The Human Rights, most explicitly, by UDHR, minimally, are now everywhere in the World with a possible exception of North Korea.
Russia is with the Council of Europe and USA has still New York state with UN as one of theirs.
EU is hosting the court of ECtHR in France. The idiots have fallen off the stairs to every university in the World, at least theoretically, such that absurd objections to evident, straight in the face truths and their cases are no longer "cool to utter", even if you have been a 10 people worth cannibal under police corruption or police states (huh, do they exist?)!
So here we are with a Worldscene, with some small exceptions, ALL HUMAN RIGHTS! Legal duties have become definite and absolute under the lie detector investigations and "police questioning rooms" on the good side, carrying out the work according to procedure.
For USA despite its "Onslow" speed (sorry for the Picket Fences reference from Britain) in reacting to New START Treaty and getting it through, here are some Human Rights references for them (also outside Scientology context, "so that they no longer need to feel that they have to present them, in a special way to some people"):
Government Organisation by http://www.humanrights.gov/contact-us/
To Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/HumanRightsgov
State Department by http://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/
Organisation more by http://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/human_rights_in_the_united_states
Link 2, http://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/
Human Rights Watch by http://www.hrw.org/
By Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Watch
Their email: HumanRightsWebsite@state.gov.
Additional:
http://www.humanrights.gov/2013/11/12/ambassador-power-on-human-rights-council-elections/ if you bother to read it.
Note: There's nothing wrong with Scientology presenting Human Rights, but, please, can't they add the UDHR reference for "Christ's sake"?
This makes me certain that we in Europe have been entertaining idiot politicians for a very long time, "and with a larger portion of them failing to read primary literature" if not the Bible directly.
We need to get our legs together people!
(Try to pull that face in USA!)
Over lunacy work for Human Rights and more (Justice, the good causes):
To say that legislation is passed against human rights or to subvert people is to be crazy in the work to advocate Human Rights (UDHR by UN).
Legislation can never be passed to protect, defend or cover for crime because this constitutes crime/corruption against own population, violates much international convention and agreement and does not pass the very formulation requirements themselves in being general.
The pro-Human Rights combatting must take place by combatting corruption and crime in general, that ICCt is correctly used and supported.
So to add, "heh-heh-heh, also in Norway", corrupt lawyers are very much a problem, as much as a psychiatric corrupt-minds-issue, when they in fact are relied on and are vital in offering legal services to the public as well as leading the police forces through the daily work.
What's next or what's the standing on the legal systems throughout the World? I don't know. One plain example: is the torture, also in terms of estimates, correctly reported? Also by the most important news-places, also by the most important authorities.
"Fun fact": The lyrics of "living on the edge" should have read, We're living on the edge when everybody should go up and nobody down [in terms of justice...] - emphasis on use of "should".
Saturday, 16 November 2013
Thursday, 14 November 2013
The Artificial Language for Linguistic Exactness - The Craziness of Philosophy - The Philosophy of Language
The artificial language in terms of completeness, aside from the use that the existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations give us is provided by,
connectives: AND, OR, NEGATION, CONDITIONAL, BICONDITIONAL (the usual), + the ones for quantification logic (for all and some, also one) and the two for modal logic (possible and necessary)
defining the entities: entities but perhaps not numbered
consistency: consistency takes as usual the premeditation almost to the point of planning. Being the De Dicto gives me a step ahead, but not any significant.
This enters in addition to Performative Utterances and Scientific Papers (from "Issues from the Internet") where exactly the above existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations are providing the necessary effectivity beyond misunderstandings, at least in a pragmatic way, given these texts.
While this solves the formal requirements set out for this project, the solution by providing the support for "existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations" is sufficient enough, even though it is simple to say to it, accounting all sorts of feats, from landing on the moon to the rest!
Tip: check for all papers/texts and books from the 80s and up. In addition, Tarski's sentence, ""the snow is white" implying the snow is white" gives the preceding peek for this clarification.
The sentence by Tarski, ""the snow is white" implying the snow is white" is admitted its strength based on the fact that snow is in fact "detected"/"found" in nature by its whiteness. Therefore, the technical, chemical term for snow, adding the physical environment as required is exactly as Tarski says it, "snow is white"!
The former, as addition to "Performative Utterances and Scientific Papers" by explaining my support of Artifical Language, an academic activity with only formal gain, possibly:
"The further development of my position on "Artificial Language Philosophy" is this simplicity, that more or less settles it, is that as the logical connectives enter the artificial language in non-contradictory way and maintaining the strict logical requirements of being consistent, the logical connectives can be read aloud like this fx. "the logical connective NOT" to [entity] "by parantheses" and reading onwards and that this, principally makes Carnap's project crossing the finishing line! Thank you for following me through!"
connectives: AND, OR, NEGATION, CONDITIONAL, BICONDITIONAL (the usual), + the ones for quantification logic (for all and some, also one) and the two for modal logic (possible and necessary)
defining the entities: entities but perhaps not numbered
consistency: consistency takes as usual the premeditation almost to the point of planning. Being the De Dicto gives me a step ahead, but not any significant.
This enters in addition to Performative Utterances and Scientific Papers (from "Issues from the Internet") where exactly the above existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations are providing the necessary effectivity beyond misunderstandings, at least in a pragmatic way, given these texts.
While this solves the formal requirements set out for this project, the solution by providing the support for "existing science- and daily manuals aided by drawings/illustrations" is sufficient enough, even though it is simple to say to it, accounting all sorts of feats, from landing on the moon to the rest!
Tip: check for all papers/texts and books from the 80s and up. In addition, Tarski's sentence, ""the snow is white" implying the snow is white" gives the preceding peek for this clarification.
The sentence by Tarski, ""the snow is white" implying the snow is white" is admitted its strength based on the fact that snow is in fact "detected"/"found" in nature by its whiteness. Therefore, the technical, chemical term for snow, adding the physical environment as required is exactly as Tarski says it, "snow is white"!
The former, as addition to "Performative Utterances and Scientific Papers" by explaining my support of Artifical Language, an academic activity with only formal gain, possibly:
"The further development of my position on "Artificial Language Philosophy" is this simplicity, that more or less settles it, is that as the logical connectives enter the artificial language in non-contradictory way and maintaining the strict logical requirements of being consistent, the logical connectives can be read aloud like this fx. "the logical connective NOT" to [entity] "by parantheses" and reading onwards and that this, principally makes Carnap's project crossing the finishing line! Thank you for following me through!"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)