Claim:
If Time Travel would be true throughout the history of human kind, at any point in time whether past or future, time travellers would be "all over us" in telling about the future or past or whatever.
However, there are no stories of either such people or common stories of such being told from one person (the traveller) to another.
Therefore, time travel isn't going to exist ever!
Logic: Modus tollens
If Time Travel then Time Travellers (or common stories of such)
No Time Travellers
No Time Travel
Please remember that:
An assumption that Time Travellers are lying to us all the time is an unreasonable story!
Also, stories of the future would hold a kind of plausibility or coherence so that if the stories would be prevalent then the "Nostradamus" stories would be recorded or a record of place and people would be with us.
The coherence here would be that of our reality entails/is able to hold the story of the future by specific calculations, inventions, a record of history from the future or technology all the way up to that point in time.
A fake story of time travelling will quickly fall apart because it's not coherent with you travelling in time and discovering new histories of science in the future or whatever the "bridged" story that marks a genuine story of time travelling. First, fx., where's your time-travelling UFO? In your garage?
Good?
Thursday, 6 April 2017
Monday, 13 March 2017
Norwegian song - Det går til helvete (It, the World, goes to hell) - Nesten ferdig
Det går til helvete!
Sang av Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea
Det går til helvete (Vokal: mørk og dyp, bass! Rytme: monoton tvers igjennom sangen)
Det går til helvete (Musikk: noe bass komp og annet, hva finner til pass)
Hungersnød her og
USA kriger med alle de der
Det kan jo derfor sies...
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
Været varmer jo mer og mer og
Skibakker i sanden til sine klær
Her og der, her og der
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
MRSA blir fler og fler
Menneskene dynger jorda mer og mer
Det gjenstår bare det her
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
Korrupsjon og profesjon blandes så der
Advokater og politi går'kke no mer
Igjen sies det her
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
En mur her og
en atombombe der
Det er slutten på denne sangen her
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
Robotøyne i huet, ulovlig implantert som
sjømissiler på et fyrtårn
Politistaten tar over
Det går til helvete ("Fading")
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete ...
(Takk til Espen Beranek Holm for "Dra til hælvete" for inspirasjon.)
Sang av Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea
Det går til helvete (Vokal: mørk og dyp, bass! Rytme: monoton tvers igjennom sangen)
Det går til helvete (Musikk: noe bass komp og annet, hva finner til pass)
Hungersnød her og
USA kriger med alle de der
Det kan jo derfor sies...
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
Været varmer jo mer og mer og
Skibakker i sanden til sine klær
Her og der, her og der
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
MRSA blir fler og fler
Menneskene dynger jorda mer og mer
Det gjenstår bare det her
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
Korrupsjon og profesjon blandes så der
Advokater og politi går'kke no mer
Igjen sies det her
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
En mur her og
en atombombe der
Det er slutten på denne sangen her
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
Robotøyne i huet, ulovlig implantert som
sjømissiler på et fyrtårn
Politistaten tar over
Det går til helvete ("Fading")
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete
Det går til helvete ...
(Takk til Espen Beranek Holm for "Dra til hælvete" for inspirasjon.)
Thursday, 5 January 2017
Case in Point - Astronomy - Against Kuhn's Revolutions and Paradigms
First, some links,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristarchus_of_Samos Aristarchus of Samos, c. 310 - c. 230 BC
- The heliocentric view that has failed to take hold
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_astronomical_diaries Babylonian astronomical diaries
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy Ptolemy, c. 100 AD - c. 170 AD
- The geocentric worldview
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_translations_of_the_12th_century#List_of_translations
"- Ptolemy (2nd century A.D.)
Almagest: from Greek, Sicily c. 1160; Gerard of Cremona, from Arabic, Toledo 1175
Optica: Eugenius of Palermo, from Arabic, c. 1154"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing_press Printing press
"The printing press spread within several decades to over two hundred cities in a dozen European countries. By 1500, printing presses in operation throughout Western Europe had already produced more than twenty million volumes. In the 16th century, with presses spreading further afield, their output rose tenfold to an estimated 150 to 200 million copies. The operation of a press became so synonymous with the enterprise of printing that it lent its name to an entire new branch of media, the press."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus Nicolaus Copernicus, 19 February 1473 - 24 May 1543 (AD)
- The heliocentric worldview (start)
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tycho_Brahe Tycho Brahe 14 December 1546 – 24 October 1601
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- Wrongly posited the geo-heliocentric worldview, the Tychonic system
"Well known in his lifetime as an astronomer, astrologer and alchemist, he has been described as "the first competent mind in modern astronomy to feel ardently the passion for exact empirical facts." His observations were some five times more accurate than the best available observations at the time."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_telescope History of the telescope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_telescope_types List of telescope types
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observatory#Oldest_astronomical_observatories Astronomical observatories - oldest
A selection...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refracting_telescope
- Galileo's use: "Galileo Galilei, happening to be in Venice in about the month of May 1609, heard of the invention and constructed a version of his own."
- Kepler's use: "The Keplerian telescope, invented by Johannes Kepler in 1611, is an improvement on Galileo's design. It uses a convex lens as the eyepiece instead of Galileo's concave one."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei Galileo Galilei, 15 February 1564 - 8 January 1642
- The heliocentric worldview (supported)
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- Refracting telescope, Galilean telescope, supporting the heliocentric worldview
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler Johannes Kepler, December 27, 1571 – November 15, 1630
- The heliocentric worldview (supported)
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- Refracting telescope, Keplerian telescope, supporting the heliocentric worldview
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism Heliocentrism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binoculars Binoculars
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflecting_telescope Reflecting telescope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton Sir Isaac Newton FRS 25 December 1642 - 20 March 1726/27
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- Reflecting telescope, Newtonian telescope (1668), supporting the heliocentric worldview
- Theory of gravity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newtonian_telescope Newtonian telescope
- Newton's invention
"In late 1668 Isaac Newton built his first reflecting telescope. He chose an alloy (speculum metal) of tin and copper as the most suitable material for his objective mirror. He later devised means for shaping and grinding the mirror and may have been the first to use a pitch lap to polish the optical surface."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Herschel Frederick William Herschel KH, FRS 15 November 1738 – 25 August 1822
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- All telescopes for this era!
"During his career, he constructed more than four hundred telescopes. The largest and most famous of these was a reflecting telescope with a 49 1⁄2-inch-diameter (1.26 m) primary mirror and a 40-foot (12 m) focal length. Because of the poor reflectivity of the speculum mirrors of that day, Herschel eliminated the small diagonal mirror of a standard newtonian reflector from his design and tilted his primary mirror so he could view the formed image directly."
