UN and Global Unemployment - One solution

A procedure to fight global unemployment, global poverty - The means to production

UN handling number of factories to fight global unemployment (and indirectly, CO2 pollution)?

If we use the furniture industry as template where much of the industry stems from national production, perhaps it gets more visual where I want to take you with this idea.

Obviously, not everyone can produce furnitures, we need people in agricultural industry and perhaps aquacultural industry as well, given sea territory.

So how do we go forward from here? What do you think are the sufficient level of factories/production sites to fight global unemployment, to enable all countries so that we can reach a kind of global happiness and communion, a sharing of the bond of being human being?

That is, the power of the people commands the companies to maintain a number of factories/production sites in order for the companies to stay with the industry agreement, within the good circles of industrial life. This also keeps the premise of capitalism alive because we do not need a shift of ideology. The one we have is sufficient or necessary for progress/lower unemployment/Utopia to be achieved!

This has to be initiated by having the common household budget as start. You can't invest all your efforts into a space station because you don't have one because it has near zero impact for the household budget. And yes, your neighbour can work for you and you can work for your neighbour because principally every nation is alone on planet Earth!

Nationbuilding and 0% Unemployment

Lesson: We build a nation with 0% unemployment

We have a nation with people, say 100 million people.
Public services have a cost - say something x money.
Then we have the private sector - say generating something y money.
In this private sector, traditionally, we put in what we like by /taste/.
We start:
1. section,
Railroad company/-ies
Construction companies
Law firms
Accounting firms
Agricultural sector (possibly with plantations)
Aquacultural sector (we're lucky to have sea next to our EmployNation!)
Brewing companies
Soda companies
Tourism (raw - alpine sites with the whole set of ski slopes and other)
For beauty:
Tourism (by given nature, also wilderness by rainforests, like Kilimanjaro)
cont. (you get the idea, all company sectors possible around, also IT sector, say Hardware especially if not software, beginning with Linux core or more basic)

2. section,
We ask the big companies to settle with a factory or two in our EmployNation.
We go to Nike
We go to Apple
- Ford
- General Motors
- Mercedes
- some other car brands
cont. (you get the idea, all companies around)

So, could this be a template for our struggling 12 Mn European buddy of Greece? Possibly, you may say!

‪#‎nationbuilding‬ ‪#‎zerounemployment‬ ‪#‎fullemployment‬ ‪#‎tastefornation‬

Economy of Happiness - Relaunched

Starts:

Along with mHDI, respects to the HDI-inventor from Pakistan, I suggest that one starts to make a money-number on fairly immaterial concepts, such as (physical) security, ethical complacency, and mental order/happiness by scope, not "robotics", with (legal) free will and autonomy kept.

With this comes a "quantified" GDP value that economists can consider, also to the population at large, adding military/police forces/system calm to satisfy very-money-interested people, all money included (black money too?).

Where these costs are calculated to belong to the public budgets (state, regional, local) or the private ones, where these may be, is beyond me.

The idea is of course to add (physical) security aspects to a general view of economics, not necessarily leading to private police (like in San Franscisco in the 30s(?)). In writing this, we need to see that physical security adds some qualities to our lives and that these can be expressed just like other services are expressed in numbers, like the cleaning of hotel rooms. Thus, physical security can be part of a bigger picture of goverment responsibility and liability. Agree?

(Also consider the Greenspanism, the quantified/justified parts of household budgets and economy overall.)

Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!
The future looks really BRIGHT!

PS: To enter the 100% Society too.

Capital in the Twenty-First Century - The book from T. Piketty

Thomas Piketty has been mentioned by Fareed Zakaria on GPS and I agree. It's just to take this in straight!

Corruption and other crime is in all aspects so vastly present that to combat crime needs to take priority! However, one does not need to declare oneself a Socialist for this reason. The (blue, lighter or stronger) VICTORY over Marx is in every way fundamental and with Piketty's solution, as he writes, Leadership and Intelligence are either way ensured! We only become more lightly BLUE!

The way forward is to secure a BETTER World, ecologically and with less CRIME too!

Other than Marx, there are these other traditional values of family, monarchy, human rights, privacy, democracy etc. All of these have been successfully defended by Capitalism. The way from 10 000 BC and upto today, 2014, has been the development of natural morals, the ETHICS, from clan wars and barbarism to a civilised society of today!

The word from Piketty's book: Regulation!

