This is the defence of Qualia, Solipsism and Contextualism with a bit of Ego in it all.
So let's assume that the impression of nature, of beauty, of colours have qualia to them in such a fashion that context of them in the brain, in the soul (that I think exists) makes them special to the person in space and time by the unique experiences they make in a person's mentality. This creates a special kind of solipsism as well such that the true magnificence of experiences overall has this subtle, non-investigative quality of person that is firmly set by context, a contextualism in the brain, in the soul. Sure, overt feelings are now fairly easy to determine by for example fMRI and other. But this is not the issue, it is the depth of contextuality in the mind that makes those other qualities of feelings inaccessible overall because they are impossible to describe and impossible to entirely investigate.
The mystery of the World, one type of religious experience, "God's temple" in us in the grand World, much stronger too with the enhancement of science and questions over existence. So I say that to live is to have qualia, solipsism and contextualism in this fashion, the imprint on each and every one by the World as a whole!
Good life, everyone!
Note: One account of Qualia can be found in Philosophy of Mind, 2nd ed. by Jaegwon Kim, chapter 8, for instance.
Thursday, 14 June 2018
Friday, 2 March 2018
On the Red-Blue Divide of Politics - The Left and Right Turns to Centrist and Right?
I see no opportunity for Red parties to hold on to the Socialism or the Socialist-Red (please, remember Nazi-Socialism). Their next move should be to declare themselves Purple and turn to Centrist politics.
It is the Socialists and Communists who are known to cause genocides. They have been quick to say "common good" without defining the Ethics and living the morality for it! We do have a tax-system (VAT and income tax etc.) that is meant to pay for public services. We have indeed the Democracy to provide the sensitivity for decision-making and I do not see how their insistence on "social justice" is supposed to be so right without the very justice itself. Is then the constant citation of social justice just an excuse for furthering the attack on humanity?
Mao Zedong, Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, whether Stalinism or Ukraine "mass death". You should know what I mean, what I imply and that lying publicly is going to be much harder in the time to come! Especially when facing the lawful scrutiny! Reds, be gone!
Ukraine and the genocide by rulers of Soviet Union: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor.
The Israeli parties have been divided for a while already by blue, blueish and purple colours. Indeed, they have been the first in the World to "abolish" the Red side of politics. Check out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Israel.
Of the colour red, see also The Masque of the Red Death (The Terror of the Red Mask) and State-terror in France. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Masque_of_the_Red_Death by Edgar Allan Poe.
Atheist North Korea seems to be no bragging post either.
Red or not, not really religious people as such, I believe, committing sadism as part of genocide, the genocide of the Armenians by the Ottoman empire: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_of_Union_and_Progress. At least there was dictatorship by ideals of Germany and Japan.
Either way, my opinion is here for you to read!
It is the Socialists and Communists who are known to cause genocides. They have been quick to say "common good" without defining the Ethics and living the morality for it! We do have a tax-system (VAT and income tax etc.) that is meant to pay for public services. We have indeed the Democracy to provide the sensitivity for decision-making and I do not see how their insistence on "social justice" is supposed to be so right without the very justice itself. Is then the constant citation of social justice just an excuse for furthering the attack on humanity?
Mao Zedong, Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, whether Stalinism or Ukraine "mass death". You should know what I mean, what I imply and that lying publicly is going to be much harder in the time to come! Especially when facing the lawful scrutiny! Reds, be gone!
Ukraine and the genocide by rulers of Soviet Union: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor.
The Israeli parties have been divided for a while already by blue, blueish and purple colours. Indeed, they have been the first in the World to "abolish" the Red side of politics. Check out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Israel.
Of the colour red, see also The Masque of the Red Death (The Terror of the Red Mask) and State-terror in France. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Masque_of_the_Red_Death by Edgar Allan Poe.
Atheist North Korea seems to be no bragging post either.
Red or not, not really religious people as such, I believe, committing sadism as part of genocide, the genocide of the Armenians by the Ottoman empire: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_of_Union_and_Progress. At least there was dictatorship by ideals of Germany and Japan.
Either way, my opinion is here for you to read!
Tuesday, 30 January 2018
Scent from Mars, after NASA, Consequences here on Earth
Scent from Mars (after NASA), consequences here on Earth:
* All the World's scents, perfumes and other available on the internet, transferred to a bluetooth patch on the skin of the nose by signals that have been converted to neurological format
* The possibility to present these neurological scents corresponding to a film or audio tape so to provide a more real aspect to the film or audio tape. There are several ways to do this, cinemas may have a server that has "scents" on it that the audience must log on to and transfer to their bluetooth patches by their smartphones
Scent from Mars by radio-detection (example: "radio-pin/stick" of food industry), converted to neurological signals fitted to the nose. Conversion of signals here on Earth: radiology, one perfume, check on nose neurology from top of nose as the scent is inhaled, then template of radiology to nose, generic. Then the SUPER!
Complexities of the brain do not enter play because one is only looking for the "traffic", the neurology to the center of smell in the brain through the nose bridge, right under the skin. So one makes a template according to this traffic by using this perfume here on Earth and thus one generates a so-called template that's generic for all scents to the brain through the nerves in the nose bridge.
There is opportunity for radio-stick to act as a ("video"-) "camera" for scents so that a lover can send one's scent to the other or any other "crazy" sending and receiving of scents, wildlife speaking and so on.
Searching for investors in the range of 10 Million NOK, initially, for the first 2 years. Interested? Phone: +47 95287964 Email: LukasFOlsnesLea@gmail.com Also presence on social media by my name.
One presentation in Norwegian and English:
Jeg har en diger idé som jeg med dette gir dere sjansen til å være med som investorer for.
Dette er en "once-in-a-lifetime" mulighet og slike kommer sjelden to ganger.
Hva som må utvikles:
* Applikasjon (konvertering av radio-signatur fra luktkilde til nevrologiske, kompatible signaler, bibliotek/lukt-database og presentasjon, interaktive muligheter)
* Bluetooth-forbindelse med tilhørende "neselapp" som overfører ferdig forberedte nevrologiske signaler fra bruker-enheten til denne "neselappen" som fører til at man faktisk kjenner den aktuelle lukten man vil lukte
* Radio-"sticken"/radio-pennen vil måtte utvikles med hensyn på å spille inn radio-signatur av den aktuelle lukten
* Noe server utvikling for bruk til applikasjon, egentlig standard arbeid
Foruten at NASA fører lukt-signalene til jorden, beskjed er allerede sent, så er dette en strålende verdensmulighet for alt som finnes av lukt i hele verden. Liksom iTunes eller andre bedrifter så er det åpenbare samarbeid med parfymerier over hele verden per denne eksklusive idé!
Dere har også sjansen til å bruke min idé og mitt navn i markedsføring og det kan virkelig også være noe, tenker jeg.
Så, er dere med? Jeg tenker meg 10 millioner NOK i investorstøtte i første omgang for neste 2 år hvor rapportering finner sted løpende, som dere ønsker det, egentlig.
(First to Facebook, 3 January, two days ago.)
It should be obvious that the scents can be "live stream" as the digital scents have all the usual formats included.
"One frame", whatever it means, may not be detectable to the senses and is not considered "very" useful. So the recording of the scents should have some length at least.
To USA
Please, just develop the idea and make it happen, all the way to the market! I see no possibility for the work getting done "here" in an upright manner!
Alright? Scents of the World, hurray!
(This is indeed another lesson for those countries which are without the "revolvers and pepperspray" + 2 more for all.)
Good?
(Time-stamps are by the comments below as well as in the comments.)
(Time-stamps are by the comments below as well as in the comments.)
Saturday, 2 December 2017
The Silent Genocides of the World Today - I accuse all corrupt governments - The duties, the systems...
(In Norwegian for now. Please use Google Translate or other)
Norges stille folkemord idag, nå i 2017. Det kan med system vitenskapen med rette påstås at det skjer et folkemord til, akkurat nå, med alle de systemer som er virksomme i Norge i 2017 og etter år 2000, internett inkludert.
Norges ledere! Jeg anklager dere for folkemord i Norge for å være årsaken til at 9120 (570 x 16, fom. 2001 - tom. 2016) mennesker har dødd ved idiotisk lederskap. Dette er ikke alle heller. Man har diverse forsvinninger og "andre drap" å legge til også!
Hvis man legger historiene til folk som har tatt sitt liv til grunn og analyserer disse ved system vitenskap om barnevern, politi, lærere, alle helsetjenester osv. (også media selv, også distriktsmedia) så kommer vi til at disse menneskene har dødd som følge av korrupt lederskap typisk sett ved grådighet og ondskap som motivasjon.
Igjen, altså, Norges ledere, regjeringen Solberg, først og fremst, jeg anklager dere for folkemord i Norge idag, 01.12.2017.
For å si det med en film, Collateral (2004): "Vincent! Go f*ck yourself!" - Det må tas grep! Våre ledere må stilles til ansvar for der det burde være systemkunnskap på plass for å gjøre Verden/Norge stadig bedre. Det holder ikke lenger å si at "det sulter mennesker i Afrika!"
(For min egen del: her sitter jeg etter bidrag til Verden og Norge i 35 år og f*en ikke enda er det tatt grep! Der sitter de! Hva f*en GJØR de?)
Det sies at hvert selvmord, generelt, har 10 - 20 selvmordsforsøk foran seg. Hvor mange desperate rop om hjelp? Hvor mange kontakter til ulike hjelpetelefoner, advokater, lærere, skolehelsetjenester, kommunefolk, Advokatforeningen, Amnesty Norge, politiet, foresatte, slektninger, osv.? Hvor mange "offisielle" innleggelser/formelle kontakter med helsetjenester?
Som sagt, å ta livet sitt tror jeg grunner i de mest alvorlige forhold og kommer ikke ut av det blå, ut av tynne luften! Produsenter av overgrepsmateriale fra barn og andre og sodomistiske "turister" gjør ikke saken lettere. Sårbarheten er der for de det gjelder i lys av det harde livet ved kriminalitet, først og fremst.
Litt historie
Så jeg sitter der på lesesalen på Eilert S. VGS og har egentlig gitt opp å gjøre det bra på skolen avsluttende året, 1993/1994.
Så tar jeg frem SSBs årbok/årsrapport fra 1993 av hyllene og leser litt om selvmordsstatistikk. Der står det under 1988 nesten 100 flere selvmord enn for de andre årene.
Siden har det slått meg: "politikode" for 1 rettssystem, Nein via EN: nine, Heil Hitler via tallkode 88 (18 for Adolf Hitler, f.eks.)!
Men ikke sant: jeg har aldri rett! Jeg kan ingenting! Tydelig realitetsbrist som psykiatrien raskt er ute med! Ingen j*vla autoritet som helst i samfunnet! (Men på den skjulte siden, mye sugling over min person likevel...)
Det er riktig, jeg leser også samfunnskunnskap (SK3) dette året!
