O-L12 October 2011 at 02:20
It seems Blogspot is juggling my posts to some degree, especially on "Opinions on Physics" where I've shown that Schrodinger is actually wrong with his Wave Collapse theory and that is should be up to the subject of _Psychology_ to investigate it further ((f)MRI and so on, mechanisms of telepathy and various)! I'm not responsible for this and it may/should also be Nobel Prize of Physics worthy what this particular writing represents!
O-L12 October 2011 at 02:23
This post, below, of 26th August 2011, has been removed for some reason or another, but why? I don't know. However, I seem to recall that there was a posting on "Opinions in Physics". Now this seems to be gone! Well, well, "love", the primal one, labours on...
L.F.O.-L.12 October 2011 at 07:44
For my writing on "Opinions on Physics", additional references are my "Time Theory" against McTaggart and "The Power of a Single Span of Time - an Instance - Contrary to Hume on Induction - The Refutation of the Problem of Induction". As you see from above you need to also consider the history of science in light of HDM and use a special consideration of Indirect Observation. To this, comes my reading of Smolin, Penrose (and various other) and my GCSE competence!
L.F.O.-L.12 October 2011 at 11:35
Add. note: You also need to make a definite decision on being Realist (in Physics) concerning the use of mathematics and metaphysics (and so to avoid fx. Photo-Theory). This goes against fx. Field's Nominalism in mathematics. It also goes against the abuse of mathematics in physical terms, like that of Zeno's Paradox, never arriving in Sparta! Good?
L.F.O.-L.14 October 2011 at 01:18
Monades has now been corrected to monads in this text as well. As I've written before, consistently "monads" throughout!
L.F.O.-L.19 October 2011 at 22:34
Relating to the upcoming "destruction" of string theory that I've "declared war" against, I have picked up these words formerly posted on Facebook: I think I've gotten some laughs from this, "I'm going to put String Theory so firmly on a cloud (by power of description, -> plausibility) that not even the cloudheads, i.e., the string theorists, can get their heads to it...!!! :-)"
I've uttered a few others as well and I hope to greet my new country -men and -women with more in the time to come! Cheers!
L.F.O.-L.19 October 2011 at 23:07
This is my original note of putting the "Wave Collapse" to Psychology: "It's my recommendation today that the department of Physics, i.e., the subject of physics, transfers its crazy idea of wave collapse to the psychology department, i.e., the subject of psychology, where this can be investigated under telepathy and kaldraum-experiments (Kald Raum - german for Cold Room, i.e., no disturbances). Simply BECAUSE, "*pointing finger*", NO wave collapse can be measured (mental event) and in the cases where they claim it can, it's always 100%. So what's the point? To PSYCHOLOGY! :-)
L.F.O.-L.19 October 2011 at 23:09
Some more under it: This is to be added to Opinions on Physics. The wave collapse can also be controlled by (f)MRI.
Besides, these wave collapse instances outside these mental events are governed by ordinary causality if not quantum mechanics.
These wave collapse instances _in physical terms_ under new and classic physics as _physical events_ ...!
"Governed by" -> "fall under" for the very demanding people out there. (Not that it was entirely stupid to write it otherwise.)
Besides, under my "Opinions on Physics" where I deal with wave collapse directly in preparation for attacking parts of the existing physics, you can still consider this wave collapse a "boomerang" move _STILL_ forming from the past and NOT some _empty_ future!
L.F.O.-L.19 October 2011 at 23:10
NOT some _empty_ future!... excepting a boomerang event that is from the past to the future and back to the present from exactly this future that stems from the past (by "building" events, more or less steady)!
L.F.O.-L.20 October 2011 at 14:21
When I address "On the Complexity of the Standard Model and Particles in Nature" I intend for it to hit physicists' claimed and absolute knowledge of the world in respect to their "definite and self-assured" stances on all matters pertaining to physics. This concerns mostly "monads"/"souls" and the physical explanation of telepathy. I HAVEN'T MEANT TO UNDERMINE ANY INVESTIGATION INTO A DEFINITIVE STANDARD MODEL OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. However, there has been a time when people have been so stubborn on the non-existence of these two entities, particularly the physicists and psychologists (rendering most of the world sceptical to telepathy and "souls"). I hold these people accountable for this and this accusation will remain as a feature, implicit or not, in every written history of science [unseriously, "of how stupid they have been"].
This pertains also to the "ability" of particles and how they work, their nature, and how we can make all come together in how we perceive the world. Why is it possible for telepathy to obtain in the way that it does? What is the nature of these particles (involved) that makes this possible?
This is the reason why this particular issue remains within the "evolution.html" page and part of the "Opinions on Physics"!
L.F.O.-L.23 October 2011 at 23:40
These are the Blogspot data for some "confused" Blogspot management for some "accidentally" deleted that a poor administrator head could never see as "any" important (to me, at least, pathetically enough):
Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 06:36 0 comments
Labels: Copenhagen Interpretation, Graviton, Higg's Boson, Standard Model
With the date on top (for several) Friday, 26 August 2011!!! (I'm sorry for them and I apologise on their behalf! Americans good enough for themselves!) Cheers!
L.F.O.-L.25 November 2011 at 14:48
To the above Kaldraum, you can add the former Ganzfeldraum!
L.F.O.-L.3 December 2011 at 17:15
Just a slight little note on two scientific approaches:
1. Cancer approach: Two component view, by poison and counter-symptom medication! (I'm not an expert, I just speculate here!)
2. People may be happy regardless, either from own ideas or funny/"funny" thoughts, but happiness will never determine present psychopathy or schizophrenia! Perhaps this is obvious by now? Cheers!
L.F.O.-L.3 December 2011 at 17:16
The cancer approach happens of course over the efficient rate, today this is measured in survival rate and possibly quality of life! (Note added!)
L.F.O.-L.3 December 2011 at 20:40
The happiness stuff relates to Dr. Martin Seligmann. Additionally, the "thoughts" relate to reality or life itself, that life can be fun to _this_ person in this or that way, on the condition of this person's personality. If perversion is the fun for this person, _then_ (undeniably and by strict logical implication) this person laughs! There is no other way!
