Sunday, 25 March 2012

Over This "Social" Power - The People Who "Invalidate" Truth

Social victory is the same as "I can invalidate all #mathematics because if they meet me I just knock them bloody hard and their mathematics FAIL!" "I am this good, I am the invalidator of mathematics!" - Jangling Jack! All academic victories need to be won under peaceful circumstances, under meditation! Otherwise, there's something wrong with the participants who are in denial (of this)! :-D

I'm telling you, these people lose truth from this idiot behaviour and they lack fundamental faculties in doing so too!

This response follows from:
"#Atheism declares #social victory over all religions!" This has a certain grounding and we are to look up for this, even though it's intellectually inferior! Either way, people need to become more aware of the good use of weapons (and pepperspray and tasers)! Live life!


Note: The last lines have been posted to Twitter on 30. January, 2012, CET by my set-up.
Note2: Some additional Twitter data from the original posting, 3 lines:
30 Jan Leonardo Olsnes-Lea Leonardo Olsnes-Lea ‏ @lfolsneslea
30 Jan Leonardo Olsnes-Lea Leonardo Olsnes-Lea ‏ @lfolsneslea
30 Jan Leonardo Olsnes-Lea Leonardo Olsnes-Lea ‏ @lfolsneslea


  1. Another challenge for our "invalidators":

    There is a smaller attack on "Sociobiology" by emphasising that human kind has set up United Nations and made the following take place:
    Power or "Macht" in German - The Political Philosophy

    As any person/idiot/lunatic utters the word "power" or "force" or the words "personal power", one has to admit that one person can't take "power" outside the legal boundaries of police power or represent military power to any extent (implicitly, without the presence of military conflict and justifiably so, allowing no attacks on civilians as such).

    Further, therefore, by definition and civilisation, all words of "power", "force", and "personal force" lie under the national assemblies or the state powers combined, the legislative, the ruling, the executive and the (state) monitoring/"watch dog" (media and lawyers to the public, not the police lawyers).

    Note: France is addressed in particular, ref. "Critical Theory" and "Social Power".

    Ref. Austin (language philosophy), psychology (carnivore psychology).

  2. A bit apart, but still connected:
    "Carnivore psychology" and Anti-Intellectualism, a few (slogan) words,

    "I got two brownies, I measure them by the height, one to be a p*ssy and one a c*ck-sucker for now. Then its myself and my hole.
    History, what? I just know one thing, Larry, we don't need IT! It's so definite."

    (I think this summarises /them/ and why they do not win the public and get to define future viability. As such, Anti-Intellectualism presents itself as a hastened conclusion, one that I find to be abrupt from the Information-Society. See etchings by GOYA: THE DISPARATES.)

    Url: .
    Url: .
    Url: .

  3. Demolition of Sociobiology to weaken Carnivorism further (also in portraying them as out of touch with history of human kind, subverting humanity as result):

    The "imposed" theory (iffy) by E. O. Wilson says that people are carnivorous on a "dog eats dog" basis and that, implicitly and dubiously, "some" people may try to impose his "reality view" on other people! This is highly objectionable as people are shown _not_ to be consistently carnivorous, i.e., they can act consistently peaceful and respectful toward other people through their whole lives.
    Now, if E. O. Wilson is this carnivore as a matter of mental disposition/pathological person then he simply FAILS to consistently answer truthfully to any other theory because they don't support his "eat dog, eat dog" per "dog eats dog" mental disposition!
    He is therefore now possibly shown to be "one-sided". Just ask him the questions yourself! Is he check-mate?! Let's see!

    Note that dogs NEVER eat other dogs! And that E. O. Wilson has chosen his insects for peculiar reasons! (Some exceptions may apply to this "dog-eats-dog-notion", that in fact, on rare events dogs may eat dogs afterall.)

    Note on Vet's Ethics and lie detection (to check for dishonesty) and "telepathic" possibilities to empathise with the dog mother in question.