A url link to Gurdian report on his book: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/may/02/thomas-piketty-capital-in-the-twenty-first-century-french-economist.
Thomas Piketty: the French economist bringing capitalism to book

Another url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx

The different story of unfolded Capitalism in history:
The Triangle Trade - Europe - Africa - USA (as account of the Human Being from this time)

The political map of this time, The Triangle Trade

The monarchies and the others

Industrial revolution

Establishment of the Workers' Movement

Establishment of the negotiating parties of working life

The fight for workers' rights!

Universal voting rights, men first and then women

1. World War

The New Deal

2. World War

UN

Further development of laws and regulations

Established mass education by law (time span)

Here and now!

The head of K. Marx (with NSDAP, Stalin and Mao) hangs by this as well as the accusations from the (Joseph) McCarthyism time:

"Gravestone for Communism (until Utopia)"

I find that capitalism is better at controlling corruption than communism. That is, capitalism is more fault tolerant. While communism almost demands that people are like angels, capitalism can deal with a relatively large amount of not so good people.

Besides, in capitalism people can settle with less and be pleased with it while those who want it can work themselves to death and enjoy their fortune from it. This is almost impossible in communism, I think.

I want to mention:

- communism focuses on work of people and this can be way harder to make a just issue of in that system

- capitalism focuses on money and money can be made to adjust for all kind of relationships, from capitalisation of ideas to the amount of stress from work

Who is supposed to kick the hardest work in communism without having advantages for doing it? If workload is supposed to be equal, should one make elaborate psychologies of work to make sure nobody stresses, carry more workload, than others? Communism seems to me to be more complex to incorporate.

Soviet Union has been marked by two very bad ideas: Communism and Atheism!

China is not any communist country anymore, mind you. It has officially described itself as socialist some years ago and even then their communism may just be a kind of "communism" through which their need for control in overcoming severe problems and a vast population may have called for it.

It's true that China has only one party, but they do elect electives to the "party congress" and I also happen to believe that there's more than 1 possible candidate in most or all of these elections to the "party congress" beside having the possibility to vote blank or not to vote at all, going into some kind of system opposition, trying to change the political machinery, at least!

The elections? You will have to check, but I think the last has been reported within a year or two. Thanks for asking the question, Wootah. One thing is for certain, China does not fulfill the the communist ideal of everyone being equally rich or poor, quite the opposite. There are quite large economic differences in China. It's true though that they have only one party and that this is typical for a communist country, perhaps even for a social one as they describe themselves as.

The type of democracy (in case it really is) is one that goes along a line of culture and a certain scope of politics and it is of this kind, I think a one-party democracy can be effective. That you want progress and control over this fast and steady and thus the political system is set up as it is. Remember that the Chinese political system is handling 1,2 Billion people and a good deal of these are quite poor! So what should one do? I think the Chinese have chosen a fine middle way, preserving own culture and emphasising the important aims beside of this.

You can look up yourselves the democracies of USA with its 310 million people and downwards...

As well (the above text has been edited from the source, Issues from the Internet, on this blog:

"I've earlier written these on [forum] where you can find the original writings. I find them to be so striking that I post them here as well:

[Dead for all foreseeable future?]

--------

Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!

The future looks really BRIGHT!

--------

Communism and ("pure") Socialism has a fundamental problem in accepting Human Rights (UDHR by UN) by their fanatical hunt for "equality ideal" (even when "equality" isn't further defined by them). Therefore, all Communistic groups (or thereof, Antifa?) can pack their things because they are in this always presenting themselves as liars on one level or another.

From a review of Klassekampen, a "Communistic"(?) newspaper in Norway, the original Norwegian version:
"Kommunisme og ("ren") Sosialisme har et fundamentalt problem med å akseptere Menneskerettighetene (UDHR ved FN) etter sin fanatiske jakt på "likhetsidealet" (uten at "likhet" er videre definert av dem). Derfor kan Klassekampen pakke sakene for på et nivå eller et annet så blir de dømt til å være løgnere!"

Heaven/Death as Definite Point of Calmness - Philosophy of Calmness

The greatest calmness is only achievable in Heaven, after death. Given this assured point of calm in Heaven there's a backward effect of calmness as you wait for Heaven and this is the calmness of LIFE!

(Philosophy of Calmness?)


(Repr.)

My Interest in Shinto, Bushido and the Hagakuré/Sun Tzu - A modern commentary to go?

