language: Artificial Language Philosopher, De Dicto - Propositional - Philosopher, Gricean in meaning theory
- Formally settling the question of language philosophy (also including logical contorversies). This is it: The further development of my position on "Artificial Language Philosophy" is this simplicity, that more or less settles it, is that as the logical connectives enter the artificial language in non-contradictory way and maintaining the strict logical requirements of being consistent, the logical connectives can be read aloud like this fx. "the logical connective NOT" to [entity] "by parantheses" and reading onwards and that this, principally makes Carnap's project crossing the finishing line! - Carnap is the Winner along with the rest of us!
Epistemology: Foundherentist (Foundationalism by photons and other quants, you can also add time and space to this, although, by Smolin, I don't bother to support more than 4 dimensions, 3 space and 1 time) and Internalist Externalist Compatibilist
Philosophy of Science: Scientific Realist, Fallback strategy to heuristic Instrumentalism and Operationalism which both include Conventionalism, Formally: Phenomenologist, Revisionist Standard Model Philosopher and Cumulative Growth of Knowledge Philosopher or Anti-Kuhnian
Metaphysics: Interactionist, Solipsist and Quietist (there's a problem relating to the status of reality. I believe in God, being a deist, status of the mind effecting matter, the brain, taking part in the kingdom of ideas, and so on. I'd really like to put Realism in here, but I find it impossible because it's likely to cut me short), Free Will Philosopher, Truth Realist, Universalism and Particularism Compatibilist
Philosophy of Mind: Reductionist/Substance Dualist (It depends on the development of Standard Model in Physics)
Logics: Logical Realist
Philosophy of Mathematics: Mathematical Realist and Tarski-Gödel Compatibilist
Philosophy of Politics: Utopian, Activist, Welfare-Capitalist, Conservative, Cosmopolitanist, Realist, Pragmatist, Idealist (maybe synonymous with Utopian), Multiculturalist, Patriotist and Secularist (!)
- Accordance Realist Pragmatist Idealist with the all-important word Accordance. - This enters in light of my little notice that pays respect to all of these three concepts inline, properly
Philosophy of Law (as formerly written): Absolutist, Legislationist and Originalist (!), Formalist Philosopher and Legal Reasoning Closure Principle Philosopher, legal reasoning, being valid, has to comply with logical entailment and that this is minimally the claim that it does, apart from the (many book) examples that it does. (This is only a formal note, not the text for lawyers to actually having to sit and make these logical texts themselves, i.e., to burden them with much extra work.)
Philosophy of Business: Minimalist (rather jokingly, as earlier noted) (!)
Philosophy of Religion: Scientific Deist, Modern Christian, Moderate Christian, Reasonable Christian, Scientologist, Ecumenical Philosopher, Deist: (Deism & Christianity = compatible "with Bible belief intact", 10 Comm., the rest) and All-Interpretationist (math. "union-U"), but only the best acc. to sense, pref. my own, also by "The Scientific Bible 2.0 - Commentary to the Bible, All Versions".
Philosophy of Aesthetics: Kantian
Philosophy of Public Relations: That under Philosophy of Public Relations (PR), I declare myself "white-side"/anti-Goebbels.
- By this, I also note that (black-side-)Goebbels is a bloody negative study and that one must remember that he has been a core-Nazi-German and all that this brings with a personhood of deep corruption. Despite this, Goebbels must have set into operation such vastness that it would have made Aristotle drool for months after witnessing it. USA has no poss. to object to this position of mine, formal note.
Note: This is taken from my Issues from the Internet.
Monday, 26 January 2015
UN and Global Unemployment - One solution
UN handling number of factories to fight global unemployment (and indirectly, CO2 pollution)?
If we use the furniture industry as template where much of the industry stems from national production, perhaps it gets more visual where I want to take you with this idea.
If we use the furniture industry as template where much of the industry stems from national production, perhaps it gets more visual where I want to take you with this idea.
Obviously, not everyone can produce furnitures, we need people in agricultural industry and perhaps aquacultural industry as well, given sea territory.
So how do we go forward from here? What do you think are the sufficient level of factories/production sites to fight global unemployment, to enable all countries so that we can reach a kind of global happiness and communion, a sharing of the bond of being human being?
That is, the power of the people commands the companies to maintain a number of factories/production sites in order for the companies to stay with the industry agreement, within the good circles of industrial life. This also keeps the premise of capitalism alive because we do not need a shift of ideology. The one we have is sufficient or necessary for progress/lower unemployment/Utopia to be achieved!