Dette er alvorlige anklager, men dette handler om over 9000 (ni tusen) menneskeliv gjennom den moderne tiden etter 2000.
Dette er for viktig til å la være! Jeg betrakter meg selv som svært pro-aktiv så det er riktig, jeg kommer ikke til å sitte stille og se på! Som jo er det riktige.
Når jeg skriver alle selvmord så vil jeg gjerne være sikker på at jeg treffer. Litt som å bruke en hagle på jakt. Husk at jeg nevner forsvinninger også ved Elys registeret (som nå "selvfølgelig" holdes skjult).
"Etterlysningsregisteret (Elys) føres av politiet og ble opprettet i 1988 for å erstatte Polititidendes funksjon når det gjaldt etterlysning av personer, biler og båter/båtmotorer. Det er ikke allmenn innsynsrett. Registeret er tilgjengelig for alle med politimyndighet."
Jeg skal selvfølgelig bygge ut min argumentasjon, gjennom mange år om det trengs! Når det er sagt så håper jeg med dette at (mange) flere kan komme med bidrag til min side av argumentasjonen og en del ved det å skrive offentlig er selvfølgelig å skape både diskusjon og veier til rettferdighet ved å ansvarliggjøre lederne i vårt samfunn. De kan altså ikke bare sitte der og begå pliktbrudd i jobben sin og tro at det ikke får konsekvenser. Igjen altså, over 9000+++ menneskeliv i den moderne tiden hvor jo trafikkdødsfall får høyeste prioritet ved systematisk arbeid! Du kan jo finne tallene for de selv! Så, er ikke de bevis for at systematisk tilnærming virker?!!! JA! (For svarte!) Så igjen: hva med selvmordene og en del av disse forsvinningene enn si "andre tilfeller her og der", ulykker eller hva enn?
Så denne spede begynnelse... Jeg har altså sett på dette over lengre tid "og kan være kjent for mine bidrag (i Verden?) her og der"! Uansett, det skal ikke stå på meg! Jeg skal gi alt jeg kan!
En "liten" ting til: før i tiden, ved SSB (Stat. Sentral Byrå), så førte man opp 5 åringer til å ha tatt selvmord. "Av diverse grunner så gjør man ikke det lenger." Tror du virkelig det var godteriet som manglet? Kanksje ikke eller NEI!!!
Det er ingen som sier at etnisitet må være et premiss for folkemord. Ingen som sjekket hvem armenerne var da ottomanerne drepte dem og ingen som sjekket hvem ukrainerne var da Sovjetunionen drepte dem. Å kalle dette for folkemord er absolutt på sin plass, folkerettslig/rettslig/juridisk/etisk/moralsk (og alle de andre ordene).
Så: min argumentasjon inngår i "Emancipation 2.0", et nytt nivå for frigjøringen av "mennesket" generalt, at man kan være hyggelig og samtidig føle seg trygg så og si. Derfor synes jeg det er stygt eller svært uønsket at man er uærlig/"uærlig" i diskusjonen her. Dette kan få svære ringvirkninger i Verden for dette absolutt gode formål. Kan jo ikke argumentere for at folk skal ha det forferdelig, ikke sant?
"Kom igjen, folkens! Vær litt med da! Nå gjør vi det! Vi bryter ned ondskap og forhindrer at folk "terroriseres" i sin lovlydighet (karakterdrap en masse?)!"
Man er gjerne ivrig når man legger krav på arbeidsutførelse til vanlige folk i fabrikkene eller andre steder som helst. Nå er det på tide å sette de samme krav til jobbutførelse til disse viktige menneskene som jo gjerne skryter av ansvaret sitt når de sosialiserer! "Jeg er statsminister, jeg!" Titler skal det være og veldig fine også.
Selvfølgelig, Stalin (Russland/Sovjetunionen) og Mao (Kina) er jo beryktet for å drepe eget folk. Absolutt. Jeg er overbevist. Våre ledere må stilles til ansvar!
Gitt at det er ganske rutine å anonymisere selvmordsrapportene og forsåvidt å kategorisere disse, hvorfor kan vi ikke i grove trekk få vite hva som gjør at folk tar livet sitt? Hvor mange av dem har kontaktet politiet, Amnesty International Norge osv. osv.? Og her har man selvmordsforskere og psykiatere og psykologer gjennom år ut og år inn, tiår, og f*en ikke om de kan gi noen stødig rapport om disse menneskene (9120 døde). Hva skal det bety? Hvorfor er de så elendige om å ta opp omstendighetene for disse menneskene?
For ordens skyld: denne diskusjonen dreier som om hvorvidt Regjeringen Solberg kan dømmes for Folkemord på gruppen av mennesker gitt ved selvmordene, (en del av) forsvinningene og "noen andre dødsfall" etter år 2000! Jeg påstår altså at denne gruppen har blitt latt i stikken og at rapportene fra vårt samfunn om disse dødsfallene viser grov forsømmelse "i tjenesten/embetet" slik at tiltale for folkemord er på sin plass. Bevis vil bli bygget på grunnlag av system-kapasitet/system-muligheter/system-betraktninger i vitenskapen rettsvitenskap, medisinsk vitenskap osv.
Slik som jeg ser det, også ved meg selv gjennom 35 år "uten post, epost og telefoner" ("kinesisk fengsel/husarrest (detention)") så har Regjeringen begått mened! (Litt synd at dette skjer med en borgerlig regjering, men slik er det. De burde vite at jeg har vært og er en betydningsfull person. De kan ikke tilgis.)
Som det skrives over, så tenker jeg å bygge saken opp på grunnlag av suksessen med å bekjempe trafikkdødsfall systematisk. Gjerne når det skjer en dødsulykke i trafikken så blir Biltilsynet koblet inn for å gjøre en grundig rapport og de blir gjort ansvarlige for dette.
Men hva er etterretteligheten i saker som gjelder selvmord og forsvinninger? Jeg ser ikke noe spesielt for de i det hele tatt. De bare "forsvinner", liksom, kanskje også fordi de blir sett på som tapere i samfunnet hvor jo helst kriminelle skal bli tatt vare på: ikke for lange fengselsstraffer og Wayback til jobb og leilighet igjen. De kriminelle mister jo ikke livet, de blir ikke invalidisert, de er "bare hodeløse", de. Så våre ledere/politikere må bli stilt til ansvar for at det ikke foreligger en systematisk bekjempelse av selvmord og for at ikke noe ansvarlig "Biltilsyn" blir koblet inn når selvmord eller "stygge" forsvinninger skjer!
Siden den norske definisjonen av korrupsjon er så snever og på en måte så "skeiv" fordi "vi har ikke mottatt penger, de har jo begått selvmord og da har de jo lite, vi er jo politikere"!
Så til Verdensspråket engelsk som jo gjerne er litt bedre:
https://www.google.no/search?q=corruption&rlz=1C1ASUM_noNO670NO670&oq=corruption:
corruption
kəˈrʌpʃ(ə)n/Send
noun
noun: corruption; plural noun: corruptions
1.
dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery.
"the journalist who wants to expose corruption in high places"
synonyms:dishonesty, dishonest dealings, unscrupulousness, deceit, deception, duplicity, double-dealing, fraud, fraudulence, misconduct, lawbreaking, crime, criminality, delinquency, wrongdoing, villainy; More
antonyms:honesty
the action or effect of making someone or something morally depraved.
"the corruption of youth was a powerful motif"
synonyms:sin, sinfulness, ungodliness, unrighteousness, profanity, impiety, impurity; More
antonyms:morality, purity
2.
the process by which a word or expression is changed from its original state to one regarded as erroneous or debased.
"a record of a word's corruption"
synonyms: alteration, falsification, doctoring, manipulation, manipulating, fudging, adulteration, debasement, degradation, abuse, subversion, misrepresentation, misapplication; rarevitiation
"these figures have been subject to corruption"
the process by which a computer database or program becomes debased by alteration or the introduction of errors.
"this procedure creates a temporary file to prevent accidental corruption"
og 2 andre linker:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corruption
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption
For "corrupt mind", se denne linken:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/corrupted + mind
Jeg har også undersøkt "ødelagte sinn" på andre måter:
Mask of Sanity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mask_of_Sanity
https://www.amazon.com/Mask-Sanity-Attempt-Psychopathic-Personality/dp/0962151904
Jeg har også tenkt på "Dr. Mengele Club" som ide til film over "utdannede mennesker med medisinsk kompetanse" som driver og torturerer og dreper alle slags mennesker, også barn.
Dr. Mengele er en historisk person fra Nazi-Tyskland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_Mengele
Videre: Selvmord deles opp i 2 grupper: 1. de som er på slutten av livet enten ved alderdom eller dødelig sykdom og ønsker å dø en verdig død og 2. de som under kriminelle forhold (overgrep, incest, vold, tortur, mobbing osv.) lever for vanskelige liv slik at de søker å avslutte sitt eget liv.
Den 1. gruppen er grei. Den er ikke et problem, ikke etisk/moralsk ihvertfall.
Det er den 2. gruppen jeg ser på spesielt og hvor man har kontaktet ulike mennesker mange ganger for å få hjelp til å få slutt på forhold som man i forhold til loven er garantert hjelp, dvs. ved Menneskerettighetsloven, straffeloven osv.
Som det står over: "Det sies at hvert selvmord, generelt, har 10 - 20 selvmordsforsøk foran seg. Hvor mange desperate rop om hjelp? Hvor mange kontakter til ulike hjelpetelefoner, advokater, lærere, skolehelsetjenester, kommunefolk, Advokatforeningen, Amnesty Norge, politiet, foresatte, slektninger, osv.? Hvor mange "offisielle" innleggelser/formelle kontakter med helsetjenester?"
"Som sagt, å ta livet sitt tror jeg grunner i de mest alvorlige forhold og kommer ikke ut av det blå, ut av tynne luften! Produsenter av overgrepsmateriale fra barn og andre og sodomistiske "turister" gjør ikke saken lettere. Sårbarheten er der for de det gjelder i lys av det harde livet ved kriminalitet, først og fremst."
Da er oppgaven ved systematisk kamp mot selvmord og ("noen") forsvinninger og noen andre drap at man sørger for en strammere disiplin mot de tjenester hvor oppgaven er nettopp å hjelpe disse sårbare menneskene som står i fare for å ta selvmord. Jeg ser jo at dette fort blir en kamp mot en type korrupsjon (se engelsk definisjon) i tjenesten, men ærlig talt, noen må vite at disse menneskene tar livet sitt hvis de allerede har prøvd å ta livet sitt 10 - 20 ganger og vært i kontakt med ulike mennesker 50 ganger, mer eller mindre, og fremdeles ikke får hjelp med støtte i Norges lover å få slutt på de forhold som leder til deres selvmordssituasjon.
