Formal Declaration as Victor over State of Norway

As a political victim and being persecuted by State of Norway, now and undeniably (subverting my relocation to some place abroad and other), I declare victory over State of Norway given my many achievements in the World of Intellectuality, forcing them backward to eventually saying "...but we have the physical forces to dominate your livelihood and to cause your death", depriving me of my natural life, effectively, confirming my status now as political dissident of Norway, being Pro-Democratic Activist!

This follows the given logic of this: victor, victor, victor, victor, finally victim and death, by torture or not, medically aided or not!!! Thus, history is likely to tell my story of being victor despite a possible death as victim, with or without being able to "escape" abroad!

There are hundreds of implications of this, all of which should have been embarrassing or deeply embarrassing to the State of Norway, but given this awful, political climate, such utterances have become impossible, displaying a evident idiot condition of a finally idiot nation that has lost all its values, all of its causes!!!

As I've now won the Intelligence war of the World, with many feats such as the historical account of "Hindenburg-New-York", I finally say too: I've won (again), idiots! Thus, of course, I can refer to the heading and the point of this text.

I'm sorry for presenting such an account for this nation and it has not been a part of my ideas and the leadership that I've wanted and for those sensitive enough, I place myself in disappointment and grief with them! Thanks for now!

Over Victor and Victim - Contribution to English language or not...

This is a notice on the distinction of "victim" and "victor"/"victory": Now many people view victims as losers, but regarding the character and these low-life scum who risk /nothing/ I must say it is both character and honour to DIE for something. Thus, as opposed to brute idiots, I find that victim and victor splits into honour ("vict"), but the victim in /less/ honour than the victor (given some ceteris paribus considerations).
Also note that "e-vict" is to throw somebody out and that "vict" in English thereby suggests to "throw" oneself into something, to make an effort toward some goal...
Thus you have it, don't live like that coward imbecile, please!!!

Note: First posted to Facebook at 28 March at 04:02 and 31 March at 06:55, with a slight alteration.
Note: This comes in addition to "Code" vs. Malapropisms (1775?, mrs. Malapropism), De Dicto contribution and The technical removal of "Ought" in two or three lines only, not the normative notion of the word, but the mere presence of the word itself, by a normative equivalent (within the context we consider, relatively speaking). Thus 4?