This has to be initiated by having the common household budget as start. You can't invest all your efforts into a space station because you don't have one because it has near zero impact for the household budget. And yes, your neighbour can work for you and you can work for your neighbour because principally every nation is alone on planet Earth!
So how do we go forward from here? What do you think are the sufficient level of factories/production sites to fight global unemployment, to enable all countries so that we can reach a kind of global happiness and communion, a sharing of the bond of being human being?
That is, the power of the people commands the companies to maintain a number of factories/production sites in order for the companies to stay with the industry agreement, within the good circles of industrial life. This also keeps the premise of capitalism alive because we do not need a shift of ideology. The one we have is sufficient or necessary for progress/lower unemployment/Utopia to be achieved!
This has to be initiated by having the common household budget as start. You can't invest all your efforts into a space station because you don't have one because it has near zero impact for the household budget. And yes, your neighbour can work for you and you can work for your neighbour because principally every nation is alone on planet Earth!
Nationbuilding and 0% Unemployment
Lesson: We build a nation with 0% unemployment
We have a nation with people, say 100 million people.
Public services have a cost - say something x money.
Then we have the private sector - say generating something y money.
In this private sector, traditionally, we put in what we like by /taste/.
We start:
1. section,
Railroad company/-ies
Construction companies
Law firms
Accounting firms
Agricultural sector (possibly with plantations)
Aquacultural sector (we're lucky to have sea next to our EmployNation!)
Brewing companies
Soda companies
Tourism (raw - alpine sites with the whole set of ski slopes and other)
For beauty:
Tourism (by given nature, also wilderness by rainforests, like Kilimanjaro)
cont. (you get the idea, all company sectors possible around, also IT sector, say Hardware especially if not software, beginning with Linux core or more basic)
Public services have a cost - say something x money.
Then we have the private sector - say generating something y money.
In this private sector, traditionally, we put in what we like by /taste/.
We start:
1. section,
Railroad company/-ies
Construction companies
Law firms
Accounting firms
Agricultural sector (possibly with plantations)
Aquacultural sector (we're lucky to have sea next to our EmployNation!)
Brewing companies
Soda companies
Tourism (raw - alpine sites with the whole set of ski slopes and other)
For beauty:
Tourism (by given nature, also wilderness by rainforests, like Kilimanjaro)
cont. (you get the idea, all company sectors possible around, also IT sector, say Hardware especially if not software, beginning with Linux core or more basic)
2. section,
We ask the big companies to settle with a factory or two in our EmployNation.
We go to Nike
We go to Apple
- Ford
- General Motors
- Mercedes
- some other car brands
cont. (you get the idea, all companies around)
We ask the big companies to settle with a factory or two in our EmployNation.
We go to Nike
We go to Apple
- Ford
- General Motors
- Mercedes
- some other car brands
cont. (you get the idea, all companies around)
So, could this be a template for our struggling 12 Mn European buddy of Greece? Possibly, you may say!
Monday, 22 September 2014
Economy of Happiness - Relaunched
Starts:
Along with mHDI, respects to the HDI-inventor from Pakistan, I suggest that one starts to make a money-number on fairly immaterial concepts, such as (physical) security, ethical complacency, and mental order/happiness by scope, not "robotics", with (legal) free will and autonomy kept.
With this comes a "quantified" GDP value that economists can consider, also to the population at large, adding military/police forces/system calm to satisfy very-money-interested people, all money included (black money too?).
Where these costs are calculated to belong to the public budgets (state, regional, local) or the private ones, where these may be, is beyond me.
The idea is of course to add (physical) security aspects to a general view of economics, not necessarily leading to private police (like in San Franscisco in the 30s(?)). In writing this, we need to see that physical security adds some qualities to our lives and that these can be expressed just like other services are expressed in numbers, like the cleaning of hotel rooms. Thus, physical security can be part of a bigger picture of goverment responsibility and liability. Agree?
(Also consider the Greenspanism, the quantified/justified parts of household budgets and economy overall.)
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!
The future looks really BRIGHT!
PS: To enter the 100% Society too.
Tuesday, 6 May 2014
Capital in the Twenty-First Century - The book from T. Piketty
Thomas Piketty has been mentioned by Fareed Zakaria on GPS and I agree. It's just to take this in straight!
Corruption and other crime is in all aspects so vastly present that to combat crime needs to take priority! However, one does not need to declare oneself a Socialist for this reason. The (blue, lighter or stronger) VICTORY over Marx is in every way fundamental and with Piketty's solution, as he writes, Leadership and Intelligence are either way ensured! We only become more lightly BLUE!
