Lately and with greater insight over a long period of time, the choice seems simple - being religious or being or becoming "wart"-religious. By "wart"-religious, I mean what happens when one (consistently) becomes immoral as a human being, one shoots off the humanity in one's self.
I agree that it is difficult to be religious at times as one is still exposed to bad people or even unscrupulous people.
As we Christians should know, the choice is between God and Heaven and Satan and Hell. However, it is unclear what qualifies to this in exact terms. Is it "so much sins" or "so much sins"? But what you can notice is that these bad people like to develop warts/papilloma both on the skin and inside the body, also in the brain. (See description of cancer like warts/papillomas.) They shed their humanity through and through by bad/vicious actions against others, preferably against good people (mostly religious). I think, therefore, that these people are "labeled" with warts/papillomas because the nervous system that also includes the brain is in its best state when the human is good and moral, also most intelligent. I.e., that I think the future will show that immoral people are those who have a bad nervous system full of warts/papilloma and that these warts/papillomas become a religion for them. They are doomed to cultivate their warts/papilloma as religion and that this is a spiral stair to Hell and a final state without humanity. They become monsters and enemies of humanity/the good people.
Again, I encourage you, the choice is easy! There is a choice between religion (eg. our/common Christianity or other "whitelist"-religion) or "wart"-religion and monsters in humanity.
You may want to search online for "wart(s)", "papilloma", "devil's mark" or "devil's taint." I have also written something about "wart(s)".
(Originally published in Norwegian at "www.verdidebatt.no" titled "Valget er enkelt - Å være religiøs eller å være "vorte"-religiøs", Oct 6, 2017.)
I'm saying that bad people are more likely to develop physical, literal warts (black/brown/red/white) in connection with their nervous system. You should know there are several types of warts, some of which are harmless.
It seems to me that all of the nervous system is affected by morality with a starting point where full health/full morality is the body without these "taints", triggers to the nervous system. So it can represent a new turn for religious people to stay away from a warty life and that these morally depraved people become these people with a wart/warts in the center of their lives. Only a claim for now, though.
Given all other strange efforts in 2017 and that no person is persecuted on grounds of warts, I don't see why people shouldn't have the information to be able to pursue investigation to what mentality these warts entail.
If it turns out to be true that cancer/warts are caused by (very) immoral thoughts/actions shouldn't the public know about it? Isn't it unscientific to shove such things under the rug on grounds of "politeness"?
I feel it's unfair to compare this effort to some (idiot/superstitious) instance of 1727 CE.
It's even more unfair if it turns out that people's mentality actually turns out to revolve around these things, the "warts", something we can use fMRI/MRI/plain sight to investigate in 2017.
To be clear then, this is not the suggestion for some kind of 21st century inquisition!
It has been my words, before the science, that have allowed us to smell the atmosphere of Mars without a person even setting foot there involving the sending of neurologically "compatible" signals straight from the planet's surface and then use a device to apply these signals to for example the skin of your nose-bone, no neural implants necessary.
You seem to demand that "I run before I can walk" and want to deny me the discussion of (possibly important) ideas. You make the unscientific claim that warts, the ones I discuss, the cancerous ones, arise from mere infection. This is not true. They are connected to the nervous system for reasons I'd like to investigate.
I see that Wikipedia is describing cancer apart from warts so if I just like to say that when I write "warts" I mean the "stuff" that has connections to the nervous system and that trigger (immoral) thoughts or dark feelings in the brain when they are touched, also by the mere contact of blood.
For now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_papillomavirus_infection.
Not in plain science yet, immoral people can be revealed by bio-electrical-value-readers straight from the skin although the results can be manipulated by use of cocaine (other as well?).
I find it important to make religious people more stalwart and faithful in their beliefs and in making the young people and Agnostics find religion attractive, also in intellectual respects.
There is an important difference in making mere science reports and submitting interesting ideas that may have positive impact in the World. Political correctness isn't a virtue and it's not a virtue either to write allegedly popular science that do not draw criticism.
I believe in my ideas until they may/might be disproven and to discuss them above the corruption in the World.
I write this (and the above) in full sincerity and that I am my brother's keeper!
Let's see who gets proven right!
Note: Ideas do come before the scientific evidence and it's part of science to make a scientific "program" (Imre Lakatos) in competition with other ideas to see who finally provides scientific description of worth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imre_Lakatos
Tuesday, 31 October 2017
Thursday, 17 August 2017
Cancer and I-relation - A new angle to Dualism - Relaunching
I've been having these "wild" thoughts as philosophical speculation. Whether cancer in a person and the corresponding view on oneself as "I" can relate to Dualism.
Now this may seem out of the ordinary and I'm trying to tie it together in this fashion: if one has cancer, does this cancer relate to one's own view of the "I"?
Let's say a confirming investigation could give something like this: one has cancer (always the case, only the ones who get questions) and then maybe answers such that "I" is of lesser importance or neglible.
So, "hopefully", one can find a correlation in cases of cancer (physical expression) and rather negative self-views on one's own "I" (the immaterial expression)! At least, this is what the investigation "aims" for, in that cancer can be seen as expression of a kind of negative impact on the (central) nervous system and therefore a negative impact on the self, the "I" correspondingly. Thus yielding insights to a dualistic view.
Sure thing, mind doesn't get cancer, thankfully, but it could be exciting to find a parallel expression in the mind if one exists. Maybe we are getting close to it above. No?
Far out? Long shot? What say you?
Now this may seem out of the ordinary and I'm trying to tie it together in this fashion: if one has cancer, does this cancer relate to one's own view of the "I"?
Let's say a confirming investigation could give something like this: one has cancer (always the case, only the ones who get questions) and then maybe answers such that "I" is of lesser importance or neglible.
So, "hopefully", one can find a correlation in cases of cancer (physical expression) and rather negative self-views on one's own "I" (the immaterial expression)! At least, this is what the investigation "aims" for, in that cancer can be seen as expression of a kind of negative impact on the (central) nervous system and therefore a negative impact on the self, the "I" correspondingly. Thus yielding insights to a dualistic view.
Sure thing, mind doesn't get cancer, thankfully, but it could be exciting to find a parallel expression in the mind if one exists. Maybe we are getting close to it above. No?
Far out? Long shot? What say you?
Cancer-Preventive Measures - Cancer as Psychiatric Idea - Reiteration
The simple sentences describes this:
If the checksum is right, it's OK, it's a healthy cell. If the checksum isn't right, then annihilate.
The checksum is the controlled amount of electricity that ripples through your nerve lines and that goes between two or more nerve ends. It has been proved that any cell can conduct electricity. A study that was followed through because of the likelihood that it would benefit the research of therapeutic genetic engineering.
Based on the nerve sensations the body takes out everything that has been defined and verified as a not OK checksum. As known, cancer arises from uncontrolled cell development making it a not OK checksum.
The conclusion: Be conscious of your feelings. They're what is used for a readily available body assessment. The thesis is this: If you hold a good consciousness and sensitivity with a nice disciplinary touch to your body, cancer will never be a problem, because your mind will hold your cells in check.
It's my view that the feelings/nerve signals/neurology are helping/controlling the body and more or less telling the body where to attack and where to hold off. This is part of the theory that feelings are just an addition to the largely rational system of being a body, that is rational according to function!