- Library of theories (Theory of gravity, Kepler, Copernicus, Newton etc.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe The Universe
"The earliest scientific models of the Universe were developed by ancient Greek and Indian philosophers and were geocentric, placing the Earth at the center of the Universe. Over the centuries, more precise astronomical observations led Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543) to develop the heliocentric model with the Sun at the center of the Solar System. In developing the law of universal gravitation, Sir Isaac Newton (NS: 1643–1727) built upon Copernicus's work as well as observations by Tycho Brahe (1546–1601) and Johannes Kepler's (1571–1630) laws of planetary motion. Further observational improvements led to the realization that our Solar System is located in the Milky Way galaxy and is one of many solar systems and galaxies. It is assumed that galaxies are distributed uniformly and the same in all directions, meaning that the Universe has neither an edge nor a center. Discoveries in the early 20th century have suggested that the Universe had a beginning and that it is expanding at an increasing rate."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Hubble Edwin Powell Hubble November 20, 1889 – September 28, 1953
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- All telescopes for this era!
- Library of theories (Theory of gravity, Kepler, Copernicus, Newton etc.)
- "was an American astronomer who played a crucial role in establishing the field of extragalactic astronomy and is generally regarded as one of the most important observational cosmologists of the 20th century. Hubble is known for showing that the recessional velocity of a galaxy increases with its distance from the earth, implying the universe is expanding, known as "Hubble's law", although a preliminary version of this relation was proposed by Georges Lemaître two years earlier in a less prominent journal."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlow_Shapley Harlow Shapley November 2, 1885 – October 20, 1972
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- All telescopes for this era!
- Library of theories (Theory of gravity, Kepler, Copernicus, Newton etc.)
"He used RR Lyrae stars to correctly estimate the size of the Milky Way Galaxy and the sun's position within it by using parallax. In 1953 he proposed his "liquid water belt" theory, now known as the concept of a habitable zone."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein Albert Einstein 14 March 1879 - 18 April 1955
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- All telescopes for this era!
- Library of theories (Theory of gravity, Kepler, Copernicus, Newton etc.)
- Theory of relativity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite Satellite
"The world's first artificial satellite, the Sputnik 1, was launched by the Soviet Union in 1957. Since then, thousands of satellites have been launched into orbit around the Earth. Some satellites, notably space stations, have been launched in parts and assembled in orbit. Artificial satellites originate from more than 40 countries and have used the satellite launching capabilities of ten nations. About a thousand satellites are currently operational, whereas thousands of unused satellites and satellite fragments orbit the Earth as space debris. A few space probes have been placed into orbit around other bodies and become artificial satellites to the Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Vesta, Eros, Ceres, and the Sun."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing Moon landing
"A Moon landing is the arrival of a spacecraft on the surface of the Moon. This includes both manned and unmanned (robotic) missions. The first human-made object to reach the surface of the Moon was the Soviet Union's Luna 2 mission, on 13 September 1959.
The United States' Apollo 11 was the first manned mission to land on the Moon, on 20 July 1969. There have been six manned U.S. landings (between 1969 and 1972) and numerous unmanned landings, with no soft landings happening from 22 August 1976 until 14 December 2013."
My claim is then that "bits and pieces" make the scientific day against Kuhn's "orderly" Paradigms and so on, that science takes place in a "Cumulativist" way where science gets increasingly accurate and on Truth!
Additionally:
I've identified a mark of stupidity in history of science in that Galileo Galilei's superior has failed to commission/make the order for building, let's say, 10 Galilean telescopes when in fact his opponents and contemporaries alike have been in need of one!
This is remarkable because it shows that his contemporaries have not (to my knowledge) been interested to learn what Galileo Galilei has seen in his telescope!
Conclusion: the opponents of Galileo Galilei have not been driven by a (first-hand) thirst for knowledge!
History shows that there are quite some examples of this kind of behaviour, I think!
This also shows that Galileo Galilei has failed to teach people the way of the telescope and the calculations for his (famous) claim in support of Copernicus!
Kuhn also seems to forget that the Galilean telescope can be directed at a far-away tree or any other object. This is, of course, not a "new worldview", but enhanced sight!
From this text I intend to show that the title reveals the truth. Largely speaking "revolutions" is the
language of the tabloids!
Case in Point #2: Swinging stone in ancient Greece vs. pendulum in renaissance Italy
Relating to Aristotle and Galileo by Kuhn and SSR, p. 118 - 125 and the difference of a swinging stone and the pendulum.
Aristotle: 384 BC - 322 BC, seeing a swinging stone, I guess, by chain or thread.
Galileo: 15 February 1564 - 8 January 1642, seeing the pendulum.
The difference between them: roughly 2000 yrs.
So, by Cumulativism, if we have 2000 years between 2 people and suppose a "revolution" as Galileo considers the pendulum I'd like people to think again because that's 2000 years of engineering history as well.
Let's list some factors for these 2000 years of engineering history:
* Measurements - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_measurement
* Accuracy and precision - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision
* Technological ability to manipulate objects (i.e., tools and more) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tool - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance (for "simple machines")
So it proceeds from the factors above that a "revolution" hardly can be noted over the course of 2000 entire years and with the advance of the factors above.
Orderly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum.
For comparison, one can note that difference in weaponry as well, in telling a story of engineering:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_weapons
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dardanelles_Gun
History of metalworking:
http://www.hackingtheuniverse.com/science/history-of-science-and-technology/genarticles/timeline-of-metalworking
Aristotle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle
Galileo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
"Thus the press/media reports an ongoing revolution by transition from a swinging stone to a pendulum for 2000 years."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristarchus_of_Samos Aristarchus of Samos, c. 310 - c. 230 BC
- The heliocentric view that has failed to take hold
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_astronomical_diaries Babylonian astronomical diaries
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy Ptolemy, c. 100 AD - c. 170 AD
- The geocentric worldview
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_translations_of_the_12th_century#List_of_translations
"- Ptolemy (2nd century A.D.)
