Hitler sits on a special chair, all naked and ready to get a**-licked, awfully enough to very many people, very dubious, dark scene.
Then the pictures run (from the infamous speeches) with Hitler's voice being the siren's song to a "dumbfounded, drooling" person, woman or man, versions?, (by actor of course).
End scene: The two (in the very dark): THIS IS HOW IT GOES WITH A PERSON WHO IS UNABLE TO MAKE THE GOOD MORAL JUDGMENTS, right there, slavishly under Hitler "with Simpson's sounds", hmmm... you're so awfully ugly, but so good tastin' too hmmmmm ¤%¤#%¤%¤%!#¤%! hmmmm
With Eichmann next? The rest of the Nazi-Dachau Physicians next? When will the perversion be stopped?!
(Human Rights now! Realistically too! With the UDHR Art. 3 of Personal Security! To Decency! To Intelligent Living!)
Good enough? You are (hereby) free to follow up making one to YouTube or whatever! "I race you to the finishing line!"
PS: Remember also, please, that we drive this on many levels, trying to make NRA, U.S. Department of State: Consular Affairs, United Nations and Pentagon a part of our campaign, adding their voices on how to best achieve Human Rights throughout the World. THEY HAVE ALSO HARD DUTIES BY THE UNIVERSALITY PRINCIPLE OF ETHICS (or Corwin Amendment for nations, "in US. style language").
The Campaign is for personal weapons for every population on the planet, flatly, so that no person can be easily obstructed by corrupt goverment (see origin of "terrorism" from France).
The tags then: Art. 3, Europe, Gandhi, Germany, Hitler, Human Rights, Indian regiment to WW2, intelligence, Personal Security, UDHR, Universality principle.
Adding some too: Consular Affairs, NRA, Pentagon, U.S. Department of State, United Nations.
Well, well, not really relevant, but for background still, supporting the whole arrangement:
The Question of Personal Weapon and Personal Security - UDHR Article 3
There's a question to NRA (National Rifle Association) if they are supporting the World in acquiring weapons for all, making it law or making it a Right in their nation...
I expect them to give an affirmative and that they are therefore in-line with the State Department. I want to write this as a heads-up for UN and most/all other nations in expecting a given behaviour from USA in aftermath of "Financial Radicalism" charges to Nazi-Germany, in making their efforts to improve the World, also in terms of humanism/human rights/humanistic progress.
So it goes:
* U. S. (American) State Department gives its public statement for the normative personal weapons rights to everywhere in the World
* So does the NRA.
* So does the UN.
* And Pentagon plays with it, displaying the use of the personal weapon.
This is inline with the sales, Worldwide, of the non-lethal weapons. That USA owes us, outside its nation, these efforts, until we too have achieved it, as far as possible.
In short, I WANT/RECOMMEND MUCH CAMPAIGNING for all and everywhere, having suggested the (mobilised) army to take part, over a 14 days period. Remember that this is about the decent family life for everyone. If not decent families, then life everywhere maybe broken DOWN!
Note: That to mention the (central) Article 3 of the UDHR doesn't necessarily entail only one article. No, the consequences are thought to influence, critically or not, many/all the others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association , note on singular vs. text above.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Department.
This also connects with explanations of universal duties from and to one-another and in being human one-self and bringing this humanity to others as well, from old, "making other people able to _hold_ the Bible" themselves too"!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_values.
Universal value - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Case for USA above Europe and Everywhere Else
1. Industry production (by reliability also) is high in USA, entailing healthy, functional people with beliefs in their society.
2. I understand the corrupt minds very well and how the guilt from failure to duties abroad influxes into USA on the "macro-scale".
3. USA has now carried out a large social welfare reform gently moved in, to remove much contradiction inside its nation in terms of Human Rights. Importantly too, the legal system ... allowing the citizens autonomy and initiative to react to deeply upsetting criminal scenes in the public and not in particular fear either to tip the police.
Sub-point: Insecurity to neighbour... dire consequences.
To cut the usual "smile of idiocy" from European thinking, that the Universality Principle of Ethics as safety-webbing is easily DESTROYED if one sits there trying to say that the Principle and Insecurity to the neighbour (with a possible disposition of acceptance by torture to the neighbour) by refusing to accept the personal weapons (max. 5?) and non-lethal weapons to ALL, denying these bloated psychiatrists these aloof statements over sanity as THEY have allowed "vampires to walk in broad daylight", like "educated torturers" and serial-killers, 10 or more!