I think one has devoted very little research on the issue of how the nerve signals work in the body and that I think there may be a "gold mine" there to be discovered in how nerve signals relate to the body, to the genes, to the immune system, to the whole...
This, first and foremost, preventive recommendation of mentality can also contribute to the explanation of benign cancers, that there's a mechanism in the body that sets the brakes on or limits the nature of the actual benign cancer in one way or another.
One should remember that the mode of one's relationship with one's own feelings/nerve signals/neurology are a quite big issue/factor in the actual person's and as such, I think this factor (feelings/nerve signals/neurology) may be decisive above rather minor factors such as diet.
This is not part of what can be described as "the tyranny of positive thinking". My theory doesn't necessarily contain such an element. I'd rather say that your mood should reflect realities!
The Cancer Registry shows a difference of about 60 points in the scope of 344,3 versus 283,8 in favour of women across cancer diagnoses. I take this to support my theory as women are known to care more about their feelings and despite they also make up the greater part of the older population. Older people are generally more susceptible to cancer than the younger counterparts. Is this due to decline of the neurological system or the efforts of maintaining the body in the face of aging? It may also be that when you grow old, the brain makes more mistakes and send these mistakes into the body as nerve signals. It can also be that the brain fails, because of this old age, deterioration of brain, to detect the wrong signals from the body and sending corrective signals back.
These are the latest numbers, 2003-2007 from the Cancer Registry of Norway, link for men and women. The link has been accessed 20. November, 2009.
My theory of women actually having a different relationship to their bodies in terms of feelings, making women avoid cancer in greater degrees than men, when indeed I think that most other factors are more or less the same. One should note that risky behaviour can indicate, also, such an inferior relationship to one's own feelings already in young age, ie. heavy drinking among young men.
Besides, modern women and men have almost the same patterns when it comes to "smoke, drink and work". Haven't you heard about "double-working" women? Also, the smoking has come down heavily before 2001 as this set (to which the link points) is from 2001 to 2007. You should also note that cancer strikes, predominantly, the older scope of the population so the fact of heavy drinking young men doesn't have any (particular) impact. I agree to "avoiding carcinogenic substances is the (best/[a significant advise]) you can achieve in the avoidance of cancer" [by chaz wyman]. This is not about the mental concept of "emotions", it's about neurologic signals, "feelings", in your body before cancer occurs! Thus, this writing is not about some kind of "magic" cure. No, it's about "Cancer-Prevention Measures"! So, what I try to point out, is the relation a person has to one's own feelings (in the body) and not some mental size of sensing sadness and so on. The claim is, simply, that when people care for a "natural" relationship to their feelings, they can in great parts avoid cancer. To internalise a "mechanistic body image"/"reject natural body feelings" can therefore lead to cancer/increased probability for cancer in my opinion! This should come in addition to other good advice such as a healthy diet, physical exercise and the avoidance of carcinogenic substances!
I agree to some extent with your [bytesplicer] emphasis on stress, even including possibly that hazardous environment also puts stress on your body ie. being subject to carcinogenics puts a load on the body to get rid of it, lowering the "energies"/electricity to sustain the feelings that support your immune system and against abnormalities by cell life (cell division, cell breathing, cell workings).
So, I'm looking for the best range of feelings, not being below a certain value and not, possibly, being too high either.
(I've been thinking that my writing is on a stage where the next step is to actually enter the field and develop techniques like making a measuring device that measures the electricity between the fingers with a person who is typically resting and calm (for steady signals) and so on (making a data bank on these data gathered from "high and low" in society.)
Concerning protests to my theory on the basis of the cases of cancer in kids, i.e., below 18 yo., I write this:
in the case of cancer in kids I think one should move the search to epigenetics from the parents and combine this with the conditions (incl. epigenetics) of the children.
The children are also mostly struck with leukemia of what I understand.
Children are also (only) one percent or less of the total of cancer-struck patients whether malignant or benign...
As a remark. There's something more also: There are the perspectives of idealism into biological manifest as a form of evolution or forming a frame for evolution.
For faster diagnostication of cancer in the body here and there, one may use radiology by photon emitter and -detector set at special frequency and by "signature", of course, as usual (also in for example quality control of food in food industry or restaurants).
If the checksum is right, it's OK, it's a healthy cell. If the checksum isn't right, then annihilate.
The checksum is the controlled amount of electricity that ripples through your nerve lines and that goes between two or more nerve ends. It has been proved that any cell can conduct electricity. A study that was followed through because of the likelihood that it would benefit the research of therapeutic genetic engineering.
Based on the nerve sensations the body takes out everything that has been defined and verified as a not OK checksum. As known, cancer arises from uncontrolled cell development making it a not OK checksum.
The conclusion: Be conscious of your feelings. They're what is used for a readily available body assessment. The thesis is this: If you hold a good consciousness and sensitivity with a nice disciplinary touch to your body, cancer will never be a problem, because your mind will hold your cells in check.
It's my view that the feelings/nerve signals/neurology are helping/controlling the body and more or less telling the body where to attack and where to hold off. This is part of the theory that feelings are just an addition to the largely rational system of being a body, that is rational according to function!
I think one has devoted very little research on the issue of how the nerve signals work in the body and that I think there may be a "gold mine" there to be discovered in how nerve signals relate to the body, to the genes, to the immune system, to the whole...
This, first and foremost, preventive recommendation of mentality can also contribute to the explanation of benign cancers, that there's a mechanism in the body that sets the brakes on or limits the nature of the actual benign cancer in one way or another.
One should remember that the mode of one's relationship with one's own feelings/nerve signals/neurology are a quite big issue/factor in the actual person's and as such, I think this factor (feelings/nerve signals/neurology) may be decisive above rather minor factors such as diet.
This is not part of what can be described as "the tyranny of positive thinking". My theory doesn't necessarily contain such an element. I'd rather say that your mood should reflect realities!
The Cancer Registry shows a difference of about 60 points in the scope of 344,3 versus 283,8 in favour of women across cancer diagnoses. I take this to support my theory as women are known to care more about their feelings and despite they also make up the greater part of the older population. Older people are generally more susceptible to cancer than the younger counterparts. Is this due to decline of the neurological system or the efforts of maintaining the body in the face of aging? It may also be that when you grow old, the brain makes more mistakes and send these mistakes into the body as nerve signals. It can also be that the brain fails, because of this old age, deterioration of brain, to detect the wrong signals from the body and sending corrective signals back.
These are the latest numbers, 2003-2007 from the Cancer Registry of Norway, link for men and women. The link has been accessed 20. November, 2009.
My theory of women actually having a different relationship to their bodies in terms of feelings, making women avoid cancer in greater degrees than men, when indeed I think that most other factors are more or less the same. One should note that risky behaviour can indicate, also, such an inferior relationship to one's own feelings already in young age, ie. heavy drinking among young men.