L.F.O.-L.3 December 2011 at 20:41
Martin E. P. "Marty" Seligman (born August 12, 1942) is an American psychologist, educator, and author of self-help books. His theory of "learned helplessness" is widely respected among scientific psychologists.[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Seligman !
L.F.O.-L.14 December 2011 at 15:46
Some data to consider: Posted to http://www.news4jax.com/news/-God-particle-coming-into-focus/-/475880/5346918/-/1js680z/-/index.html in relation to "Gravity" _forces_ are a whole different thing than energy by photons! Forces are given by a kind of smashing force, popularly speaking and this hinges on to the extent of this "Technicolour" set-up! You can't make "forces hop out the hat" like that! To look for forces is "to look for a car _in motion_"! (Or a photon in motion...) This "forces talk" is therefore doomed to fail as well!
'God particle' coming into focus
www.news4jax.com
Gossip isn't just for teenage girls -- scientists spread rumors, too. Physicists are giddy about an announcement that will come from the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) on Tuesday at 8 a.m. EST.
The forces issue in physics is really a meeting here of classical physics and these nuclear physics (all including string theory and quantum mechanics). All this has been under hard debate concerning the divide between classical physics and "new" physics and how to make it all come together!
Is it really necessary to have the Higgs-Boson to explain mass? Why can't ordinary particles have mass simply by property, that is, mass is part of their nature?
BBC World Have Your Say Here's a Q and A on the Higgs Boson: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/large-hadron-collider/8952584/Q-and-A-Higgs-boson.html
And isn't "Technicolour" a blow in the air?
Wasn't the intention in the first place (by 3,5 TeV/7 TeV) to smash these pieces smaller? So that the Protons would be split to smaller bits? Then CERN presents masses on 125 GeV? What?
The Up Quark has mass 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c(2) and 125 GeV(/c(2)) means something bigger than the Protons even, so you're considering "fusion effects" of the Protons to be the Higgs-Boson?
Q & A: Higgs boson - Telegraph
www.telegraph.co.uk
Scientists have spent decades searching for signs of Higgs boson, the so-called
Some from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z_boson
W and Z bosons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
The W and Z bosons (together known as the weak bosons) are the elementary partic...See more
GeV to MeV (or Giga to Mega): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giga
Giga- - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
Giga ( /ˈɡɪɡə/ or /ˈdʒɪɡə/) is a unit prefix in the metric system denoting a factor of billion (109 or 1000000000). It has the symbol G.
Fx. the Up quark: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_quark
Up quark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
The up quark or u quark (from its symbol, u) is the lightest of all quarks, a ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton
Proton - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
The proton is a subatomic particle with the symbol p or p+ and a positive ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_model
Standard Model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
The Standard Model of particle physics is a theory concerning the electromagneti...See more
To summarise the masses: Higgs Boson is suggested to 125 GeV(/c(2)), Proton 938.272046(21) MeV(/c2), W boson, 80.398±0.023 GeV/c2, Z boson, 91.1876±0.0021 GeV/c2 and (finally) the Up quark 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c2! Good?
It seems hard for Physorg to accept input to this story: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-12-particle-physicists-intriguing-hints-higgs.html !
Particle physicists report 'intriguing hints' of Higgs Boson
www.physorg.com
Yesterday physicists in Europe reported possible signs of the Higgs boson, a mis...See more
I note on Physorg.com that they are trying to "govern"/"steer"/hamper the scientific debate on Higgs' Boson by what I present here! Today, 15:08, 14.12.2011 CET.
L.F.O.-L.14 December 2011 at 15:47
I also note a former story by Physorg.com: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-endgame-higgs-boson.html !
L.F.O.-L.14 December 2011 at 15:49
Also a story by BBC on how the "God particle" may not exist: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1695390.stm !
BBC News | SCI/TECH | 'God particle may not exist'
news.bbc.co.uk
The most sought after particle in physics, the Higgs boson, may not even exist, suggest Geneva-based scientists.
Sorry also, but the story above by BBC is old, it appears: Thursday, 6 December, 2001, 13:13 GMT!
An example of Physorg idiocy: By "Despite the retarded wanton for moderation here, one link: http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.com/2011/10/opinions-on-science-in-expression-of.html and you need to locate "Opinions on Physics" (implying also the Photon Theory). I've written more on Higgs' later and I pursue the story of CNN and BBC by number on the masses by MeV and GeV in light of 3,5x2/7 TeV! Cheers!", I get "Your message didn't pass the spam-filter (even after log-in routines by Facebook) and your message will be manually moderated"! Ahhh, if they could only _manually_ look after _themselves_!!!
L.F.O.-L.15 December 2011 at 23:26
Considering "Opinions on Physics" (if you bother to locate above, please), here is the status of today:
The Challenges to the Higgs' (All) - Killing it?
I just add the list, *The Kill List* for the Higgs':
Why the Higgs' field of the Universe when the Universe is (mostly?) "best" vacuum?!
How does Higgs' fit into the Unifying work of Physics?
Is it really necessary to have the Higgs-Boson to explain mass?
Why can't ordinary particles have mass simply by property, that is, mass is part of their nature?
Even then, why is it necessary for mass to "obtain" rather than to be as in "gravity", one form or another, i.e., explanation?
"Technicolour" isn't an alternative as it confuses "energy" and "forces"?
Wasn't the intention in the first place (by 3,5 TeV/7 TeV) to smash these pieces smaller? So that the Protons would be split to smaller bits? Then CERN presents masses on 125 GeV? What?
The Up Quark has mass 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c(2) and 125 GeV(/c(2)) means something bigger than the Protons even, so you're considering "fusion effects" of the Protons to be the Higgs-Boson?
Finally, the realism: To summarise the masses: Higgs Boson is suggested to 125 GeV(/c(2)), Proton 938.272046(21) MeV(/c2), W boson, 80.398±0.023 GeV/c2, Z boson, 91.1876±0.0021 GeV/c2 and (finally) the Up quark 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c2! Good? Merry Christmas!