Eksempel: La oss ta et "feil" eksempel: en pasient har opplevd mye kriminalitet og får ikke hjelp av politiet, men blir puttet inn i psykiatri gjentatte ganger for selvmordstanker, depresjon og angst. Denne personen har kontaktet ulike mennesker mange ganger for å få rettslig hjelp ift. politi, kommune, skole, overgripere osv. slik at lidelsene slutter. Dette skjer ikke og personen tar livet sitt. I dette eksempelet skjer det heller ingen etterkontroll fra myndigheters side eller evnt. tilsyn som et slags "Selvmordstilsyn" liksom Biltilsynet gjør etterkontroll ved trafikkulykker og spesielt trafikkdødsfall.
Dette "Selvmordstilsynet" kan man tenke seg har myndighet til å gå inn i hvert eneste tilfelle og ta ut tiltale for korrupsjon/brudd på tjenesteplikten i jobben der hvor man ikke har brydd seg med å gi mennesker i en selvmordssituasjon tilstrekkelig hjelp. Idag er det jo sånn at selvmordstallene bare rapporteres og det er det. Man får egentlig ikke noen systematisk arbeid mot selvmord av flere grunner. Slik som at selvmordskandidatene har levd under korrupsjon/brudd på tjenesteplikten i jobben i lengre eller kortere tid. Hvis noen har tatt kontakt ulike steder 50 ganger så vil "Selvmordstilsynet" kunne gå inn og sjekke disse ulike stedene og alle 50 ganger kontakten har funnet sted.
På denne måten kan man forbedre rettssystemet flere nivå oppover og få til bedre rapportering til samfunnet forøvrig når og hvorfor et selvmord har funnet sted.
Dermed slipper man å tenke på at eneste mulighet er "å låse selvmordskandidatene inne" for å hindre selvmord.
Bare så det er sagt. Disse forhold skal jeg forfølge "helt hjem"! ("The hunt is on!")
Load up on guns
Bring your friends
It's fun to lose and to pretend
She's overboard, self assured
Oh no I know, a dirty word
Hello, hello, hello, how low [x3]
Hello, hello, hello
With the lights out, it's less dangerous
Here we are now, entertain us
I feel stupid and contagious
Here we are now, entertain us
A mulatto, an Albino
A mosquito, my libido, yeah
Hey, yay
I'm worse at what I do best
And for this gift, I feel blessed
Our little group has always been
And always will until the end
Hello, hello, hello, how low [x3]
Hello, hello, hello
With the lights out, it's less dangerous
Here we are now, entertain us
I feel stupid and contagious
Here we are now, entertain us
A mulatto, an Albino
A mosquito, my libido, yeah
Hey, yay
And I forget just why I taste
Oh yeah, I guess it makes me smile
I found it hard, it was hard to find
Oh well, whatever, nevermind
Hello, hello, hello, how low [x3]
Hello, hello, hello
With the lights out, it's less dangerous
Here we are now, entertain us
I feel stupid and contagious
Here we are now, entertain us
A mulatto, an Albino
A mosquito, my libido
A denial, A denial, A denial, A denial, A denial
A denial, A denial, A denial, A denial
Norges stille folkemord idag, nå i 2017. Det kan med system vitenskapen med rette påstås at det skjer et folkemord til, akkurat nå, med alle de systemer som er virksomme i Norge i 2017 og etter år 2000, internett inkludert.
Norges ledere! Jeg anklager dere for folkemord i Norge for å være årsaken til at 9120 (570 x 16, fom. 2001 - tom. 2016) mennesker har dødd ved idiotisk lederskap. Dette er ikke alle heller. Man har diverse forsvinninger og "andre drap" å legge til også!
Hvis man legger historiene til folk som har tatt sitt liv til grunn og analyserer disse ved system vitenskap om barnevern, politi, lærere, alle helsetjenester osv. (også media selv, også distriktsmedia) så kommer vi til at disse menneskene har dødd som følge av korrupt lederskap typisk sett ved grådighet og ondskap som motivasjon.
Igjen, altså, Norges ledere, regjeringen Solberg, først og fremst, jeg anklager dere for folkemord i Norge idag, 01.12.2017.
For å si det med en film, Collateral (2004): "Vincent! Go f*ck yourself!" - Det må tas grep! Våre ledere må stilles til ansvar for der det burde være systemkunnskap på plass for å gjøre Verden/Norge stadig bedre. Det holder ikke lenger å si at "det sulter mennesker i Afrika!"
Til sammenligning kalles det folkemord når det dør 8000 mennesker i Srebrenica!
Om system på engelsk: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System.
Selvmordene (tenk mellom år 2000 og 2017): http://statistikkbank.fhi.no/dar/.
Registre fra politi, psykiatri, Advokatforeningen, Justisdepartementet, Helsedepartementet, Amnesty International ("som jo beskytter Menneskerettighetene"), kommuner, fastlegene, sykehusene og evnt. media. Dere skjønner sikkert tegninga!
19.01.12 19:55 her på VGD skrev jeg Rettssak mot staten for forfølgelse med selvmord.. - http://vgd.no/samfunn/jus/tema/1698925/tittel/rettssak-mot-staten-for-forfoelgelse-med-selvmord/innlegg/38113979/.
Videre: det ble diskutert noe om søksmålene mot Justisdepartementet for en tid siden, MEN hvor er mediaomtalen, enn fra "vårt kjære NRK" og hvem er menneskene som har fremsatt disse søksmålene? Hvor er disse tallene å finne? Hvor blir innføringen av løgndetektorer (AVATAR) av? (For politi, domstoler og Spesialenheten for politisaker)
Hvor lenge skal man finne seg i disse j*vla hodeløse "eksperter og ledere" før det skjer noe? Har ingen noe ansvar som helst?
Det sies at hvert selvmord, generelt, har 10 - 20 selvmordsforsøk foran seg. Hvor mange desperate rop om hjelp? Hvor mange kontakter til ulike hjelpetelefoner, advokater, lærere, skolehelsetjenester, kommunefolk, Advokatforeningen, Amnesty Norge, politiet, foresatte, slektninger, osv.? Hvor mange "offisielle" innleggelser/formelle kontakter med helsetjenester?
Som sagt, å ta livet sitt tror jeg grunner i de mest alvorlige forhold og kommer ikke ut av det blå, ut av tynne luften! Produsenter av overgrepsmateriale fra barn og andre og sodomistiske "turister" gjør ikke saken lettere. Sårbarheten er der for de det gjelder i lys av det harde livet ved kriminalitet, først og fremst.
Litt historie
Så jeg sitter der på lesesalen på Eilert S. VGS og har egentlig gitt opp å gjøre det bra på skolen avsluttende året, 1993/1994.
Så tar jeg frem SSBs årbok/årsrapport fra 1993 av hyllene og leser litt om selvmordsstatistikk. Der står det under 1988 nesten 100 flere selvmord enn for de andre årene.
Siden har det slått meg: "politikode" for 1 rettssystem, Nein via EN: nine, Heil Hitler via tallkode 88 (18 for Adolf Hitler, f.eks.)!
Men ikke sant: jeg har aldri rett! Jeg kan ingenting! Tydelig realitetsbrist som psykiatrien raskt er ute med! Ingen j*vla autoritet som helst i samfunnet! (Men på den skjulte siden, mye sugling over min person likevel...)
Det er riktig, jeg leser også samfunnskunnskap (SK3) dette året!
Dette er alvorlige anklager, men dette handler om over 9000 (ni tusen) menneskeliv gjennom den moderne tiden etter 2000.
Dette er for viktig til å la være! Jeg betrakter meg selv som svært pro-aktiv så det er riktig, jeg kommer ikke til å sitte stille og se på! Som jo er det riktige.
Når jeg skriver alle selvmord så vil jeg gjerne være sikker på at jeg treffer. Litt som å bruke en hagle på jakt. Husk at jeg nevner forsvinninger også ved Elys registeret (som nå "selvfølgelig" holdes skjult).
"Etterlysningsregisteret (Elys) føres av politiet og ble opprettet i 1988 for å erstatte Polititidendes funksjon når det gjaldt etterlysning av personer, biler og båter/båtmotorer. Det er ikke allmenn innsynsrett. Registeret er tilgjengelig for alle med politimyndighet."
Jeg skal selvfølgelig bygge ut min argumentasjon, gjennom mange år om det trengs! Når det er sagt så håper jeg med dette at (mange) flere kan komme med bidrag til min side av argumentasjonen og en del ved det å skrive offentlig er selvfølgelig å skape både diskusjon og veier til rettferdighet ved å ansvarliggjøre lederne i vårt samfunn. De kan altså ikke bare sitte der og begå pliktbrudd i jobben sin og tro at det ikke får konsekvenser. Igjen altså, over 9000+++ menneskeliv i den moderne tiden hvor jo trafikkdødsfall får høyeste prioritet ved systematisk arbeid! Du kan jo finne tallene for de selv! Så, er ikke de bevis for at systematisk tilnærming virker?!!! JA! (For svarte!) Så igjen: hva med selvmordene og en del av disse forsvinningene enn si "andre tilfeller her og der", ulykker eller hva enn?
Så denne spede begynnelse... Jeg har altså sett på dette over lengre tid "og kan være kjent for mine bidrag (i Verden?) her og der"! Uansett, det skal ikke stå på meg! Jeg skal gi alt jeg kan!
En "liten" ting til: før i tiden, ved SSB (Stat. Sentral Byrå), så førte man opp 5 åringer til å ha tatt selvmord. "Av diverse grunner så gjør man ikke det lenger." Tror du virkelig det var godteriet som manglet? Kanksje ikke eller NEI!!!
Det er ingen som sier at etnisitet må være et premiss for folkemord. Ingen som sjekket hvem armenerne var da ottomanerne drepte dem og ingen som sjekket hvem ukrainerne var da Sovjetunionen drepte dem. Å kalle dette for folkemord er absolutt på sin plass, folkerettslig/rettslig/juridisk/etisk/moralsk (og alle de andre ordene).
Så: min argumentasjon inngår i "Emancipation 2.0", et nytt nivå for frigjøringen av "mennesket" generalt, at man kan være hyggelig og samtidig føle seg trygg så og si. Derfor synes jeg det er stygt eller svært uønsket at man er uærlig/"uærlig" i diskusjonen her. Dette kan få svære ringvirkninger i Verden for dette absolutt gode formål. Kan jo ikke argumentere for at folk skal ha det forferdelig, ikke sant?
"Kom igjen, folkens! Vær litt med da! Nå gjør vi det! Vi bryter ned ondskap og forhindrer at folk "terroriseres" i sin lovlydighet (karakterdrap en masse?)!"
Man er gjerne ivrig når man legger krav på arbeidsutførelse til vanlige folk i fabrikkene eller andre steder som helst. Nå er det på tide å sette de samme krav til jobbutførelse til disse viktige menneskene som jo gjerne skryter av ansvaret sitt når de sosialiserer! "Jeg er statsminister, jeg!" Titler skal det være og veldig fine også.
Selvfølgelig, Stalin (Russland/Sovjetunionen) og Mao (Kina) er jo beryktet for å drepe eget folk. Absolutt. Jeg er overbevist. Våre ledere må stilles til ansvar!