In Bushido declaring to choose death in a choice between life and death, I think this must be understood as choosing death in Dying to Reject a Life that Is Deeply Sinful, i.e., a kind of parallel to Rejection of the Cardinal Sins by the Weapon.

It says, Bushido, that this choice arises "in the presence of Death", not in the joyful life, only. Equally so, Jihad stands more clear to the Christian mind in waging the religious life despite the many challenges (of violence, threats, corruption, other crime).

This means that any mentally pathological side to living life needs to be warned against and "fought", also with the weapon in hand, real, unarmed or metaphorically.

The Muslims on the other hand say that Christians are in "(metaphysical) global  Jihad" with the story of Jesus Christ, one that I have deep sympathies too.

Links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushido
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagakure
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinto
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_the_Dead
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Souls%27_Day
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Saints%27_Day

Note: I think there is a need to replace any voodoo suspicion in Ko-(Shinto) with a more spirited (Ko-)Shinto, one that's also more "flexible" in seeing a more lively life, afterlife and nature.

In siding with, note on religious symmetry, ecumenism and religious humanism, (Ko-)Shinto, you may want to take note of the "Maria Magdalena"/Mary Magdalene and

2 Corinthians 6:14-18 - Warning Against Idolatry (Idolatry = Failure to the path of Heaven, failure in terms of morality)

14 Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? 15 What harmony is there between Christ and Belial[a]? Or what does a believer have in common with an unbeliever? 16 What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols? For we are the temple of the living God. As God has said:
“I will live with them
and walk among them,
and I will be their God,
and they will be my people.”[b]

17 Therefore,
“Come out from them
and be separate,
says the Lord.
Touch no unclean thing,
and I will receive you.”[c]

18 And,
“I will be a Father to you,
and you will be my sons and daughters,
says the Lord Almighty.”[d]

(I've used the reference from New International Version (NIV) and www.biblegateway.com .)

Note also that, usually, the decent and morally straight are the ones who assaulted in the back so one needs "to sharpen the senses" and be ALERT in order for a dream of Utopia to come true!

(More may be coming...)

The National Parks and the Future – The Parks Become Wisely Old

In the spirit of national wilderness parks/areas/ranges (also with WWF and Greenpeace), I suggest concreted (on site, possibly) steel mantelled (“light”) tunneling of existing roads and rails through these “critical” areas in order to allow the wilderness animals and other (like insects) to CALM DOWN. Do you like it? Let’s do it!

(Remember that a WiFi-mast/tower can mean activity in two directions, one of them being “to chain animals” away from their natural freedom “to Darthmouth malpractice of insanity to nature”!)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tunel_en_Guanajuato.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Joralemon_Street_Tunnel_postcard,_1913.jpg

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunnel.

http://isisinform.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/tunnel.jpg

Source: http://www.isisinform.com/

One natural goal now must be to corroborate and “build” these natural parks/areas bigger by demolishing ALL human-made buildings and structures (radio-/transmitting-towers, roads, rails, ALL).

Failures of leadership, 2 cases to start plus one that we leave alone:

1. WWF, data-set: 1993 – 2014. Delivery on promise and agency: Nothing!
Premises/Quality criteria/Qualification:
1. Failure to curb overpopulation.
2. Failure to curb CO2 emissions.
3. Failure to introduce anti-overpopulation policies (1 child or 2 children, economic incentives to any other nation than China.
4. Failure to increase the total World-area of national parks beyond the number of 1999.
5. Failure to communicate the stress on animals by the oversized number of human beings on the planet.

2. Adolf Hitler, data-set, primary: 1933 – 1945. Havoc of an idiot!
Failures: the most a man can accomplish in dying to early!

(3. A man with a Blood-Whore (NO:Blod hore) problem of a nation down veneral south.)

Reminder. I'd like to remind the responsible parties how demoralising / stupid (stoopid) it appears when they can use 2 seconds to arrive at a sound conclusion and these "high" leaders "of honour" fail to do so in 20 years, even when it's their full-time job! What a signal to send to members and World in general!

Not only this, but also the trending "bad behaviour". That if one is suitably bad in the World, you can become something depending on your willingness...! What is "work code" in being wicked and what is work completed as expected...? "No, nobody knows!" As if one is willing to accept such an excuse! "Hasn't the salary been acceptable?"