Reaction, as in the military: Add the Photon Theory by asserting (plausibly) that "Photons are the smallest constituents of all matter. I assume the other particles of the Standard Model are made up of photons. Why is this? The sun burns mass and to my knowledge it only/mostly by far emits electromagnetic radiation, consequently in the form of photons. When a nuclear bomb explodes, it converts matter into electromagnetic radiation, energy of various forms. Compared to this, I think one can throw the string theory out the window along with dimensions beyond the usual 4 (I'm not certain about this concerning Einstein's theories that I'd like to keep as it is). Also, let's assume higher intensity radiation emits more dense amounts of photons and that it declines further down the electromagnetic spectrum.
(Extra: New on photons: I think I can also hold that photons are "semi-fluid" on a hyper-level (of course). I don't know what this adds to our view of reality, but it's a possible way of reconciling the wave-particle duality.)" On top of the Photon Theory: Unifying work -> full speed ahead!
You may want to check out Slashdot org under "LHC Homes In On Possible Higgs Boson Around 126GeV", message nr. 207, and The Kill List and the Photon Theory that's added there for all the virtues they can present... Enjoy! You know, the whole thing, the "split time-units after Big Bang", the "supersymmetry" on this basis, the "symmetry" and "symmetry break and the rest", it's... *for you to decide* (incl. other mysteries of this kind)! So therefore, at this point I don't go into that, but I admit that speculation is fun and it's going to be exciting to see how the map of science develops! Cheers!
L.F.O.-L.15 December 2011 at 23:27
Due to the evolving comprehension of "Opinions on Physics", I've now re-published it as a new post here on this blog, going parallel with the Science blog!
L.F.O.-L.3 August 2012 at 04:47
Addition to my explanation of the Sun's Corona:
Under my description of the corona of the Sun as the most plausible, I think of it to also contain mostly Hydrogen (H) and Helium (He) because they are light and plausibly commonplace by the nuclear reactions going on/in the Sun, fission and fusion, both taking place /there/.
Hydrogen, as we know, burn easily on Earth because of Oxygen levels in the air, but there is probably little or no oxygen on/in the Sun (probably zapped out as quickly as it is produced) as the Hydrogen being there can't burn as we are used to here on Earth.
We have yet (to my knowledge) to analyse the light from the corona to acquire better data on this question of "outer" substances as of the substances database.
The nuclear reactions also have a solid literature, mine is Norwegian, "Fra strålende objekter til sorte hull" publ. by Damm and written by Elgarøy and Hauge. This is the 2nd volume of 2.
Fusion processes from this book, pp. 194 - 195.
L.F.O.-L.3 August 2012 at 04:47
Also published here on the Blog: To be added to Evolution!
Now that I've added most or all subjects of Universities to the science chart as valid sciences (mostly by adding description to the HDM chart, as opposed to the experiment of the hard sciences, investigation replaces the experiment in the other sciences). I intend, consequently, to add my invention of a cold war against USA by all other nations on Earth. Now this idea is rather of the docile kind with the effect that NO other nation can threaten or attack another nation, unreasonably, without itself to sustain severe damage. This is the idea of basic deterrence especially meant for USA according to its abused words and its dubious track-record with the added comment that one is venturing into unknown space every year and that power abuse has been a common trait of human kind where the Information Era of the Internet now has a harder say on this issue. This is therefore an effect of living in the 21. Century and may be nothing more than a trait of being human where we need to seek a more symmetric world society for living respectfully with one another _on a global scale_!
L.F.O.-L.3 August 2012 at 04:49
This "cold war" is named (#)LovetoUSAWar and was first posted to Twitter. I have therefore put the # on the word that's really made up of several words, Love, to, USA, war. Let's where this carries!
13 September 2011 10:29
The original Twitter posts: Under the new world order, I can imagine a shift from the #coldwar/cold war against Soviet Union/#Russia and toward making super-power...
7 May
...truly global by ramping up military power all over the world in order to become #symmetric to USA under "LoveToUSA-war"/#LoveToUSAwar...
7 May
...and that this war is not really any war at all (and it also sounds a lot better than "The Cold War"! World, engage your people for a better...
7 May
...future, please!!! Cheers! #LoveToUSAwar #coldwar #Russia #China #superpower #global :-D 8-D 8-D 8-D 8-D Now the summer time is also...
7 May
...entering the northern hemisphere! Enjoy! (Out from me!)
7 May
Note: This idea sorts under the _political science_.
L.F.O.-L.6 August 2012 at 10:06
The Corona of the Sun again: Even though I "interestingly" enough write "up against the vacuum" as a linguistic twist (and jokingly over physics itself), _there is no doubt_ that the gases are there, most out from the center of the Sun, because of the gravity forces (also differently expressed by myself elsewhere) of the Sun, the Sun we're discussing and its corona!
L.F.O.-L.5 January 2013 at 21:22
There is a time-delay of the most minute kind of the connections for the internet-lines before achieving light-speed and preventing the signals from achieving light-speed, 1 c. Good? (Mystery solved of the wire-speed of electrical system wiring for the internet.)
That is, the connections between the elctrical wires themselves are halting speed, so that electrical wiring by mere and whole wire itself does, by my opinion, indeed, reach 1 c, exactly as light does in perfect vacuum.
L.F.O.-L.8 April 2013 at 20:12
"Physics/Biology, Abiogenesis - Would It Be Meteors That Impacted Onto Earth or Simply the Volcanos - Erupting Magma/Lava That Leads to Life in Its Most Basic Form?" ->
Along with Big Bang Theory, that I must be credited with "Life from Earth's Magma"-theory rather than any "Life from Meteor down on Earth"-theory. That it should be clear that History Channel has presented their view on how life has begun on Earth /after/ my writing on it, the Abiogenesis (as they should also do with "The Rise of the U.S. American Military Complex"). It must be clear that this is the only route to life and that the "Frankenstein"-experiments, as I like to refer to them as, should very well become university standard for every 4th or so university or more, in being a study in bio-chemistry.
Necessarily, all the way from my messages to places in Norway and Austria, if Lee Cronin and his team from Scotland have done their work properly, a result of success should now be clear or soon hereafter. Cheers!
L.F.O.-L.8 July 2013 at 14:49
A note more on Cancer-Preventive Measures
To live life according to principles of life (ref:Hinduism, Veda?), the health and the Objective Ethics that I may add my own neuro-value (from between the fingertips or more technically, with the needle and meter attached). This level is presupposed to stay on top of the own awareness of neurology/feelings and that this too represents at the very end as theory for countering the cancers of all types.