The way forward is to secure a BETTER World, ecologically and with less CRIME too!
Other than Marx, there are these other traditional values of family, monarchy, human rights, privacy, democracy etc. All of these have been successfully defended by Capitalism. The way from 10 000 BC and upto today, 2014, has been the development of natural morals, the ETHICS, from clan wars and barbarism to a civilised society of today!
The word from Piketty's book: Regulation!
A url link to Gurdian report on his book: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/may/02/thomas-piketty-capital-in-the-twenty-first-century-french-economist.
Thomas Piketty: the French economist bringing capitalism to book
Another url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx
The different story of unfolded Capitalism in history:
The Triangle Trade - Europe - Africa - USA (as account of the Human Being from this time)
The political map of this time, The Triangle Trade
The monarchies and the others
Industrial revolution
Establishment of the Workers' Movement
Establishment of the negotiating parties of working life
The fight for workers' rights!
Universal voting rights, men first and then women
1. World War
The New Deal
2. World War
UN
Further development of laws and regulations
Established mass education by law (time span)
Here and now!
The head of K. Marx (with NSDAP, Stalin and Mao) hangs by this as well as the accusations from the (Joseph) McCarthyism time:
"Gravestone for Communism (until Utopia)"
Corruption and other crime is in all aspects so vastly present that to combat crime needs to take priority! However, one does not need to declare oneself a Socialist for this reason. The (blue, lighter or stronger) VICTORY over Marx is in every way fundamental and with Piketty's solution, as he writes, Leadership and Intelligence are either way ensured! We only become more lightly BLUE!
The way forward is to secure a BETTER World, ecologically and with less CRIME too!
Other than Marx, there are these other traditional values of family, monarchy, human rights, privacy, democracy etc. All of these have been successfully defended by Capitalism. The way from 10 000 BC and upto today, 2014, has been the development of natural morals, the ETHICS, from clan wars and barbarism to a civilised society of today!
The word from Piketty's book: Regulation!
A url link to Gurdian report on his book: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/may/02/thomas-piketty-capital-in-the-twenty-first-century-french-economist.
Thomas Piketty: the French economist bringing capitalism to book
Another url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx
The different story of unfolded Capitalism in history:
The Triangle Trade - Europe - Africa - USA (as account of the Human Being from this time)
The political map of this time, The Triangle Trade
The monarchies and the others
Industrial revolution
Establishment of the Workers' Movement
Establishment of the negotiating parties of working life
The fight for workers' rights!
Universal voting rights, men first and then women
1. World War
The New Deal
2. World War
UN
Further development of laws and regulations
Established mass education by law (time span)
Here and now!
The head of K. Marx (with NSDAP, Stalin and Mao) hangs by this as well as the accusations from the (Joseph) McCarthyism time:
"Gravestone for Communism (until Utopia)"
I find that capitalism is better at controlling corruption than communism. That is, capitalism is more fault tolerant. While communism almost demands that people are like angels, capitalism can deal with a relatively large amount of not so good people.
Besides, in capitalism people can settle with less and be pleased with it while those who want it can work themselves to death and enjoy their fortune from it. This is almost impossible in communism, I think.
I want to mention:
- communism focuses on work of people and this can be way harder to make a just issue of in that system
- capitalism focuses on money and money can be made to adjust for all kind of relationships, from capitalisation of ideas to the amount of stress from work
Who is supposed to kick the hardest work in communism without having advantages for doing it? If workload is supposed to be equal, should one make elaborate psychologies of work to make sure nobody stresses, carry more workload, than others? Communism seems to me to be more complex to incorporate.
Soviet Union has been marked by two very bad ideas: Communism and Atheism!
China is not any communist country anymore, mind you. It has officially described itself as socialist some years ago and even then their communism may just be a kind of "communism" through which their need for control in overcoming severe problems and a vast population may have called for it.
Besides, in capitalism people can settle with less and be pleased with it while those who want it can work themselves to death and enjoy their fortune from it. This is almost impossible in communism, I think.
I want to mention:
- communism focuses on work of people and this can be way harder to make a just issue of in that system
- capitalism focuses on money and money can be made to adjust for all kind of relationships, from capitalisation of ideas to the amount of stress from work
Who is supposed to kick the hardest work in communism without having advantages for doing it? If workload is supposed to be equal, should one make elaborate psychologies of work to make sure nobody stresses, carry more workload, than others? Communism seems to me to be more complex to incorporate.