Besides, modern women and men have almost the same patterns when it comes to "smoke, drink and work". Haven't you heard about "double-working" women? Also, the smoking has come down heavily before 2001 as this set (to which the link points) is from 2001 to 2007. You should also note that cancer strikes, predominantly, the older scope of the population so the fact of heavy drinking young men doesn't have any (particular) impact. I agree to "avoiding carcinogenic substances is the (best/[a significant advise]) you can achieve in the avoidance of cancer" [by chaz wyman]. This is not about the mental concept of "emotions", it's about neurologic signals, "feelings", in your body before cancer occurs! Thus, this writing is not about some kind of "magic" cure. No, it's about "Cancer-Prevention Measures"! So, what I try to point out, is the relation a person has to one's own feelings (in the body) and not some mental size of sensing sadness and so on. The claim is, simply, that when people care for a "natural" relationship to their feelings, they can in great parts avoid cancer. To internalise a "mechanistic body image"/"reject natural body feelings" can therefore lead to cancer/increased probability for cancer in my opinion! This should come in addition to other good advice such as a healthy diet, physical exercise and the avoidance of carcinogenic substances!
I agree to some extent with your [bytesplicer] emphasis on stress, even including possibly that hazardous environment also puts stress on your body ie. being subject to carcinogenics puts a load on the body to get rid of it, lowering the "energies"/electricity to sustain the feelings that support your immune system and against abnormalities by cell life (cell division, cell breathing, cell workings).
So, I'm looking for the best range of feelings, not being below a certain value and not, possibly, being too high either.
(I've been thinking that my writing is on a stage where the next step is to actually enter the field and develop techniques like making a measuring device that measures the electricity between the fingers with a person who is typically resting and calm (for steady signals) and so on (making a data bank on these data gathered from "high and low" in society.)
Concerning protests to my theory on the basis of the cases of cancer in kids, i.e., below 18 yo., I write this:
in the case of cancer in kids I think one should move the search to epigenetics from the parents and combine this with the conditions (incl. epigenetics) of the children.
The children are also mostly struck with leukemia of what I understand.
Children are also (only) one percent or less of the total of cancer-struck patients whether malignant or benign...
As a remark. There's something more also: There are the perspectives of idealism into biological manifest as a form of evolution or forming a frame for evolution.
For faster diagnostication of cancer in the body here and there, one may use radiology by photon emitter and -detector set at special frequency and by "signature", of course, as usual (also in for example quality control of food in food industry or restaurants).
To live life according to principles of life (ref: Hinduism, Veda?), the health and the Objective Ethics that I may add my own neuro-value (from between the fingertips or more technically, with the needle and meter attached). This level is presupposed to stay on top of the own awareness of neurology/feelings and that this too represents at the very end as theory for countering the cancers of all types.
The idea from the original writing is of course to create a debate that may kill various stupid ideas in society, such as the blatant suppression of others and further push for better medical practices and better health campaigns much like fitness campaigns for avoiding artery-diseases. In addition, of course, that people are made able to record privately or by doctor, their neuro-values with a very simple device.
As such, by summary, we have then these three levels:
1. The life according to life principles, to health and more.
2. The Healthy Neuro-Values, the awareness of own neurology, of own feelings.
3. The dangerous values and, possibly, a person's growing ignorance to life and cancer alike.
I suspect it's even common now to measure these cancer-relevant values in USA! So, go ahead and try to be stupid about it, you other people...!
Also, the neuro-values are NOT supposed to reflect stress, they are supposed to reflect a person in "neutral state", relaxed and "ordinary".
Perhaps we are looking for a kind of "core"-spectrum value. I think so as I lack the finishing opportunities for getting the data-set together, clinically, science-worth speaking...
There can't be a cure for cancer because a cure necessarily relies on the neural/electrical signals of the body and they are in the cases of cancer WRONG in the first place. The thing to hope for, though, is for cancer to turn benign... But the wrong signals, the wrong signals...
http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/cells/badcom/ writes "Cell growth and division is such an important process that it is under tight control with many checks and balances. But even so, cell communication can break down. The result is uncontrolled cell growth, often leading to cancer. Cancer can occur in many ways, but it always requires multiple signaling breakdowns. Often, cancer begins when a cell gains the ability to grow and divide even in the absence of a signal. Ordinarily this unregulated growth triggers a signal for self-destruction. But when the cell also loses the ability to respond to death signals, it divides out of control, forming a tumor. Later cell communication events cause blood vessels to grow into the tumor, enabling it to grow larger. Additional signals allow the cancer to spread to other parts of the body."
So the case with an imagined cancer in the arm (maybe not the usual, but let's imagine), I happen to think that one has, in one's mind, severely abused the arm of a person to such an extent that in one's own mind this arm has become "neurologically marked" by symptoms of cancer (warts) in the arm and a repugnance in the mind where the arm is no longer considered as a good part of the body, but still used! Thus, there is actually a kind of correspondence in both the mind and the physical part that's the arm. This is a hypothesis for investigation.
The case is clear! The body-electric value/bio-value of people with cancer is lower than in people of a sound mind/very reliable people! Yet society fails to publish such studies that may enable people to take a course of intelligence/wisdom, living the good life! Thus, feelings are moral after all?
Given the special mindset of people with cancer, there should be rich possibilities with getting confirmations by "swimhat"-fMRI!
Thus we have: moral people in the best sense will never become affected by cancer! On the other side: the immoral will generally become affected, it becomes their "religion"! To psychology and psychiatry!
The study for the initial 1000 people, laying down an examination schema, can be reliably completed in 1-2 years! Given the troubles of the World, the case should be completed and crystal clear in 10-20 years time. Which is to say that the investigation is well-defined and certainly not pseudo-scientific.
Let's imagine a different case of cancer/warts: what if one case of cancer arises on the penis of a man because he has used it to suffocate women and children numerous times, perhaps reviving them multiple times. Let's also say he has in some way taken part in torture by using his penis pervertly. Let's say further his penis falls off by the consequences of the cancer/warts.
Now, shouldn't the public know how this cancer arises, these warts arise by this case? I mean, if there is a clear causal relationship between disgusting acts of immorality and cancer/warts then my opinion is that the public/the World has a definite right TO KNOW THIS!
"Concerning protests to my theory on the basis of the cases of cancer in kids, i.e., below 18 yo., I write this:
in the case of cancer in kids I think one should move the search to epigenetics from the parents and combine this with the conditions (incl. epigenetics) of the children."
So, we have the (emotional) moral leadership from parents to children and the feelings-exchange from a parent to the child may mean A LOT to the child. Again, there's not much said in this regard (research/science).
So I conclude with that children with cancer are in one way or another "emotionally abused" toward having their feelings the wrong way. They may learn to behave "mechanically", disregard their own feelings and so on. Some (few?) may even have been abused/tortured by "specialists" and become affected by cancer/warts (even "warts" in the blood) "over night" as one way to survival/ending the abuse/torture against them, but I have no estimate for this. Cancer in children is already rare.
Either way, children with cancer can or should be examined with "swimhat"-fMRI and given input-response checks by a given set of pictures, but this is "limited"/given by the intelligence of the examiner. For instance, one picture may hold various instances of cancer directly as one suggestion, to check what "signals" or "firings" take place in the child. No matter what, whether signals for pains or other, the child's brain is _modular_! And this can prove very useful for the examination of the child.