Almagest: from Greek, Sicily c. 1160; Gerard of Cremona, from Arabic, Toledo 1175
Optica: Eugenius of Palermo, from Arabic, c. 1154"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing_press Printing press
"The printing press spread within several decades to over two hundred cities in a dozen European countries. By 1500, printing presses in operation throughout Western Europe had already produced more than twenty million volumes. In the 16th century, with presses spreading further afield, their output rose tenfold to an estimated 150 to 200 million copies. The operation of a press became so synonymous with the enterprise of printing that it lent its name to an entire new branch of media, the press."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus Nicolaus Copernicus, 19 February 1473 - 24 May 1543 (AD)
- The heliocentric worldview (start)
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tycho_Brahe Tycho Brahe 14 December 1546 – 24 October 1601
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- Wrongly posited the geo-heliocentric worldview, the Tychonic system
"Well known in his lifetime as an astronomer, astrologer and alchemist, he has been described as "the first competent mind in modern astronomy to feel ardently the passion for exact empirical facts." His observations were some five times more accurate than the best available observations at the time."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_telescope History of the telescope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_telescope_types List of telescope types
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observatory#Oldest_astronomical_observatories Astronomical observatories - oldest
A selection...
- 1577: Istanbul observatory of Taqi al-Din, Turkey
- 1580: Uraniborg, Denmark
- 1581: Stjerneborg, Denmark
- 1642: Panzano Observatory, Italy
- 1642: Round Tower, Denmark
- 1633: Leiden Observatory, Netherlands
- 1667: Paris Observatory, France
- 1675: Royal Greenwich Observatory, England
- 1695: Sukharev Tower, Russia
- 1711: Berlin Observatory, Germany
- 1724: Jantar Mantar, India
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refracting_telescope
- Galileo's use: "Galileo Galilei, happening to be in Venice in about the month of May 1609, heard of the invention and constructed a version of his own."
- Kepler's use: "The Keplerian telescope, invented by Johannes Kepler in 1611, is an improvement on Galileo's design. It uses a convex lens as the eyepiece instead of Galileo's concave one."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei Galileo Galilei, 15 February 1564 - 8 January 1642
- The heliocentric worldview (supported)
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- Refracting telescope, Galilean telescope, supporting the heliocentric worldview
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler Johannes Kepler, December 27, 1571 – November 15, 1630
- The heliocentric worldview (supported)
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- Refracting telescope, Keplerian telescope, supporting the heliocentric worldview
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism Heliocentrism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binoculars Binoculars
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflecting_telescope Reflecting telescope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton Sir Isaac Newton FRS 25 December 1642 - 20 March 1726/27
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- Reflecting telescope, Newtonian telescope (1668), supporting the heliocentric worldview
- Theory of gravity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newtonian_telescope Newtonian telescope
- Newton's invention
"In late 1668 Isaac Newton built his first reflecting telescope. He chose an alloy (speculum metal) of tin and copper as the most suitable material for his objective mirror. He later devised means for shaping and grinding the mirror and may have been the first to use a pitch lap to polish the optical surface."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Herschel Frederick William Herschel KH, FRS 15 November 1738 – 25 August 1822
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- All telescopes for this era!
"During his career, he constructed more than four hundred telescopes. The largest and most famous of these was a reflecting telescope with a 49 1⁄2-inch-diameter (1.26 m) primary mirror and a 40-foot (12 m) focal length. Because of the poor reflectivity of the speculum mirrors of that day, Herschel eliminated the small diagonal mirror of a standard newtonian reflector from his design and tilted his primary mirror so he could view the formed image directly."
- Library of theories (Theory of gravity, Kepler, Copernicus, Newton etc.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe The Universe
"The earliest scientific models of the Universe were developed by ancient Greek and Indian philosophers and were geocentric, placing the Earth at the center of the Universe. Over the centuries, more precise astronomical observations led Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543) to develop the heliocentric model with the Sun at the center of the Solar System. In developing the law of universal gravitation, Sir Isaac Newton (NS: 1643–1727) built upon Copernicus's work as well as observations by Tycho Brahe (1546–1601) and Johannes Kepler's (1571–1630) laws of planetary motion. Further observational improvements led to the realization that our Solar System is located in the Milky Way galaxy and is one of many solar systems and galaxies. It is assumed that galaxies are distributed uniformly and the same in all directions, meaning that the Universe has neither an edge nor a center. Discoveries in the early 20th century have suggested that the Universe had a beginning and that it is expanding at an increasing rate."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Hubble Edwin Powell Hubble November 20, 1889 – September 28, 1953
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- All telescopes for this era!
- Library of theories (Theory of gravity, Kepler, Copernicus, Newton etc.)
- "was an American astronomer who played a crucial role in establishing the field of extragalactic astronomy and is generally regarded as one of the most important observational cosmologists of the 20th century. Hubble is known for showing that the recessional velocity of a galaxy increases with its distance from the earth, implying the universe is expanding, known as "Hubble's law", although a preliminary version of this relation was proposed by Georges Lemaître two years earlier in a less prominent journal."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlow_Shapley Harlow Shapley November 2, 1885 – October 20, 1972
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- All telescopes for this era!
- Library of theories (Theory of gravity, Kepler, Copernicus, Newton etc.)
"He used RR Lyrae stars to correctly estimate the size of the Milky Way Galaxy and the sun's position within it by using parallax. In 1953 he proposed his "liquid water belt" theory, now known as the concept of a habitable zone."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein Albert Einstein 14 March 1879 - 18 April 1955
- Growing archive/database of observations, library of astronomical data
- All telescopes for this era!
- Library of theories (Theory of gravity, Kepler, Copernicus, Newton etc.)
- Theory of relativity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite Satellite
"The world's first artificial satellite, the Sputnik 1, was launched by the Soviet Union in 1957. Since then, thousands of satellites have been launched into orbit around the Earth. Some satellites, notably space stations, have been launched in parts and assembled in orbit. Artificial satellites originate from more than 40 countries and have used the satellite launching capabilities of ten nations. About a thousand satellites are currently operational, whereas thousands of unused satellites and satellite fragments orbit the Earth as space debris. A few space probes have been placed into orbit around other bodies and become artificial satellites to the Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Vesta, Eros, Ceres, and the Sun."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing Moon landing
"A Moon landing is the arrival of a spacecraft on the surface of the Moon. This includes both manned and unmanned (robotic) missions. The first human-made object to reach the surface of the Moon was the Soviet Union's Luna 2 mission, on 13 September 1959.
The United States' Apollo 11 was the first manned mission to land on the Moon, on 20 July 1969. There have been six manned U.S. landings (between 1969 and 1972) and numerous unmanned landings, with no soft landings happening from 22 August 1976 until 14 December 2013."
My claim is then that "bits and pieces" make the scientific day against Kuhn's "orderly" Paradigms and so on, that science takes place in a "Cumulativist" way where science gets increasingly accurate and on Truth!
Additionally:
I've identified a mark of stupidity in history of science in that Galileo Galilei's superior has failed to commission/make the order for building, let's say, 10 Galilean telescopes when in fact his opponents and contemporaries alike have been in need of one!