Soviet Union has been marked by two very bad ideas: Communism and Atheism!
China is not any communist country anymore, mind you. It has officially described itself as socialist some years ago and even then their communism may just be a kind of "communism" through which their need for control in overcoming severe problems and a vast population may have called for it.
It's true that China has only one party, but they do elect electives to the "party congress" and I also happen to believe that there's more than 1 possible candidate in most or all of these elections to the "party congress" beside having the possibility to vote blank or not to vote at all, going into some kind of system opposition, trying to change the political machinery, at least!
The elections? You will have to check, but I think the last has been reported within a year or two. Thanks for asking the question, Wootah. One thing is for certain, China does not fulfill the the communist ideal of everyone being equally rich or poor, quite the opposite. There are quite large economic differences in China. It's true though that they have only one party and that this is typical for a communist country, perhaps even for a social one as they describe themselves as.
The type of democracy (in case it really is) is one that goes along a line of culture and a certain scope of politics and it is of this kind, I think a one-party democracy can be effective. That you want progress and control over this fast and steady and thus the political system is set up as it is. Remember that the Chinese political system is handling 1,2 Billion people and a good deal of these are quite poor! So what should one do? I think the Chinese have chosen a fine middle way, preserving own culture and emphasising the important aims beside of this.
You can look up yourselves the democracies of USA with its 310 million people and downwards...
The elections? You will have to check, but I think the last has been reported within a year or two. Thanks for asking the question, Wootah. One thing is for certain, China does not fulfill the the communist ideal of everyone being equally rich or poor, quite the opposite. There are quite large economic differences in China. It's true though that they have only one party and that this is typical for a communist country, perhaps even for a social one as they describe themselves as.
The type of democracy (in case it really is) is one that goes along a line of culture and a certain scope of politics and it is of this kind, I think a one-party democracy can be effective. That you want progress and control over this fast and steady and thus the political system is set up as it is. Remember that the Chinese political system is handling 1,2 Billion people and a good deal of these are quite poor! So what should one do? I think the Chinese have chosen a fine middle way, preserving own culture and emphasising the important aims beside of this.
You can look up yourselves the democracies of USA with its 310 million people and downwards...
As well (the above text has been edited from the source, Issues from the Internet, on this blog:
"I've earlier written these on [forum] where you can find the original writings. I find them to be so striking that I post them here as well:
[Dead for all foreseeable future?]
--------
Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!
The future looks really BRIGHT!
--------
Communism and ("pure") Socialism has a fundamental problem in accepting Human Rights (UDHR by UN) by their fanatical hunt for "equality ideal" (even when "equality" isn't further defined by them). Therefore, all Communistic groups (or thereof, Antifa?) can pack their things because they are in this always presenting themselves as liars on one level or another.
From a review of Klassekampen, a "Communistic"(?) newspaper in Norway, the original Norwegian version:
"Kommunisme og ("ren") Sosialisme har et fundamentalt problem med å akseptere Menneskerettighetene (UDHR ved FN) etter sin fanatiske jakt på "likhetsidealet" (uten at "likhet" er videre definert av dem). Derfor kan Klassekampen pakke sakene for på et nivå eller et annet så blir de dømt til å være løgnere!"
[Dead for all foreseeable future?]
--------
Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!
The future looks really BRIGHT!
--------
Communism and ("pure") Socialism has a fundamental problem in accepting Human Rights (UDHR by UN) by their fanatical hunt for "equality ideal" (even when "equality" isn't further defined by them). Therefore, all Communistic groups (or thereof, Antifa?) can pack their things because they are in this always presenting themselves as liars on one level or another.
From a review of Klassekampen, a "Communistic"(?) newspaper in Norway, the original Norwegian version:
"Kommunisme og ("ren") Sosialisme har et fundamentalt problem med å akseptere Menneskerettighetene (UDHR ved FN) etter sin fanatiske jakt på "likhetsidealet" (uten at "likhet" er videre definert av dem). Derfor kan Klassekampen pakke sakene for på et nivå eller et annet så blir de dømt til å være løgnere!"
Saturday, 19 April 2014
Heaven/Death as Definite Point of Calmness - Philosophy of Calmness
The greatest calmness is only achievable in Heaven, after death. Given this assured point of calm in Heaven there's a backward effect of calmness as you wait for Heaven and this is the calmness of LIFE!
(Philosophy of Calmness?)
(Repr.)
(Philosophy of Calmness?)
(Repr.)