One step further? Toward the end of the schematics (for my Nobel Prize, thiii-hiii-hii)? In every respect, I hope the research community takes this to heart, whether in Chile, South Africa, Pakistan or India (or "the Western World") as ordinary cancer research has had at least 50 years already! ("Shame on you!")
To this investigation, under Personality Psychology:
To identify factors of common traits of psychology that generates cancer in the body.
It is my theory that a lack of moral psychology has such bearing on the nervous system that the body looses control and that cancer results, also depending on the corresponding signature in the mentality of the given person.
Means:
"swimhat"-fMRI
device for identifying bio-electrical value, a "stick", generates mA outcome from the nerves, I think, almost like a USB-stick in size
qualitative interviews, revolving around morality, feelings, harmony of mentality to the body
Cancer: By my perspective on cancer, the World has a chance to become cancerfree in some 200 yrs because of the heavy work with culture, thereof, given that 200 years may be seen as a long time (to wait).
To this investigation, under Personality Psychology:
To identify factors of common traits of psychology that generates cancer in the body.
It is my theory that a lack of moral psychology has such bearing on the nervous system that the body loses control and that cancer results, also depending on the corresponding signature in the mentality of the given person. Loses in the sense that body control is lost due to the lack of moral psychology, Kantianistic type, no insincerity or play with moral ideas such as Utilitarianism allowed.
Means:
"swimhat"-fMRI
device for identifying bio-electrical value, a "stick", generates mA outcome from the nerves, I think, almost like a USB-stick in size.
Some key words: qualitative interviews, revolving around morality, feelings, harmony of mentality to the body.
As a consequence from the above, there's a good chance that cancer can be fought with schizophrenia medicine (and ECT, I suppose) in helping cancer patients to live longer.
The short story is thus:
Immoral mentality implies schizophrenia and cancer where cancer is symptom of schizophrenia.
On Cancer and Sexology:
What is the sexology of cancer patients above 25 years of age?
One guess (loosely): homosexual tendencies high, plus exotic tendencies as well, BDSM, sodomy and the rest... Thus, "category"-schizophrenia, especially the "deep"-schizophrenia patients, and cancer patients align by this aspect too!
Optimal treatment for all cancers may be this "despite doing nothing more than halting cancer and not preventing cancer":
"Full treatment" of cancer:
* Injected opiates/subutex/"clean" heroin, at suitable locations/hospitals/clinics/special homes for sleep?
* Electro-convulsion therapy (ECT, that is generally enjoyed by these patients)
* One special type of cancer drug removing (some) "warty/papilloma"-stuff (from Australia?). Nivolumab (Opdivo)? The cancer drug in question destroys cancer cells chemically, though I can't remember the mechanisms.
* The usual schizophrenics drugs, 3 strengths according to ECT effects wearing off, starting with the weakest of course.
In addition to the anti-cancer treatment, surgery etc., prescribed by the physicians/oncologists.
Actually, the treatment of cancer and schizophrenia may have much in common, unknown if this is exactly 100% given that schizophrenia may not have developed that much cancer/cancerous stuff that requires surgery of various kinds, radiological surgery, scalpel surgery, the rest...
Please note!
By "The Full Treatment" of Schizophrenia program you can halt the ailments of a lot, diseases, degeneration of immune system, stopping (early) symptoms of ALS, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Cancer (all types), HIV/AIDS, etc. In general, you halt or nullify some or all proneness to all negative effects by schizophrenia.
You may also halt or nullify some or all increasing need for more drugs. So the treatment of schizophrenia may be the key to successful treatment of drug addicts, ALL of them!
* The connection to ALS may be questioned. Research yet to confirm.
* Some of this, the above, may require more research for (final) confirmation.
By this note, I say that schizophrenia is a key illness in making patients prone to all ailments in the broadest sense, be they cancer, weakened immune system, all sorts of bacteria and viruses, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS and the rest. The ailments, all of them! Science in hand, the best!
See also The Good People List and, if you will, The Bad People List! "The future is still looking very bright!"
One note on (all) cancer research.
It may well amount to disinformation of the public if one continues to ignore "the possible fact" of "category"-schizophrenia connected to all types of cancer. If the public is not given the information that there may well be a connection between ("category"-)schizophrenia and all types of cancer then this may be a type of disinformation to the public. There are the metabolism readings and there are the treatments by schizophrenia medication and ECT for these cancer patients to quickly determine the connection! The duties...
-------------------
22.02.2003, 20.11.2009, 04.02.2010, 05.02.2010, 07.02.2010, 28.10.2010 and 20.02.2011
Terje Lea©2003, ©2009, ©2010, ©2011
Note: a comment concerning cancer in children has been added today, 20.02.2011, but written to the Philosophy Now forum 18.02.2011.
The idea from the original writing is of course to create a debate that may kill various stupid ideas in society, such as the blatant suppression of others and further push for better medical practices and better health campaigns much like fitness campaigns for avoiding artery-diseases. In addition, of course, that people are made able to record privately or by doctor, their neuro-values with a very simple device.
As such, by summary, we have then these three levels:
1. The life according to life principles, to health and more.
2. The Healthy Neuro-Values, the awareness of own neurology, of own feelings.
3. The dangerous values and, possibly, a person's growing ignorance to life and cancer alike.
I suspect it's even common now to measure these cancer-relevant values in USA! So, go ahead and try to be stupid about it, you other people...!
Also, the neuro-values are NOT supposed to reflect stress, they are supposed to reflect a person in "neutral state", relaxed and "ordinary".
Perhaps we are looking for a kind of "core"-spectrum value. I think so as I lack the finishing opportunities for getting the data-set together, clinically, science-worth speaking...
There can't be a cure for cancer because a cure necessarily relies on the neural/electrical signals of the body and they are in the cases of cancer WRONG in the first place. The thing to hope for, though, is for cancer to turn benign... But the wrong signals, the wrong signals...
http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/cells/badcom/ writes "Cell growth and division is such an important process that it is under tight control with many checks and balances. But even so, cell communication can break down. The result is uncontrolled cell growth, often leading to cancer. Cancer can occur in many ways, but it always requires multiple signaling breakdowns. Often, cancer begins when a cell gains the ability to grow and divide even in the absence of a signal. Ordinarily this unregulated growth triggers a signal for self-destruction. But when the cell also loses the ability to respond to death signals, it divides out of control, forming a tumor. Later cell communication events cause blood vessels to grow into the tumor, enabling it to grow larger. Additional signals allow the cancer to spread to other parts of the body."
So the case with an imagined cancer in the arm (maybe not the usual, but let's imagine), I happen to think that one has, in one's mind, severely abused the arm of a person to such an extent that in one's own mind this arm has become "neurologically marked" by symptoms of cancer (warts) in the arm and a repugnance in the mind where the arm is no longer considered as a good part of the body, but still used! Thus, there is actually a kind of correspondence in both the mind and the physical part that's the arm. This is a hypothesis for investigation.
The case is clear! The body-electric value/bio-value of people with cancer is lower than in people of a sound mind/very reliable people! Yet society fails to publish such studies that may enable people to take a course of intelligence/wisdom, living the good life! Thus, feelings are moral after all?
Given the special mindset of people with cancer, there should be rich possibilities with getting confirmations by "swimhat"-fMRI!