This is remarkable because it shows that his contemporaries have not (to my knowledge) been interested to learn what Galileo Galilei has seen in his telescope!
Conclusion: the opponents of Galileo Galilei have not been driven by a (first-hand) thirst for knowledge!
History shows that there are quite some examples of this kind of behaviour, I think!
This also shows that Galileo Galilei has failed to teach people the way of the telescope and the calculations for his (famous) claim in support of Copernicus!
Kuhn also seems to forget that the Galilean telescope can be directed at a far-away tree or any other object. This is, of course, not a "new worldview", but enhanced sight!
language of the tabloids!
Case in Point #2: Swinging stone in ancient Greece vs. pendulum in renaissance Italy
Relating to Aristotle and Galileo by Kuhn and SSR, p. 118 - 125 and the difference of a swinging stone and the pendulum.
Aristotle: 384 BC - 322 BC, seeing a swinging stone, I guess, by chain or thread.
Galileo: 15 February 1564 - 8 January 1642, seeing the pendulum.
The difference between them: roughly 2000 yrs.
So, by Cumulativism, if we have 2000 years between 2 people and suppose a "revolution" as Galileo considers the pendulum I'd like people to think again because that's 2000 years of engineering history as well.
Let's list some factors for these 2000 years of engineering history:
* Measurements - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_measurement
* Accuracy and precision - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision
* Technological ability to manipulate objects (i.e., tools and more) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tool - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance (for "simple machines")
So it proceeds from the factors above that a "revolution" hardly can be noted over the course of 2000 entire years and with the advance of the factors above.
Orderly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum.
For comparison, one can note that difference in weaponry as well, in telling a story of engineering:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_weapons
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dardanelles_Gun
History of metalworking:
http://www.hackingtheuniverse.com/science/history-of-science-and-technology/genarticles/timeline-of-metalworking
Aristotle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle
Galileo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
"Thus the press/media reports an ongoing revolution by transition from a swinging stone to a pendulum for 2000 years."
Monday, 3 October 2016
A combined Limited Free Trade and Protectionism - (Short) Progress Manifesto
In this instance "we, the people" really means something. Along with an Active State, setting the inflation rate by annual budget (deficit) and central bank interest rate for combatting unemployment and financial instability, that educates the economists working as bankers and investors, the rich people may not feel as necessary which is why they should pick up their duties as moral leaders as fast as possible or find themselves ousted from the business life.
Our targets by this are (virtually) full employment, stable politics, low crime rates and a solid Welfare State. By inviting the Labour Unions to support the business life, one creates the foundation for growth (although small growth in advanced economies, also depending on technology). This happens by Employer organisations to Employee organisations year to year in setting fair payments for employees who in turn see their prospects with the children in working for decency and shift up the social class/education, no particular levels of crime included here as fairness holds for all.
Then, the Limited Free Trade is to ensure Developing Countries their place in the future with all the traits of stable and prosperous leadership and business environment to name. The Protectionism is only in place until respect among the Developed and Developing Countries obtain, by each and every country themselves, the Developed countries being not conflict-free in tackling the dynamics of life and technology. The business agreement holds for each nation/regional cultural group by themselves, every nation/state included and then for these business agreements to negotiate fairness between themselves so that the World as a whole sees the rightful moral days/Utopia.
The whole thing is regulated by the business life as social group where the market is split up by agreement until something new and unexpected takes place whereto the business agreement has to "settle" again, possibly with new rich people among the insiders' group where agreement holds.
Bottom line: to the rich people, we want moral leadership or push you into exile!
Bankers and investors alike have the duty to accommodate (virtually) full employment throughout the World by making this a business agreement and by Central Banks' Quantitative Easing (QE) as every nation's strategy. That is, no nation is "happy" with any (substantial) unemployment.
Subsumed under the text above: I'm with Elon Musk as he predicts Universal Basic Income for all as automation will do most work in the future.
In the meanwhile, I'm just watching the revolution. It's definitely going to be an asset to be part of a group that does some kind of (creative) work in the future. There's a possibility, though, that all unemployed people get the power of being organised under a company and such remain active people the whole time (as they please).
Elon Musk here: http://mashable.com/2016/11/05/elon-musk-universal-basic-income/
However, people should, in the future, be able to think more freely about work and the group of people/company they choose to affiliate with.
Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!
The future looks really BRIGHT!
(Yet more may be entered. The text is not as full as it should be.)
Our targets by this are (virtually) full employment, stable politics, low crime rates and a solid Welfare State. By inviting the Labour Unions to support the business life, one creates the foundation for growth (although small growth in advanced economies, also depending on technology). This happens by Employer organisations to Employee organisations year to year in setting fair payments for employees who in turn see their prospects with the children in working for decency and shift up the social class/education, no particular levels of crime included here as fairness holds for all.
Then, the Limited Free Trade is to ensure Developing Countries their place in the future with all the traits of stable and prosperous leadership and business environment to name. The Protectionism is only in place until respect among the Developed and Developing Countries obtain, by each and every country themselves, the Developed countries being not conflict-free in tackling the dynamics of life and technology. The business agreement holds for each nation/regional cultural group by themselves, every nation/state included and then for these business agreements to negotiate fairness between themselves so that the World as a whole sees the rightful moral days/Utopia.
The whole thing is regulated by the business life as social group where the market is split up by agreement until something new and unexpected takes place whereto the business agreement has to "settle" again, possibly with new rich people among the insiders' group where agreement holds.
Bottom line: to the rich people, we want moral leadership or push you into exile!
Bankers and investors alike have the duty to accommodate (virtually) full employment throughout the World by making this a business agreement and by Central Banks' Quantitative Easing (QE) as every nation's strategy. That is, no nation is "happy" with any (substantial) unemployment.
Subsumed under the text above: I'm with Elon Musk as he predicts Universal Basic Income for all as automation will do most work in the future.
In the meanwhile, I'm just watching the revolution. It's definitely going to be an asset to be part of a group that does some kind of (creative) work in the future. There's a possibility, though, that all unemployed people get the power of being organised under a company and such remain active people the whole time (as they please).
Elon Musk here: http://mashable.com/2016/11/05/elon-musk-universal-basic-income/
However, people should, in the future, be able to think more freely about work and the group of people/company they choose to affiliate with.
Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!
The future looks really BRIGHT!
(Yet more may be entered. The text is not as full as it should be.)