The idea from the original writing is of course to create a debate that may kill various stupid ideas in society, such as the blatant suppression of others and further push for better medical practices and better health campaigns much like fitness campaigns for avoiding artery-diseases. In addition, of course, that people are made able to record privately or by doctor, their neuro-values with a very simple device, possibly.
As such, by summary, we have then these three levels:
1. The life according to life principles, to health and more.
2. The Healthy Neuro-Values, the awareness of own neurology, of own feelings.
3. The dangerous values and, possibly, a person's growing ignorance to life and cancer alike.
I suspect it's even common now to measure these cancer-relevant values in USA! So, go ahead and try to be stupid about it, you other people...!
Also, the neuro-values are NOT supposed to reflect stress, they are supposed to reflect a person in "neutral state", relaxed and "ordinary".
Perhaps we are looking for a kind of "core"-spectrum value. I think so as I lack the finishing opportunities for getting the data-set together, clinically, science-worth speaking...
L.F.O.-L.8 July 2013 at 22:34
The proper link for my cancer data has now been entered. The link is, as spelt out, http://www.kreftregisteret.no/en/The-Registries/Cancer-Statistics/ . In Norway, we do only have one cancer registry and this is it, the url, "kreftregisteret", the cancer registry, singular!
L.F.O.-L.25 September 2013 at 23:47
The Physics killing of Copenhagen Interpretation + Schrödinger Cat to the Rat, by animal guillotine. The Evolution.html-file:
-meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-GB"-
-meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"-
meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0"
meta name="ProgId" content="Gedit"
meta NAME="Description" CONTENT="Terje Lea"
meta NAME="Author" CONTENT="Terje Lea"
meta name="CREATED" content="20030222"
meta name="CHANGEDBY" content="Terje Lea" [+ L. F. Olsnes-Lea]
meta name="Keywords" content="Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other,Cancer-Preventive Measures,Evolution
,Opinions on Physics,Opinions on Astrophysics,Terje Lea"
-meta name="Description" content="Opinions on Astrophysics, Possible Explanation of the Paradox of the Corona of the Sun and its Temperature
Differences. Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other. Cancer-Preventive Measures. Form of evolution or forming a frame for
evolution. Opinions on Physics. "-
-meta name="CHANGED" content="20110422"- [Look for last comment by myself.]
-link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="t_daemon_lea.css" /-
-link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="t-lea.css" /-
title-Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other-/title
L.F.O.-L.16 October 2013 at 02:04
There are some (scientific) charges against psychology today (2013), possibly failing some leadership duties. These are:
→ the lack of corrupt mind investigation programs and objective criteria, as well as forensics.
→ the lack of normative psychology programs, also communicated to the public in terms of public health.
→ the lack of relations to history as subject in being to easily persuaded into the "worker's psychology" as animalism, the belly/butt psychology, also the veneral. That psychology as profession seem to much apt to abuse its power of profession rather than bringing/forwarding the wise/far-sighted, like the implausible, two-well known studies that ask us deeply for sympathy, the Stanley Milgram Learning Experiment (that socially approves of torture) and the Stanford Prison Experiment.
As Gen 2, this is what I claim the right to defend by investigation and also to leave/fold in terms of intellectuality if it's found to be untrue (by myself and others, by lack of credibility/evidence).
L.F.O.-L.7 December 2013 at 16:19
Political Science and Science of History Writing (Opinions on Science... - Expr...):
Considering the neutrality of Sweden to Finland distinctly, after Finland has had to defend itself from Communistic Russia/Soviet Union during the Winter War, being tired from war and blown in the face with another, the World War II, receiving this friendly neutrality from Sweden, its linguistic brother/sister to the West, to which Finland has had the ability yet again to catch breath and provide defence and some attack capacities against enemy forces, I guess this time, the forces of Nazis of Nazi-Germany!
Throwing off idiot-non-Christian Soviet Union only to face another flavour of non-Christian-post-Karl-Marx Adolf Hitler and his Nazi-onal Sozialistische Partei Deutschland, one dint less communistic than the "ideal" Communism of Soviet Union.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_war , 1939 - 1940.
(Norway decreasing "in personhood" and "with an evident methane problem"!)
L.F.O.-L.7 February 2014 at 07:03
Like cancer, there may be a similar investigation for prevention that is justified for Osteoporosis!
At least, I support this angle. Thank you!
More to go:
I agree that "witchhunts" are to be loathed! But if personality points prove worthwhile for the just and the able, then why shouldn't people have this information???!!! "Simply, they say torture, I say HEALTH (and morality)!"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osteoporosis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology
Remember milk or calcium additive (Ca) though. You can't escape reality like that.
L.F.O.-L.4 April 2014 at 01:16
Over Social Psychology
Given that the "weapons effect" is defined to be this, "any presence of weapons is increasing the aggression to use it", by Social Psychology
However (!!!)...
They forget a possible alternative explanation that's this:
In removing the possible means for punishment from people, they increase the aggression itself to such lengths, maybe, that 1. they become pacified to nearby crime, making it impossible for them to get inbetween, to stop it, 2. they may fall victim to beginning to like torture in releasing the aggression they have built up over longer periods of time, indeed, even commonly, they may begin to accept the violence as common behaviour to solving problems, yes, the knuckle crime now, NOT by the ("very ugly") "anti-Gandhi/anti-wisdom" gun-smoke weapons! Remember also how neatly the non-lethal weapons can be used to solve conflicts in terms of less fatalities! Alright?
That's how they also get these absurd results "proving" that people are willing positively willing to torture people "so that they study better", as in plain. (Ref., Stanley Milgram Learning Experiment. Please, consider the Learning Experiment against corrupt minds and also, please, do not mistake progress for the effects of threats to being tortured and in so doing that you have secretly been helping human kind to progress, i.e., that you've become a "secret hero" by deepest immorality. Note also on sexuality by this, the secret aspect.)
Also, they "prove" how it's wrong to imprison people for crime because, allegedly, it, the imprisoning, makes people insane! (Ref., Stanford Prison Experiment.)
Bottom line, in my opinion: the dangers of the corrupt minds are most subtle and evident. The lurking hands of torture and death are just very immediate as crime should not be acceptable, but more present than we're truly willing to accept, I think!