The academic usual at the end: Instantly, I submit to the Objectivity and more powerful arguments if they exist as well as the best data-sets to these (academic) matters of political science/legal forensics.
The court issues: theology and psychiatry are traditionally alike banned from the courts in terms of presenting Legal Objectivity. They are only, especially psychiatry now, allowed to enter for testifying as experts to a given (narrow) aspect.
In addition, legal blindness is the Cardinal Sin that condemns either of the acting parties of the court, including the judge. (The judge is continuously under the duty to not become legally blind, i.e., corrupt or "insane".)
Two "missing" sentences above:
3. Importantly too, their legal system has higher standing in terms of crime, allowing the citizens autonomy and initiative to react to deeply upsetting criminal scenes in the public and not in particular fear either to tip the police and for deeper intuitions of decency, dignity and human worth (than in Europe, elsewhere, hence the "necessity" of "meat shops", crime you can't talk about, the "necessity" of torture, etc.).
Sub-point ("reiteration"): Insecurity (by physical insecurity, "a door open") as insistence to the neighbour, universally, can have dire, negative consequences.
Additionally and outside, possibly, the campaign: Regarding Elie Wiezel, all respects, in Aftenposten, 2014-01-27, also being of North European descent through several hundred years (esp. 1900 – 1946 and Nuremberg), I’ll choose instead the more factual route for now by “USA Theory”, so to speak, computer-simulating (by USA data-set, inviting both mathematicians, Applied Mathematics and Wolfram, the program) a possible other destiny for our uneducated Hitler, setting necessary Kripke lines by 1925 and 1933 up to 1939.
(Holding of course on to two others, the non-lethal weapons and the neuro-meters, unsettling to read L. Ron Hubbard’s “0 – 8 The Basics” and the Ethics tone scale!)
The Campaign is for personal weapons for every population on the planet, flatly, so that no person can be easily obstructed by corrupt goverment (see origin of "terrorism" from France).
The tags then: Art. 3, Europe, Gandhi, Germany, Hitler, Human Rights, Indian regiment to WW2, intelligence, Personal Security, UDHR, Universality principle.
Adding some too: Consular Affairs, NRA, Pentagon, U.S. Department of State, United Nations.
Well, well, not really relevant, but for background still, supporting the whole arrangement:
The Question of Personal Weapon and Personal Security - UDHR Article 3
There's a question to NRA (National Rifle Association) if they are supporting the World in acquiring weapons for all, making it law or making it a Right in their nation...
I expect them to give an affirmative and that they are therefore in-line with the State Department. I want to write this as a heads-up for UN and most/all other nations in expecting a given behaviour from USA in aftermath of "Financial Radicalism" charges to Nazi-Germany, in making their efforts to improve the World, also in terms of humanism/human rights/humanistic progress.
So it goes:
* U. S. (American) State Department gives its public statement for the normative personal weapons rights to everywhere in the World
* So does the NRA.
* So does the UN.
* And Pentagon plays with it, displaying the use of the personal weapon.
This is inline with the sales, Worldwide, of the non-lethal weapons. That USA owes us, outside its nation, these efforts, until we too have achieved it, as far as possible.
In short, I WANT/RECOMMEND MUCH CAMPAIGNING for all and everywhere, having suggested the (mobilised) army to take part, over a 14 days period. Remember that this is about the decent family life for everyone. If not decent families, then life everywhere maybe broken DOWN!
Note: That to mention the (central) Article 3 of the UDHR doesn't necessarily entail only one article. No, the consequences are thought to influence, critically or not, many/all the others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association , note on singular vs. text above.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Department.
This also connects with explanations of universal duties from and to one-another and in being human one-self and bringing this humanity to others as well, from old, "making other people able to _hold_ the Bible" themselves too"!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_values.
Universal value - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Case for USA above Europe and Everywhere Else
1. Industry production (by reliability also) is high in USA, entailing healthy, functional people with beliefs in their society.
2. I understand the corrupt minds very well and how the guilt from failure to duties abroad influxes into USA on the "macro-scale".
3. USA has now carried out a large social welfare reform gently moved in, to remove much contradiction inside its nation in terms of Human Rights. Importantly too, the legal system ... allowing the citizens autonomy and initiative to react to deeply upsetting criminal scenes in the public and not in particular fear either to tip the police.
Sub-point: Insecurity to neighbour... dire consequences.