Thus we have: moral people in the best sense will never become affected by cancer! On the other side: the immoral will generally become affected, it becomes their "religion"! To psychology and psychiatry!
The study for the initial 1000 people, laying down an examination schema, can be reliably completed in 1-2 years! Given the troubles of the World, the case should be completed and crystal clear in 10-20 years time. Which is to say that the investigation is well-defined and certainly not pseudo-scientific.
Let's imagine a different case of cancer/warts: what if one case of cancer arises on the penis of a man because he has used it to suffocate women and children numerous times, perhaps reviving them multiple times. Let's also say he has in some way taken part in torture by using his penis pervertly. Let's say further his penis falls off by the consequences of the cancer/warts.
Now, shouldn't the public know how this cancer arises, these warts arise by this case? I mean, if there is a clear causal relationship between disgusting acts of immorality and cancer/warts then my opinion is that the public/the World has a definite right TO KNOW THIS!
"Concerning protests to my theory on the basis of the cases of cancer in kids, i.e., below 18 yo., I write this:
in the case of cancer in kids I think one should move the search to epigenetics from the parents and combine this with the conditions (incl. epigenetics) of the children."
So, we have the (emotional) moral leadership from parents to children and the feelings-exchange from a parent to the child may mean A LOT to the child. Again, there's not much said in this regard (research/science).
So I conclude with that children with cancer are in one way or another "emotionally abused" toward having their feelings the wrong way. They may learn to behave "mechanically", disregard their own feelings and so on. Some (few?) may even have been abused/tortured by "specialists" and become affected by cancer/warts (even "warts" in the blood) "over night" as one way to survival/ending the abuse/torture against them, but I have no estimate for this. Cancer in children is already rare.
Either way, children with cancer can or should be examined with "swimhat"-fMRI and given input-response checks by a given set of pictures, but this is "limited"/given by the intelligence of the examiner. For instance, one picture may hold various instances of cancer directly as one suggestion, to check what "signals" or "firings" take place in the child. No matter what, whether signals for pains or other, the child's brain is _modular_! And this can prove very useful for the examination of the child.
One step further? Toward the end of the schematics (for my Nobel Prize, thiii-hiii-hii)? In every respect, I hope the research community takes this to heart, whether in Chile, South Africa, Pakistan or India (or "the Western World") as ordinary cancer research has had at least 50 years already! ("Shame on you!")
To this investigation, under Personality Psychology:
To identify factors of common traits of psychology that generates cancer in the body.
It is my theory that a lack of moral psychology has such bearing on the nervous system that the body looses control and that cancer results, also depending on the corresponding signature in the mentality of the given person.
Means:
"swimhat"-fMRI
device for identifying bio-electrical value, a "stick", generates mA outcome from the nerves, I think, almost like a USB-stick in size
qualitative interviews, revolving around morality, feelings, harmony of mentality to the body
Cancer: By my perspective on cancer, the World has a chance to become cancerfree in some 200 yrs because of the heavy work with culture, thereof, given that 200 years may be seen as a long time (to wait).
To this investigation, under Personality Psychology:
To identify factors of common traits of psychology that generates cancer in the body.
It is my theory that a lack of moral psychology has such bearing on the nervous system that the body loses control and that cancer results, also depending on the corresponding signature in the mentality of the given person. Loses in the sense that body control is lost due to the lack of moral psychology, Kantianistic type, no insincerity or play with moral ideas such as Utilitarianism allowed.
Means:
"swimhat"-fMRI
device for identifying bio-electrical value, a "stick", generates mA outcome from the nerves, I think, almost like a USB-stick in size.
Some key words: qualitative interviews, revolving around morality, feelings, harmony of mentality to the body.
As a consequence from the above, there's a good chance that cancer can be fought with schizophrenia medicine (and ECT, I suppose) in helping cancer patients to live longer.
The short story is thus:
Immoral mentality implies schizophrenia and cancer where cancer is symptom of schizophrenia.
On Cancer and Sexology:
What is the sexology of cancer patients above 25 years of age?
One guess (loosely): homosexual tendencies high, plus exotic tendencies as well, BDSM, sodomy and the rest... Thus, "category"-schizophrenia, especially the "deep"-schizophrenia patients, and cancer patients align by this aspect too!
Optimal treatment for all cancers may be this "despite doing nothing more than halting cancer and not preventing cancer":
"Full treatment" of cancer:
* Injected opiates/subutex/"clean" heroin, at suitable locations/hospitals/clinics/special homes for sleep?
* Electro-convulsion therapy (ECT, that is generally enjoyed by these patients)
* One special type of cancer drug removing (some) "warty/papilloma"-stuff (from Australia?). Nivolumab (Opdivo)? The cancer drug in question destroys cancer cells chemically, though I can't remember the mechanisms.
* The usual schizophrenics drugs, 3 strengths according to ECT effects wearing off, starting with the weakest of course.
In addition to the anti-cancer treatment, surgery etc., prescribed by the physicians/oncologists.
Actually, the treatment of cancer and schizophrenia may have much in common, unknown if this is exactly 100% given that schizophrenia may not have developed that much cancer/cancerous stuff that requires surgery of various kinds, radiological surgery, scalpel surgery, the rest...
Please note!
By "The Full Treatment" of Schizophrenia program you can halt the ailments of a lot, diseases, degeneration of immune system, stopping (early) symptoms of ALS, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Cancer (all types), HIV/AIDS, etc. In general, you halt or nullify some or all proneness to all negative effects by schizophrenia.
You may also halt or nullify some or all increasing need for more drugs. So the treatment of schizophrenia may be the key to successful treatment of drug addicts, ALL of them!
* The connection to ALS may be questioned. Research yet to confirm.
* Some of this, the above, may require more research for (final) confirmation.
By this note, I say that schizophrenia is a key illness in making patients prone to all ailments in the broadest sense, be they cancer, weakened immune system, all sorts of bacteria and viruses, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS and the rest. The ailments, all of them! Science in hand, the best!
See also The Good People List and, if you will, The Bad People List! "The future is still looking very bright!"
One note on (all) cancer research.
It may well amount to disinformation of the public if one continues to ignore "the possible fact" of "category"-schizophrenia connected to all types of cancer. If the public is not given the information that there may well be a connection between ("category"-)schizophrenia and all types of cancer then this may be a type of disinformation to the public. There are the metabolism readings and there are the treatments by schizophrenia medication and ECT for these cancer patients to quickly determine the connection! The duties...
22.02.2003, 20.11.2009, 04.02.2010, 05.02.2010, 07.02.2010, 28.10.2010 and 20.02.2011
Terje Lea©2003, ©2009, ©2010, ©2011
Note: a comment concerning cancer in children has been added today, 20.02.2011, but written to the Philosophy Now forum 18.02.2011.
Tuesday, 8 August 2017
Idea for Film: The Telepaths and Reincarnators - A kind of near/immediate Sci-Fi...
Idea for film: The Telepaths and Reincarnators fighting crime and cooperating from afar, across the planet Earth. That the heros and heroines can use telepathy as communication and being able to destroy themselves and reincarnate somewhere conveniently close to an action scene or another. A kind of (near/immediate) Sci-Fi! Wearing special "Agent" clothing or something else...