Friday, 3 June 2016
Comparison of USA and EU-28 by Legal Systems - Comments
This is the effort to describe a given elephant in the European legal room by comparing the legal systems of USA and EU. It's an assumption that Norway doesn't differ much from that of Germany or France or other (developed nation). By this effort I cherry-pick certain stats, always in pairs, from Eurostat (EU-28) and FBI (USA). All of this relates to crime and the influence of crime to suicide rates among else.
The comments will show that I favour the character and traits of USA in defending the dignity of the humans living there. USA has an important advantage by the 2nd Amendment that ensures a real defence of people who have the pistol or revolver. Even in face of crime, the pistol or revolver secures a fairly painless and quick death or an injury that's fairly clean, i.e., the bullet penetrates in a straight manner often creating a mere flesh wound. Even the fractured bones from gunshot wounds should be possible to heal given some time for this.
We have:
(I start with Norway as crime typical for Europe)
From https://www.ssb.no/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/statistikker/lovbrudda/aar/2015-04-15?fane=tabell#content there is 372 107 complaints filed to the police which is 72,8 complaints per 1000 inhabitants/Norwegians for 2014, newest numbers.
So we see that "respectable" Norway has a good deal of crime to handle. There's no Eden here.
Sources:
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat - Various statistics for Europe, also crime.
https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/crimestats - Crime for USA.
http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.MHSUICIDE?lang=en - Suicides for every country.
https://www.ssb.no/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/statistikker/lovbrudda/aar/2015-04-15?fane=tabell#content - Complaints filed to the police in Norway.
http://www.gunpolicy.org/ - Guns in the world, also those privately owned.
"Straight" USA allows its citizens to defend by handweapons, tazers and peppersprays! "Corrupt/Crooked" Europe has all this practically banned, especially after Behring Breivik. Note!
"Straight" USA also has the death penalty for these depraved monsters who commit atrocities with the full mental report of them to go!
At least for suicides:
It's stated that "Approximately one-half of suicides are committed by firearm, accounting for two-thirds of all firearms deaths. [21,334 of 33,599 in 2014]"[24-reference]
Those are decent suicides! In Europe we do all sorts of crazy things in order to (finally) die because either it's the corrupt authorities hunting the suicide candidates only to get more torture on them. A corruption we in Europe usually never can do anything about because the self-protection is outlawed, that is, guns, pepperspray, tazers and killer knives. And that's after the 20 times the suicide candidates "bounce" about before they ide!
"The same article [USA Today] stated that there are far fewer homicides than suicides in the country; in fact, homicide rates have fallen by half in the U.S. since 1991."
So homicides are bad, but the numbers are improving and the victims have gotten the death by gun shot, not tortured a few times first as in Europe.
For the instances of torture in Europe, pick out the stats for murders, missing people and a good portion of the suicides who "failed" to die when tortured!
At spot no. 48 USA comes in with 12.6 per 100 000 people.
At spot no. 102 Norway comes in with 9.3 per 100 K people.
Hurray! At spot no. 123 United Kingdom comes in with 7.4 per 100 K people.
Now, from the above and given Europe's tendency to sodomy, corruption and lying for the facade, also for protection (because a wounded prey in Europe usually gets "taken" quickly).
You know, I happen to think that USA takes it (accepts the deaths, some also "beautiful"), all factors considered! (Don't say you're young, please, because then you have quite a bit of learning to do!)
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_the_United_States
Some additional:
Warburton, N., 2004, p. 21. The Basics - Philosophy, 4th ed. Routledge: New York The Problem of Evil. "...of the widespread practice of torture." and "...all examples of moral evil or cruelty: human beings inflicting suffering on other human beings..."
(This blog-posting is intended to develop and more will appear.)
The comments will show that I favour the character and traits of USA in defending the dignity of the humans living there. USA has an important advantage by the 2nd Amendment that ensures a real defence of people who have the pistol or revolver. Even in face of crime, the pistol or revolver secures a fairly painless and quick death or an injury that's fairly clean, i.e., the bullet penetrates in a straight manner often creating a mere flesh wound. Even the fractured bones from gunshot wounds should be possible to heal given some time for this.
We have:
(I start with Norway as crime typical for Europe)
From https://www.ssb.no/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/statistikker/lovbrudda/aar/2015-04-15?fane=tabell#content there is 372 107 complaints filed to the police which is 72,8 complaints per 1000 inhabitants/Norwegians for 2014, newest numbers.
So we see that "respectable" Norway has a good deal of crime to handle. There's no Eden here.
Sources:
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat - Various statistics for Europe, also crime.
https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/crimestats - Crime for USA.
http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.MHSUICIDE?lang=en - Suicides for every country.
https://www.ssb.no/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/statistikker/lovbrudda/aar/2015-04-15?fane=tabell#content - Complaints filed to the police in Norway.
http://www.gunpolicy.org/ - Guns in the world, also those privately owned.
"Straight" USA allows its citizens to defend by handweapons, tazers and peppersprays! "Corrupt/Crooked" Europe has all this practically banned, especially after Behring Breivik. Note!
"Straight" USA also has the death penalty for these depraved monsters who commit atrocities with the full mental report of them to go!
At least for suicides:
It's stated that "Approximately one-half of suicides are committed by firearm, accounting for two-thirds of all firearms deaths. [21,334 of 33,599 in 2014]"[24-reference]
Those are decent suicides! In Europe we do all sorts of crazy things in order to (finally) die because either it's the corrupt authorities hunting the suicide candidates only to get more torture on them. A corruption we in Europe usually never can do anything about because the self-protection is outlawed, that is, guns, pepperspray, tazers and killer knives. And that's after the 20 times the suicide candidates "bounce" about before they ide!
"The same article [USA Today] stated that there are far fewer homicides than suicides in the country; in fact, homicide rates have fallen by half in the U.S. since 1991."
So homicides are bad, but the numbers are improving and the victims have gotten the death by gun shot, not tortured a few times first as in Europe.
For the instances of torture in Europe, pick out the stats for murders, missing people and a good portion of the suicides who "failed" to die when tortured!
At spot no. 48 USA comes in with 12.6 per 100 000 people.
At spot no. 102 Norway comes in with 9.3 per 100 K people.
Hurray! At spot no. 123 United Kingdom comes in with 7.4 per 100 K people.
Now, from the above and given Europe's tendency to sodomy, corruption and lying for the facade, also for protection (because a wounded prey in Europe usually gets "taken" quickly).
You know, I happen to think that USA takes it (accepts the deaths, some also "beautiful"), all factors considered! (Don't say you're young, please, because then you have quite a bit of learning to do!)