Gitt at det er ganske rutine å anonymisere selvmordsrapportene og forsåvidt å kategorisere disse, hvorfor kan vi ikke i grove trekk få vite hva som gjør at folk tar livet sitt? Hvor mange av dem har kontaktet politiet, Amnesty International Norge osv. osv.? Og her har man selvmordsforskere og psykiatere og psykologer gjennom år ut og år inn, tiår, og f*en ikke om de kan gi noen stødig rapport om disse menneskene (9120 døde). Hva skal det bety? Hvorfor er de så elendige om å ta opp omstendighetene for disse menneskene?
For ordens skyld: denne diskusjonen dreier som om hvorvidt Regjeringen Solberg kan dømmes for Folkemord på gruppen av mennesker gitt ved selvmordene, (en del av) forsvinningene og "noen andre dødsfall" etter år 2000! Jeg påstår altså at denne gruppen har blitt latt i stikken og at rapportene fra vårt samfunn om disse dødsfallene viser grov forsømmelse "i tjenesten/embetet" slik at tiltale for folkemord er på sin plass. Bevis vil bli bygget på grunnlag av system-kapasitet/system-muligheter/system-betraktninger i vitenskapen rettsvitenskap, medisinsk vitenskap osv.
Slik som jeg ser det, også ved meg selv gjennom 35 år "uten post, epost og telefoner" ("kinesisk fengsel/husarrest (detention)") så har Regjeringen begått mened! (Litt synd at dette skjer med en borgerlig regjering, men slik er det. De burde vite at jeg har vært og er en betydningsfull person. De kan ikke tilgis.)
Som det skrives over, så tenker jeg å bygge saken opp på grunnlag av suksessen med å bekjempe trafikkdødsfall systematisk. Gjerne når det skjer en dødsulykke i trafikken så blir Biltilsynet koblet inn for å gjøre en grundig rapport og de blir gjort ansvarlige for dette.
Men hva er etterretteligheten i saker som gjelder selvmord og forsvinninger? Jeg ser ikke noe spesielt for de i det hele tatt. De bare "forsvinner", liksom, kanskje også fordi de blir sett på som tapere i samfunnet hvor jo helst kriminelle skal bli tatt vare på: ikke for lange fengselsstraffer og Wayback til jobb og leilighet igjen. De kriminelle mister jo ikke livet, de blir ikke invalidisert, de er "bare hodeløse", de. Så våre ledere/politikere må bli stilt til ansvar for at det ikke foreligger en systematisk bekjempelse av selvmord og for at ikke noe ansvarlig "Biltilsyn" blir koblet inn når selvmord eller "stygge" forsvinninger skjer!
Siden den norske definisjonen av korrupsjon er så snever og på en måte så "skeiv" fordi "vi har ikke mottatt penger, de har jo begått selvmord og da har de jo lite, vi er jo politikere"!
Så til Verdensspråket engelsk som jo gjerne er litt bedre:
https://www.google.no/search?q=corruption&rlz=1C1ASUM_noNO670NO670&oq=corruption:
corruption
kəˈrʌpʃ(ə)n/Send
noun
noun: corruption; plural noun: corruptions
1.
dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery.
"the journalist who wants to expose corruption in high places"
synonyms:dishonesty, dishonest dealings, unscrupulousness, deceit, deception, duplicity, double-dealing, fraud, fraudulence, misconduct, lawbreaking, crime, criminality, delinquency, wrongdoing, villainy; More
antonyms:honesty
the action or effect of making someone or something morally depraved.
"the corruption of youth was a powerful motif"
synonyms:sin, sinfulness, ungodliness, unrighteousness, profanity, impiety, impurity; More
antonyms:morality, purity
2.
the process by which a word or expression is changed from its original state to one regarded as erroneous or debased.
"a record of a word's corruption"
synonyms: alteration, falsification, doctoring, manipulation, manipulating, fudging, adulteration, debasement, degradation, abuse, subversion, misrepresentation, misapplication; rarevitiation
"these figures have been subject to corruption"
the process by which a computer database or program becomes debased by alteration or the introduction of errors.
"this procedure creates a temporary file to prevent accidental corruption"
og 2 andre linker:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corruption
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption
For "corrupt mind", se denne linken:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/corrupted + mind
Jeg har også undersøkt "ødelagte sinn" på andre måter:
Mask of Sanity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mask_of_Sanity
https://www.amazon.com/Mask-Sanity-Attempt-Psychopathic-Personality/dp/0962151904
Jeg har også tenkt på "Dr. Mengele Club" som ide til film over "utdannede mennesker med medisinsk kompetanse" som driver og torturerer og dreper alle slags mennesker, også barn.
Dr. Mengele er en historisk person fra Nazi-Tyskland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_Mengele
Videre: Selvmord deles opp i 2 grupper: 1. de som er på slutten av livet enten ved alderdom eller dødelig sykdom og ønsker å dø en verdig død og 2. de som under kriminelle forhold (overgrep, incest, vold, tortur, mobbing osv.) lever for vanskelige liv slik at de søker å avslutte sitt eget liv.
Den 1. gruppen er grei. Den er ikke et problem, ikke etisk/moralsk ihvertfall.
Det er den 2. gruppen jeg ser på spesielt og hvor man har kontaktet ulike mennesker mange ganger for å få hjelp til å få slutt på forhold som man i forhold til loven er garantert hjelp, dvs. ved Menneskerettighetsloven, straffeloven osv.
Som det står over: "Det sies at hvert selvmord, generelt, har 10 - 20 selvmordsforsøk foran seg. Hvor mange desperate rop om hjelp? Hvor mange kontakter til ulike hjelpetelefoner, advokater, lærere, skolehelsetjenester, kommunefolk, Advokatforeningen, Amnesty Norge, politiet, foresatte, slektninger, osv.? Hvor mange "offisielle" innleggelser/formelle kontakter med helsetjenester?"
"Som sagt, å ta livet sitt tror jeg grunner i de mest alvorlige forhold og kommer ikke ut av det blå, ut av tynne luften! Produsenter av overgrepsmateriale fra barn og andre og sodomistiske "turister" gjør ikke saken lettere. Sårbarheten er der for de det gjelder i lys av det harde livet ved kriminalitet, først og fremst."
Da er oppgaven ved systematisk kamp mot selvmord og ("noen") forsvinninger og noen andre drap at man sørger for en strammere disiplin mot de tjenester hvor oppgaven er nettopp å hjelpe disse sårbare menneskene som står i fare for å ta selvmord. Jeg ser jo at dette fort blir en kamp mot en type korrupsjon (se engelsk definisjon) i tjenesten, men ærlig talt, noen må vite at disse menneskene tar livet sitt hvis de allerede har prøvd å ta livet sitt 10 - 20 ganger og vært i kontakt med ulike mennesker 50 ganger, mer eller mindre, og fremdeles ikke får hjelp med støtte i Norges lover å få slutt på de forhold som leder til deres selvmordssituasjon.
Eksempel: La oss ta et "feil" eksempel: en pasient har opplevd mye kriminalitet og får ikke hjelp av politiet, men blir puttet inn i psykiatri gjentatte ganger for selvmordstanker, depresjon og angst. Denne personen har kontaktet ulike mennesker mange ganger for å få rettslig hjelp ift. politi, kommune, skole, overgripere osv. slik at lidelsene slutter. Dette skjer ikke og personen tar livet sitt. I dette eksempelet skjer det heller ingen etterkontroll fra myndigheters side eller evnt. tilsyn som et slags "Selvmordstilsyn" liksom Biltilsynet gjør etterkontroll ved trafikkulykker og spesielt trafikkdødsfall.
Dette "Selvmordstilsynet" kan man tenke seg har myndighet til å gå inn i hvert eneste tilfelle og ta ut tiltale for korrupsjon/brudd på tjenesteplikten i jobben der hvor man ikke har brydd seg med å gi mennesker i en selvmordssituasjon tilstrekkelig hjelp. Idag er det jo sånn at selvmordstallene bare rapporteres og det er det. Man får egentlig ikke noen systematisk arbeid mot selvmord av flere grunner. Slik som at selvmordskandidatene har levd under korrupsjon/brudd på tjenesteplikten i jobben i lengre eller kortere tid. Hvis noen har tatt kontakt ulike steder 50 ganger så vil "Selvmordstilsynet" kunne gå inn og sjekke disse ulike stedene og alle 50 ganger kontakten har funnet sted.
På denne måten kan man forbedre rettssystemet flere nivå oppover og få til bedre rapportering til samfunnet forøvrig når og hvorfor et selvmord har funnet sted.
Dermed slipper man å tenke på at eneste mulighet er "å låse selvmordskandidatene inne" for å hindre selvmord.
---------
A song for our march toward a better World:
Smells Like Teen Spirit
Load up on guns
Bring your friends
It's fun to lose and to pretend
She's overboard, self assured
Oh no I know, a dirty word
Hello, hello, hello, how low [x3]
Hello, hello, hello
With the lights out, it's less dangerous
Here we are now, entertain us
I feel stupid and contagious
Here we are now, entertain us
A mulatto, an Albino
A mosquito, my libido, yeah
Hey, yay
I'm worse at what I do best
And for this gift, I feel blessed
Our little group has always been
And always will until the end
Hello, hello, hello, how low [x3]
Hello, hello, hello
With the lights out, it's less dangerous
Here we are now, entertain us
I feel stupid and contagious
Here we are now, entertain us
A mulatto, an Albino
A mosquito, my libido, yeah
Hey, yay
And I forget just why I taste
Oh yeah, I guess it makes me smile
I found it hard, it was hard to find
Oh well, whatever, nevermind
Hello, hello, hello, how low [x3]
Hello, hello, hello
With the lights out, it's less dangerous
Here we are now, entertain us
I feel stupid and contagious
Here we are now, entertain us
A mulatto, an Albino
A mosquito, my libido
A denial, A denial, A denial, A denial, A denial
A denial, A denial, A denial, A denial
Youtube, the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTWKbfoikeg - Nirvana - Smells Like Teen Spirit
Tuesday, 31 October 2017
Being religious or being "wart"-religious - The choice is simple
Lately and with greater insight over a long period of time, the choice seems simple - being religious or being or becoming "wart"-religious. By "wart"-religious, I mean what happens when one (consistently) becomes immoral as a human being, one shoots off the humanity in one's self.
I agree that it is difficult to be religious at times as one is still exposed to bad people or even unscrupulous people.
As we Christians should know, the choice is between God and Heaven and Satan and Hell. However, it is unclear what qualifies to this in exact terms. Is it "so much sins" or "so much sins"? But what you can notice is that these bad people like to develop warts/papilloma both on the skin and inside the body, also in the brain. (See description of cancer like warts/papillomas.) They shed their humanity through and through by bad/vicious actions against others, preferably against good people (mostly religious). I think, therefore, that these people are "labeled" with warts/papillomas because the nervous system that also includes the brain is in its best state when the human is good and moral, also most intelligent. I.e., that I think the future will show that immoral people are those who have a bad nervous system full of warts/papilloma and that these warts/papillomas become a religion for them. They are doomed to cultivate their warts/papilloma as religion and that this is a spiral stair to Hell and a final state without humanity. They become monsters and enemies of humanity/the good people.