Conclusion: We may be looking at a perfect storm here...! (Despite Pugwash movement too! By end of January, 2014, CO2-reading hits 397,80 ppm. Read about it on www.CO2now.org.)

You know, I'm speaking in terms of completeness, that no option toward the better is left out. This means that all sensible policies toward sound ecology should be put into effect, such as the common economic incentives for nudging the population in the right, ecological direction.

The World in Human Rights - UDHR - ECHR

The Human Rights, most explicitly, by UDHR, minimally, are now everywhere in the World with a possible exception of North Korea.

Russia is with the Council of Europe and USA has still New York state with UN as one of theirs.

EU is hosting the court of ECtHR in France. The idiots have fallen off the stairs to every university in the World, at least theoretically, such that absurd objections to evident, straight in the face truths and their cases are no longer "cool to utter", even if you have been a 10 people worth cannibal under police corruption or police states (huh, do they exist?)!

So here we are with a Worldscene, with some small exceptions, ALL HUMAN RIGHTS! Legal duties have become definite and absolute under the lie detector investigations and "police questioning rooms" on the good side, carrying out the work according to procedure.

For USA despite its "Onslow" speed (sorry for the Picket Fences reference from Britain) in reacting to New START Treaty and getting it through, here are some Human Rights references for them (also outside Scientology context, "so that they no longer need to feel that they have to present them, in a special way to some people"):

Government Organisation by http://www.humanrights.gov/contact-us/
To Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/HumanRightsgov
State Department by http://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/
Organisation more by http://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/human_rights_in_the_united_states
Link 2, http://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/
Human Rights Watch by http://www.hrw.org/
By Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Watch
Their email: HumanRightsWebsite@state.gov.

Additional:
http://www.humanrights.gov/2013/11/12/ambassador-power-on-human-rights-council-elections/ if you bother to read it.

Note: There's nothing wrong with Scientology presenting Human Rights, but, please, can't they add the UDHR reference for "Christ's sake"?

This makes me certain that we in Europe have been entertaining idiot politicians for a very long time, "and with a larger portion of them failing to read primary literature" if not the Bible directly.

We need to get our legs together people!

(Try to pull that face in USA!)

Over lunacy work for Human Rights and more (Justice, the good causes):

To say that legislation is passed against human rights or to subvert people is to be crazy in the work to advocate Human Rights (UDHR by UN).

Legislation can never be passed to protect, defend or cover for crime because this constitutes crime/corruption against own population, violates much international convention and agreement and does not pass the very formulation requirements themselves in being general.

The pro-Human Rights combatting must take place by combatting corruption and crime in general, that ICCt is correctly used and supported.

So to add, "heh-heh-heh, also in Norway", corrupt lawyers are very much a problem, as much as a psychiatric corrupt-minds-issue, when they in fact are relied on and are vital in offering legal services to the public as well as leading the police forces through the daily work.

What's next or what's the standing on the legal systems throughout the World? I don't know. One plain example: is the torture, also in terms of estimates, correctly reported? Also by the most important news-places, also by the most important authorities.

"Fun fact": The lyrics of "living on the edge" should have read, We're living on the edge when everybody should go up and nobody down [in terms of justice...] - emphasis on use of "should".

The Artificial Language for Linguistic Exactness - The Craziness of Philosophy - The Philosophy of Language

The artificial language in terms of completeness, aside from the use that the existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations give us is provided by,

connectives: AND, OR, NEGATION, CONDITIONAL, BICONDITIONAL (the usual), + the ones for quantification logic (for all and some, also one) and the two for modal logic (possible and necessary)
defining the entities: entities but perhaps not numbered
consistency: consistency takes as usual the premeditation almost to the point of planning. Being the De Dicto gives me a step ahead, but not any significant.

This enters in addition to Performative Utterances and Scientific Papers (from "Issues from the Internet") where exactly the above existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations are providing the necessary effectivity beyond misunderstandings, at least in a pragmatic way, given these texts.

While this solves the formal requirements set out for this project, the solution by providing the support for "existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations" is sufficient enough, even though it is simple to say to it, accounting all sorts of feats, from landing on the moon to the rest!
Tip: check for all papers/texts and books from the 80s and up. In addition, Tarski's sentence, ""the snow is white" implying the snow is white" gives the preceding peek for this clarification.

