tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3767439602878972356.post8023916504174325336..comments2023-10-26T14:41:46.244+02:00Comments on What is Written...: The Efficiency Argument - Philosophy of Science - Star no. 1 over the 6 Nobel PrizesDr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Leahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00588900299772602295noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3767439602878972356.post-90654693579615817002013-07-15T05:51:32.982+02:002013-07-15T05:51:32.982+02:00Other expression:
Fallibilism is outside the theor...Other expression:<br />Fallibilism is outside the theory as matter of theory strike-field.<br />Falsification is inside the theory as matter of theory strike-field, also the slight note on formulating the theory/hypothesis (a bit description) of how the phenomena are to be entailed by the theory/hypothesis.Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Leahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00588900299772602295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3767439602878972356.post-33358735878359393202013-07-15T05:48:05.312+02:002013-07-15T05:48:05.312+02:00Fallibilism (falsifiability) is the strict scienti...Fallibilism (falsifiability) is the strict scientific demand to formulate a theory so that it can be defeated, simply. That there is a kind of theoretical demand to elaborate on a theory to make it clear how it can be imagined to fail given a consideration of the evidence, fx., or an alternative way to opposing theory, maybe given some other finding, let's say, for the time being.<br /><br />Falsification on the other hand is about being able to prove, whether proponent to a theory or in opposition to it. Either way, the data-set, method and results are to go through the falsification process to see if they pass as credible/plausible.<br /><br />In short,<br />Fallibilism: the theoretical ability for a theory to fail, such that one doesn't enter drivel like psudoscience by soothsaying of identifying "your" stars or looking through some tarot cards for yielding revelations to your own life. Very important.<br /><br />Again,<br />fallibilism: the theoretical possibility for a theory to fail.<br /><br /><br />Falsification: isn't so much about the very theory at all, it can be directed toward the results, the method and data-set. Falsification is a far more practical notion than fallibilism, but on the other hand, there are many theorists looking to kill a theory by the fallibilistic attack.<br /><br />Again,<br />falsification: the inquiry into a theory, first and foremost, by investigating the data-set, the method and the results.<br />Therefore, it must be d*mn clear that these two concepts can never be dropped from any complete Demarcation of Science Criterium, holding a set under it, these two ideas included.<br />Both Fallibilism and Falsification are ideas by Karl Popper, most splendidly made.<br /><br />They are found in Karl Popper's, outside the papers, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson & Co, 1959, pp. 57 - 73.<br /><br />(This is a temporary note until finished paper. I must also note you that I'm not able to finish this paper in the ChicagoStyleM yet. This is an absolute stand of mine and that YOU ARE IN NO WAY to object! Understood, please?)Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Leahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00588900299772602295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3767439602878972356.post-90791501057992227542013-07-15T02:03:33.758+02:002013-07-15T02:03:33.758+02:00Some people may question themselves why I haven...Some people may question themselves why I haven't added the references of fx. Karl Popper with The Efficiency Argument and the answer to this is that circumstances haven't allowed me too finish it properly and that this is not a fully developed paper of academic quality yet. No, it's now only "idea and cast" for this very important paper to the World, one that I've "designed the bones" to.<br /><br />I can also admit that with Confirmation/HDM (Hypothetico-Deductive-Method)/Scientific Method (compl. entailed by HDM) Objectivity and Replication have been missing from the text in that very pedagogical sense until mentioned now.<br />In the meanwhile, you will have to wait some time more, uknown for how long because of a stressful "political" situation, i.e., the lack of access to library and university resources and calmness to get this paper properly grounded.Dr. Lukas F. Olsnes-Leahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00588900299772602295noreply@blogger.com