Monday, 7 April 2014
My Interest in Shinto, Bushido and the Hagakuré/Sun Tzu - A modern commentary to go?
In Bushido declaring to choose death in a choice between life and death, I think this must be understood as choosing death in Dying to Reject a Life that Is Deeply Sinful, i.e., a kind of parallel to Rejection of the Cardinal Sins by the Weapon.
It says, Bushido, that this choice arises "in the presence of Death", not in the joyful life, only. Equally so, Jihad stands more clear to the Christian mind in waging the religious life despite the many challenges (of violence, threats, corruption, other crime).
This means that any mentally pathological side to living life needs to be warned against and "fought", also with the weapon in hand, real, unarmed or metaphorically.
The Muslims on the other hand say that Christians are in "(metaphysical) global Jihad" with the story of Jesus Christ, one that I have deep sympathies too.
It says, Bushido, that this choice arises "in the presence of Death", not in the joyful life, only. Equally so, Jihad stands more clear to the Christian mind in waging the religious life despite the many challenges (of violence, threats, corruption, other crime).
This means that any mentally pathological side to living life needs to be warned against and "fought", also with the weapon in hand, real, unarmed or metaphorically.
The Muslims on the other hand say that Christians are in "(metaphysical) global Jihad" with the story of Jesus Christ, one that I have deep sympathies too.
Links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushido
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagakure
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinto
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_the_Dead
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Souls%27_Day
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Saints%27_Day
Note: I think there is a need to replace any voodoo suspicion in Ko-(Shinto) with a more spirited (Ko-)Shinto, one that's also more "flexible" in seeing a more lively life, afterlife and nature.
In siding with, note on religious symmetry, ecumenism and religious humanism, (Ko-)Shinto, you may want to take note of the "Maria Magdalena"/Mary Magdalene and
2 Corinthians 6:14-18 - Warning Against Idolatry (Idolatry = Failure to the path of Heaven, failure in terms of morality)
14 Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? 15 What harmony is there between Christ and Belial[a]? Or what does a believer have in common with an unbeliever? 16 What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols? For we are the temple of the living God. As God has said:
“I will live with them
and walk among them,
and I will be their God,
and they will be my people.”[b]
17 Therefore,
“Come out from them
and be separate,
says the Lord.
Touch no unclean thing,
and I will receive you.”[c]
18 And,
“I will be a Father to you,
and you will be my sons and daughters,
says the Lord Almighty.”[d]
(I've used the reference from New International Version (NIV) and www.biblegateway.com .)
Note also that, usually, the decent and morally straight are the ones who assaulted in the back so one needs "to sharpen the senses" and be ALERT in order for a dream of Utopia to come true!
(More may be coming...)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagakure
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinto
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_the_Dead
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Souls%27_Day
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Saints%27_Day
Note: I think there is a need to replace any voodoo suspicion in Ko-(Shinto) with a more spirited (Ko-)Shinto, one that's also more "flexible" in seeing a more lively life, afterlife and nature.
In siding with, note on religious symmetry, ecumenism and religious humanism, (Ko-)Shinto, you may want to take note of the "Maria Magdalena"/Mary Magdalene and
2 Corinthians 6:14-18 - Warning Against Idolatry (Idolatry = Failure to the path of Heaven, failure in terms of morality)
14 Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? 15 What harmony is there between Christ and Belial[a]? Or what does a believer have in common with an unbeliever? 16 What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols? For we are the temple of the living God. As God has said:
“I will live with them
and walk among them,
and I will be their God,
and they will be my people.”[b]
17 Therefore,
“Come out from them
and be separate,
says the Lord.
Touch no unclean thing,
and I will receive you.”[c]
18 And,
“I will be a Father to you,
and you will be my sons and daughters,
says the Lord Almighty.”[d]
(I've used the reference from New International Version (NIV) and www.biblegateway.com .)
Note also that, usually, the decent and morally straight are the ones who assaulted in the back so one needs "to sharpen the senses" and be ALERT in order for a dream of Utopia to come true!
(More may be coming...)
Saturday, 1 February 2014
The National Parks and the Future – The Parks Become Wisely Old
In the spirit of national wilderness parks/areas/ranges (also with WWF and Greenpeace), I suggest concreted (on site, possibly) steel mantelled (“light”) tunneling of existing roads and rails through these “critical” areas in order to allow the wilderness animals and other (like insects) to CALM DOWN. Do you like it? Let’s do it!