The sentence by Tarski, ""the snow is white" implying the snow is white" is admitted its strength based on the fact that snow is in fact "detected"/"found" in nature by its whiteness. Therefore, the technical, chemical term for snow, adding the physical environment as required is exactly as Tarski says it, "snow is white"!

The former, as addition to "Performative Utterances and Scientific Papers" by explaining my support of Artifical Language, an academic activity with only formal gain, possibly:
"The further development of my position on "Artificial Language Philosophy" is this simplicity, that more or less settles it, is that as the logical connectives enter the artificial language in non-contradictory way and maintaining the strict logical requirements of being consistent, the logical connectives can be read aloud like this fx. "the logical connective NOT" to [entity] "by parantheses" and reading onwards and that this, principally makes Carnap's project crossing the finishing line! Thank you for following me through!"

World Peace?

To the UN Security Council:

This is the suggestion for a statement to the World in providing a reliable signal of leadership "to the acting parties toward a better World".

For example: "That we, UN Sec. Council, want to declare that unjustified surveillance of other countries need to END! That we, by this, want to emphasise, also by military power Worldwide, that all nations are entitled their own free sky and destinies. That this person in Afghanistan with an AK-47 (part of Afghan military) represents NO terrorism to the World, in particular not to USA, and that we think that a kind of military "dream" has come through where the democratic nations are no longer threatened by other military powers, and true, we are now down to more basic duties, acting as citizens to oversee the progress of Human Rights (UDHR etc.) and the improvement of legal systems everywhere, also supported by economic/financial progress everywhere too!"

Good?

--------

This includes the argument for Abolition of All "Justified" Torture under democratic governments, universally. Url: http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2013/01/the-call-for-total-abolition-of-torture.html - Header: The Call for the Total Abolition of Torture, time: SATURDAY, 19 JANUARY 2013.

The Hypothetico-Deductive Method (HDM) and the Scientific Method - The Noir: Have it from me if you like...

The Hypothetico-Deductive Method (HDM) is a kind of minimal scientific method. Not only this, but it ensures the necessary requirements in place in order to produce a reliable result inside the experiment/discovery context where the procedures are clear and replicable.

The listing by HDM:
* the method for experiment or discovery
* the means to experiment or discovery, whether lab apparatus or satellite in space
* a data-set that the above produces with the observations to go
* the logics involved to determine success or failure, two used, Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens
* the theory/hypothesis part for a possible success, in giving the set-up an aim, a description, a constructive intention

- then it's to go ahead with plans.

The result from the HDM set-up can be focused diversely in that it holds rich possibilities for both descriptions or, more luckily, one identifies natural laws, like with the classical physics, after Newton especially.

While scientific method in the past, before mid-80s, has been characterised by much (confusing)  description, HDM cuts this down to the bone. With HDM describing the minimal set of scientific method the World now gets better grip on science and can start think more constructively on the requirements, such as the theory/hypothesis part, the experiment part, possible outcome of a given set-up, either for discovery as with the Hubble Telescope or for the experiment set-up, plain as in chemistry and physics, or more delicate as in psychology or other social science.

The science has become steady, the serious people are easily relating to the science set-ups and the failures are more easily observed after the introduction of HDM. The World is picking up pace, also to the benefit for democracy and various health effects while the excuses are becoming fewer for liars.

(With success all the way from early on in the 80s up to today, 2013. Lea/Olsnes-Lea signing out.)

--------

The Logics is only the Modus Ponens (for success, confirmation of existence) and the Modus Tollens (for failure, the lack of existence). Both types can be set up before the plans are carried out.

Modus Ponens, sententially:
P → Q
P
Q - Conclusion. Confirmation made.

Modus Tollens, sententially:
P → Q
~Q
~P - Conclusion. The lack of existence, broadly.

Some links, 4:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothetico-deductive_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_ponens
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_tollens

Note: The importance of the experiment is great. So great that if you do it properly you will not see any counter experiments confirmed because what you have proved with it is definite. Thus, seeing "features/laws of nature" become properly expressed is a matter of writing into eternity. Therefore, Confirmation is stronger than what is popularly written because the experiments/discoveries should describe something fundamental.

Otherwise, please see "THE POWER OF A SINGLE SPAN OF TIME - AN INSTANCE - CONTRARY TO HUME ON INDUCTION - THE REFUTATION OF THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTION" by https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2011/08/philosophical-notes-of-intellectual.html#PSST.