Lastly, it seems that psychology has a way to go before it gets more reliable as science. The potential to improve should be significant in terms of science, is my estimate!
(Gen 2 has said "hello". ;-) .)
L.F.O.-L.4 April 2014 at 01:18
The above ("Over Social Psychology") has first been accessible on my profile, publicly, by Facebook some weeks ago, around 23 February. (Stress...)
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea28 November 2016 at 02:32
There can't be a cure for cancer because a cure necessarily relies on the neural/electrical signals of the body and they are in the cases of cancer WRONG in the first place. The thing to hope for, though, is for cancer to turn benign... But the wrong signals, the wrong signals...
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea29 November 2016 at 06:31
http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/cells/badcom/ writes "Cell growth and division is such an important process that it is under tight control with many checks and balances. But even so, cell communication can break down. The result is uncontrolled cell growth, often leading to cancer. Cancer can occur in many ways, but it always requires multiple signaling breakdowns. Often, cancer begins when a cell gains the ability to grow and divide even in the absence of a signal. Ordinarily this unregulated growth triggers a signal for self-destruction. But when the cell also loses the ability to respond to death signals, it divides out of control, forming a tumor. Later cell communication events cause blood vessels to grow into the tumor, enabling it to grow larger. Additional signals allow the cancer to spread to other parts of the body."
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea10 August 2017 at 21:13
Comment to Wikipedia article: Uncritical article? The photon really massless?
The article on photon ignores several issues such as:
The fact that photons as a straight line is bent by the gravity of the Sun as Mercury shines past it, sending the ray of photons.
How is it that the photon disappears and the electron appears instead in the case of photovoltaics? The case isn't so clearcut as the article seems to say.
How is it that photons are emitted as the stars burn up and there is a conversion of matter into photons by E=mc(2) and the photons are supposed to be massless still? Surely a paradox with matter disappearing in "thin air"!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Photon
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea15 August 2017 at 21:57
"This spinoff was inspired by my grandfather's death due to cancer..."
Correction: My grandfather, Harry E. Olsnes, did not die from cancer. He died from stroke!
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea11 October 2017 at 22:47
Against String Theory and dimensions beyond 3+1
Said elsewhere (NRK, Nytt på nytt), the bending of space by gravity is smashed by the fact that one can see the Black Holes there by visual data. The Black Holes would otherwise disappear in terms of visual data if the bending of space would be true!
To crush the "space-bending" further, one can imagine a powerful electro-magnetic field next to a concrete wall and sending a light beam along the concrete wall. I happen to think that only the light beam bends, comparatively!
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea16 October 2017 at 03:19
Suspicion:
Given the petri-dish growing of meat, one knows that it starts with the bone of the meat chop.
However, given the standard addition of bio-"soup" for growing this meat, how does the growing of the bone (calcium) compare to the actual calcium contents of the bio-"soup"? Investigating from underneath by adjusting the lens of the microscope a little, maybe one finds out, bio-chemically and physically...
A prospect from this may result in constructing bio-reactors for generating lots of energy!
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea18 October 2017 at 23:55
Only deep dishonesty in the World prevents establishing truths of telepathy, soul (regeneration, reincarnation, out-of-body experience)!
Lie detection of all experts/"experts"! AVATAR to the World! Hurray!
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea31 October 2017 at 18:44
Given that one special module of the brain has been removed, can it be that thoughts can be generated inside this vacant area still? I think so and that such a result reinforces the position of Dualism. Only dishonesty and "conventionalism" prevents this from surfacing as truth in the World.
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea31 October 2017 at 19:04
Some peculiar science from my hand that you may like now or in the future: It has been my words, before the science, that have allowed us to smell the atmosphere of Mars without a person even setting foot there involving the sending of neurologically "compatible" signals straight from the planet's surface and then use a device to apply these signals to for example the skin of your nose-bone, no neural implants necessary. The neural signals are converted from pick-up detector of a radio-stick, one type of radiology applied, I think now in hindsight, not knowing if Blogspot has deleted important text of mine!
It may also be possible that radiology isn't necessary. Rather the only thing needed may be photovoltaics and then the conversion to neural signals. At the same time suggesting that the human body is a kind of "open" nervous system, one neural signal or other, depending on the organ!
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea8 November 2017 at 17:42
On improving the SETI-program, one way may be to have the radiological signature of a healthy brain and then use this signature by the (large) radio-telescopes of the World everywhere on the sky of outer space!
By B.B.L. (Repr.)
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea8 November 2017 at 17:45
On improving the SETI-program, one way may be to have the radiological signature of a healthy brain and then use this signature by the (large) radio-telescopes of the World everywhere on the sky of outer space!
That is, the radio-waves are sent out as before and then the returning radio-signals are compared to the signature as with radiological exploration for oil and gas.
By B.B.L. (Repr.)
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea9 November 2017 at 11:10
Note on Psychiatry:
Even if one writes that function is qualifying for mental illness or not, there should be no doubt that _criminal_ behaviour is just as qualifying. Thus, GAF (Global Assessment of Functioning) needs an update?
Further, if one requires assistance of "an entire hospital" to function then that is also plain "mental illness"! IMO! #Honesty
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea28 December 2017 at 23:26
On Climacterium:
It's my belief that the normative medicine point of view is one in all people where there is no climacterium. That is, full health, somatic as well as mental, has no climacterium. Thus, contraceptives should be given without question whatsoever.
The presence of climacterium in humanity, IMO, is a significant weakness that is caused by mentality, first and foremost.
Bio-electrical-value confirmation? Metabolism level confirmation as well?
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea29 December 2017 at 01:38
Time to reinvigorate the idea of specialised hospitals/clinics/sections for people on each side of the depressed and schizophrenic scale?
It seems like psychiatry has a systematic problem in treating the problems of the 2 general patient groups properly, especially in assisting the depressed with lawyer services and relevant information for them, let's say after they have been abused or other.
The 2 groups can be separated by their stories, metabolism reading and bio-electrical-value reading.
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea5 January 2018 at 12:59
On Theory of Evolution:
Let's say we hold the theory suspended over Abiogenesis and the wonders of nature. Then what's left is to see where Theory of Evolution hits the tree!