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_the_United_States
Some additional:
Warburton, N., 2004, p. 21. The Basics - Philosophy, 4th ed. Routledge: New York The Problem of Evil. "...of the widespread practice of torture." and "...all examples of moral evil or cruelty: human beings inflicting suffering on other human beings..."
(This blog-posting is intended to develop and more will appear.)
Monday, 28 December 2015
Rich Countries and Poor Countries - A story over the wealth of nations
This is a story of the wealth of nations and that the potential for making a nation matched or aligned. I think there's a possible story of development to the nations that are poor today. Of course, systematic corruption plays a large or larger role in some countries while all countries in the World today are affected by corruption.
Three types of countries:
The matched country - this is the country that has symmetry over the sectors of the country. Such that one doesn't over-extend or under-extend one's nations finances. The primary sectors are cared for properly and technology is prudently applied in order to provide happiness and satisfaction to the population. This enables great levels of production, all the way from low-tech production to high-level production.
The top-heavy country - this type of country seeks power through technology and is typically a dictatorship where poverty strikes the workers of the primary sectors in order to seek technology and finance military capacities. One example: Soviet Union.
The bottom-heavy country - this type of country has large primary sectors and much corruption and entertains dictatorships as well. One example: North Korea.
Cases: Soviet Union, North Korea, South Korea, Cambodia, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, France, Italy, Russia, -(others)
Three types of countries:
The matched country - this is the country that has symmetry over the sectors of the country. Such that one doesn't over-extend or under-extend one's nations finances. The primary sectors are cared for properly and technology is prudently applied in order to provide happiness and satisfaction to the population. This enables great levels of production, all the way from low-tech production to high-level production.
The top-heavy country - this type of country seeks power through technology and is typically a dictatorship where poverty strikes the workers of the primary sectors in order to seek technology and finance military capacities. One example: Soviet Union.
The bottom-heavy country - this type of country has large primary sectors and much corruption and entertains dictatorships as well. One example: North Korea.
Cases: Soviet Union, North Korea, South Korea, Cambodia, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, France, Italy, Russia, -(others)
Sunday, 20 December 2015
The Responsibility of the Child Protection Services - Also the Fight against Corruption
Concerning the systematic work and according procedures for first-line services, especially the hotlines for children in need of help
There's this view that the procedures for people who have the responsibility to help children who are subject to crime and neglect etc. can be expressed by a new ISO-standard. It's not complicated and the laws are most clear!
How much the emotional hand helps is very limited. We are here discussing real action.
-------------
(Norwegian, to be translated:)
(Informasjonen er tatt fra helsenorge.no )
There's this view that the procedures for people who have the responsibility to help children who are subject to crime and neglect etc. can be expressed by a new ISO-standard. It's not complicated and the laws are most clear!
How much the emotional hand helps is very limited. We are here discussing real action.
-------------
(Norwegian, to be translated:)
Ad det systematiske arbeid og tilsvarende
prosedyrer for førstelinjetjenester, spesielt telefontjenestene
ISO-standard
Nytter ikke med følelsessnakk type det skjer med
mange barn, du får nok hjelp snart (men ikke av oss) osv.
Når ansvarsforhold brytes enten det gjelder
fundamentale voksen-barn relasjoner eller noe annet.
Listen over tjenester:
Alarmtelefonen for barn og unge ( http://www.116111.no/ )
Alarmtelefonen for barn og unge ( http://www.116111.no/ )
Telefon: 116 111
Telefon fra utlandet: +47 954 11 755
Sms: 417 16 111
E-post: alarm@116111.no
Gratis nødtelefon for barn og unge som har det vanskelig hjemme. Alarmtelefon er åpen 15:00 -08:00. Åpent hele dagen i helger og helligdager.
Telefon fra utlandet: +47 954 11 755
Sms: 417 16 111
E-post: alarm@116111.no
Gratis nødtelefon for barn og unge som har det vanskelig hjemme. Alarmtelefon er åpen 15:00 -08:00. Åpent hele dagen i helger og helligdager.
Telefon: 800 333 21
På Kors på halsen kan du prate med eller skrive anonymt til voksne som er frivillige i Røde Kors. Åpen kl. 14 - 20.
Ungdomstelefonen (UT) ( http://www.ungdomstelefonen.no/ )
Mobil: 400 00 777
Ungdomstelefon er Skeiv Ungdom sin hjelpe- og støttetelefon, et gratis lavterskeltilbud der ungdom svarer ungdom på spørsmål om forelskelse, seksualitet, kjønn, identitet, aktivitetstilbud og sikrere sex. Åpen kl. 18 - 22, søndag til fredag.
På Kors på halsen kan du prate med eller skrive anonymt til voksne som er frivillige i Røde Kors. Åpen kl. 14 - 20.
Ungdomstelefonen (UT) ( http://www.ungdomstelefonen.no/ )
Mobil: 400 00 777
Ungdomstelefon er Skeiv Ungdom sin hjelpe- og støttetelefon, et gratis lavterskeltilbud der ungdom svarer ungdom på spørsmål om forelskelse, seksualitet, kjønn, identitet, aktivitetstilbud og sikrere sex. Åpen kl. 18 - 22, søndag til fredag.
Kriminelle forhold. Barns advokat overfor politiet
og rettsapparatet. Krav på hjelp. Case-studiene og beste prosedyrer
på problemer i forhold til disse. Og da også henvisninger til nære
personer som lærere, sykepleiere, leger, politi, helsetjeneste ved
skole eller kommunehelsetjeneste.
Kriminelle forhold, enten som omsorgssvikt,
misbruk, mishandling, eller mobbing/grov erting over tid.
Når man leser statistikk så fremkommer det jo
ofte at tilfellene er mange, men det som ikke alltid fremkommer også,
er hvem som mottar alle disse meldingene fra barn om dype
vanskeligheter som gjerne truer deres liv og til sist like godt kan
ende med selvmord i tenåringsalderen.
Det som dermed er kritikkverdig er at barnas
fremste advokat, nemlig Barneombudet, ikke legger større kritikk på
de tjenestene som skal igangsette prosesser som fører til at barna
ikke entrer langvarige, smertefulle tilstander ved problemer hjemme,
barnehage, skole eller annet. Dvs. disse tjenestene som skal i
fremste rekke forhindre (dype/alvorlige) lovbrudd hvor barn er
lidende part og hvor politiet eller andre burde inntre for å ordne
opp i disse forhold det her gjelder. Eventuelle kriminelle som begår
lovbrudd mot barn er gjerne også de groveste menneskene som gjerne
trenger forvaring i fengselssystemet.