Again, I encourage you, the choice is easy! There is a choice between religion (eg. our/common Christianity or other "whitelist"-religion) or "wart"-religion and monsters in humanity.
You may want to search online for "wart(s)", "papilloma", "devil's mark" or "devil's taint." I have also written something about "wart(s)".
(Originally published in Norwegian at "www.verdidebatt.no" titled "Valget er enkelt - Å være religiøs eller å være "vorte"-religiøs", Oct 6, 2017.)
I'm saying that bad people are more likely to develop physical, literal warts (black/brown/red/white) in connection with their nervous system. You should know there are several types of warts, some of which are harmless.
It seems to me that all of the nervous system is affected by morality with a starting point where full health/full morality is the body without these "taints", triggers to the nervous system. So it can represent a new turn for religious people to stay away from a warty life and that these morally depraved people become these people with a wart/warts in the center of their lives. Only a claim for now, though.
Given all other strange efforts in 2017 and that no person is persecuted on grounds of warts, I don't see why people shouldn't have the information to be able to pursue investigation to what mentality these warts entail.
If it turns out to be true that cancer/warts are caused by (very) immoral thoughts/actions shouldn't the public know about it? Isn't it unscientific to shove such things under the rug on grounds of "politeness"?
I feel it's unfair to compare this effort to some (idiot/superstitious) instance of 1727 CE.
It's even more unfair if it turns out that people's mentality actually turns out to revolve around these things, the "warts", something we can use fMRI/MRI/plain sight to investigate in 2017.
To be clear then, this is not the suggestion for some kind of 21st century inquisition!
It has been my words, before the science, that have allowed us to smell the atmosphere of Mars without a person even setting foot there involving the sending of neurologically "compatible" signals straight from the planet's surface and then use a device to apply these signals to for example the skin of your nose-bone, no neural implants necessary.
You seem to demand that "I run before I can walk" and want to deny me the discussion of (possibly important) ideas. You make the unscientific claim that warts, the ones I discuss, the cancerous ones, arise from mere infection. This is not true. They are connected to the nervous system for reasons I'd like to investigate.
I see that Wikipedia is describing cancer apart from warts so if I just like to say that when I write "warts" I mean the "stuff" that has connections to the nervous system and that trigger (immoral) thoughts or dark feelings in the brain when they are touched, also by the mere contact of blood.
For now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_papillomavirus_infection.
Not in plain science yet, immoral people can be revealed by bio-electrical-value-readers straight from the skin although the results can be manipulated by use of cocaine (other as well?).
I find it important to make religious people more stalwart and faithful in their beliefs and in making the young people and Agnostics find religion attractive, also in intellectual respects.
There is an important difference in making mere science reports and submitting interesting ideas that may have positive impact in the World. Political correctness isn't a virtue and it's not a virtue either to write allegedly popular science that do not draw criticism.
I believe in my ideas until they may/might be disproven and to discuss them above the corruption in the World.
I write this (and the above) in full sincerity and that I am my brother's keeper!
Let's see who gets proven right!
Note: Ideas do come before the scientific evidence and it's part of science to make a scientific "program" (Imre Lakatos) in competition with other ideas to see who finally provides scientific description of worth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imre_Lakatos
I agree that it is difficult to be religious at times as one is still exposed to bad people or even unscrupulous people.
As we Christians should know, the choice is between God and Heaven and Satan and Hell. However, it is unclear what qualifies to this in exact terms. Is it "so much sins" or "so much sins"? But what you can notice is that these bad people like to develop warts/papilloma both on the skin and inside the body, also in the brain. (See description of cancer like warts/papillomas.) They shed their humanity through and through by bad/vicious actions against others, preferably against good people (mostly religious). I think, therefore, that these people are "labeled" with warts/papillomas because the nervous system that also includes the brain is in its best state when the human is good and moral, also most intelligent. I.e., that I think the future will show that immoral people are those who have a bad nervous system full of warts/papilloma and that these warts/papillomas become a religion for them. They are doomed to cultivate their warts/papilloma as religion and that this is a spiral stair to Hell and a final state without humanity. They become monsters and enemies of humanity/the good people.
Again, I encourage you, the choice is easy! There is a choice between religion (eg. our/common Christianity or other "whitelist"-religion) or "wart"-religion and monsters in humanity.
You may want to search online for "wart(s)", "papilloma", "devil's mark" or "devil's taint." I have also written something about "wart(s)".
(Originally published in Norwegian at "www.verdidebatt.no" titled "Valget er enkelt - Å være religiøs eller å være "vorte"-religiøs", Oct 6, 2017.)
I'm saying that bad people are more likely to develop physical, literal warts (black/brown/red/white) in connection with their nervous system. You should know there are several types of warts, some of which are harmless.
It seems to me that all of the nervous system is affected by morality with a starting point where full health/full morality is the body without these "taints", triggers to the nervous system. So it can represent a new turn for religious people to stay away from a warty life and that these morally depraved people become these people with a wart/warts in the center of their lives. Only a claim for now, though.
Given all other strange efforts in 2017 and that no person is persecuted on grounds of warts, I don't see why people shouldn't have the information to be able to pursue investigation to what mentality these warts entail.
If it turns out to be true that cancer/warts are caused by (very) immoral thoughts/actions shouldn't the public know about it? Isn't it unscientific to shove such things under the rug on grounds of "politeness"?
I feel it's unfair to compare this effort to some (idiot/superstitious) instance of 1727 CE.
It's even more unfair if it turns out that people's mentality actually turns out to revolve around these things, the "warts", something we can use fMRI/MRI/plain sight to investigate in 2017.
To be clear then, this is not the suggestion for some kind of 21st century inquisition!
It has been my words, before the science, that have allowed us to smell the atmosphere of Mars without a person even setting foot there involving the sending of neurologically "compatible" signals straight from the planet's surface and then use a device to apply these signals to for example the skin of your nose-bone, no neural implants necessary.
You seem to demand that "I run before I can walk" and want to deny me the discussion of (possibly important) ideas. You make the unscientific claim that warts, the ones I discuss, the cancerous ones, arise from mere infection. This is not true. They are connected to the nervous system for reasons I'd like to investigate.
I see that Wikipedia is describing cancer apart from warts so if I just like to say that when I write "warts" I mean the "stuff" that has connections to the nervous system and that trigger (immoral) thoughts or dark feelings in the brain when they are touched, also by the mere contact of blood.
For now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_papillomavirus_infection.
Not in plain science yet, immoral people can be revealed by bio-electrical-value-readers straight from the skin although the results can be manipulated by use of cocaine (other as well?).
I find it important to make religious people more stalwart and faithful in their beliefs and in making the young people and Agnostics find religion attractive, also in intellectual respects.
There is an important difference in making mere science reports and submitting interesting ideas that may have positive impact in the World. Political correctness isn't a virtue and it's not a virtue either to write allegedly popular science that do not draw criticism.
I believe in my ideas until they may/might be disproven and to discuss them above the corruption in the World.
I write this (and the above) in full sincerity and that I am my brother's keeper!
Let's see who gets proven right!
Note: Ideas do come before the scientific evidence and it's part of science to make a scientific "program" (Imre Lakatos) in competition with other ideas to see who finally provides scientific description of worth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imre_Lakatos
Thursday, 17 August 2017
Cancer and I-relation - A new angle to Dualism - Relaunching
I've been having these "wild" thoughts as philosophical speculation. Whether cancer in a person and the corresponding view on oneself as "I" can relate to Dualism.
Now this may seem out of the ordinary and I'm trying to tie it together in this fashion: if one has cancer, does this cancer relate to one's own view of the "I"?
Let's say a confirming investigation could give something like this: one has cancer (always the case, only the ones who get questions) and then maybe answers such that "I" is of lesser importance or neglible.
So, "hopefully", one can find a correlation in cases of cancer (physical expression) and rather negative self-views on one's own "I" (the immaterial expression)! At least, this is what the investigation "aims" for, in that cancer can be seen as expression of a kind of negative impact on the (central) nervous system and therefore a negative impact on the self, the "I" correspondingly. Thus yielding insights to a dualistic view.
Sure thing, mind doesn't get cancer, thankfully, but it could be exciting to find a parallel expression in the mind if one exists. Maybe we are getting close to it above. No?
Far out? Long shot? What say you?
Now this may seem out of the ordinary and I'm trying to tie it together in this fashion: if one has cancer, does this cancer relate to one's own view of the "I"?
Let's say a confirming investigation could give something like this: one has cancer (always the case, only the ones who get questions) and then maybe answers such that "I" is of lesser importance or neglible.
So, "hopefully", one can find a correlation in cases of cancer (physical expression) and rather negative self-views on one's own "I" (the immaterial expression)! At least, this is what the investigation "aims" for, in that cancer can be seen as expression of a kind of negative impact on the (central) nervous system and therefore a negative impact on the self, the "I" correspondingly. Thus yielding insights to a dualistic view.
Sure thing, mind doesn't get cancer, thankfully, but it could be exciting to find a parallel expression in the mind if one exists. Maybe we are getting close to it above. No?
Far out? Long shot? What say you?
Cancer-Preventive Measures - Cancer as Psychiatric Idea - Reiteration
The simple sentences describes this:
If the checksum is right, it's OK, it's a healthy cell. If the checksum isn't right, then annihilate.
The checksum is the controlled amount of electricity that ripples through your nerve lines and that goes between two or more nerve ends. It has been proved that any cell can conduct electricity. A study that was followed through because of the likelihood that it would benefit the research of therapeutic genetic engineering.
Based on the nerve sensations the body takes out everything that has been defined and verified as a not OK checksum. As known, cancer arises from uncontrolled cell development making it a not OK checksum.
The conclusion: Be conscious of your feelings. They're what is used for a readily available body assessment. The thesis is this: If you hold a good consciousness and sensitivity with a nice disciplinary touch to your body, cancer will never be a problem, because your mind will hold your cells in check.
It's my view that the feelings/nerve signals/neurology are helping/controlling the body and more or less telling the body where to attack and where to hold off. This is part of the theory that feelings are just an addition to the largely rational system of being a body, that is rational according to function!
I think one has devoted very little research on the issue of how the nerve signals work in the body and that I think there may be a "gold mine" there to be discovered in how nerve signals relate to the body, to the genes, to the immune system, to the whole...
This, first and foremost, preventive recommendation of mentality can also contribute to the explanation of benign cancers, that there's a mechanism in the body that sets the brakes on or limits the nature of the actual benign cancer in one way or another.