Cool?
Another idea: Cult of the Wart!
Special members of a cult in for example New York (or somewhere else, fittingly) are living special lives according to the Code of Wart. Warts in this culture, be they "expensive" or "cheap", yields a kind of genealogy and remains the religion for them in a strict hierarchical group. They do crime and take pleasure in the most sodomistic ways. The filthy ways make their lives, in all social interaction and certainly mentally! "Coming to a screen near you!" Genre: Thriller/horror.
Cool?
Another idea: Cult of the Wart!
Special members of a cult in for example New York (or somewhere else, fittingly) are living special lives according to the Code of Wart. Warts in this culture, be they "expensive" or "cheap", yields a kind of genealogy and remains the religion for them in a strict hierarchical group. They do crime and take pleasure in the most sodomistic ways. The filthy ways make their lives, in all social interaction and certainly mentally! "Coming to a screen near you!" Genre: Thriller/horror.
Friday, 14 July 2017
One Idea for (Generic/Worldwide) Zero Unemployment - "Common Company"/"Intellectual Property Company"
One idea for (generic/Worldwide) zero unemployment:
You make a company "Common Company"/"Intellectual Property Shop" that hires/is required by law to hire all unemployed people and other people who want to work with the company. Then you set up various "factories/mechanical shops/workshops" or whatever, in addition to buying software licenses in order to enable these people.
So the rules of this "Common Company"/"Intellectual Property Shop" are very relaxed down to the point that people do not need to do ANYTHING for working there. They are just hired!
But my suspicion (by good knowledge of people's psychology and happiness) is that people want to work and that people like to make a name for themselves. Indeed, work (or the opportunity to work) makes people HAPPY!
Bottom line:"I have so many ideas and based on local production and Quantitative Easing I can hire the entire World of unemployed people!"
So I hereby (virtually) hire the whole World of people who are unemployed!
To this comes the Social Programs for families and others and "corporate" lawyers hired for services to the people of "Common Company..." with the heavyweight of all these employees to solve all sorts of problems they may have! :-)
This is in line with 100 % Society: https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2012/05/100-society-matter-of-political-science.html.
To say it with President Donald Trump, "I'm going to make the World so great that it has never been before!"
To this comes the Social Programs for families and others and "corporate" lawyers hired for services to the people of "Common Company..." with the heavyweight of all these employees to solve all sorts of problems they may have!
Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!
The future looks really BRIGHT!
(More to come!)
You make a company "Common Company"/"Intellectual Property Shop" that hires/is required by law to hire all unemployed people and other people who want to work with the company. Then you set up various "factories/mechanical shops/workshops" or whatever, in addition to buying software licenses in order to enable these people.
So the rules of this "Common Company"/"Intellectual Property Shop" are very relaxed down to the point that people do not need to do ANYTHING for working there. They are just hired!
But my suspicion (by good knowledge of people's psychology and happiness) is that people want to work and that people like to make a name for themselves. Indeed, work (or the opportunity to work) makes people HAPPY!
Bottom line:"I have so many ideas and based on local production and Quantitative Easing I can hire the entire World of unemployed people!"
So I hereby (virtually) hire the whole World of people who are unemployed!
To this comes the Social Programs for families and others and "corporate" lawyers hired for services to the people of "Common Company..." with the heavyweight of all these employees to solve all sorts of problems they may have! :-)
This is in line with 100 % Society: https://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2012/05/100-society-matter-of-political-science.html.
To say it with President Donald Trump, "I'm going to make the World so great that it has never been before!"
To this comes the Social Programs for families and others and "corporate" lawyers hired for services to the people of "Common Company..." with the heavyweight of all these employees to solve all sorts of problems they may have!
Principally,
1 Mn people service the same 1 Mn people, including oneself. Then 1 Mn services if individual services by administration of robots. Then this means 1 Mn $ income by 1 $ for each person served, affording 1 Mn products and services including the service to oneself.
Proof: Everyone can become dollar-millionaires on Earth and at the same time affording many products and services if not exactly 1 Mn services and products, i.e., living the life of a dollar-millionaire!
The future looks really BRIGHT!
(More to come!)
Extended Death in Dignity - Human Rights Improved, Suicides Prevented - The Ethics...
Now there is no doubt that "the right to a death in dignity" is important! Also for our own human worth. But... It might be that if for example this "right to a death in dignity" is ensured for typically younger people who have deep depressions and, as a result, are qualified (required) through 3 or 5 years(?) at psychologists or psychiatrists before they are allowed to die. This qualifying period will be reported to the authorities and thus you can use this to prevent suicide in this younger group in the future because they told about all the craziness/vileness (crime) they have been through and in this way, Norway and other countries may improve their human rights work on a much deeper level so that ALL suicides can be prevented (except those where there are a disease and those who will die a death in dignity of old age). Is this something? Still good luck with the good work, you people who work for dying in dignity! WE WIN through!
There seems to be a duty in doing this work, making this happen that's implied by the suicides themselves, especially for the group 10 to 50 year olds. A citizens' commission for inquiry into suicides for this group?
There seems to be a duty in doing this work, making this happen that's implied by the suicides themselves, especially for the group 10 to 50 year olds. A citizens' commission for inquiry into suicides for this group?
Wednesday, 12 July 2017
The Definition of the Political Attempt - The internet erases important political nomenclature?
This is for amending the "politically correct Internet" in it trying to erase the concept of "political attempt"!
An attempt (preliminary) for definition:
"The "political attempt" is what takes place, rightfully/morally, when or if a state violates its own (explicit) duties toward individual citizens or groups of people, e.g. IRA, Irish Republican Army, may be said to do (ethical/moral) political attempts in its "armed struggle" against the (alleged?) oppression of Irish/of Irish descent Catholics in Northern Ireland. The "armed struggle" by Palestine Liberation Organization, PLO is also an example (possibly) of people doing political attempts. I also happen to think a number of citizens have committed political attempts though they are generally not mentioned by media as media seldom reports violations of citizens in democracies!)"
IRA: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/topics/troubles_politics and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Republican_Army.
PLO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Liberation_Organization.
Individual citizens as victims of state crime have largely been neglected by politically correct/corrupt media so don't expect to find material about them. Just for mentioning one person, though a dubious person and an alleged Neo-Nazi, Timothy McVeigh, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh. (Be careful in seeing this guy as carrying out "political attempt", however.)
--------------
Some side notes over state crimes:
Anders Behring Breivik: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik can be mentioned as one guy criticizing political correctness, but his criticism goes "here and there".
I accuse Jens Stoltenberg for enlisting a gang for the means to his political ends/gains known as The (Nazi) Jugend List where Nazi Jugend describes a band of people possibly going all the way by immoral actions, such as torture of people and more (threats, etc.). I also suspect Stoltenberg for living in Farsund local district for some time, probably thereby starting his enlisting of horrible/dubious people. To be true, I don't know the story 100%. I may be wrong.