(Remember that a WiFi-mast/tower can mean activity in two directions, one of them being “to chain animals” away from their natural freedom “to Darthmouth malpractice of insanity to nature”!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tunel_en_Guanajuato.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Joralemon_Street_Tunnel_postcard,_1913.jpg
(Remember that a WiFi-mast/tower can mean activity in two directions, one of them being “to chain animals” away from their natural freedom “to Darthmouth malpractice of insanity to nature”!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tunel_en_Guanajuato.jpg
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunnel.
http://isisinform.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/tunnel.jpg
Source: http://www.isisinform.com/
One natural goal now must be to corroborate and “build” these natural parks/areas bigger by demolishing ALL human-made buildings and structures (radio-/transmitting-towers, roads, rails, ALL).
Failures of leadership, 2 cases to start plus one that we leave alone:
1. WWF, data-set: 1993 – 2014. Delivery on promise and agency: Nothing!
Premises/Quality criteria/Qualification:
1. Failure to curb overpopulation.
2. Failure to curb CO2 emissions.
3. Failure to introduce anti-overpopulation policies (1 child or 2 children, economic incentives to any other nation than China.
4. Failure to increase the total World-area of national parks beyond the number of 1999.
5. Failure to communicate the stress on animals by the oversized number of human beings on the planet.
2. Adolf Hitler, data-set, primary: 1933 – 1945. Havoc of an idiot!
Failures: the most a man can accomplish in dying to early!
(3. A man with a Blood-Whore (NO:Blod hore) problem of a nation down veneral south.)
Reminder. I'd like to remind the responsible parties how demoralising / stupid (stoopid) it appears when they can use 2 seconds to arrive at a sound conclusion and these "high" leaders "of honour" fail to do so in 20 years, even when it's their full-time job! What a signal to send to members and World in general!
Not only this, but also the trending "bad behaviour". That if one is suitably bad in the World, you can become something depending on your willingness...! What is "work code" in being wicked and what is work completed as expected...? "No, nobody knows!" As if one is willing to accept such an excuse! "Hasn't the salary been acceptable?"
Conclusion: We may be looking at a perfect storm here...! (Despite Pugwash movement too! By end of January, 2014, CO2-reading hits 397,80 ppm. Read about it on www.CO2now.org.)
You know, I'm speaking in terms of completeness, that no option toward the better is left out. This means that all sensible policies toward sound ecology should be put into effect, such as the common economic incentives for nudging the population in the right, ecological direction.
One natural goal now must be to corroborate and “build” these natural parks/areas bigger by demolishing ALL human-made buildings and structures (radio-/transmitting-towers, roads, rails, ALL).
Failures of leadership, 2 cases to start plus one that we leave alone:
1. WWF, data-set: 1993 – 2014. Delivery on promise and agency: Nothing!
Premises/Quality criteria/Qualification:
1. Failure to curb overpopulation.
2. Failure to curb CO2 emissions.
3. Failure to introduce anti-overpopulation policies (1 child or 2 children, economic incentives to any other nation than China.
4. Failure to increase the total World-area of national parks beyond the number of 1999.
5. Failure to communicate the stress on animals by the oversized number of human beings on the planet.
2. Adolf Hitler, data-set, primary: 1933 – 1945. Havoc of an idiot!
Failures: the most a man can accomplish in dying to early!
(3. A man with a Blood-Whore (NO:Blod hore) problem of a nation down veneral south.)
Reminder. I'd like to remind the responsible parties how demoralising / stupid (stoopid) it appears when they can use 2 seconds to arrive at a sound conclusion and these "high" leaders "of honour" fail to do so in 20 years, even when it's their full-time job! What a signal to send to members and World in general!
Not only this, but also the trending "bad behaviour". That if one is suitably bad in the World, you can become something depending on your willingness...! What is "work code" in being wicked and what is work completed as expected...? "No, nobody knows!" As if one is willing to accept such an excuse! "Hasn't the salary been acceptable?"
Conclusion: We may be looking at a perfect storm here...! (Despite Pugwash movement too! By end of January, 2014, CO2-reading hits 397,80 ppm. Read about it on www.CO2now.org.)
You know, I'm speaking in terms of completeness, that no option toward the better is left out. This means that all sensible policies toward sound ecology should be put into effect, such as the common economic incentives for nudging the population in the right, ecological direction.
Saturday, 16 November 2013
The World in Human Rights - UDHR - ECHR
The Human Rights, most explicitly, by UDHR, minimally, are now everywhere in the World with a possible exception of North Korea.