One should remember that the mode of one's relationship with one's own feelings/nerve signals/neurology are a quite big issue/factor in the actual person's and as such, I think this factor (feelings/nerve signals/neurology) may be decisive above rather minor factors such as diet.
This is not part of what can be described as "the tyranny of positive thinking". My theory doesn't necessarily contain such an element. I'd rather say that your mood should reflect realities!
The Cancer Registry shows a difference of about 60 points in the scope of 344,3 versus 283,8 in favour of women across cancer diagnoses. I take this to support my theory as women are known to care more about their feelings and despite they also make up the greater part of the older population. Older people are generally more susceptible to cancer than the younger counterparts. Is this due to decline of the neurological system or the efforts of maintaining the body in the face of aging? It may also be that when you grow old, the brain makes more mistakes and send these mistakes into the body as nerve signals. It can also be that the brain fails, because of this old age, deterioration of brain, to detect the wrong signals from the body and sending corrective signals back.
These are the latest numbers, 2003-2007 from the Cancer Registry of Norway, link for men and women. The link has been accessed 20. November, 2009.
My theory of women actually having a different relationship to their bodies in terms of feelings, making women avoid cancer in greater degrees than men, when indeed I think that most other factors are more or less the same. One should note that risky behaviour can indicate, also, such an inferior relationship to one's own feelings already in young age, ie. heavy drinking among young men.
Besides, modern women and men have almost the same patterns when it comes to "smoke, drink and work". Haven't you heard about "double-working" women? Also, the smoking has come down heavily before 2001 as this set (to which the link points) is from 2001 to 2007. You should also note that cancer strikes, predominantly, the older scope of the population so the fact of heavy drinking young men doesn't have any (particular) impact. I agree to "avoiding carcinogenic substances is the (best/[a significant advise]) you can achieve in the avoidance of cancer" [by chaz wyman]. This is not about the mental concept of "emotions", it's about neurologic signals, "feelings", in your body before cancer occurs! Thus, this writing is not about some kind of "magic" cure. No, it's about "Cancer-Prevention Measures"! So, what I try to point out, is the relation a person has to one's own feelings (in the body) and not some mental size of sensing sadness and so on. The claim is, simply, that when people care for a "natural" relationship to their feelings, they can in great parts avoid cancer. To internalise a "mechanistic body image"/"reject natural body feelings" can therefore lead to cancer/increased probability for cancer in my opinion! This should come in addition to other good advice such as a healthy diet, physical exercise and the avoidance of carcinogenic substances!
I agree to some extent with your [bytesplicer] emphasis on stress, even including possibly that hazardous environment also puts stress on your body ie. being subject to carcinogenics puts a load on the body to get rid of it, lowering the "energies"/electricity to sustain the feelings that support your immune system and against abnormalities by cell life (cell division, cell breathing, cell workings).
So, I'm looking for the best range of feelings, not being below a certain value and not, possibly, being too high either.
(I've been thinking that my writing is on a stage where the next step is to actually enter the field and develop techniques like making a measuring device that measures the electricity between the fingers with a person who is typically resting and calm (for steady signals) and so on (making a data bank on these data gathered from "high and low" in society.)
Concerning protests to my theory on the basis of the cases of cancer in kids, i.e., below 18 yo., I write this:
in the case of cancer in kids I think one should move the search to epigenetics from the parents and combine this with the conditions (incl. epigenetics) of the children.
The children are also mostly struck with leukemia of what I understand.
Children are also (only) one percent or less of the total of cancer-struck patients whether malignant or benign...
As a remark. There's something more also: There are the perspectives of idealism into biological manifest as a form of evolution or forming a frame for evolution.
For faster diagnostication of cancer in the body here and there, one may use radiology by photon emitter and -detector set at special frequency and by "signature", of course, as usual (also in for example quality control of food in food industry or restaurants).
If the checksum is right, it's OK, it's a healthy cell. If the checksum isn't right, then annihilate.
The checksum is the controlled amount of electricity that ripples through your nerve lines and that goes between two or more nerve ends. It has been proved that any cell can conduct electricity. A study that was followed through because of the likelihood that it would benefit the research of therapeutic genetic engineering.
Based on the nerve sensations the body takes out everything that has been defined and verified as a not OK checksum. As known, cancer arises from uncontrolled cell development making it a not OK checksum.
The conclusion: Be conscious of your feelings. They're what is used for a readily available body assessment. The thesis is this: If you hold a good consciousness and sensitivity with a nice disciplinary touch to your body, cancer will never be a problem, because your mind will hold your cells in check.
It's my view that the feelings/nerve signals/neurology are helping/controlling the body and more or less telling the body where to attack and where to hold off. This is part of the theory that feelings are just an addition to the largely rational system of being a body, that is rational according to function!
I think one has devoted very little research on the issue of how the nerve signals work in the body and that I think there may be a "gold mine" there to be discovered in how nerve signals relate to the body, to the genes, to the immune system, to the whole...
This, first and foremost, preventive recommendation of mentality can also contribute to the explanation of benign cancers, that there's a mechanism in the body that sets the brakes on or limits the nature of the actual benign cancer in one way or another.
One should remember that the mode of one's relationship with one's own feelings/nerve signals/neurology are a quite big issue/factor in the actual person's and as such, I think this factor (feelings/nerve signals/neurology) may be decisive above rather minor factors such as diet.
This is not part of what can be described as "the tyranny of positive thinking". My theory doesn't necessarily contain such an element. I'd rather say that your mood should reflect realities!
The Cancer Registry shows a difference of about 60 points in the scope of 344,3 versus 283,8 in favour of women across cancer diagnoses. I take this to support my theory as women are known to care more about their feelings and despite they also make up the greater part of the older population. Older people are generally more susceptible to cancer than the younger counterparts. Is this due to decline of the neurological system or the efforts of maintaining the body in the face of aging? It may also be that when you grow old, the brain makes more mistakes and send these mistakes into the body as nerve signals. It can also be that the brain fails, because of this old age, deterioration of brain, to detect the wrong signals from the body and sending corrective signals back.
These are the latest numbers, 2003-2007 from the Cancer Registry of Norway, link for men and women. The link has been accessed 20. November, 2009.
My theory of women actually having a different relationship to their bodies in terms of feelings, making women avoid cancer in greater degrees than men, when indeed I think that most other factors are more or less the same. One should note that risky behaviour can indicate, also, such an inferior relationship to one's own feelings already in young age, ie. heavy drinking among young men.
Besides, modern women and men have almost the same patterns when it comes to "smoke, drink and work". Haven't you heard about "double-working" women? Also, the smoking has come down heavily before 2001 as this set (to which the link points) is from 2001 to 2007. You should also note that cancer strikes, predominantly, the older scope of the population so the fact of heavy drinking young men doesn't have any (particular) impact. I agree to "avoiding carcinogenic substances is the (best/[a significant advise]) you can achieve in the avoidance of cancer" [by chaz wyman]. This is not about the mental concept of "emotions", it's about neurologic signals, "feelings", in your body before cancer occurs! Thus, this writing is not about some kind of "magic" cure. No, it's about "Cancer-Prevention Measures"! So, what I try to point out, is the relation a person has to one's own feelings (in the body) and not some mental size of sensing sadness and so on. The claim is, simply, that when people care for a "natural" relationship to their feelings, they can in great parts avoid cancer. To internalise a "mechanistic body image"/"reject natural body feelings" can therefore lead to cancer/increased probability for cancer in my opinion! This should come in addition to other good advice such as a healthy diet, physical exercise and the avoidance of carcinogenic substances!
I agree to some extent with your [bytesplicer] emphasis on stress, even including possibly that hazardous environment also puts stress on your body ie. being subject to carcinogenics puts a load on the body to get rid of it, lowering the "energies"/electricity to sustain the feelings that support your immune system and against abnormalities by cell life (cell division, cell breathing, cell workings).
So, I'm looking for the best range of feelings, not being below a certain value and not, possibly, being too high either.
(I've been thinking that my writing is on a stage where the next step is to actually enter the field and develop techniques like making a measuring device that measures the electricity between the fingers with a person who is typically resting and calm (for steady signals) and so on (making a data bank on these data gathered from "high and low" in society.)
Concerning protests to my theory on the basis of the cases of cancer in kids, i.e., below 18 yo., I write this:
in the case of cancer in kids I think one should move the search to epigenetics from the parents and combine this with the conditions (incl. epigenetics) of the children.
The children are also mostly struck with leukemia of what I understand.
Children are also (only) one percent or less of the total of cancer-struck patients whether malignant or benign...
As a remark. There's something more also: There are the perspectives of idealism into biological manifest as a form of evolution or forming a frame for evolution.
For faster diagnostication of cancer in the body here and there, one may use radiology by photon emitter and -detector set at special frequency and by "signature", of course, as usual (also in for example quality control of food in food industry or restaurants).
To live life according to principles of life (ref: Hinduism, Veda?), the health and the Objective Ethics that I may add my own neuro-value (from between the fingertips or more technically, with the needle and meter attached). This level is presupposed to stay on top of the own awareness of neurology/feelings and that this too represents at the very end as theory for countering the cancers of all types.
The idea from the original writing is of course to create a debate that may kill various stupid ideas in society, such as the blatant suppression of others and further push for better medical practices and better health campaigns much like fitness campaigns for avoiding artery-diseases. In addition, of course, that people are made able to record privately or by doctor, their neuro-values with a very simple device.
As such, by summary, we have then these three levels:
1. The life according to life principles, to health and more.
2. The Healthy Neuro-Values, the awareness of own neurology, of own feelings.
3. The dangerous values and, possibly, a person's growing ignorance to life and cancer alike.
I suspect it's even common now to measure these cancer-relevant values in USA! So, go ahead and try to be stupid about it, you other people...!
Also, the neuro-values are NOT supposed to reflect stress, they are supposed to reflect a person in "neutral state", relaxed and "ordinary".
Perhaps we are looking for a kind of "core"-spectrum value. I think so as I lack the finishing opportunities for getting the data-set together, clinically, science-worth speaking...
There can't be a cure for cancer because a cure necessarily relies on the neural/electrical signals of the body and they are in the cases of cancer WRONG in the first place. The thing to hope for, though, is for cancer to turn benign... But the wrong signals, the wrong signals...
http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/cells/badcom/ writes "Cell growth and division is such an important process that it is under tight control with many checks and balances. But even so, cell communication can break down. The result is uncontrolled cell growth, often leading to cancer. Cancer can occur in many ways, but it always requires multiple signaling breakdowns. Often, cancer begins when a cell gains the ability to grow and divide even in the absence of a signal. Ordinarily this unregulated growth triggers a signal for self-destruction. But when the cell also loses the ability to respond to death signals, it divides out of control, forming a tumor. Later cell communication events cause blood vessels to grow into the tumor, enabling it to grow larger. Additional signals allow the cancer to spread to other parts of the body."