I can also claim that Norwegian vileness may have had tentacles to genocidal Serbia from 1991 - 1995 and so may have had "people on the ground" during the Srebrenica massacre ("perhaps" never mentioned by Norwegian media nor ever been given an account of by them):
"2 - Norwegian Assistance to BiH 1991-2008"
"Norway became engaged in the Western Balkans as soon as hostilities broke out in
1991, by providing humanitarian assistance in BiH and Croatia. Once the DPA was
signed, focus was shifted towards reconstruction and development, and subsequently
to aiding the process of Euro-Atlantic association, state-building and democratization.
Support for the Western Balkans was classified as Official Development Assistance
(ODA) and thus could have been expected to be handled by Norway’s development
cooperation agency Norad. Because of the highly political nature of Norway’s
engagement in the region, however, and the fact that the main actors on the donor
side were political and/or security bodies like the EU, OSCE and NATO, the MFA
decided that it would manage the funds itself. Only during the period 1999-2003
was Norad formally involved, when it was asked to manage the medium-term
activities in BiH and Albania. All along, however, Norway emphasized the importance
of ensuring that its aid was aligned with and supported overall policy objectives
of the international community."
"During the period 1992-1995, the annual allocations were for humanitarian aid and
relief, along with support to IDPs. The key aim for Norway’s early aid, according to
an MFA review document from 1997, was “to assist the refugees as close to their
place of origin as possible. The Norwegian program has therefore had BiH as its
focus of attention” (Annex I, our translation). The Budget Documents presented a
running political analysis of the conflict, being quite realistic concerning the timelines
and how soon the conflict might end during the first years."
Ref.: "Evaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation with the Western Balkans" by https://www.oecd.org/derec/norway/45900070.pdf, p. 13.
I claim that parts of or all the Norwegian vileness to Serbia has been led by Jens Stoltenberg and his associates.
Jens Stoltenberg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jens_Stoltenberg, where the biography of his has a black hole from "10 yo. to 40 yo.", I don't know exactly how big it is. Again, the media has been ignorant/neglecting (of its duties).
--------------
By political science, there is a traditional rightness to political attempt:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_revolution - Right to revolt or commit the political attempt:
"Individual or collective right"
"Although some explanations of the right of revolution leave open the possibility of its exercise as an individual right, it was clearly understood to be a collective right under English constitutional and political theory."
"In political philosophy, the right of revolution is the right or duty of the people of a nation to overthrow a government that acts against their common interests and/or threatens the safety of the people without probable cause."
Further: "The U.S. Declaration of Independence states that "when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government""
Not that I think there will be a revolution in "democratic" Norway, but that the right or in fact the duty to commit the political attempt is protected and natural as answer to injustice by deep abuses of power, whether failure to defend your UDHR Human Rights or other!
--------------
Personally and for example, in gaining (more) motivation for the political attempt:
People everywhere may feel offended by the Norwegian, public, inhumane treatment of my person. Thus valid (ethical) threats from everywhere by political attempt? Human Rights (UDHR) should prevail everywhere! To victory, globally!
An attempt (preliminary) for definition:
"The "political attempt" is what takes place, rightfully/morally, when or if a state violates its own (explicit) duties toward individual citizens or groups of people, e.g. IRA, Irish Republican Army, may be said to do (ethical/moral) political attempts in its "armed struggle" against the (alleged?) oppression of Irish/of Irish descent Catholics in Northern Ireland. The "armed struggle" by Palestine Liberation Organization, PLO is also an example (possibly) of people doing political attempts. I also happen to think a number of citizens have committed political attempts though they are generally not mentioned by media as media seldom reports violations of citizens in democracies!)"
IRA: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/topics/troubles_politics and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Republican_Army.
PLO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Liberation_Organization.
Individual citizens as victims of state crime have largely been neglected by politically correct/corrupt media so don't expect to find material about them. Just for mentioning one person, though a dubious person and an alleged Neo-Nazi, Timothy McVeigh, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh. (Be careful in seeing this guy as carrying out "political attempt", however.)
--------------
Some side notes over state crimes:
Anders Behring Breivik: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik can be mentioned as one guy criticizing political correctness, but his criticism goes "here and there".
I accuse Jens Stoltenberg for enlisting a gang for the means to his political ends/gains known as The (Nazi) Jugend List where Nazi Jugend describes a band of people possibly going all the way by immoral actions, such as torture of people and more (threats, etc.). I also suspect Stoltenberg for living in Farsund local district for some time, probably thereby starting his enlisting of horrible/dubious people. To be true, I don't know the story 100%. I may be wrong.
I can also claim that Norwegian vileness may have had tentacles to genocidal Serbia from 1991 - 1995 and so may have had "people on the ground" during the Srebrenica massacre ("perhaps" never mentioned by Norwegian media nor ever been given an account of by them):
"2 - Norwegian Assistance to BiH 1991-2008"
"Norway became engaged in the Western Balkans as soon as hostilities broke out in
1991, by providing humanitarian assistance in BiH and Croatia. Once the DPA was
signed, focus was shifted towards reconstruction and development, and subsequently
to aiding the process of Euro-Atlantic association, state-building and democratization.
Support for the Western Balkans was classified as Official Development Assistance
(ODA) and thus could have been expected to be handled by Norway’s development
cooperation agency Norad. Because of the highly political nature of Norway’s
engagement in the region, however, and the fact that the main actors on the donor
side were political and/or security bodies like the EU, OSCE and NATO, the MFA
decided that it would manage the funds itself. Only during the period 1999-2003
was Norad formally involved, when it was asked to manage the medium-term
activities in BiH and Albania. All along, however, Norway emphasized the importance
of ensuring that its aid was aligned with and supported overall policy objectives
of the international community."
"During the period 1992-1995, the annual allocations were for humanitarian aid and
relief, along with support to IDPs. The key aim for Norway’s early aid, according to
an MFA review document from 1997, was “to assist the refugees as close to their
place of origin as possible. The Norwegian program has therefore had BiH as its
focus of attention” (Annex I, our translation). The Budget Documents presented a
running political analysis of the conflict, being quite realistic concerning the timelines
and how soon the conflict might end during the first years."
Ref.: "Evaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation with the Western Balkans" by https://www.oecd.org/derec/norway/45900070.pdf, p. 13.
I claim that parts of or all the Norwegian vileness to Serbia has been led by Jens Stoltenberg and his associates.
Jens Stoltenberg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jens_Stoltenberg, where the biography of his has a black hole from "10 yo. to 40 yo.", I don't know exactly how big it is. Again, the media has been ignorant/neglecting (of its duties).
--------------
By political science, there is a traditional rightness to political attempt:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_revolution - Right to revolt or commit the political attempt:
"Individual or collective right"
"Although some explanations of the right of revolution leave open the possibility of its exercise as an individual right, it was clearly understood to be a collective right under English constitutional and political theory."
"In political philosophy, the right of revolution is the right or duty of the people of a nation to overthrow a government that acts against their common interests and/or threatens the safety of the people without probable cause."
Further: "The U.S. Declaration of Independence states that "when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government""
Not that I think there will be a revolution in "democratic" Norway, but that the right or in fact the duty to commit the political attempt is protected and natural as answer to injustice by deep abuses of power, whether failure to defend your UDHR Human Rights or other!