To cut the usual "smile of idiocy" from European thinking, that the Universality Principle of Ethics as safety-webbing is easily DESTROYED if one sits there trying to say that the Principle and Insecurity to the neighbour (with a possible disposition of acceptance by torture to the neighbour) by refusing to accept the personal weapons (max. 5?) and non-lethal weapons to ALL, denying these bloated psychiatrists these aloof statements over sanity as THEY have allowed "vampires to walk in broad daylight", like "educated torturers" and serial-killers, 10 or more!
The academic usual at the end: Instantly, I submit to the Objectivity and more powerful arguments if they exist as well as the best data-sets to these (academic) matters of political science/legal forensics.
The court issues: theology and psychiatry are traditionally alike banned from the courts in terms of presenting Legal Objectivity. They are only, especially psychiatry now, allowed to enter for testifying as experts to a given (narrow) aspect.
In addition, legal blindness is the Cardinal Sin that condemns either of the acting parties of the court, including the judge. (The judge is continuously under the duty to not become legally blind, i.e., corrupt or "insane".)
Two "missing" sentences above:
3. Importantly too, their legal system has higher standing in terms of crime, allowing the citizens autonomy and initiative to react to deeply upsetting criminal scenes in the public and not in particular fear either to tip the police and for deeper intuitions of decency, dignity and human worth (than in Europe, elsewhere, hence the "necessity" of "meat shops", crime you can't talk about, the "necessity" of torture, etc.).
Sub-point ("reiteration"): Insecurity (by physical insecurity, "a door open") as insistence to the neighbour, universally, can have dire, negative consequences.
Additionally and outside, possibly, the campaign: Regarding Elie Wiezel, all respects, in Aftenposten, 2014-01-27, also being of North European descent through several hundred years (esp. 1900 – 1946 and Nuremberg), I’ll choose instead the more factual route for now by “USA Theory”, so to speak, computer-simulating (by USA data-set, inviting both mathematicians, Applied Mathematics and Wolfram, the program) a possible other destiny for our uneducated Hitler, setting necessary Kripke lines by 1925 and 1933 up to 1939.
(Holding of course on to two others, the non-lethal weapons and the neuro-meters, unsettling to read L. Ron Hubbard’s “0 – 8 The Basics” and the Ethics tone scale!)
The Campaign is for personal weapons for every population on the planet, flatly, so that no person can be easily obstructed by corrupt goverment (see origin of "terrorism" from France).
ReplyDeleteThe tags then: Art. 3, Europe, Gandhi, Germany, Hitler, Human Rights, Indian regiment to WW2, intelligence, Personal Security, UDHR, Universality principle.
Adding some too: Consular Affairs, NRA, Pentagon, U.S. Department of State, United Nations.
ReplyDeleteWell, well, not really relevant, but for background still, supporting the whole arrangement:
ReplyDeleteThe Question of Personal Weapon and Personal Security - UDHR Article 3
There's a question to NRA (National Rifles Association) if they are supporting the World in acquiring weapons for all, making it law or making it a Right in their nation...
I expect them to give an affirmative and that they are therefore in-line with the State Department. I want to write this as a heads-up for UN and most/all other nations in expecting a given behaviour from USA in aftermath of "Financial Radicalism" charges to Nazi-Germany, in making their efforts to improve the World, also in terms of humanism/human rights/humanistic progress.
So it goes:
* U. S. (American) State Department gives its public statement for the normative personal weapons rights to everywhere in the World
* So does the NRA.
* So does the UN.
* And Pentagon plays with it, displaying the use of the personal weapon.
This is inline with the sales, Worldwide, of the non-lethal weapons. That USA owes us, outside its nation, these efforts, until we too have achieved it, as far as possible.
In short, I WANT/RECOMMEND MUCH CAMPAIGNING for all and everywhere, having suggested the (mobilised) army to take part, over a 14 days period. Remember that this is about the decent family life for everyone. If not decent families, then life everywhere maybe broken DOWN!
Note: That to mention the (central) Article 3 of the UDHR doesn't necessarily entail only one article. No, the consequences are thought to influence, critically or not, many/all the others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association , note on singular vs. text above.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Department .
This also connects with explanations of universal duties from and to one-another and in being human one-self and bringing this humanity to others as well, from old, "making other people able to _hold_ the Bible" themselves too"!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_values .
Universal value - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Case for USA above Europe and Everywhere Else
ReplyDelete1. Industry production (by reliability also) is high in USA, entailing healthy, functional people with beliefs in their society.