So the case with an imagined cancer in the arm (maybe not the usual, but let's imagine), I happen to think that one has, in one's mind, severely abused the arm of a person to such an extent that in one's own mind this arm has become "neurologically marked" by symptoms of cancer (warts) in the arm and a repugnance in the mind where the arm is no longer considered as a good part of the body, but still used! Thus, there is actually a kind of correspondence in both the mind and the physical part that's the arm. This is a hypothesis for investigation.
The case is clear! The body-electric value/bio-value of people with cancer is lower than in people of a sound mind/very reliable people! Yet society fails to publish such studies that may enable people to take a course of intelligence/wisdom, living the good life! Thus, feelings are moral after all?
Given the special mindset of people with cancer, there should be rich possibilities with getting confirmations by "swimhat"-fMRI!
Thus we have: moral people in the best sense will never become affected by cancer! On the other side: the immoral will generally become affected, it becomes their "religion"! To psychology and psychiatry!
The study for the initial 1000 people, laying down an examination schema, can be reliably completed in 1-2 years! Given the troubles of the World, the case should be completed and crystal clear in 10-20 years time. Which is to say that the investigation is well-defined and certainly not pseudo-scientific.
Let's imagine a different case of cancer/warts: what if one case of cancer arises on the penis of a man because he has used it to suffocate women and children numerous times, perhaps reviving them multiple times. Let's also say he has in some way taken part in torture by using his penis pervertly. Let's say further his penis falls off by the consequences of the cancer/warts.
Now, shouldn't the public know how this cancer arises, these warts arise by this case? I mean, if there is a clear causal relationship between disgusting acts of immorality and cancer/warts then my opinion is that the public/the World has a definite right TO KNOW THIS!
"Concerning protests to my theory on the basis of the cases of cancer in kids, i.e., below 18 yo., I write this:
in the case of cancer in kids I think one should move the search to epigenetics from the parents and combine this with the conditions (incl. epigenetics) of the children."
So, we have the (emotional) moral leadership from parents to children and the feelings-exchange from a parent to the child may mean A LOT to the child. Again, there's not much said in this regard (research/science).
So I conclude with that children with cancer are in one way or another "emotionally abused" toward having their feelings the wrong way. They may learn to behave "mechanically", disregard their own feelings and so on. Some (few?) may even have been abused/tortured by "specialists" and become affected by cancer/warts (even "warts" in the blood) "over night" as one way to survival/ending the abuse/torture against them, but I have no estimate for this. Cancer in children is already rare.
Either way, children with cancer can or should be examined with "swimhat"-fMRI and given input-response checks by a given set of pictures, but this is "limited"/given by the intelligence of the examiner. For instance, one picture may hold various instances of cancer directly as one suggestion, to check what "signals" or "firings" take place in the child. No matter what, whether signals for pains or other, the child's brain is _modular_! And this can prove very useful for the examination of the child.
One step further? Toward the end of the schematics (for my Nobel Prize, thiii-hiii-hii)? In every respect, I hope the research community takes this to heart, whether in Chile, South Africa, Pakistan or India (or "the Western World") as ordinary cancer research has had at least 50 years already! ("Shame on you!")
To this investigation, under Personality Psychology:
To identify factors of common traits of psychology that generates cancer in the body.
It is my theory that a lack of moral psychology has such bearing on the nervous system that the body looses control and that cancer results, also depending on the corresponding signature in the mentality of the given person.
Means:
"swimhat"-fMRI
device for identifying bio-electrical value, a "stick", generates mA outcome from the nerves, I think, almost like a USB-stick in size
qualitative interviews, revolving around morality, feelings, harmony of mentality to the body
Cancer: By my perspective on cancer, the World has a chance to become cancerfree in some 200 yrs because of the heavy work with culture, thereof, given that 200 years may be seen as a long time (to wait).
To this investigation, under Personality Psychology:
To identify factors of common traits of psychology that generates cancer in the body.
It is my theory that a lack of moral psychology has such bearing on the nervous system that the body loses control and that cancer results, also depending on the corresponding signature in the mentality of the given person. Loses in the sense that body control is lost due to the lack of moral psychology, Kantianistic type, no insincerity or play with moral ideas such as Utilitarianism allowed.
Means:
"swimhat"-fMRI
device for identifying bio-electrical value, a "stick", generates mA outcome from the nerves, I think, almost like a USB-stick in size.
Some key words: qualitative interviews, revolving around morality, feelings, harmony of mentality to the body.
As a consequence from the above, there's a good chance that cancer can be fought with schizophrenia medicine (and ECT, I suppose) in helping cancer patients to live longer.
The short story is thus:
Immoral mentality implies schizophrenia and cancer where cancer is symptom of schizophrenia.
On Cancer and Sexology:
What is the sexology of cancer patients above 25 years of age?
One guess (loosely): homosexual tendencies high, plus exotic tendencies as well, BDSM, sodomy and the rest... Thus, "category"-schizophrenia, especially the "deep"-schizophrenia patients, and cancer patients align by this aspect too!
Optimal treatment for all cancers may be this "despite doing nothing more than halting cancer and not preventing cancer":
"Full treatment" of cancer:
* Injected opiates/subutex/"clean" heroin, at suitable locations/hospitals/clinics/special homes for sleep?
* Electro-convulsion therapy (ECT, that is generally enjoyed by these patients)
* One special type of cancer drug removing (some) "warty/papilloma"-stuff (from Australia?). Nivolumab (Opdivo)? The cancer drug in question destroys cancer cells chemically, though I can't remember the mechanisms.
* The usual schizophrenics drugs, 3 strengths according to ECT effects wearing off, starting with the weakest of course.
In addition to the anti-cancer treatment, surgery etc., prescribed by the physicians/oncologists.
Actually, the treatment of cancer and schizophrenia may have much in common, unknown if this is exactly 100% given that schizophrenia may not have developed that much cancer/cancerous stuff that requires surgery of various kinds, radiological surgery, scalpel surgery, the rest...
Please note!
By "The Full Treatment" of Schizophrenia program you can halt the ailments of a lot, diseases, degeneration of immune system, stopping (early) symptoms of ALS, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Cancer (all types), HIV/AIDS, etc. In general, you halt or nullify some or all proneness to all negative effects by schizophrenia.
You may also halt or nullify some or all increasing need for more drugs. So the treatment of schizophrenia may be the key to successful treatment of drug addicts, ALL of them!
* The connection to ALS may be questioned. Research yet to confirm.
* Some of this, the above, may require more research for (final) confirmation.
By this note, I say that schizophrenia is a key illness in making patients prone to all ailments in the broadest sense, be they cancer, weakened immune system, all sorts of bacteria and viruses, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS and the rest. The ailments, all of them! Science in hand, the best!
See also The Good People List and, if you will, The Bad People List! "The future is still looking very bright!"
One note on (all) cancer research.
It may well amount to disinformation of the public if one continues to ignore "the possible fact" of "category"-schizophrenia connected to all types of cancer. If the public is not given the information that there may well be a connection between ("category"-)schizophrenia and all types of cancer then this may be a type of disinformation to the public. There are the metabolism readings and there are the treatments by schizophrenia medication and ECT for these cancer patients to quickly determine the connection! The duties...
-------------------
22.02.2003, 20.11.2009, 04.02.2010, 05.02.2010, 07.02.2010, 28.10.2010 and 20.02.2011
Terje Lea©2003, ©2009, ©2010, ©2011
Note: a comment concerning cancer in children has been added today, 20.02.2011, but written to the Philosophy Now forum 18.02.2011.
The idea from the original writing is of course to create a debate that may kill various stupid ideas in society, such as the blatant suppression of others and further push for better medical practices and better health campaigns much like fitness campaigns for avoiding artery-diseases. In addition, of course, that people are made able to record privately or by doctor, their neuro-values with a very simple device.
As such, by summary, we have then these three levels:
1. The life according to life principles, to health and more.
2. The Healthy Neuro-Values, the awareness of own neurology, of own feelings.
3. The dangerous values and, possibly, a person's growing ignorance to life and cancer alike.
I suspect it's even common now to measure these cancer-relevant values in USA! So, go ahead and try to be stupid about it, you other people...!
Also, the neuro-values are NOT supposed to reflect stress, they are supposed to reflect a person in "neutral state", relaxed and "ordinary".
Perhaps we are looking for a kind of "core"-spectrum value. I think so as I lack the finishing opportunities for getting the data-set together, clinically, science-worth speaking...
There can't be a cure for cancer because a cure necessarily relies on the neural/electrical signals of the body and they are in the cases of cancer WRONG in the first place. The thing to hope for, though, is for cancer to turn benign... But the wrong signals, the wrong signals...
http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/cells/badcom/ writes "Cell growth and division is such an important process that it is under tight control with many checks and balances. But even so, cell communication can break down. The result is uncontrolled cell growth, often leading to cancer. Cancer can occur in many ways, but it always requires multiple signaling breakdowns. Often, cancer begins when a cell gains the ability to grow and divide even in the absence of a signal. Ordinarily this unregulated growth triggers a signal for self-destruction. But when the cell also loses the ability to respond to death signals, it divides out of control, forming a tumor. Later cell communication events cause blood vessels to grow into the tumor, enabling it to grow larger. Additional signals allow the cancer to spread to other parts of the body."
So the case with an imagined cancer in the arm (maybe not the usual, but let's imagine), I happen to think that one has, in one's mind, severely abused the arm of a person to such an extent that in one's own mind this arm has become "neurologically marked" by symptoms of cancer (warts) in the arm and a repugnance in the mind where the arm is no longer considered as a good part of the body, but still used! Thus, there is actually a kind of correspondence in both the mind and the physical part that's the arm. This is a hypothesis for investigation.
The case is clear! The body-electric value/bio-value of people with cancer is lower than in people of a sound mind/very reliable people! Yet society fails to publish such studies that may enable people to take a course of intelligence/wisdom, living the good life! Thus, feelings are moral after all?
Given the special mindset of people with cancer, there should be rich possibilities with getting confirmations by "swimhat"-fMRI!
Thus we have: moral people in the best sense will never become affected by cancer! On the other side: the immoral will generally become affected, it becomes their "religion"! To psychology and psychiatry!
The study for the initial 1000 people, laying down an examination schema, can be reliably completed in 1-2 years! Given the troubles of the World, the case should be completed and crystal clear in 10-20 years time. Which is to say that the investigation is well-defined and certainly not pseudo-scientific.
Let's imagine a different case of cancer/warts: what if one case of cancer arises on the penis of a man because he has used it to suffocate women and children numerous times, perhaps reviving them multiple times. Let's also say he has in some way taken part in torture by using his penis pervertly. Let's say further his penis falls off by the consequences of the cancer/warts.
Now, shouldn't the public know how this cancer arises, these warts arise by this case? I mean, if there is a clear causal relationship between disgusting acts of immorality and cancer/warts then my opinion is that the public/the World has a definite right TO KNOW THIS!
