Rich Countries and Poor Countries - A story over the wealth of nations

This is a story of the wealth of nations and that the potential for making a nation matched or aligned. I think there's a possible story of development to the nations that are poor today. Of course, systematic corruption plays a large or larger role in some countries while all countries in the World today are affected by corruption.

Three types of countries:

The matched country - this is the country that has symmetry over the sectors of the country. Such that one doesn't over-extend or under-extend one's nations finances. The primary sectors are cared for properly and technology is prudently applied in order to provide happiness and satisfaction to the population. This enables great levels of production, all the way from low-tech production to high-level production.

The top-heavy country - this type of country seeks power through technology and is typically a dictatorship where poverty strikes the workers of the primary sectors in order to seek technology and finance military capacities. One example: Soviet Union.

The bottom-heavy country - this type of country has large primary sectors and much corruption and entertains dictatorships as well. One example: North Korea.

Cases: Soviet Union, North Korea, South Korea, Cambodia, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, France, Italy, Russia,  -(others)

The World in Human Rights - UDHR - ECHR

The Human Rights, most explicitly, by UDHR, minimally, are now everywhere in the World with a possible exception of North Korea.

Russia is with the Council of Europe and USA has still New York state with UN as one of theirs.

EU is hosting the court of ECtHR in France. The idiots have fallen off the stairs to every university in the World, at least theoretically, such that absurd objections to evident, straight in the face truths and their cases are no longer "cool to utter", even if you have been a 10 people worth cannibal under police corruption or police states (huh, do they exist?)!

So here we are with a Worldscene, with some small exceptions, ALL HUMAN RIGHTS! Legal duties have become definite and absolute under the lie detector investigations and "police questioning rooms" on the good side, carrying out the work according to procedure.

For USA despite its "Onslow" speed (sorry for the Picket Fences reference from Britain) in reacting to New START Treaty and getting it through, here are some Human Rights references for them (also outside Scientology context, "so that they no longer need to feel that they have to present them, in a special way to some people"):

Government Organisation by http://www.humanrights.gov/contact-us/
To Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/HumanRightsgov
State Department by http://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/
Organisation more by http://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/human_rights_in_the_united_states
Link 2, http://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/
Human Rights Watch by http://www.hrw.org/
By Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Watch
Their email: HumanRightsWebsite@state.gov.

Additional:
http://www.humanrights.gov/2013/11/12/ambassador-power-on-human-rights-council-elections/ if you bother to read it.

Note: There's nothing wrong with Scientology presenting Human Rights, but, please, can't they add the UDHR reference for "Christ's sake"?

This makes me certain that we in Europe have been entertaining idiot politicians for a very long time, "and with a larger portion of them failing to read primary literature" if not the Bible directly.

We need to get our legs together people!

(Try to pull that face in USA!)

Over lunacy work for Human Rights and more (Justice, the good causes):

To say that legislation is passed against human rights or to subvert people is to be crazy in the work to advocate Human Rights (UDHR by UN).

Legislation can never be passed to protect, defend or cover for crime because this constitutes crime/corruption against own population, violates much international convention and agreement and does not pass the very formulation requirements themselves in being general.

The pro-Human Rights combatting must take place by combatting corruption and crime in general, that ICCt is correctly used and supported.

So to add, "heh-heh-heh, also in Norway", corrupt lawyers are very much a problem, as much as a psychiatric corrupt-minds-issue, when they in fact are relied on and are vital in offering legal services to the public as well as leading the police forces through the daily work.

What's next or what's the standing on the legal systems throughout the World? I don't know. One plain example: is the torture, also in terms of estimates, correctly reported? Also by the most important news-places, also by the most important authorities.

"Fun fact": The lyrics of "living on the edge" should have read, We're living on the edge when everybody should go up and nobody down [in terms of justice...] - emphasis on use of "should".

The Internet Population - The Story of an Ever Growing Interconnected World - How many? By the Nations...

From Wikipedia 2nd time:

2006 2011

6.5 billion 7 billion

2006 2011

Africa 3% 13%

Americas 39% 56%

Arab States 11% 29%

Asia and Pacific 11% 27%

Commonwealth of Independent States 13% 48%

Europe 50% 74%

a Estimate. b Share of regional population.

World Total: 7,017,846,922 Internet Users - Latest Data: 2,405,518,376. -> Gives 34,2% of World total. (Surprising low. Who to take the blame? USA and World corruption, much police?)

Extra consideration:

Internet population (more):

Well, well, I don't know why ITU chooses to disclose the numbers the way that it does, but a reasonable way of informing the public on this has usually included a notice such as "of those who _can_ use/access the Internet". To this number we should expect Europe and USA to be quite high, much like almost 100%, exempting the usual groups, those who are too ill, one matter or another, and those who are too young or old.

Indeed, the ITU numbers seem too much idiotic when they should know better and that the current numbers may also reflect the World status, i.e., that the World is unnecessarily "pointy"!

Numbers of (implied) users from possible users, also as percentage, is the usual way for presenting these "Internet population" numbers. It is now? But this may not be a problem, rather, how much of Planet Earth area, land territory as connection of one place with people to another, has "Internet" on it, on land and elsewhere? So what is this number, in percentage, please? No, there is something strange in this World? Also, a type of technological access at sea, including a type of technology use to a given degree to this calculation such as "a certain percentage of the boats/ships at sea has a certain technology with them that allows them Internet connection at all times". More this includes technology that allows only limited access "here and there" based on other technology to land based antennas or radio-based transmission of kind, accessible some areas at sea, but not others...


That it's unnecessary to add this statistics consideration over population, i.e., the absolute population vs. the actual possible Internet population, a number that may be very obscured from a number of people. We need to follow this up to the ITU.

(One pervert consideration is that "0-year old kids" are unconsciously using the Internet by what would normally be considered criminal implants, and that this approach is enticing to ITU that, giggling wildly, ITU would like to see h*llishly more of it, word by intention.)

Source: International Telecommunications Union. href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_population (#cite_note-8").

Source: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm for World numbers in absolute terms.