--------------
Personally and for example, in gaining (more) motivation for the political attempt:
People everywhere may feel offended by the Norwegian, public, inhumane treatment of my person. Thus valid (ethical) threats from everywhere by political attempt? Human Rights (UDHR) should prevail everywhere! To victory, globally!
Tuesday, 11 July 2017
Why Religion, the Ethical Life - Keeping the Atheists at a Distance?
It's not so much that "Universe has to have a purpose" but to think, by deep intuition by ethical living, that there's something there beyond a "simple, cold grave"! Besides, if this "cold grave" thinking leads people awry then what is the responsibility? At least with the soul people can speculate and have a hope in life. Why kill this hope? Why keep whining that people have "superfluous, unscientific" thoughts as if it's supposed to have merit? In short, what if the Atheists are d*mn wrong? At least ethical living will carry a lot positive with it in case the hope proves to be in vain...!
What I'm saying is that ethical living may lead to (better) after-life! If not only the good consequences of ethical living in this life, that is, both for society and family and friends and yourself, ethical living proves valuable (given that there may only be this "cold grave")!
The logic:
Prem. 1: Ethical living -> hope of (great) after-life "and possibly more, i.e., God/Heaven"
Prem. 2: If not (great) after-life -> ethical living -> Very good consequences in this life, society, family, friends, yourself
(Deduction)
Conclusion: Ethical living proves worthwhile in every respect!
What if ethical living proves crucial for all this hope in God or what if there's something fantastic in death by living ethically? What is the responsibility for those against this? It seems they risk very little by insisting on a "cold grave" and being "scientific" despite the very stories of the many Near-Death Experiences and Out-of-body experiences! Why do they bother if the answer isn't to spread the corrupt mind?
What I'm saying is that ethical living may lead to (better) after-life! If not only the good consequences of ethical living in this life, that is, both for society and family and friends and yourself, ethical living proves valuable (given that there may only be this "cold grave")!
The logic:
Prem. 1: Ethical living -> hope of (great) after-life "and possibly more, i.e., God/Heaven"
Prem. 2: If not (great) after-life -> ethical living -> Very good consequences in this life, society, family, friends, yourself
(Deduction)
Conclusion: Ethical living proves worthwhile in every respect!
What if ethical living proves crucial for all this hope in God or what if there's something fantastic in death by living ethically? What is the responsibility for those against this? It seems they risk very little by insisting on a "cold grave" and being "scientific" despite the very stories of the many Near-Death Experiences and Out-of-body experiences! Why do they bother if the answer isn't to spread the corrupt mind?
(By this, finally, I hope to shove all Atheists into Secular Humanism or Humanism with Atheism!)
Palaeontology: Warning and Questions! - The given science by nature...
To the "conjurers", the cheaters... A warning!
It concerns palaeontology in the way that one can (possibly, not normal) "conjure" or "produce" fossils by doing the "voodoo", horrible to (I guess) children, them being most "popular" and their "plasticity", in seeking "freak nature" of this kind, can be directed toward "producing"/"conjuring" these fossils "on demand" and "by design", actually! All I'm saying is that I'm against this "practice" by palaeontologists and associates who may no longer have the mentality of human beings after treating people this horribly bad! I'm also sorry that this comes to you as readers as other-worldly!
The science.
Besides, has anybody pondered the time span of abiogenesis to today's animals? It seems that the speed of abiogenesis is quite rapid in laboratory experiments and more crucially, what decides which animals/organisms get developed first?
Is there a definite palaeontological logic that says that human beings can't be developed "straight up" as long as the fundamentals for living are there, the temperature, the fruits and all other edible and so on?
It concerns palaeontology in the way that one can (possibly, not normal) "conjure" or "produce" fossils by doing the "voodoo", horrible to (I guess) children, them being most "popular" and their "plasticity", in seeking "freak nature" of this kind, can be directed toward "producing"/"conjuring" these fossils "on demand" and "by design", actually! All I'm saying is that I'm against this "practice" by palaeontologists and associates who may no longer have the mentality of human beings after treating people this horribly bad! I'm also sorry that this comes to you as readers as other-worldly!
The science.
Besides, has anybody pondered the time span of abiogenesis to today's animals? It seems that the speed of abiogenesis is quite rapid in laboratory experiments and more crucially, what decides which animals/organisms get developed first?
Is there a definite palaeontological logic that says that human beings can't be developed "straight up" as long as the fundamentals for living are there, the temperature, the fruits and all other edible and so on?
Tuesday, 4 July 2017
Seeking to Prove the Souls of People - At the frontier of science...
Let's take the example of the soul and let's "imagine" a way to prove it.
We have two sizeable pools for two people to voluntary drown themselves in, forcing the souls, 2, to separate from the 2 bodies.
Let's "imagine" further that the 2 souls are so friendly and gentle to one another that they are able to follow one another in the forms of 2 souls, human-sized, I guess.
Then some "diverse" interaction between these 2 souls. Then, from this "out-of-body" state the 2 souls decide to retrieve their bodies by "flying" to these 2 bodies lying there lifeless in the 2 pools and "retake up" their respective bodies.
Then, we at the outside of the situation, the friends to these 2 bodies with souls in them, these 2 people, may note they begin to wake in the pools and help them out of the pools.
Later, these 2 people go through (f)MRI scans to confirm the new mental content that also light up "reality" mark in these 2 heads/brains.
I suggest, by the above, that we "now" (by our current imagination here at the blog, Whatiswritten777, reading) have proven the existence of soul/souls, interacting and more.
Proof by inter-subjective/objective facts in 2 people and by clinical death state in these 2 people while "soul-walking". Also, the new (f)MRI scans support our findings.
Good?
--------
Some technical details, suggestions:
Time: 20 minutes to "drown" and 20 minutes of "flying time/soul time". Oxygenated pools and possibly (lightly) chlorinated. Water temperature: 22 degrees Celsius.
Pools, 4x4 meters each, in order to hold sufficient oxygen/air.
We have two sizeable pools for two people to voluntary drown themselves in, forcing the souls, 2, to separate from the 2 bodies.
Let's "imagine" further that the 2 souls are so friendly and gentle to one another that they are able to follow one another in the forms of 2 souls, human-sized, I guess.
Then some "diverse" interaction between these 2 souls. Then, from this "out-of-body" state the 2 souls decide to retrieve their bodies by "flying" to these 2 bodies lying there lifeless in the 2 pools and "retake up" their respective bodies.
Then, we at the outside of the situation, the friends to these 2 bodies with souls in them, these 2 people, may note they begin to wake in the pools and help them out of the pools.
Later, these 2 people go through (f)MRI scans to confirm the new mental content that also light up "reality" mark in these 2 heads/brains.
I suggest, by the above, that we "now" (by our current imagination here at the blog, Whatiswritten777, reading) have proven the existence of soul/souls, interacting and more.
Proof by inter-subjective/objective facts in 2 people and by clinical death state in these 2 people while "soul-walking". Also, the new (f)MRI scans support our findings.
Good?
--------
Some technical details, suggestions:
Time: 20 minutes to "drown" and 20 minutes of "flying time/soul time". Oxygenated pools and possibly (lightly) chlorinated. Water temperature: 22 degrees Celsius.
Pools, 4x4 meters each, in order to hold sufficient oxygen/air.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)