Derfor synes jeg det er dypt kritikkverdig at en
eneste sak får pågå i lengre tid selv etter at et gitt barn har
tatt kontakt med en eller flere av de tjenestene som er satt opp for
å hjelpe barn. Dette synes å være enklere å løse enn vold i
parforhold som gjerne avfeies “på grunn av bevisets stilling”.
Altså, hvis man finner at barn er utsatt for noe så skal jo help
finne sted. Man sitter liksom ikke å lurer på om barnet har
eventuelle “skjulte motiver”.
Hvis ikke disse hjelpetjenestene besitter de
riktige prosedyrene for å hjelpe barn så ber jeg om at de
utarbeides STRAKS! Dette kan ikke kalles noe annet enn korrupsjon
hvis forhold får pågå over noe tid som helst.
Det er ikke tvil om at vår moderne tid gir oss
mye hjelp i form av system og gjerne bruk av internett og
datamaskiner og derfor synes jeg rapportene om barns problemer er
grove nettopp fordi de viser at det ikke har blitt gjort noe! Så jeg
vil gjerne si at Barneombudet er skyldig for hvert eneste år som går
fordi disse problemene med akseptabel prosedyre ikke er tatt hånd
om, rett og slett!
Med håp om at noe blir gjort og takk for nå!
(Husk at det er julen 2015.)
Med vennlig hilsen
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea
Saturday, 19 December 2015
Legal System - A song
(Genre: Rock, guitars, bass, drums - Rhythm: as natural, chorus like)
Intro: This song is for the abused children, for those who fight corruption and for those who have not coped, they who died for life and dignity.
"Kills on the corners", (<= dispassionate vocals) (for all the abused children, the terror everywhere and for those fighting corruption, not to say all those who have died under these difficulties)
"Kills on the corners", (<= dispassionate vocals)
sanity assassins (<= dispassionate vocals)
Legal system, legal system - where are you? (<= suppressed vocals, flat tone)
It all seems real, the lawyers, judges, they are there (in telling tone vocals, these two lines)
But of late...? Corruption... any good deeds at all?!
"Kills on the corners",
"Kills on the corners",
sanity assassins
Legal system, legal system, - where are you?
The daily life labours on, the future coming on strong
But of late...? Crime is rife, life is low
"Kills on the corners",
"Kills on the corners",
sanity assassins
Legal system, legal system, where are you?
Dignity's not here, dignity's not there
"Kills on the corners",
Intro: This song is for the abused children, for those who fight corruption and for those who have not coped, they who died for life and dignity.
"Kills on the corners", (<= dispassionate vocals) (for all the abused children, the terror everywhere and for those fighting corruption, not to say all those who have died under these difficulties)
"Kills on the corners", (<= dispassionate vocals)
sanity assassins (<= dispassionate vocals)
Legal system, legal system - where are you? (<= suppressed vocals, flat tone)
It all seems real, the lawyers, judges, they are there (in telling tone vocals, these two lines)
But of late...? Corruption... any good deeds at all?!
"Kills on the corners",
"Kills on the corners",
sanity assassins
Legal system, legal system, - where are you?
The daily life labours on, the future coming on strong
But of late...? Crime is rife, life is low
"Kills on the corners",
"Kills on the corners",
sanity assassins
Legal system, legal system, where are you?
Dignity's not here, dignity's not there
"Kills on the corners",
"kills on the corners"
sanity assassins,
sanity assassins,
only the insane is real
The death, the murder
Sanity's gone forever!
(Forever the fear...) (<=- low vocals, a kind of silent)
Background: the corruption of the World is high, more rife in developing countries than the developed ones. (More text is coming.)
The death, the murder
Sanity's gone forever!
(Forever the fear...) (<=- low vocals, a kind of silent)
Background: the corruption of the World is high, more rife in developing countries than the developed ones. (More text is coming.)
Thursday, 23 July 2015
The Lie Detectors - Improved Police Work and Courts
There's this strong belief in the single or combined use of these 5 methods of lie detection:
* Polygraph testing
* Voice stress analysers
* Mimicry including capillory dilation
* fMRI and its brain signals, also where it says "lie", "false" and "deception"
* Transdermal Optical Imaging (new)
These can greatly contribute to police standards of practice, routinely used. The courts have earlier been encouraged to use both video and audio recordings for lie detection in the process of legal work at these arenas.
It's also a strong belief that the combined use of all or any 2 gives the lie itself its death. That lying dies as this is incorporated on all levels throughout the legal systems of the World. That reality gives these 4 methods 100% (or near-100%) hit level in revealing lies/lying.
I'll follow up on some cases where its use can greatly influence the results. Ok? Cheers!
Transdermal Optical Imaging is presented by Kang Lee on TedTalks, by url, https://www.ted.com/talks/kang_lee_can_you_really_tell_if_a_kid_is_lying .
(Also see my work on ethical (moral) objectivity here: http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2012/09/ethical-objectivity-objection-to.html .)
--------
Lie detectors - A more happy and religious world?
It's my view that all the injustice of the World helps the Darwinian view as a kind of lifestyle and simultaneously demoralizes religious people making them use more energy to stay optimistic and cheerful.
In other words, a just World probably helps people in getting them more religious. So how do you see lie detectors help legal systems worldwide? I think there can be more resolve to help victims of domestic violence. Not only that, but also as a kind of confirmation of the stories that enter the police, they can test all sides of a reported crime to find out who's telling the truth. This can help police greatly, IMO. It can also aid in avoiding putting innocent people behind bars. I really see no end for the benefits.
The AVATAR:
From http://bgr.com/2016/12/28/lie-detector-test-kiosk-airport-avatar/.
Mike Wehner @MikeWehner
December 28th, 2016 at 7:16 PM
"Lie-detecting kiosks are coming to an airport near you"
Quote:
The system is called AVATAR, which is short for Automated Virtual Agent for Truth Assessments in Real Time, and is currently being tested by the Canadian Border Services Agency as well as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. It’s been in development for some time, and the United States has already deployed AVATAR kiosks in “low risk” areas to get a sense of how they might handle the flow of people moving into and out of the United States at the border.
Quote:
“AVATAR has been tested in labs, in airports and at border crossing stations,” Elkins told the SDSU NewsCenter. “The system is fully ready for implementation to help stem the flow of contraband, thwart fleeing criminals, and detect potential terrorists and many other applications in the effort to secure international borders.”
Lie detection progresses! Hurray! Because truth serves the people, democracy and Human Rights (eventually)!