2. I understand the corrupt minds very well and how the guilt from failure to duties abroad influxes into USA on the "macro-scale".
3. USA has now carried out a large social welfare reform gently moved in, to remove much contradiction inside its nation in terms of Human Rights. Importantly too, the legal system ... allowing the citizens autonomy and initiative to react to deeply upsetting criminial scenes in the public and not in particular fear either to tip the police.
Sub-point: Insecurity to neighbour... dire consequences.
To cut the usual "smile of idiocy" from European thinking, that the Universality Principle of Ethics as safety-webbing is easily DESTROYED if one sits there trying to say that the Principle and Insecurity to the neighbour (with a possible disposition of acceptance by torture to the neighbour) by refusing to accept the personal weapons (max. 5?) and non-lethal weapons to ALL, denying these bloated psychiatrists these aloof statements over sanity as THEY have allowed "vampires to walk in broad daylight", like "educated torturers" and serial-killers, 10 or more!
The academic usual at the end: Instantly, I submit to the Objectivity and more powerful arguments if they exist as well as the best data-sets to these (academic) matters of political science/legal forensics.
Text is not entirely finished!
The court issues: theology and psychiatry are traditionally alike banned from the courts in terms of presenting Legal Objectivity. They are only, especially psychiatry now, allowed to enter for testifying as experts to a given (narrow) aspect.
ReplyDeleteIn addition, legal blindness is the Cardinal Sin that condemns either of the acting parties of the court, including the judge. (The judge is continuously under the duty to not become legally blind, i.e., corrupt or "insane".)
Two "missing" sentences above:
ReplyDelete3. Importantly too, their legal system has higher standing in terms of crime, allowing the citizens autonomy and initiative to react to deeply upsetting criminial scenes in the public and not in particular fear either to tip the police and for deeper intuitions of decency, dignity and human worth (than in Europe, elsewhere, hence the "necessity" of "meatshops", crime you can't talk about, the "necessity" of torture, etc.).
Sub-point ("reiteration"): Insecurity (by physical insecurity, "a door open") as insistence to the neighbour, universally, can have dire, negative consequences.
Additionally and outside, possibly, the campaign: Regarding Elie Wiezel, all respects, in Aftenposten, 2014-01-27, also being of North European descent through several hundred years (esp. 1900 – 1946 and Nuremberg), I’ll choose instead the more factual route for now by “USA Theory”, so to speak, computer-simulating (by USA data-set, inviting both mathematicians, Applied Mathematics and Wolfram, the program) a possible other destiny for our uneducated Hitler, setting necessary Kripke lines by 1925 and 1933 up to 1939.
ReplyDelete(Holding of course on to two others, the non-lethal weapons and the neuro-meters, unsettling to read L. Ron Hubbard’s “0 – 8 The Basics” and the Ethics tone scale!)
"It's better to die by the gun than the torture!"
ReplyDeleteAt least for suicides:
ReplyDeleteIt's stated that "Approximately one-half of suicides are committed by firearm, accounting for two-thirds of all firearms deaths. [21,334 of 33,599 in 2014]"[24-reference]
Those are decent suicides! In Europe we do all sorts of crazy things in order to (finally) die because either it's the corrupt authorities hunting the suicide candidates only to get more torture on them. A corruption we in Europe usually never can do anything about because the self-protection is outlawed, that is, guns, pepperspray, tazers and killer knives. And that's after the 20 times the suicide candidates "bounce" about before they ide!
"The same article [USA Today] stated that there are far fewer homicides than suicides in the country; in fact, homicide rates have fallen by half in the U.S. since 1991."
So homcides are bad, but the numbers are improving and the victims have gotten the death by gun shot, not tortured a few times first as in Europe.
For the instances of torture in Europe, pick out the stats for murders, missing people and a good portion of the suicides who "failed" to die when tortured!
At spot no. 48 USA comes in with 12.6 per 100 000 people.
At spot no. 102 Norway comes in with 9.3 per 100 K people.
Hurray! At spot no. 123 United Kingdom comes in with 7.4 per 100 K people.
Now, from the above and given Europe's tendency to sodomy, corruption and lying for the facade, also for protection (because a wounded prey in Europe usually gets "taken" quickly).
You know, I happen to think that USA takes it (accepts the deaths, some also "beautiful"), all factors considered! (Don't say you're young, please, because then you have quite a bit of learning to do!)