Russia is with the Council of Europe and USA has still New York state with UN as one of theirs.
EU is hosting the court of ECtHR in France. The idiots have fallen off the stairs to every university in the World, at least theoretically, such that absurd objections to evident, straight in the face truths and their cases are no longer "cool to utter", even if you have been a 10 people worth cannibal under police corruption or police states (huh, do they exist?)!
So here we are with a Worldscene, with some small exceptions, ALL HUMAN RIGHTS! Legal duties have become definite and absolute under the lie detector investigations and "police questioning rooms" on the good side, carrying out the work according to procedure.
For USA despite its "Onslow" speed (sorry for the Picket Fences reference from Britain) in reacting to New START Treaty and getting it through, here are some Human Rights references for them (also outside Scientology context, "so that they no longer need to feel that they have to present them, in a special way to some people"):
Government Organisation by http://www.humanrights.gov/contact-us/
To Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/HumanRightsgov
State Department by http://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/
Organisation more by http://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/human_rights_in_the_united_states
Link 2, http://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/
Human Rights Watch by http://www.hrw.org/
By Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Watch
Their email: HumanRightsWebsite@state.gov.
Additional:
http://www.humanrights.gov/2013/11/12/ambassador-power-on-human-rights-council-elections/ if you bother to read it.
Note: There's nothing wrong with Scientology presenting Human Rights, but, please, can't they add the UDHR reference for "Christ's sake"?
This makes me certain that we in Europe have been entertaining idiot politicians for a very long time, "and with a larger portion of them failing to read primary literature" if not the Bible directly.
We need to get our legs together people!
(Try to pull that face in USA!)
Over lunacy work for Human Rights and more (Justice, the good causes):
To say that legislation is passed against human rights or to subvert people is to be crazy in the work to advocate Human Rights (UDHR by UN).
Legislation can never be passed to protect, defend or cover for crime because this constitutes crime/corruption against own population, violates much international convention and agreement and does not pass the very formulation requirements themselves in being general.
The pro-Human Rights combatting must take place by combatting corruption and crime in general, that ICCt is correctly used and supported.
So to add, "heh-heh-heh, also in Norway", corrupt lawyers are very much a problem, as much as a psychiatric corrupt-minds-issue, when they in fact are relied on and are vital in offering legal services to the public as well as leading the police forces through the daily work.
What's next or what's the standing on the legal systems throughout the World? I don't know. One plain example: is the torture, also in terms of estimates, correctly reported? Also by the most important news-places, also by the most important authorities.
"Fun fact": The lyrics of "living on the edge" should have read, We're living on the edge when everybody should go up and nobody down [in terms of justice...] - emphasis on use of "should".
Russia is with the Council of Europe and USA has still New York state with UN as one of theirs.
EU is hosting the court of ECtHR in France. The idiots have fallen off the stairs to every university in the World, at least theoretically, such that absurd objections to evident, straight in the face truths and their cases are no longer "cool to utter", even if you have been a 10 people worth cannibal under police corruption or police states (huh, do they exist?)!
So here we are with a Worldscene, with some small exceptions, ALL HUMAN RIGHTS! Legal duties have become definite and absolute under the lie detector investigations and "police questioning rooms" on the good side, carrying out the work according to procedure.
For USA despite its "Onslow" speed (sorry for the Picket Fences reference from Britain) in reacting to New START Treaty and getting it through, here are some Human Rights references for them (also outside Scientology context, "so that they no longer need to feel that they have to present them, in a special way to some people"):
Government Organisation by http://www.humanrights.gov/contact-us/
To Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/HumanRightsgov
State Department by http://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/
Organisation more by http://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/human_rights_in_the_united_states
Link 2, http://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/
Human Rights Watch by http://www.hrw.org/
By Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Watch
Their email: HumanRightsWebsite@state.gov.
Additional:
http://www.humanrights.gov/2013/11/12/ambassador-power-on-human-rights-council-elections/ if you bother to read it.
Note: There's nothing wrong with Scientology presenting Human Rights, but, please, can't they add the UDHR reference for "Christ's sake"?
This makes me certain that we in Europe have been entertaining idiot politicians for a very long time, "and with a larger portion of them failing to read primary literature" if not the Bible directly.
We need to get our legs together people!
(Try to pull that face in USA!)
Over lunacy work for Human Rights and more (Justice, the good causes):
To say that legislation is passed against human rights or to subvert people is to be crazy in the work to advocate Human Rights (UDHR by UN).