Theory of Evolution needs more corroboration?
(I'd also say that Theory of Evolution has been abused a lot, especially in the social sciences when it actually sits best in Biology.)
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea18 March 2018 at 12:05
One tip: you can use a special quantum stick programmed with 30 cycles or more of the OR-gate in computing to test the moral value of things, be they buildings, cars, books or any other. Good luck!
(Also to a group on Facebook.)
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea18 March 2018 at 12:06
This works on humans as well etc.
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea20 March 2018 at 20:43
It must be said that tendencies of the mind toward the "schizophrenic category" of mental illness seem to make one vulnerable to a host of diseases and other afflictions such as MRSA, HIV-AIDS, cancer, weakened immune system, lesser intellectual abilities, etc.
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea24 March 2018 at 12:56
For homosexuality in children, whatever age
Just one warning: homosexuality may be "inflicted" on a baby by the (malicious) abuse or torture of it, just as I expect Leukemia to be inflicted in a similar way!
See personality conversion of psychiatry (Conversion disorder for now): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_disorder.
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea26 March 2018 at 07:38
It must be said that tendencies of the mind toward the "schizophrenic category" of mental illness seem to make one vulnerable to a host of diseases and other afflictions such as MRSA, HIV-AIDS, cancer, weakened immune system, lesser intellectual abilities, etc.
That these tendencies are more clearly seen as the "category" degree / degree of schizophrenia increases, is meant to be implied by the above.
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea8 April 2018 at 05:55
Misdiagnosing aside, I am against the use of ECT on patients suffering from depression because they have real life issues to solve making services from lawyers and others far more relevant.
To be true, the treatment is simple: the anti-depressants (Cipralex?) and cognitive therapy a la T. Beck and "scientific inquiry". The rest consists in re-building a feeling of security and perhaps improving on security as well, also seeking trustworthy people for developing a more happy life (again).
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea19 May 2018 at 15:47
Science reports
Warning against misreporting by (more or less) corrupt physicians to the sets of medical cases such as HIV/AIDS and MRSA and the others.
I have reason to believe that there is a part corrupt data in the medical reports. This should be investigated systematically and factored in order to have higher quality science reporting.
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea20 May 2018 at 01:50
Kantian ethics gold standard means that everyone can be psychologically measured by it!
Thus, we have Kantian Ethics Psychology! Primary tools can be the electrometer (neuro-value) or metabolism blood test or by radio-stick and the fMRI with the according questions, such as "what do you think of ethics, say, Christian ethics?" and all the rest...
To this, one can rate the moral blindness of a person, that is, a schizophrenic person and how deep the schizophrenia is given also a reactions scale of aggression and other.
Thus, Metric Morality Psychology founded, 2018-05-18.
18 May at 16:00, timestamp from Facebook.
(First announced on Facebook.)
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea26 May 2018 at 07:50
On sun bathing and tanning beds and cancer risks:
If you have the impression that you run a risk in sun bathing or using tanning bed then perhaps you do. However, most people of non-"category"-schizophrenia run no particular risk, I believe.
However, the "category"-schizophrenics do run risks as they are susceptible to cancer in the first place and can't take stress on their bodies that easily as the non-"category"-schizophrenia people can.
As usual, sun burns should still be avoided if for nothing else than the pains and possible scarring of the body.
Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea26 May 2018 at 07:54
Schizophrenia seems so destructive to the abilities to withstand diseases and illnesses that outside good medication practices in getting a jab every 5 years or so in addition to the usual vaccines and whatever accidents that can happen to anybody, schizophrenia seems responsible for 99% of those conditions. Good people have some incredible advantages and with some medication or medical support, they are guaranteed their health almost regardless.
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea12 June 2018 at 04:59
On genetics and genetic engineering on human beings
It isn't as easy as merely choosing something, some qualities and think that they happen. You need to take into account the nurture side, the environment of the new-born. So how do you go about it? Genetics is about what is able to live once the genes have been engineered. A bad womb or the bad character of the mother can also kill the fetus. So, for a start, you can "load" it up with the physical attributes and hope for the best, but society isn't as simple as that given the years to live until adulthood.
So the best genetic "set-up" may depend heavily on the parents-to-be and the expected challenges in growing up. Perhaps, we're no further than the fact that genetic engineering for human beings is of no particular use at all because of the natural advantages of the true bonds to mother and father are more important than people think and they are already adjusted to society where they are.
Rather than bothering with the "hype" of genetic engineering, I'd rather go for combatting crime and increasing qualities of democracy and human rights that may prove far more effective in improving human beings than any genetic engineering can do! "Genetic engineering does not give people the ability to walk through walls!"
Besides, if this thing called "race" (of human beings), a concept I'm against, is merely due to sun-exposure, you know, the colour of the skin, then "race" isn't really an issue at all.
Should it be allowed? Given that the genetic engineering is within bounds, that a human being gets born and not a "freak with an ear on the back" and is within the usual regulations for volition, I don't think it poses any particular problem to allow it!
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea15 June 2018 at 11:01
Scientific theory - Why Earth revolves and alternately swings axially
Due to solar (storm) dust the Earth has started to revolve early on, a little by a little, and picked up speed up to a maximum to the cycle today of (appx.) 24 hours a day.
The same story repeats again with the alternate, axial swings of the Earth, but is slightly different. As the Earth encounters solar (storm) dust in its path, the dust causes the Earth to slowly start this alternate, axial swinging.
So that's the story of 2 effects of solar (storm) dust in space on Earth. Clearly, these effects are probably repeated throughout the Universe so that Exo-Earths "out there" everywhere may have seasons as well.
(I think... for now.)
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea15 June 2018 at 22:55
New news on homosexuality
There can be serious crimes underpinning homosexuality, all the way to pro-forma homosexuality.
So, as far as crime goes hand in hand with homosexuality, I feel misled by sources of information on the homosexuality issue.
Though, homosexual people clearly are entitled human rights (UDHR), they are not granted freedom to do crime. Perhaps, one instead should "as rule of thumb", prescribe psychiatry to homosexual people by "the full treatment of schizophrenia". Furthermore, still, I do not support "a cure against homosexuality", believing that schizophrenia typically requires a life-long follow-up because of its deep rooting.