* Polygraph testing
* Voice stress analysers
* Mimicry including capillory dilation
* fMRI and its brain signals, also where it says "lie", "false" and "deception"
* Transdermal Optical Imaging (new)
These can greatly contribute to police standards of practice, routinely used. The courts have earlier been encouraged to use both video and audio recordings for lie detection in the process of legal work at these arenas.
It's also a strong belief that the combined use of all or any 2 gives the lie itself its death. That lying dies as this is incorporated on all levels throughout the legal systems of the World. That reality gives these 4 methods 100% (or near-100%) hit level in revealing lies/lying.
I'll follow up on some cases where its use can greatly influence the results. Ok? Cheers!
Transdermal Optical Imaging is presented by Kang Lee on TedTalks, by url, https://www.ted.com/talks/kang_lee_can_you_really_tell_if_a_kid_is_lying .
(Also see my work on ethical (moral) objectivity here: http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2012/09/ethical-objectivity-objection-to.html .)
--------
Lie detectors - A more happy and religious world?
It's my view that all the injustice of the World helps the Darwinian view as a kind of lifestyle and simultaneously demoralizes religious people making them use more energy to stay optimistic and cheerful.
In other words, a just World probably helps people in getting them more religious. So how do you see lie detectors help legal systems worldwide? I think there can be more resolve to help victims of domestic violence. Not only that, but also as a kind of confirmation of the stories that enter the police, they can test all sides of a reported crime to find out who's telling the truth. This can help police greatly, IMO. It can also aid in avoiding putting innocent people behind bars. I really see no end for the benefits.
The AVATAR:
From http://bgr.com/2016/12/28/lie-detector-test-kiosk-airport-avatar/.
Mike Wehner @MikeWehner
December 28th, 2016 at 7:16 PM
"Lie-detecting kiosks are coming to an airport near you"
Quote:
The system is called AVATAR, which is short for Automated Virtual Agent for Truth Assessments in Real Time, and is currently being tested by the Canadian Border Services Agency as well as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. It’s been in development for some time, and the United States has already deployed AVATAR kiosks in “low risk” areas to get a sense of how they might handle the flow of people moving into and out of the United States at the border.
Quote:
“AVATAR has been tested in labs, in airports and at border crossing stations,” Elkins told the SDSU NewsCenter. “The system is fully ready for implementation to help stem the flow of contraband, thwart fleeing criminals, and detect potential terrorists and many other applications in the effort to secure international borders.”
Lie detection progresses! Hurray! Because truth serves the people, democracy and Human Rights (eventually)!
Wednesday, 15 July 2015
The USA - Iran Relations - Diplomacy plays out..
The USA - Iran diplomatic relations play out and I intend to follow them. By the template of the conflict of Israel - Palestine of transparency to the public, I hope for better progress if pres. Obama hasn't accomplished this already.
Let's see, premise 1, we want a peaceful World with content citizens in all countries, including USA and Iran (well, well, if not happy directly). This implies progress for Iran, political, economic and social, probably. Remember that Iran treats its women fairly well, they're ahead of many other countries.
Iran stands at difficult economic situation as it sponsors or is accused of sponsoring terrorism by Hezbollah and Hamas, that's trangression against international norms.
It is currently under sanctions for its assumed intentions to acquire a nuclear weapon, something that's strongly unacceptable by the international society under the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty that's set up to prevent exactly such.
Iran (USA is good, internationally they do most correctly these days):
* Sponsoring terrorism, Hezbollah and Hamas. They use XXX dollars on this and they suffer XXX dollars in sponsoring these people who the international society see as terrorists trying to harm Israel.
SOLVED! * They hold 4 US Americans (3 for trying to smuggle drugs and one for killing a nun? True?).
* They presumably, until otherwise confirmed, by IAEA, try to acquire a nuclear weapon.
* ...
* ...
- For this, given they hold the 4 citizens unfairly (drugs are serious felonies in a number of countries, like China) and the rest, they suffer serious sanctions. Update, 2016-01-17, Iran releases the U.S. Americans, 4+1, after negotiations and a swap for Iranians being held in USA. This is great news indeed! Hurray! For a more peaceful world!
In wanting progress for all, for a World of justice and peace and careers also in Iran, the obvious aim is to work to reduce the transgressions in return for greater freedom as country and to yet again being seen as a plain country of the civilized World.
How? This is to be worked out, but as of now, sanctions are exactly just and should remain until better news. Also, Iran holds only 80 Mn people. There are limits to what they are able to do. Therefore, given their size, they need India, China, Pakistan and Russia to make the most of the "work" or change in the World, whatever this is. Further, therefore, their aim should be peaceful because they aren't able to do that much regardless. They have only this one goal in sight, namely PEACE! So let's see how they move about in the World.
Let's see, premise 1, we want a peaceful World with content citizens in all countries, including USA and Iran (well, well, if not happy directly). This implies progress for Iran, political, economic and social, probably. Remember that Iran treats its women fairly well, they're ahead of many other countries.
Iran stands at difficult economic situation as it sponsors or is accused of sponsoring terrorism by Hezbollah and Hamas, that's trangression against international norms.
It is currently under sanctions for its assumed intentions to acquire a nuclear weapon, something that's strongly unacceptable by the international society under the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty that's set up to prevent exactly such.
Iran (USA is good, internationally they do most correctly these days):
* Sponsoring terrorism, Hezbollah and Hamas. They use XXX dollars on this and they suffer XXX dollars in sponsoring these people who the international society see as terrorists trying to harm Israel.
SOLVED! * They hold 4 US Americans (3 for trying to smuggle drugs and one for killing a nun? True?).
* They presumably, until otherwise confirmed, by IAEA, try to acquire a nuclear weapon.
* ...
* ...
- For this, given they hold the 4 citizens unfairly (drugs are serious felonies in a number of countries, like China) and the rest, they suffer serious sanctions. Update, 2016-01-17, Iran releases the U.S. Americans, 4+1, after negotiations and a swap for Iranians being held in USA. This is great news indeed! Hurray! For a more peaceful world!
In wanting progress for all, for a World of justice and peace and careers also in Iran, the obvious aim is to work to reduce the transgressions in return for greater freedom as country and to yet again being seen as a plain country of the civilized World.
How? This is to be worked out, but as of now, sanctions are exactly just and should remain until better news. Also, Iran holds only 80 Mn people. There are limits to what they are able to do. Therefore, given their size, they need India, China, Pakistan and Russia to make the most of the "work" or change in the World, whatever this is. Further, therefore, their aim should be peaceful because they aren't able to do that much regardless. They have only this one goal in sight, namely PEACE! So let's see how they move about in the World.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)