Legislation can never be passed to protect, defend or cover for crime because this constitutes crime/corruption against own population, violates much international convention and agreement and does not pass the very formulation requirements themselves in being general.
The pro-Human Rights combatting must take place by combatting corruption and crime in general, that ICCt is correctly used and supported.
So to add, "heh-heh-heh, also in Norway", corrupt lawyers are very much a problem, as much as a psychiatric corrupt-minds-issue, when they in fact are relied on and are vital in offering legal services to the public as well as leading the police forces through the daily work.
What's next or what's the standing on the legal systems throughout the World? I don't know. One plain example: is the torture, also in terms of estimates, correctly reported? Also by the most important news-places, also by the most important authorities.
"Fun fact": The lyrics of "living on the edge" should have read, We're living on the edge when everybody should go up and nobody down [in terms of justice...] - emphasis on use of "should".
Thursday, 14 November 2013
The Artificial Language for Linguistic Exactness - The Craziness of Philosophy - The Philosophy of Language
The artificial language in terms of completeness, aside from the use that the existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations give us is provided by,
connectives: AND, OR, NEGATION, CONDITIONAL, BICONDITIONAL (the usual), + the ones for quantification logic (for all and some, also one) and the two for modal logic (possible and necessary)
defining the entities: entities but perhaps not numbered
consistency: consistency takes as usual the premeditation almost to the point of planning. Being the De Dicto gives me a step ahead, but not any significant.
This enters in addition to Performative Utterances and Scientific Papers (from "Issues from the Internet") where exactly the above existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations are providing the necessary effectivity beyond misunderstandings, at least in a pragmatic way, given these texts.
While this solves the formal requirements set out for this project, the solution by providing the support for "existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations" is sufficient enough, even though it is simple to say to it, accounting all sorts of feats, from landing on the moon to the rest!
Tip: check for all papers/texts and books from the 80s and up. In addition, Tarski's sentence, ""the snow is white" implying the snow is white" gives the preceding peek for this clarification.
The sentence by Tarski, ""the snow is white" implying the snow is white" is admitted its strength based on the fact that snow is in fact "detected"/"found" in nature by its whiteness. Therefore, the technical, chemical term for snow, adding the physical environment as required is exactly as Tarski says it, "snow is white"!
The former, as addition to "Performative Utterances and Scientific Papers" by explaining my support of Artifical Language, an academic activity with only formal gain, possibly:
"The further development of my position on "Artificial Language Philosophy" is this simplicity, that more or less settles it, is that as the logical connectives enter the artificial language in non-contradictory way and maintaining the strict logical requirements of being consistent, the logical connectives can be read aloud like this fx. "the logical connective NOT" to [entity] "by parantheses" and reading onwards and that this, principally makes Carnap's project crossing the finishing line! Thank you for following me through!"
connectives: AND, OR, NEGATION, CONDITIONAL, BICONDITIONAL (the usual), + the ones for quantification logic (for all and some, also one) and the two for modal logic (possible and necessary)
defining the entities: entities but perhaps not numbered
consistency: consistency takes as usual the premeditation almost to the point of planning. Being the De Dicto gives me a step ahead, but not any significant.
This enters in addition to Performative Utterances and Scientific Papers (from "Issues from the Internet") where exactly the above existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations are providing the necessary effectivity beyond misunderstandings, at least in a pragmatic way, given these texts.
While this solves the formal requirements set out for this project, the solution by providing the support for "existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations" is sufficient enough, even though it is simple to say to it, accounting all sorts of feats, from landing on the moon to the rest!
Tip: check for all papers/texts and books from the 80s and up. In addition, Tarski's sentence, ""the snow is white" implying the snow is white" gives the preceding peek for this clarification.
The sentence by Tarski, ""the snow is white" implying the snow is white" is admitted its strength based on the fact that snow is in fact "detected"/"found" in nature by its whiteness. Therefore, the technical, chemical term for snow, adding the physical environment as required is exactly as Tarski says it, "snow is white"!
The former, as addition to "Performative Utterances and Scientific Papers" by explaining my support of Artifical Language, an academic activity with only formal gain, possibly:
"The further development of my position on "Artificial Language Philosophy" is this simplicity, that more or less settles it, is that as the logical connectives enter the artificial language in non-contradictory way and maintaining the strict logical requirements of being consistent, the logical connectives can be read aloud like this fx. "the logical connective NOT" to [entity] "by parantheses" and reading onwards and that this, principally makes Carnap's project crossing the finishing line! Thank you for following me through!"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)