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea25 June 2018 at 04:12
On the existence of walking, white giants "to crush evil":
I think they exist!
Note on literary sources of "golems"! I find them real, actually! Note also on "freak nature" and "fantastic world"! "Only what is known is found in the school books!" Beware of the "Problem of Induction" (The Black Swans) to be found on Wikipedia also. It is not considered clever to report your lack of knowledge!
Note on changelings/shapeshifters, also under fraudulent palaeontology! "A psychiatric game for torturers!"
Note that we also have reincarnation and regeneration, even regenerating function and memory of the brain, "suggesting" the souls actually exist! We also have telepathy, phantom feelings, Van Lommel studies, deep reports on NDEs and OBEs (Out-of-body experiences)!
I'm tired of hearing these no-knowledge idiots "managing information" for the sake of keeping people in depression!
I just don't take it anymore! That these morons are supposed to tell us what exists or not "based on what they feel is right!"
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea25 June 2018 at 11:12
Question, regarding science and knowledge of the public:
Given the #SETI project and a simple routine that says that a radio-signature of sentient life in New York City or just the radio-signature of a healthy, good brain of a young person is used as search template for the radio-telescopes of the World.
How many such extraterrestrial signatures do you then think are found by now? 0? 1000? Any other number?
Remember that (even) radio-telescopes have "limited" range in the Universe, even though it's a great deal more than the visual telescopes, like the Hubble telescope.
My bet is that maybe a full 1000 extraterrestrial radio-signatures of life or "sentience" are found by the SETI project by now.
Assumptions for this SETI set-up: I assume the search for intelligence radio-signatures have been going on for about 20 years. I also assume that intelligence has the form of (healthy) brains on Earth so that brains everywhere in the Universe are actually like those on Earth.
So let's see how the SETI project unfolds...
Links 2:
Wikipedia, extraterrestrial intelligence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterrestrial_intelligence
Wikipedia, Active Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_SETI
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea26 June 2018 at 10:30
One possible effect of gravitational waves is that the Earth is shaken in its orbit at various points through its journey around the sun so that the total effect is that the Earth stays in its orbit, "more or less". Check for disturbances to the "roundness" of the orbit?
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea27 June 2018 at 13:25
On fattiness and obesity in the population:
Two steps of action
1. To supply medication to both main groups of patients in making them able to change focus from the satisfaction of eating food to being able to appreciate life itself. "The fast step."
2. To implement The 4 Factors, pistols/revolvers, pepper spray, lie detection array (5 methods +) and radio-based scanner portals ("against 500 ills in human beings") to the World so to make people able to achieve health, both physical and mental, more easily so that in turn people are able to regulate their food intake according to activity more easily, implying that healthy people only rarely or never become fatty. "The heavy steps."
It must be recognized that sadness in all forms and varieties makes it difficult for people to keep the mood up and energize themselves for exercise when needed or stay away from food when food becomes too much. "Crooked" Europe makes this no better "even though the abjection from life makes it easier to stay thin!"
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea30 June 2018 at 16:53
Let's say that it is impossible to make significant trips in the outer space, ie to travel over long distances, typically light years and so on, so it will logically be such that one can look at each other with radio telescopes, but impossible to meet.
That is, we experience the proof that longer travel (of significance) in the outer space is impossible!
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea9 July 2018 at 21:24
The "conjuring" of mostly white poles out of thin air, straight from the ground and up into the air, out of unknown substance, AND reincarnation, also out of thin air, makes the "conjuring" of the Universe, in this or that way, by "God-like" entity, a scientific one, justifiably competing with Big Bang Theory. Ok?
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea9 July 2018 at 21:35
The "Conjuring" Theory against the Big Bang Theory has also this as support: instances of "white, giant "golems" set for crushing evil", also out of thin air (one literary instance from destruction of Rome?). See giants of "Bhima" in India, seeming skulls of giants from those whereabouts.
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea10 July 2018 at 06:53
To the Conjuring/Creation Theory of Universe/Planets/Stars
While men can "conjure" these white poles, women also have these phenomena I think they name their "conjuring" "ice" in their vaginas or out of their vaginas. Note.
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea12 September 2018 at 20:33
From above, as comment: "Scientific note on evolutionary theory: it is "countered" by abiogenesis experiments and investigations and notions of fantastic nature and freak nature like with telepathy and souls of paranormal psychology."
Fantastic nature also includes spurious existence, spurious birth of organisms! (Whatever the wind of whiteness, "The Holy Ghost", the consciousness(es) of Universe!)
For Fantastic Nature, Fantastic World, Fantastic Phenomena, please see "The Fantastic Phenomena or of Freak Nature as Accounts of Reality" on for example Facebook (written by me).
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea3 October 2018 at 20:48
New for the SETI Project
To place a radio telescope as satellite in solar stationary position (out there in outer space). I think this is very much possible.
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea12 October 2018 at 15:33
#QuantumComputing #QuantumPhysics #ORgate To use quantum computing (further), you can simply check for any statement inside a field and check this field for its quantum computing value. If it gets a high value, it's definitely something. Ok? Can be HumanResources (HR) or any other.
Such that, examples:
1. [Field of database] Is this something for the future? [Field tested: true or false] Yes or no!
2. Are The 4 Factors useful toward Utopia? True or false.
3. Is Donald J. Trump a hazard to USA? True or false.
4. Is Donald J. Trump a hazard to the World otuside USA? True or false.
5. Is John Doe a good friend of Jane Doe? True or false.
6. Is CIA a service to USA and the World? True or false.
...
Endless possibilities. Check it out! Have fun!
(Delivery to University of Oslo, Physics Institute in spring semester, 2000. Also having a walk to some students down to the National Assembly to talk things through.)
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea12 October 2018 at 15:42
Additional. Important:
The use of OR-gate in computers to test for various stuff. Also for the future "vision". Is it wrong you think? You need to have a proper scale for it, like 30 million true values upward and 30 millions false values downward.
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea12 October 2018 at 15:55
Warning!