"Concerning protests to my theory on the basis of the cases of cancer in kids, i.e., below 18 yo., I write this:
in the case of cancer in kids I think one should move the search to epigenetics from the parents and combine this with the conditions (incl. epigenetics) of the children."
So, we have the (emotional) moral leadership from parents to children and the feelings-exchange from a parent to the child may mean A LOT to the child. Again, there's not much said in this regard (research/science).
So I conclude with that children with cancer are in one way or another "emotionally abused" toward having their feelings the wrong way. They may learn to behave "mechanically", disregard their own feelings and so on. Some (few?) may even have been abused/tortured by "specialists" and become affected by cancer/warts (even "warts" in the blood) "over night" as one way to survival/ending the abuse/torture against them, but I have no estimate for this. Cancer in children is already rare.
Either way, children with cancer can or should be examined with "swimhat"-fMRI and given input-response checks by a given set of pictures, but this is "limited"/given by the intelligence of the examiner. For instance, one picture may hold various instances of cancer directly as one suggestion, to check what "signals" or "firings" take place in the child. No matter what, whether signals for pains or other, the child's brain is _modular_! And this can prove very useful for the examination of the child.
One step further? Toward the end of the schematics (for my Nobel Prize, thiii-hiii-hii)? In every respect, I hope the research community takes this to heart, whether in Chile, South Africa, Pakistan or India (or "the Western World") as ordinary cancer research has had at least 50 years already! ("Shame on you!")
To this investigation, under Personality Psychology:
To identify factors of common traits of psychology that generates cancer in the body.
It is my theory that a lack of moral psychology has such bearing on the nervous system that the body looses control and that cancer results, also depending on the corresponding signature in the mentality of the given person.
Means:
"swimhat"-fMRI
device for identifying bio-electrical value, a "stick", generates mA outcome from the nerves, I think, almost like a USB-stick in size
qualitative interviews, revolving around morality, feelings, harmony of mentality to the body
Cancer: By my perspective on cancer, the World has a chance to become cancerfree in some 200 yrs because of the heavy work with culture, thereof, given that 200 years may be seen as a long time (to wait).
To this investigation, under Personality Psychology:
To identify factors of common traits of psychology that generates cancer in the body.
It is my theory that a lack of moral psychology has such bearing on the nervous system that the body loses control and that cancer results, also depending on the corresponding signature in the mentality of the given person. Loses in the sense that body control is lost due to the lack of moral psychology, Kantianistic type, no insincerity or play with moral ideas such as Utilitarianism allowed.
Means:
"swimhat"-fMRI
device for identifying bio-electrical value, a "stick", generates mA outcome from the nerves, I think, almost like a USB-stick in size.
Some key words: qualitative interviews, revolving around morality, feelings, harmony of mentality to the body.
As a consequence from the above, there's a good chance that cancer can be fought with schizophrenia medicine (and ECT, I suppose) in helping cancer patients to live longer.
The short story is thus:
Immoral mentality implies schizophrenia and cancer where cancer is symptom of schizophrenia.
On Cancer and Sexology:
What is the sexology of cancer patients above 25 years of age?
One guess (loosely): homosexual tendencies high, plus exotic tendencies as well, BDSM, sodomy and the rest... Thus, "category"-schizophrenia, especially the "deep"-schizophrenia patients, and cancer patients align by this aspect too!
Optimal treatment for all cancers may be this "despite doing nothing more than halting cancer and not preventing cancer":
"Full treatment" of cancer:
* Injected opiates/subutex/"clean" heroin, at suitable locations/hospitals/clinics/special homes for sleep?
* Electro-convulsion therapy (ECT, that is generally enjoyed by these patients)
* One special type of cancer drug removing (some) "warty/papilloma"-stuff (from Australia?). Nivolumab (Opdivo)? The cancer drug in question destroys cancer cells chemically, though I can't remember the mechanisms.
* The usual schizophrenics drugs, 3 strengths according to ECT effects wearing off, starting with the weakest of course.
In addition to the anti-cancer treatment, surgery etc., prescribed by the physicians/oncologists.
Actually, the treatment of cancer and schizophrenia may have much in common, unknown if this is exactly 100% given that schizophrenia may not have developed that much cancer/cancerous stuff that requires surgery of various kinds, radiological surgery, scalpel surgery, the rest...
Please note!
By "The Full Treatment" of Schizophrenia program you can halt the ailments of a lot, diseases, degeneration of immune system, stopping (early) symptoms of ALS, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Cancer (all types), HIV/AIDS, etc. In general, you halt or nullify some or all proneness to all negative effects by schizophrenia.
You may also halt or nullify some or all increasing need for more drugs. So the treatment of schizophrenia may be the key to successful treatment of drug addicts, ALL of them!
* The connection to ALS may be questioned. Research yet to confirm.
* Some of this, the above, may require more research for (final) confirmation.
By this note, I say that schizophrenia is a key illness in making patients prone to all ailments in the broadest sense, be they cancer, weakened immune system, all sorts of bacteria and viruses, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS and the rest. The ailments, all of them! Science in hand, the best!
See also The Good People List and, if you will, The Bad People List! "The future is still looking very bright!"
One note on (all) cancer research.
It may well amount to disinformation of the public if one continues to ignore "the possible fact" of "category"-schizophrenia connected to all types of cancer. If the public is not given the information that there may well be a connection between ("category"-)schizophrenia and all types of cancer then this may be a type of disinformation to the public. There are the metabolism readings and there are the treatments by schizophrenia medication and ECT for these cancer patients to quickly determine the connection! The duties...
22.02.2003, 20.11.2009, 04.02.2010, 05.02.2010, 07.02.2010, 28.10.2010 and 20.02.2011
Terje Lea©2003, ©2009, ©2010, ©2011
Note: a comment concerning cancer in children has been added today, 20.02.2011, but written to the Philosophy Now forum 18.02.2011.
Tuesday, 8 August 2017
Idea for Film: The Telepaths and Reincarnators - A kind of near/immediate Sci-Fi...
Idea for film: The Telepaths and Reincarnators fighting crime and cooperating from afar, across the planet Earth. That the heros and heroines can use telepathy as communication and being able to destroy themselves and reincarnate somewhere conveniently close to an action scene or another. A kind of (near/immediate) Sci-Fi! Wearing special "Agent" clothing or something else...
Cool?
Another idea: Cult of the Wart!
Special members of a cult in for example New York (or somewhere else, fittingly) are living special lives according to the Code of Wart. Warts in this culture, be they "expensive" or "cheap", yields a kind of genealogy and remains the religion for them in a strict hierarchical group. They do crime and take pleasure in the most sodomistic ways. The filthy ways make their lives, in all social interaction and certainly mentally! "Coming to a screen near you!" Genre: Thriller/horror.
Cool?
Another idea: Cult of the Wart!
Special members of a cult in for example New York (or somewhere else, fittingly) are living special lives according to the Code of Wart. Warts in this culture, be they "expensive" or "cheap", yields a kind of genealogy and remains the religion for them in a strict hierarchical group. They do crime and take pleasure in the most sodomistic ways. The filthy ways make their lives, in all social interaction and certainly mentally! "Coming to a screen near you!" Genre: Thriller/horror.
Friday, 14 July 2017
One Idea for (Generic/Worldwide) Zero Unemployment - "Common Company"/"Intellectual Property Company"
One idea for (generic/Worldwide) zero unemployment:
You make a company "Common Company"/"Intellectual Property Shop" that hires/is required by law to hire all unemployed people and other people who want to work with the company. Then you set up various "factories/mechanical shops/workshops" or whatever, in addition to buying software licenses in order to enable these people.
So the rules of this "Common Company"/"Intellectual Property Shop" are very relaxed down to the point that people do not need to do ANYTHING for working there. They are just hired!
But my suspicion (by good knowledge of people's psychology and happiness) is that people want to work and that people like to make a name for themselves. Indeed, work (or the opportunity to work) makes people HAPPY!
Bottom line:"I have so many ideas and based on local production and Quantitative Easing I can hire the entire World of unemployed people!"
So I hereby (virtually) hire the whole World of people who are unemployed!
To this comes the Social Programs for families and others and "corporate" lawyers hired for services to the people of "Common Company..." with the heavyweight of all these employees to solve all sorts of problems they may have! :-)
This is in line with 100 % Society: https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2012/05/100-society-matter-of-political-science.html.
To say it with President Donald Trump, "I'm going to make the World so great that it has never been before!"
To this comes the Social Programs for families and others and "corporate" lawyers hired for services to the people of "Common Company..." with the heavyweight of all these employees to solve all sorts of problems they may have!
Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!
The future looks really BRIGHT!
(More to come!)
You make a company "Common Company"/"Intellectual Property Shop" that hires/is required by law to hire all unemployed people and other people who want to work with the company. Then you set up various "factories/mechanical shops/workshops" or whatever, in addition to buying software licenses in order to enable these people.
So the rules of this "Common Company"/"Intellectual Property Shop" are very relaxed down to the point that people do not need to do ANYTHING for working there. They are just hired!
But my suspicion (by good knowledge of people's psychology and happiness) is that people want to work and that people like to make a name for themselves. Indeed, work (or the opportunity to work) makes people HAPPY!
Bottom line:"I have so many ideas and based on local production and Quantitative Easing I can hire the entire World of unemployed people!"
So I hereby (virtually) hire the whole World of people who are unemployed!
To this comes the Social Programs for families and others and "corporate" lawyers hired for services to the people of "Common Company..." with the heavyweight of all these employees to solve all sorts of problems they may have! :-)
This is in line with 100 % Society: https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2012/05/100-society-matter-of-political-science.html.
To say it with President Donald Trump, "I'm going to make the World so great that it has never been before!"
To this comes the Social Programs for families and others and "corporate" lawyers hired for services to the people of "Common Company..." with the heavyweight of all these employees to solve all sorts of problems they may have!
Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!
The future looks really BRIGHT!
(More to come!)
Extended Death in Dignity - Human Rights Improved, Suicides Prevented - The Ethics...
Now there is no doubt that "the right to a death in dignity" is important! Also for our own human worth. But... It might be that if for example this "right to a death in dignity" is ensured for typically younger people who have deep depressions and, as a result, are qualified (required) through 3 or 5 years(?) at psychologists or psychiatrists before they are allowed to die. This qualifying period will be reported to the authorities and thus you can use this to prevent suicide in this younger group in the future because they told about all the craziness/vileness (crime) they have been through and in this way, Norway and other countries may improve their human rights work on a much deeper level so that ALL suicides can be prevented (except those where there are a disease and those who will die a death in dignity of old age). Is this something? Still good luck with the good work, you people who work for dying in dignity! WE WIN through!
There seems to be a duty in doing this work, making this happen that's implied by the suicides themselves, especially for the group 10 to 50 year olds. A citizens' commission for inquiry into suicides for this group?
There seems to be a duty in doing this work, making this happen that's implied by the suicides themselves, especially for the group 10 to 50 year olds. A citizens' commission for inquiry into suicides for this group?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)