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_the_United_States
Some additional:
Warburton, N., 2004, p. 21. The Basics - Philosophy, 4th ed. Routledge: New York The Problem of Evil. "...of the widespread practice of torture." and "...all examples of moral evil or cruelty: human beings inflicting suffering on other human beings..."
The basic reasoning for guns to your aid, whether only for yourself or for your family:
ReplyDeleteThe Bible
New International Version
"Even though I walk through the darkest valley, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me."
You may think that guns are awful, but the invisible hand of torture (threats) is much, much worse!
In addition, those who are in desperate situations, on the average, get a much easier way out of unbearable psychological/physical pains!
One solution...
ReplyDeleteI can think of, is the one to improve society by The 4 Factors. Now, USA has these guns "everywhere" and also pepper spray, but what about the other 2: lie detection array (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals ("against 500 conditions in human beings").
Clearly, lie detection array can be used by police internal affairs, by FBI, by common police and by the courts.
Radio-based scanner portals can reveal the abuse of science by detecting criminal implants put there by monster-physicians, including the monster-surgeons, etc. They can also make the job much easier for ordinary physicians in detecting a given condition.
So:
We have one shooting. The shooter has a history. Let's say bullying. So who failed this shooter? We use lie detection array to reveal and punish failing school services, failing police services, failing other services which may have received cries for help from the shooter before the person becomes the shooter.
One important point is to feed the aftermath to Media (MainStreamMedia and other) and local society of these steps to reveal these failing services and the punishing of them so that future failures to provide services will be stopped or deeply warned against. In this way, one can start to provide young people and others with ever-increasing quality of services so to prevent (all) abuse of people so that the thoughts of wanting to shoot other people never come to mind.
Rationale for implementing The 4 Factors everywhere in the World:
ReplyDelete1. The unarmed Jews before Kristallnacht and Holocaust in Nazi-Germany.
2. The financial success, might of military forces (NATO and Human Rights (UDHR) as opposed to Communist/Atheist Soviet Union and general character of person in USA by allowing the population their self-defence by pepper spray and guns and other.
3. point is of course that the sadistic perverts, torturers of children, who can't handle guns (pistols, revolvers) and pepper spray get extra protection if the population is denied this self-defence.
Thinking about a new song built on "Go West" by Pet Shop Boys
ReplyDelete- A kind of activists' song!
2018-07-24
New Song, version on "Go West": USA - The 4 Factors (Hail to USA, the Leader of the Free World)
Music: Pet Shop Boys (no need for alterations, even the choir voices are still good)
Come on, come on, come on, come on
(USA) we will go our way - whether German USA as OSA or English USA with accented A on the end
The 4 factors
(USA) we will leave someday
we need them a lot
(USA) your hand in my hands
then peace will be
(USA) we will make our plans
and families see
(Together) we will fly so high
and with happiness too
(Together) tell all our friends goodbye
(Together) we will start life new
(Together) this is what we'll do
life is peaceful there
(Go west) in the open air
(Go west) where the skies are blue
(Go west) this is what we're gonna do
(Go west, this is what we're gonna do, go west)
we will love the beach
(Together) we will learn and teach
(Together) change our pace of life
(Together) we will work and strive
I know you love me
(I want you) how could I disagree?
(So that's why) I make no protest
(When you say) you will do the rest
life is peaceful there
(Go west) in the open air
(Go west) baby you and me
(Go west) this is our destiny (aah)
(Go west) sun in wintertime
(Go west) we will do just fine
(Go west) where the skies are blue
(Go west, this is what we're gonna do)
There where the air is free
We'll be (we'll be) what we want to be (aah aah aah aah)
Now if we make a stand (aah)
We'll find (we'll find) our promised land (aah)
there are many ways
(To live there) in the sun or shade
(Together) we will find a place
(To settle) where there's so much space
(Without rush) and the pace back east
(The hustling) rustling just to feed
(I know I'm) ready to leave too
(So that's what) we are gonna do
(What we're gonna do is)
life is peaceful there
(Go west) there in the open air
(Go west) where the skies are blue
(Go west) this is what we're gonna do
(Life is peaceful there)
Go west (in the open air)
Go west (baby, you and me)
Go west (this is our destiny)
Come on, come on, come on, come on
(Go west) sun in wintertime
(Go west) we will feel just fine
(Go west) where the skies are blue
(Go west) this is what we're gonna do
(Come on, come on, come on)
How should we continue?