Sensitivity is important for this stuff, trying to influence the result one way or another like a dumb pollster (you vote for Hillary Clinton or I kill you! That's a yes???) or using for evil may render the results useless for at least the individual being (very) foolish! Even so, that individual may never use the quantum computing "calculator" ever again!
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea16 October 2018 at 08:53
Given Quantum Computing testing of where our place in the Universe may be, we can place a load on a supercomputer:
If we designate the Universe as Up, Down, East, West, North and South and then start to OR-gate cycle these inquiries with informed guesses:
Are we 100 Bn (or Tn, for that matter) lightyears from the north edge of the Universe? (True/false) And then incrementally work it from there... until all directions are covered in a systematic computer search by OR-gate determination.
Thus, "tentatively", we can locate our place in the Universe!
#QuantumComputing #ORGateCycling #Astronomy
("I am still Dr. Terje Lea!")
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea12 November 2018 at 16:07
Theory: Maybe the white Golems (2nd destruction of Rome) crushed out room for the early people of the Earth to a good start. Like killing natural predators like snakes, hyena, hippopotamus, scorpions and such. Even clearing ground of whatever trees and bushes too, I guess.
By this, it may be possible to take on a much more conservative view on evolution, yet more "miraculous" in terms of spurious existences and the rest of The Fantastic Phenomena and the Freak Nature as Accounts of Reality.
Link, Facebook, The Fantastic Phenomena and the Freak Nature as Accounts of Reality (white Golems being part): https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=the%20fantastic%20phenomena%20and%20the%20freak%20nature
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea9 December 2018 at 22:13
OR gate test estimate of Earth Age: 45 million years +/- 2000 years.
#ORgatetesting is fun, right? #QuantumComputing #Earth #HistoryofEarth #CreationofEarth
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea9 December 2018 at 22:32
"Being nice to people":
The OR gate (test), explanation,
- the OR gate is constructed by leading electricity up a wire and splitting in into 2 strands that is qualified at the ends as 1 on the first and 0 on the other. As electricity goes up the wire, there's a quantum nature of reality that quite "magically" splits the electrons into 1s and 0s as you register the signal hits on each strand. This can be used in a diverse number of useful ways, also as the most true randomizer test (rather than lottery balls or other) straight from nature by nature's own principles.
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea23 December 2018 at 05:19
(Only in Norwegian for now. Compare with my dissatisfaction with Stem Cell research or what that is.)
I forbindelse med Aftenpostens spørsmål til leserne "Ville du ha gentestet barnet ditt?" - "Selvtesting av barns DNA bør forbys, mener Bioteknologirådet. Regjeringen sier det er opp til foreldrene."
Lenke, Aftenposten, https://www.aftenposten.no/norge/i/9mwjql/Ville-du-ha-gentestet-barnet-ditt
Så vil jeg si dette uten videre: Gentesting har egentlig mindre for seg enn man skal tro. Når barnet er født i live så betyr det stort sett at alle muligheter i Verden ligger åpne der i fremtiden "gitt at alt går etter planen og ikke galskap inntreffer i prosessen". Man kan like gjerne genteste foreldrene istedet og slå sammen en og en. Når det er sagt så vil jeg gjerne at leserne tenker litt på fertilitetsassistanse (gjerne ved legene som gjør Urologi) fordi det er egentlig mye mer betenkelig med kunstig befruktning/fertilitetsassistanse enn det er med noe gentesting som helst, dvs. i den forstand at barnet har mye bedre fremtidsutsikter bare ved den naturlige disposisjon ved å være kvinne og mann om å lage et barn i livmoren uten noen annen inngripen som helst.
Så i tilfelle man bryr seg så mye om gentesting så er det vel ikke så mye i veien for det, men det er som regel tolkningene som kan være problematiske og at jeg derfor tenker at man genteste seg selv som kommende foreldre når som helst før man unnfanger barnet og planlegger eller bruker litt fremtidssans for å vurdere om det er kommet til den rette tiden for å få barn sammen. Så når det gjelder gentestingen, derfor, så skulle jeg gjerne ønske at genprøven blir testet radiologisk og at det radiologiske resultatet blir sendt til fortolkning slik at man sikrer at både standarden er så bra som mulig, men at radiologisk avlesning også kan sendes til andre gentest-spesialister slik at det ikke blir noe tull ut av det!
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea17 February 2019 at 00:34
One Blow Against Stanford Prison Experiment
Isn't the popular shame corner for kids more or less the prison for adults?
Shouldn't the code for doing crime be a sanction that is felt awful?
Somehow, psychologists say one thing for children's upbringing and completely another for adults.
You know, the carrot and the shame corner or other (mild) reaction to children for saying something is wrong.
It seems to me, at least, that the positive and negative stimulations run deep in psychology and that the Stanford Prison Experiment runs counter to some of this in the normative sense, in educating people and making examples of people, positive in winning prizes, negative in being sanctioned for awful, more or less, behaviour!
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea22 April 2019 at 04:49
System Journalism - Countering poor journalism and Fake News by malicious neglect, especially
1. No holes - completeness - "payment slip laws and regulations"
2. Society is in many ways a system
3. Parity equations as for the social sciences
4. All investigative tools including the OR gate tests
5. Statistical images with exhaustive comments to some extent addressing given problem or problems
...
We are in a new World where we need laws and regulations in order to avoid "unhinged freedom howling wildlife barbarism" when the sentence now reads "peace, democracy, human rights, wildlife, animal rights, laws and regulations, capitalism and freedom"!
This the start for the monitoring of more serious journalism program under the academic subject of History writing.
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea22 April 2019 at 05:32
As such, there can be no doubt that the professional ethics (Kantian type) for System Journalism should be consistent with the way to Utopia and a "No Evil" motto! Ruthlessly so?
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea6 May 2019 at 15:06
Mere information:
Souls, Satellites and NASA
Claim or actual science, I say that souls can be seen from satellites! For how long? NASA, anything you want to say to us in the World?
Thus, souls and radiology... Ghosts are more plain today than you may want to think!
#High!
Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Lea28 May 2019 at 04:48
The Hysteria over Obesity
The hysteria over obesity can easily be countered by offering Skinny Coffee, coffee with therapeutic doses of pharmaceutical amphetamine, much like Adderall or Ritaline!
Another problem for physicians to stop worrying about!
